Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi kesesuaian penerapan tahapan audit kinerja oleh Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah (APIP), yang meliputi tahap perencanaan, pelaksanaan, dan komunikasi hasil audit. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan penelitian kualitatif berupa studi kasus dengan objek penelitian pada Inspektorat Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi (Kementerian PANRB). Inspektorat Kementerian PANRB merupakan unit pengawas intern yang salah satu tugasnya adalah melakukan audit kinerja. Evaluasi dalam penelitian ini difokuskan pada kegiatan audit kinerja yang dilakukan oleh Inspektorat Kementerian PANRB tahun 2022 yaitu Audit Kinerja atas Pelaksanaan Pemantauan dan Evaluasi Kinerja Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik (PEKPPP). Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui telaah dokumen dan wawancara. Analisis data menggunakan Keputusan Inspektur Kementerian PANRB Nomor 5 Tahun 2021 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Audit Kinerja di Lingkungan Kementerian PANRB, yang mengacu pada Panduan Praktik Audit Kinerja yang diterbitkan oleh Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan (BPKP) tahun 2018. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa secara keseluruhan Inspektorat Kementerian PANRB sudah melakukan setiap tahapan audit kinerja mulai dari tahap perencanaan, pelaksanaan, sampai dengan komunikasi hasil audit, namun beberapa kegiatan dalam tahapan audit kinerja tersebut masih memerlukan perbaikan sesuai dengan ketentuan dalam Keputusan Inspektur Kementerian PANRB Nomor 5 Tahun 2021, terutama terkait pendokumentasian kertas kerja. Penyebab terjadinya kondisi ini antara lain belum dilakukan sosialisasi Pedoman secara berkala, periode waktu penugasan cukup singkat, adanya tumpang tindih penugasan, jumlah dan kompetensi tim audit belum memadai, auditee tidak merespons tim audit, dan belum ada sistem penilaian kinerja yang menerapkan reward and punishment. Untuk mengoptimalkan kegiatan audit kinerja ke depannya, Inspektorat Kementerian PANRB dapat melakukan sosialisasi Pedoman secara berkala, mengevaluasi waktu penugasan, menambah jumlah auditor, menyusun rencana diklat, melakukan sharing knowledge dengan auditee, dan menerapkan sistem reward and punishment.

---

This research aims to evaluate the compliance of the implementation of the performance audit stages by the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP), which includes the audit planning, audit execution, and communication of audit results. The method used in this research is a qualitative research approach in the form of a case study with the object of research at the Inspectorate of the Ministry of State Apparatus Empowerment and Bureaucratic Reform (PANRB Ministry). The Inspectorate of the PANRB Ministry is an internal supervisory unit, one of whose duties is to carry out performance audits. The evaluation in this research focused on the performance audit activities carried out by the Inspectorate of the PANRB Ministry in 2022, which is the performance audit on the implementation of performance monitoring and evaluation of public service delivery (PEKPPP). Data collection is conducted through document review and interviews. Data analysis is based on the Decree of the Inspector of the PANRB Ministry Number 5 of 2021 concerning the Guidelines for Performance Audit Implementation in the PANRB Ministry, which refers to the Guidelines for Performance Audit Practices published by the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency (BPKP) in 2018. The results of this research show that, overall, the Inspectorate of the PANRB Ministry has carried out each stage of the performance audit, starting from the audit planning, audit execution, and communication of audit results, but some activities in those performance audit stages still require improvement in accordance with the Decree of the Inspector of the PANRB Ministry Number 5 of 2021, especially the documentation of working papers. This is due to the socialization of the guidelines not yet held regularly, the assignment time period is quite short, there is overlapping of assignments, the number and competence of the audit team are not sufficient, the auditee does not respond to the audit team, and there is no system of performance assessment that applies reward and punishment. To optimize the performance audit activities in the future, the Inspectorate of the PANRB Ministry can hold the socialization of the guidelines regularly, evaluate the assignment time period, add the number of auditors, make training plans, share knowledge with auditees, and implement a reward and punishment system."

"Laporan magang ini membahas mengenai prosedur dari tahap perencanaan audit kinerja yang dilakukan oleh Departemen Audit Internal OJK terhadap proses pernyataan pendaftaran oleh emiten dalam rangka penawaran umum untuk periode 1 Januari 2018 sampai dengan 15 November 2018. Audit kinerja dilakukan untuk menilai efisiensi dan efektivitas dari proses pernyataan pendaftaran oleh emiten melalui E- Registration. Perencanaan audit kinerja didasarkan pada pedoman audit kinerja yang dikeluarkan oleh DewaniKomisioner Audit Internal, Manajemen Risiko, dan Pengendalian Kualitas. Sementara itu, kerangka analisis yang digunakan penulis adalah konsep perencanaan  audit kinerja pada sektor publik. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa masih terdapat beberapa kelemahan dalam implementasi prosedur perencanan audit kinerja seperti penentuan tujuan audit yang belum disesuaikan dengan area kunci dan kriteria audit yang belum bersifat spesifik terhadap tujuan audit.

---

This report discusses about the procedures of performance audit at the planning stage which conducted by Departemen Audit InternaI OJK over the process of registration statement with regard to Initial Public Offering or Go Public. The audit period is from 1 Januari 2018 to 15 November 2018. The performance auditing was held to assess the efficiency and effectiveness of registration statement process through E-Registration. The performance audit planning is based on the performance audit guidance which was issued by The Board of Commissioners of Internal Audit, Risk Management and Quality Control. The framework which used by the author is the concept of performance audit plan on public sector. The results of analysis show that there are some shortcoming in performance audit planning procedure implementation, such as the setting of the audit objectives is not matched with the key areas and the audit criteria that is not specific yet with the audit objective. "

"Kapabilitas Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah (APIP) sangat penting karena memiliki dampak signifikan dalam memperkuat efektivitas Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah (SPIP) untuk mewujudkan tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik. Pada tahun 2021 Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan (BPKP) menerbitkan Peraturan BPKP No. 8 Tahun 2021 tentang Penilaian Kapabilitas APIP. Sampai saat ini belum terdapat publikasi hasil penilaian kapabilitas APIP berdasarkan peraturan baru tersebut. Oleh sebab itu penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi kapabilitas APIP berdasarkan peraturan terbaru tersebut. Studi kasus dilakukan pada salah satu inspektorat pemerintah daerah yaitu Inspektorat Kabupaten Sukabumi. Inspektorat Kabupaten Sukabumi dipilih sebagai objek penelitian karena mengalami peningkatan kapabilitas setelah penerapan peraturan terbaru. Inspektorat Kabupaten Sukabumi merupakan salah satu dari 362 APIP dengan level kapabilitas di bawah Level 3, berdasarkan hasil asesmen BPKP tahun 2021. Namun setelah menggunakan peraturan terbaru, hasil penilaian mandiri Inspektorat Kabupaten Sukabumi menunjukan kapabilitas APIP-nya sudah meningkat menjadi Level 3. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membuktikan secara independen hasil penilaian mandiri tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan studi kasus tipe evaluasi. Kerangka evaluasi mengacu pada peraturan baru dan peraturan lama terkait penilaian kapabilitas APIP. Hasil penelitian menunjukan peningkatan level kapabilitas APIP Inspektorat Kabupaten Sukabumi bukan dikarenakan peraturan baru yang lebih longgar. Peraturan baru penilaian kapabilitas APIP lebih ketat dari peraturan lama karena dalam peraturan baru mengalami penyesuaian konsep dan mekanisme penilaian kapabilitas. Peraturan baru tidak hanya mendorong APIP untuk membangun infrastruktur pengendalian internal, tetapi juga melakukan penerapan dan internalisasi fungsi pengendalian mutu secara penuh untuk mendukung dan menghasilkan pengendalian internal pemerintah yang memadai. Hasil evaluasi juga menunjukan bahwa Inspektorat Kabupaten Sukabumi belum dapat mencapai Level 3 sebagaimana hasil penilaian mandirinya. Hal tersebut ditunjukan oleh adanya keterbatasan Sumber Daya Manusia (SDM), kurangnya sosialisasi, keterbatasan anggaran, belum optimalnya audit ketaatan dan audit kinerja, serta PKPT (Program Kerja Pengawasan Tahunan) belum berbasis risiko.

---

The capability of the Government Internal Audit Apparatus (APIP) is very important because it has a significant impact on strengthening the effectiveness of the Government Internal Control System (SPIP) to realize good governance. In 2021, the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency (BPKP) issued BPKP Regulation No. 8 of 2021 concerning APIP Capability Assessment. Until now, there has been no publication of the results of the APIP capability assessment based on this new regulation. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the capability of APIP based on this latest regulation. A case study was conducted at one of the local government inspectorates, namely the Sukabumi District Inspectorate. The Sukabumi District Inspectorate was chosen as the object of research because it experienced an increase in capability after the implementation of the latest regulations. The Sukabumi District Inspectorate is one of 362 APIPs with a capability level below Level 3, based on the results of the BPKP assessment in 2021. However, after using the latest regulations, the results of the Sukabumi District Inspectorate's self-assessment show that its APIP capability has increased to Level 3. This research aims to independently verify the results of the self-assessment. This research uses a qualitative method with an evaluation-type case study. The evaluation framework refers to the new and old regulations related to APIP capability assessment. The results showed that the increase in the APIP capability level of the Sukabumi District Inspectorate was not due to new regulations that were more relaxed. The new APIP capability assessment regulation is stricter than the old regulation because the new regulation has adjusted the concept and mechanism of capability assessment. The new regulation not only encourages APIP to build internal control infrastructure, but also to fully implement and internalize the quality control function to support and produce adequate government internal control. The evaluation results also show that the Sukabumi District Inspectorate has not been able to achieve Level 3 as the results of its self-assessment. This is indicated by the existence of limited Human Resources (HR), lack of socialization, budget limitations, not optimal compliance audits and performance audits, and PKPT (Annual Supervisory Work Program) is not yet risk-based."

"Dalam rangka memastikan bahwa kegiatan audit telah dilaksanakan sesuai denganstandar audit dan kode etik, pemerintah menetapkan kebijakan melalui Permen-PAN RBNomor 19 Tahun 2009 sebagai pedoman pengendalian mutu audit. Itjen Kemenkes RItelah membangun sistem pengendalian mutu audit, namun berdasarkan hasil penilaiantingkat kapablitas APIP melalui penilaian IACM menunjukkan hasil bahwa kegiatanaudit belum sepenuhnya dilaksanakan sesuai dengan standar audit. Untuk itu penelitimerasa perlu untuk melakukan analisis implementasi pengendalian mutu audit untukmemperoleh gambaran dan informasi mendalam terkait bagaimana implementasipengendalian mutu audit di Itjen Kemenkes RI. Penelitian menggunakan metodekualitatif dengan tehnik pengumpulan data melalui wawancara mendalam , FGD dantelaah dokumen, sehingga triangulasi dilakukan dengan membandingkan informasi yangdiperoleh dari beberapa informan yang berbeda dan membandingkan dengan hasil telaahdokumen.Hasil penelitian diperoleh bahwa Itjen Kemenkes telah membangun sistemkendali mutu audit namun prosedur pengendalian mutu audit belum sepenuhnyadilaksanakan sesuai langkah-langkah pengendalian mutu audit dalam Permen-PAN RBNomor 19 Tahun 2009 dan ouput yang dihasilkan belum sepenuhnya sesuai denganstandar audit. Selain itu belum memiliki rancangan dan belum menetapkan programpenjaminan dan peningkatan kualitas sehingga belum adanya mekanisme untukevaluasi/reviu dan penilaian atas kesesuaian kegiatan audit intern dengan standar auditserta evaluasi terhadap penerapan kode etik oleh auditor. Faktor penghambat belumoptimalnya pelaksanaan pengendalian mutu audit ini adalah dari aspek komunikasi masihbelum optimal sehingga perlu ditingkatkan terutama komunikasi pada tingkat pelaksanakebijakan. Pelaksanaan pengendalian mutu audit melekat pada bagian yangmelaksanakan tugas pokok fungsinya sehingga perlu adanya bagian/tim yangmengkoordinasikan untuk melakukan monitoring, evaluasi dan penilaian secara berkaladan berkelanjutan terhadap pelaksanaan pengendalian mutu audit, disamping itu perlumelengkapi pedoman/SOP yang mengatur mekanisme pengendalian dan penjaminanmutu audit. Sumber daya baik SDM, fasilitas dan anggaran masih perlu mendapatperhatian guna mendukung pelaksanaan kebijakan dan yang tidak kalah penting adalahperlunya meningkatkan komitmen dari seluruh pelaksana kebijakan.

---

In order to ensure that audit activities have been carried out in accordance with auditingstandards and codes of conduct, the government sets the policy through Permen PANRB Number 19 of 2009 as a guideline for audit quality control. Itjen Kemenkes RI hasestablished an audit quality control system, but based on the assessment of APIPcapability level through IACM assessment shows that audit activities have not been fullyimplemented in accordance with audit standards. For that researchers feel the need toperform analysis of audit quality control implementation to obtain an overview and indepthinformation related to how the implementation of quality control audit in ItjenKemenkes RI. The study used qualitative methods with data collection techniquesthrough in depth interviews, FGD and document review, so triangulation was done bycomparing the information obtained from several different informants and comparing theresults of the document review.

The result of the research shows that Itjen Kemenkes hasbuilt an audit quality control system but audit quality control procedure has not been fullyimplemented according to audit quality control measures in PER PAN RB Number 19 of2009 and the resultant output is not fully in accordance with audit standard. Besides, ithas not yet designed and has not established the quality assurance and improvementprogramme so that there is no mechanism for evaluation review and assessment on theconformity of internal audit activities with audit standards and evaluation on theapplication of code of ethics by the auditor. The inhibiting factor is not optimal theimplementation of audit quality control is from the aspect of communication is still notoptimal so it needs to be improved especially communication at the level of implementingthe policy. Implementation of audit quality control attached to the part that performs themain task of its function so that the need for a section team that coordinate to conductmonitoring, evaluation and assessment periodically and continuously to theimplementation of quality control of audit, besides need to complete guidance SOPwhich arrange mechanism of quality control and quality assurance of audit. Resources of human resources, facilities and budgets still need attention to support the implementation of the policy and no less important is the need to increase the commitmentof all policy implementers.Key words Audit quality control Inspectorate General Regulation of Minister of Empowerment of State Apparatus number 19 of 2009 PKMA."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis persepsi auditor, auditi, dan pengguna laporan jika opini audit internal diterapkan, dan merekomendasikan rancangan perumusan opini audit internal yang tepat. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan studi kasus dengan metode kualitatif. Objek penelitian adalah lima unit Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah (APIP) Kementerian beserta auditinya, dan satu unit pengguna laporan. Data penelitian diperoleh dari data primer dan sekunder melalui dokumentasi dan wawancara. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa opini audit internal sangat diperlukan untuk melangkah menuju kapabilitas APIP level 4 Internal Audit Capability Model (IA-CM). Menurut auditi, opini audit internal merupakan penilaian bagi organisasi dan membawa dampak terhadap peningkatan kinerja unit. Menurut pengguna laporan, opini audit internal memberikan pengaruh terhadap proses pengambilan keputusan. Penelitian merekomendasikan identifikasi rincian kriteria pengukuran lingkup tata kelola, manajemen risiko, dan pengendalian organisasi pemerintahan untuk kebutuhan perumusan opini. Bentuk opini audit internal yang sesuai adalah opini dengan tiga atau empat tingkat, yang dapat diterapkan baik di level mikro maupun makro.

---

This study aims to analyze the perceptions of auditor, auditee, and report user if an internal audit opinion is applied and recommend the design of the formulation of appropriate internal audit opinion. The study used a case study approach with qualitative methods. The object of the research is five units of the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus or Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah (APIP) of the Ministry along with their auditees, and one unit of report user. The research data was obtained from primary and secondary data through documentation and interviews. This study shows that an internal audit opinion is very necessary to move towards APIP level 4 capabilities of the Internal Audit Capability Model (IA-CM). According to the auditee, the internal audit opinion is an assessment of the organization and has an impact on improving the performance of the unit. According to report user, internal audit opinions have an influence on the decision making process. The study recommends identifying details of criteria for measuring the scope of governance, risk management, and control of government organizations for the needs of opinion formulation. The appropriate form of internal audit opinion is opinion with three or four levels, which can be applied both at the micro and macro level."

"[ABSTRAKTujuan utama penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui efektivitas audit intern pada sektor publik di Indonesia dilakukan oleh Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah (APIP), baik berdasarkan penilaian pimpinan APIP maupun pimpinan instansi. Sedangkan tujuan kedua penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui apakah terdapat perbedaan sudut pandang antara pimpinan APIP dengan pimpinan instansi terhadap risiko yang dihadapi instansi. Metode penelitian ini adalah kuantitatif deskriptif yang menggunakan metode pengumpulan data berupa survei melalui penyebaran kuesioner. Studi kepustakaan dan dokumen serta wawancara dilakukan untuk mendukung hasil survei. Hasil penelitian terhadap 33 pimpinan APIP menyimpulkan bahwa APIP telah berperan cukup efektif walaupun layanan masih bersifat tradisional (audit ketaatan dan operasional), belum menerapkan risk-based audit serta lemahnya manajemen sumber daya manusia, begitu pula persepsi atas 29 pimpinan instansi menilai bahwa peran APIP cukup sesuai harapan walaupun ditemukan minimnya pengomunikasian hasil kerja APIP. Hasil penelitian kedua, mengenai risiko yang dihadapi instansi, ternyata ditemukan perbedaan sudut pandang antara 26 pimpinan APIP dan pimpinan instansinya yang disebabkan belum diterapkannya risk-based audit. Efektivitas peran APIP memerlukan dukungan pimpinan tertinggi instansi berupa kewenangan bagi APIP agar dapat berperan tanpa ada tekanan dan pengaruh politik apapun serta dukungan anggaran untuk meningkatkan kapabilitas APIP.

---

ABSTRACTThe objective of this study is to determine Inspector General?s and the Minister/Head of the Organization?s perceptions toward the effectiveness of internal audit in Indonesian public sector which is applied by Inspectorate General (Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah or known as APIP). It is also aims to determine if there is perspective differ about organization?s risk between Inspector General and the Minister/Head of the Organization. Statistical technique, which is the descriptive statistic analysis is used to analyze the data from the survey. Literature survey and semi-structured interviews were utilised to support the findings. Based on 33 Inspector Generals? and 29 ministers? perception, the result of the study shows that their APIP has a moderate effective role. However, the internal audit service is limited in the traditional area (which is compliance and operational audit), not implementing risk-based audit and less managing the human capital. Thus, the output of APIP is less communicating. Moreover, the second result shows that there is a different perspective about organization?s risk between 26 Inspector Generals? and their Ministers?. The inequility perception indicates that comprehensive risk-based audit is not implemented. The effectiveness of APIP will depend strongly to top management support for carrying out APIP responsibility free from conditions that threaten their independence and also funding support to improve the APIP?s capability.;The objective of this study is to determine Inspector General?s and the Minister/Head of the Organization?s perceptions toward the effectiveness of internal audit in Indonesian public sector which is applied by Inspectorate General (Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah or known as APIP). It is also aims to determine if there is perspective differ about organization?s risk between Inspector General and the Minister/Head of the Organization. Statistical technique, which is the descriptive statistic analysis is used to analyze the data from the survey. Literature survey and semi-structured interviews were utilised to support the findings. Based on 33 Inspector Generals? and 29 ministers? perception, the result of the study shows that their APIP has a moderate effective role. However, the internal audit service is limited in the traditional area (which is compliance and operational audit), not implementing risk-based audit and less managing the human capital. Thus, the output of APIP is less communicating. Moreover, the second result shows that there is a different perspective about organization?s risk between 26 Inspector Generals? and their Ministers?. The inequility perception indicates that comprehensive risk-based audit is not implemented. The effectiveness of APIP will depend strongly to top management support for carrying out APIP responsibility free from conditions that threaten their independence and also funding support to improve the APIP?s capability.;The objective of this study is to determine Inspector General?s and the Minister/Head of the Organization?s perceptions toward the effectiveness of internal audit in Indonesian public sector which is applied by Inspectorate General (Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah or known as APIP). It is also aims to determine if there is perspective differ about organization?s risk between Inspector General and the Minister/Head of the Organization. Statistical technique, which is the descriptive statistic analysis is used to analyze the data from the survey. Literature survey and semi-structured interviews were utilised to support the findings. Based on 33 Inspector Generals? and 29 ministers? perception, the result of the study shows that their APIP has a moderate effective role. However, the internal audit service is limited in the traditional area (which is compliance and operational audit), not implementing risk-based audit and less managing the human capital. Thus, the output of APIP is less communicating. Moreover, the second result shows that there is a different perspective about organization?s risk between 26 Inspector Generals? and their Ministers?. The inequility perception indicates that comprehensive risk-based audit is not implemented. The effectiveness of APIP will depend strongly to top management support for carrying out APIP responsibility free from conditions that threaten their independence and also funding support to improve the APIP?s capability.;The objective of this study is to determine Inspector General’s and the Minister/Head of the Organization’s perceptions toward the effectiveness of internal audit in Indonesian public sector which is applied by Inspectorate General (Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah or known as APIP). It is also aims to determine if there is perspective differ about organization’s risk between Inspector General and the Minister/Head of the Organization. Statistical technique, which is the descriptive statistic analysis is used to analyze the data from the survey. Literature survey and semi-structured interviews were utilised to support the findings. Based on 33 Inspector Generals’ and 29 ministers’ perception, the result of the study shows that their APIP has a moderate effective role. However, the internal audit service is limited in the traditional area (which is compliance and operational audit), not implementing risk-based audit and less managing the human capital. Thus, the output of APIP is less communicating. Moreover, the second result shows that there is a different perspective about organization’s risk between 26 Inspector Generals’ and their Ministers’. The inequility perception indicates that comprehensive risk-based audit is not implemented. The effectiveness of APIP will depend strongly to top management support for carrying out APIP responsibility free from conditions that threaten their independence and also funding support to improve the APIP’s capability., The objective of this study is to determine Inspector General’s and the Minister/Head of the Organization’s perceptions toward the effectiveness of internal audit in Indonesian public sector which is applied by Inspectorate General (Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah or known as APIP). It is also aims to determine if there is perspective differ about organization’s risk between Inspector General and the Minister/Head of the Organization. Statistical technique, which is the descriptive statistic analysis is used to analyze the data from the survey. Literature survey and semi-structured interviews were utilised to support the findings. Based on 33 Inspector Generals’ and 29 ministers’ perception, the result of the study shows that their APIP has a moderate effective role. However, the internal audit service is limited in the traditional area (which is compliance and operational audit), not implementing risk-based audit and less managing the human capital. Thus, the output of APIP is less communicating. Moreover, the second result shows that there is a different perspective about organization’s risk between 26 Inspector Generals’ and their Ministers’. The inequility perception indicates that comprehensive risk-based audit is not implemented. The effectiveness of APIP will depend strongly to top management support for carrying out APIP responsibility free from conditions that threaten their independence and also funding support to improve the APIP’s capability.]"

"Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui level kapabilitas Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah APIP pada Inspektorat Jenderal Kementerian Agama, mengidentifikasi kelemahan masing-masing elemen dan key process area dengan menggunakan Internal Audit-Capability Model. Berdasarkan kelemahan key process area diidentifikasikan area of improvement dan dirancang strategi serta rencana tindak untuk meningkatan level kapabilitas APIP. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan metode studi kasus.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa level kapabilitas Inspektorat Jenderal Kementerian Agama berada pada level 1 initial. Kelemahan pada elemen peran dan layanan, manajemen sumber daya manusia, praktik profesional, akuntabilitas dan manajemen kinerja serta struktur tata kelola harus mendapatkan perhatian untuk mempercepat pencapaian target ke level 3 integrated. Strategi peningkatan level kapabilitas APIP pada Inspektorat Jenderal adalah melakukan penguatan kapasitas, kewenangan dan peningkatan kompetensi sumber daya manusia.

---

The objective of the research is to asses capability level of Government Internal Auditor APIP at General Inspectorate of Ministry of Religious Affairs, to identifying weakness of each elements as well as key process area using Internal Audit Capability Model IA CM. By weakness of such key process area had been identified area of improvement, strategy design and its follow up for increasing such capability level of APIP. This research uses qualitative method with case study method.

The study indicated that capability level of General Inspectorate of Ministry of Religious Affairs is in 1 initial. This study identifies the weakness in the element of role and service, human resources management, professional practice, performance management and accountability and governance structure should be observed in order to accelerate target achievement to level 3 integrated. Strategy to increase capability level of APIP at general inspectorate is by strengthening capacity, authority and increasing of human resource competency."

"Peran auditor internal untuk menghasilkan pengawasan yang berkualitas sangat dibutuhkan dalam menghadapi lingkungan yang semakin dinamis. Untuk itu, diperlukan peningkatan mutu kapabilitas yang diukur menggunakan enam elemen Internal Audit-Capability Model (IA-CM). Di sektor pemerintah, tugas pengawasan intern dilakukan oleh Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah (APIP). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi kapabilitas internal audit beserta tantangan dan hambatan yang dihadapi oleh Inspektorat Jenderal Kementerian Hukum dan HAM dalam mencapai kapabilitas APIP level 4. Kapabilitas APIP level 4 adalah APIP telah menjadi mitra strategis organisasi dan hasil pengawasan APIP terkait tata kelola, manajemen risiko, dan pengendalian (GRC) yang secara berkelanjutan mendukung pencapaian tujuan organisasi. Pengumpulan data penelitian menggunakan kuesioner, telaah dokumen, dan wawancara yang dianalisis melalui pendekatan kualitatif. Data dianalisis berdasarkan aspek penilaian kapabilitas APIP level 4 yang terdapat pada Peraturan BPKP No. 8 Tahun 2021 tentang Penilaian Kapabilitas Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah pada K/L/D. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa masih diperlukan perbaikan dalam mencapai kapabilitas APIP level 4 terkait Elemen Pengelolaan SDM, Elemen Praktik Profesional, dan Elemen Peran dan Layanan. Hasil penelitian juga memberikan saran bagi Inspektorat Jenderal dalam menghadapi tantangan dan hambatan untuk mencapai kapabilitas APIP level 4.

---

The role of internal auditors in producing quality supervision is needed in the face of an increasingly dynamic environment. For this reason, it is necessary to improve the quality of capabilities as measured using the six elements of the Internal Audit- Capability Model (IA-CM). In the government sector, Internal supervision is carried out by the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP). This study aims to evaluate internal audit capability along with the challenges and obstacles faced by the Inspectorate General of Ministry of Law and Human Rights in achieving APIP capability level 4. APIP capability level 4 is defined as APIP has become a strategic partner of the organization and the results of APIP supervision related to governance, risk management, and control (GRC) sustainably support the achievement of organizational goals. Research data collection using questionnaires, document reviews, and interviews were analyzed through a qualitative approach. The data were analyzed based on the aspects of the APIP capability level 4 assessment in BPKP Regulation No. 8 of 2021 concerning Capability Assessment of Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus in K/L/D. The results showed that improvements were still needed in achieving APIP capability level 4 related to the People Management Element, Professional Practice Element, and Service and Role Element. The study results also provide suggestions for Inspectorate General in facing challenges and obstacles to achieving APIP capability level 4."

"Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui penerapan audit kinerja pada Satuan Kerja Kementerian Kehutanan, implikasi dari perubahan pemberlakuan audit operasional menjadi audit kinerja, dan manfaat serta efektivitas audit kinerja dalam meningkatkan kualitas sistem pengendalian intern Kementerian Kehutanan. Penelitian ini adalah kualitatif dengan desain deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menjelaskan bahwa pelaksanaan audit kinerja telah memberikan manfaat berupa peningkatan sistem pengendalian intern Kementerian Kehutanan, hal ini terlihat dari Indikator Kinerja Utama (IKU) Inspektorat Jenderal Kementerian Kehutanan yaitu penurunan temuan audit berupa kelemahan administrasi, ketaatan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, hambatan kelancaran tugas serta penurunan potensi kerugian negara dan ditunjang dengan peningkatan akuntabilitas Laporan Keuangan (LK) Kementerian Kehutanan melalui opini/pendapat yang dikeluarkan oleh Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) Republik Indonesia dalam Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan (LHP) atas Laporan Keuangan yaitu Wajar Tanpa Pengecualian (WTP) dengan Paragraf Penjelas dan Wajar Tanpa Pengecualian (WTP) untuk Laporan Keuangan Tahun 2011 dan 2012.

---

The purpose of this study is to investigate the application of a performance audit on the Ministry of Forestry Task Force, the implications of changes in the implementation of the operational audit to audit performance, and the benefits and effectiveness of performance audit in improving the quality of internal control system of the Ministry of Forestry. This research is a qualitative descriptive design. The results clarify that the performance audit has provided benefits in improved internal control systems of Forestry Ministry, it is seen from the Key Performance Indicators (KPI) of the Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Forestry is decreasing administrative weaknesses in the form of audit findings, compliance with laws and regulations, barriers to fluency task and decrease the potential loss of state and supported by increased accountability Financial Statements (LK) through the Ministry of Forestry opinion/opinions issued by the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) Republic of Indonesia in the Inspection Report (LHP) to the financial statements is unqualified (WTP) with Clarifying paragraphs and unqualified (WTP) for the Financial Statements for 2011 and 2012."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana strategi Inspektorat Jenderal supaya menjadi unit internal audit yang efektif sesuai dengan redefinisi internal audit oleh IIA yang dilihat dari peran dalam proses manajemen risiko, pengendalian, dan tata kelola organisasi; serta untuk mempertahankan dan meningkatkan level Internal Audit Capability Model (IACM) dari level 3 ke 4, yang terdiri atas 6 (enam) elemen yaitu service and role; pengelolaan SDM; praktik profesional; akuntabilitas dan manajemen kinerja; hubungan dan budaya oganisasi; dan struktur tata kelola. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan desain deskriptif. Data yang digunakan adalah data primer yang diperoleh dari wawancara dan data sekunder yang merupakan laporan dan publikasi dari Inspektorat Jenderal dan BPKP. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Inspektorat Jenderal belum sepenuhnya menjalankan peran sebagai unit internal audit sebagaimana redefinisi IIA dan masih terdapat hambatan dalam upaya mempertahankan dan meningkatkan level IACM. Hasil penelitian menyarankan strategi bagi Inspektorat Jenderal yaitu: meningkatkan risk awareness melalui knowledge sharing; melakukan audit manajemen risiko organisasi; mengawal pembentukan unit kontrol intern yang efektif; melakukan comprehensive fraud risk assessment organisasi; memperluas obyek sistem whistle blower; membangun sistem kepegawaian yang terintegrasi; internalisasi nilai-nilai organisasi; melakukan kajian pembentukan Badan Pengawas Independen berdasarkan best practice; dan memisahkan fungsi konsultasi dan assurance.

---

This study aims to determine how the strategy of the Inspectorate General in order to become an effective internal audit unit in accordance with the internal audit redefinition by the IIA seen from the roles in the process of risk management, control, and governance of the organization, as well as to maintain and increase the level of Internal Audit Capability Model (IACM) from level 3 to 4, which consists of 6 (six) elements of services and role of internal auditing; people management; professional practices; performance management and accountability; organization relationships and cultural, and governance structures. This research is a qualitative research with descriptive design. The data used are primary data obtained from interviews and secondary data from the reports and publications from the Inspectorate General and the BPKP.

The results showed that the Inspectorate General has not fully performed the role of internal audit units as the redefinition of the IIA and there are obstacles in the effort to maintain and improve the level of IACM. The results suggest strategies that the Inspectorate General can adopt: increasing risk awareness through knowledge sharing; audit the organization risk management; oversee the establishment of an effective internal control unit; undertake comprehensive organization’s fraud risk assessment, expand the whistle-blower system object; build an integrated personnel system; internalization of organizational values; reviewing the establishment of the Independent Monitoring Body based on best practices, and separate consulting and assurance functions."