Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Latar Belakang: Penyakit periodontal dapat terjadi sebagai bentuk manifestasi oral selama masa kehamilan. Penyakit ini diketahui merupakan salah satu faktor risiko terjadinya hasil kehamilan bayi dengan berat badan lahir rendah (BBLR) dan prematur. Untuk mencegah hal tersebut, kunjungan ke dokter gigi diperlukan sehingga kesehatan rongga mulut serta kesehatan bayi dan kehamilan dapat dijaga. Kondisi pengetahuan diketahui berhubungan dengan kunjungan ibu ke dokter gigi selama masa kehamilan. Untuk melihat bagaimana kondisi pengetahuan dan perilaku ibu hamil terkait kesehatan gigi mulut selama masa kehamilan, dibutuhkan sebuah instrumen penelitian yang valid dan reliabel. Namun sayangnya, instrumen seperti itu belum ada di Indonesia. Tujuan: Menganalisis nilai validitas dan reliabilitas kuesioner Knowledge and Behavior towards Oral Health during Pregnancy (KBOHP) versi Indonesia. Metode: Metode penelitian analisis deskriptif dengan rancangan potong lintang dan metode pemilihan sampel dengan convinience sampling menggunakan kuesioner KBOHP. Proses adaptasi lintas budaya dilakukan dengan pendekatan simetris. Analisis psikometrik yang dilakukan adalah validitas isi, validitas konstruksi, dan reliabilitas tes ulang. Hasil: Kuesioner KBOHP berhasil diadaptasi lintas budaya kedalam Bahasa Indonesia menggunakan pendekatan simetris. Sebanyak 167 orang bersedia berpartisipasi dalam penelitian. Nilai koefisien validitas isi I-CVI sebesar 0.8, namun nilai validitas konstruksi domain pengetahuan dan perilaku 0,05. Uji reliabilitas tes ulang menunjukkan nilai Intraclass Correlation 0,89-1. Kesimpulan: Kuesioner KBOHP versi Indonesia berhasil diadaptasi lintas budaya dari Bahasa Inggris. Kuesioner KBOHP valid dan reliabel untuk digunakan pada populasi Indonesia, namun untuk dapat meningkatkan validitas konstruksi, dibutuhkan penyempurnaan pada pertanyaan kuesioner.

---

Background: Periodontal disease may occur as an oral manifestation during pregnancy, it is known to be one of the risk factor for low birth weight and premature pregnancy outcomes. To prevent those situations, a visit to the dentist is needed, so that oral health, the health of the baby and also pregnancy could be maintained. Knowledge is known to be associated to womens visit to the dentist during pregnancy. To determine the condition of knowledge and behavior of pregnant women related to oral health during pregnancy, a valid and reliable instrument is needed. Unfortunately, such instrument is lacking in Indonesia.

Objective: To analyze the validity and reliability value of the Indonesian version of Knowledge and Behavior towards Oral Health during Pregnancy (KBOHP) questionnaire.

Method: This was analytic descriptive crossectional study with convinience sampling design using previously published KBOHP questionnaire. Cross-cultural adaptation of the questionnaire is done using Symmetrical approach. Psychometric analysis of the questionnaire were analyzed using content validity, construct validity, and test retest reliability.

Result: The KBOHP questionnaire was successfully cross-adapted culturally into Indonesian using Symmetrical approach. There were 167 people agreed to participate in this study. The value of content validity index (I-CVI) was 0.8 but the construct validity of the knowledge and behavior domain was 0.05. The test and retest reliability showed the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) value of 0.89-1.

Conclusion: The KBOHP Indonesian version questionnaire was successfully cross-culturally adapted from the English version. The KBHOP Indonesian version was valid and reliabel to be used in Indonesian population. However, improvement is still needed on the items of the questionnaire in order to improve the construct validity."

"Pendahuluan: Nyeri bahu merupakan salah satu masalah yang kerap menjadi keluhan pasien di klinik orthopaedi. Saat ini belum ada instrumen untuk menilai luaran klinis bahu berbahasa Indonesia yang sudah teruji validitas dan reliabilitas. Constant Score (CS) merupakan alat ukur luaran yang sering digunakan dalam literatur untuk mendeskripsikan kondisi fungsional bahu.Metode: Adaptasi Constant Score ke dalam bahasa Indonesia dilakukan sesuai dengan pedoman yang direkomendasikan oleh Beaton et al. Pengambilan sampel secara konsekutif dilakukan di klinik orthopaedi RS Cipto Mangunkusumo dan RSUP Fatmawati pada pasien dengan keluhan nyeri bahu. Uji validitas dan reliabilitas kuisioner CS-INA versi final dilakukan oleh satu orang peneliti dalam 2 kali kesempatan dengan rentang 1-2 minggu. Responden juga diminta mengisi kusioner SF-36 berbahasa Indonesia pada pertemuan pertama.Hasil: Sebanyak 102 bahu (101 pasien) diikutsertakan dalam studi validasi dan reliabilitas. Uji validitas konstruk antar poin kuisioner menunjukkan korelasi moderat hingga kuat (Koefisien korelasi 0,429-0,846; p < 0,05). Validitas kriteria dengan kuisioner SF-36 juga menunjukkan korelasi kuat (Pearson correlation 0,90; p < 0,05). Uji reliabilitas menunjukkan konsistensi internal yang sangat baik (Cronbach’s  = 0,85) dan korelasi intrakelas yang baik (ICC = 0,86). Hasil yang baik juga ditunjukkan dari skor SEM 7,32 dan 6,82 serta MDC 14,4 dan 13,3. Dalam penelitian ini tidak didapatkan efek floor and ceiling.Kesimpulan: Adaptasi Constant Score ke dalam bahasa dan kultur Indonesia menghasilkan alat ukur luaran yang valid dan reliabel untuk digunakan dalam populasi pasien Indonesia dengan keluhan nyeri bahu.

---

Introduction: Shoulder pain is one of the main complaints of patients coming to the orthopaedic clinic. To the extend of our knowledge, there has been no outcome measure relating to shoulder complaints in Indonesian language. Constant Score (CS) is widely used in publications and literatures to explain shoulder functional outcome.

Method: Cross-cultural adaptation of the Constant score to Indonesian language and culture was performed according to recommendation by Beaton et al. Data from patient with shoulder pain were collected consecutively in the orthopaedic clinic in Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital and Fatmawati General Hospital. Validity and reliability study of the final version of CS-INA was conducted by one researcher in 2 meetings, within 1-2 weeks. The Indonesian version of the SF-36 questionnaire was also given to the respondents.

Results: A total of 102 shoulders (101 patients) was included in the study. CS-INA showed excellent construct validity between items of questionnaire (correlation coefficient 0.429-0.846; p < 0.05) and criterion validity with SF-36 (Pearson correlation 0.90; p < 0.05). Reliability study showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s  = 0.85) and intraclass correlation (ICC = 0.86). The SEM of the test and retest were 7,37 and 6,82, while the MDC were 14,3 and 13,3. There is no floor and ceiling effects observed in this study.

Conclusion: The Indonesian version of the Constant Score exhibits good validity and reliability for Indonesian population complaining of shoulder pain."

"Latar Belakang. Kuesioner Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (BCTQ) merupakan kuesioner yang dikembangkan untuk menilai keluhan pasien sindrom terowongan karpal dalam melakukan aktifitas sehari-hari. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan uji validasi dan reliabilitas kuesioner BCTQ ke dalam bahasa Indonesia. Metode. Melakukan adaptasi dan translasi transkultural, kemudian dilakukan uji validitas dan uji reliabilitas kuesioner BCTQ versi bahasa Indonesia. Populasi dari penelitian ini adalah semua pasien dewasa dengan sindrom terowongan karpal yang datang ke Poliklinik Neurologi RSUPNCM yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi. Hasil. Tiga puluh lima pasien memenuhi kriteria inklusi. Sebagian besar adalah perempuan (88,6%). Usia berkisar antara 45 tahun sampai 71 tahun, dengan prevalensi tertingi > 50 tahun (91,4%), pekerjaan sebagian besar subjek adalah sebagai ibu rumah tangga (77,1%). Pada uji validitas domain derajat keparahan gejala pada uji pertama memiliki nilai antara 0,484-0,781, pada retes didapatkan nilai 0,482 sampai 0,760, untuk domain status fungsional didapatkan nilai antara 0,495 sampai 0,825, dan nilai 0,615 sampai 0,783 pada retes. Hasil uji reliabilitas domain derajat keparahan gejala 0,876 pada uji pertama dan 0,874 pada uji kedua, untuk uji reabilitas domain status fungsional pada uji pertama sebesar 0,857 dan pada retes 0,854. Waktu yang dibutuhkan untuk mengisi kuesioner oleh semua subjek kurang dari 10 menit, Kesimpulan. Kuesioner BCTQ versi Bahasa Indonesia valid dan reliabel dalam mengevaluasi keluhan serta gejala pada pasien dengan sindrom terowongan karpal.

---

Introduction. Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) is a questionnaire developed to assess complaints and symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome patients in carrying out daily activities. Aim of this study is to gain a valid and reliable Indonesian version of BCTQ. Methods. Trancultural adaptation and translation from the original version to Indonesian version, then validation and reliability test are carried out. The population of this study was adult patients with carpal tunnel syndrome who came to the neurology department RSUPNCM and met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-five patients met the inclusion criteria, majority are women (88,6%). Age ranged from 45-71 years, with the highest prevalence >50 years old. Most of the subjects were housewife. The value of symptoms severity scale domain between 0,484-0,781 for first test, 0,482-0,760 on the retest. For domain functional status 0,495-0,825 in the first tests, and 0,615-0,783 for the retest. The reliability test for symptoms severity scale domain for the first test is 0,876 and 0,874 for the retest. The realiability test value for functional status 0,857 for the first test and 0,854 for the retest. The time needed to complete the questionnaire is under 10 minutes. Conclusion. Indonesian version of BCTQ is a valid and reliable instrument to be used as instrument in evaluate complaint and symptoms in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome."

"Pandemi Covid-19 membuat metode pembelajaran bauran berpotensi makin sering digunakan dalam pendidikan kedokteran. Berbagai studi menunjukkan bahwa terdapat hubungan antara kemampuan regulasi diri mahasiswa dengan lingkungan pembelajaran bauran. Blended Learning Questionnaire (BLQ) merupakan instrumen yang dikembangkan di University of Western Sydney, Australia untuk mengukur regulasi diri mahasiswa kedokteran dalam lingkungan pembelajaran bauran. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memperoleh BLQ versi bahasa Indonesia untuk digunakan pada mahasiswa kedokteran Indonesia.Penelitian ini dilakukan dalam beberapa tahap, yaitu penerjemahan, telaah ahli, wawancara kognitif, uji pilot, dan pengumpulan data akhir dengan BLQ versi bahasa Indonesia. Validitas isi diukur berdasarkan nilai Content Validity Index (CVI). Validitas konstruksi diukur dengan metode exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Reliabilitas diukur dari konsistensi internal dengan nilai Cronbach’s alpha.Seluruh butir pernyataan yang menyusun BLQ versi bahasa Indonesia mendapatkan nilai CVI≥0.83. Hasil EFA mengekstraksi 5 faktor. Faktor 4 dan 5 memiliki nilai Cronbach’s alpha≤0,7. Hasil-hasil tersebut menunjukkan bahwa BLQ versi bahasa Indonesia memiliki validitas isi yang baik untuk mengukur tingkat regulasi diri mahasiswa kedokteran Indonesia dalam lingkungan pembelajaran bauran. Namun, instrumen ini belum memiliki validitas konstruksi yang baik sehingga saat ini belum dapat digunakan pada mahasiswa kedokteran Indonesia. Diperlukan penelitian lebih lanjut untuk meningkatkan validitas konstruksi dan konsistensi internal dari instumen ini.

---

Covid-19 pandemic has made blended learning as a more common learning environment design in medical education. Many studies have shown that there is a relationship between students' self-regulation and blended learning environment. The Blended Learning Questionnaire (BLQ) is an instrument developed at the University of Western Sydney, Australia to measure self-regulation of medical students in a blended learning environment. This study aims to obtain the Indonesian version of the BLQ to be used in Indonesia’s medical education setting.

This research was conducted in several stages, namely translation, expert review, cognitive interviews, pilot testing, and final data collection using the Indonesian version of the BLQ. Content validity is measured based on the value of the Content Validity Index (CVI). Construct validity was measured by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) method. Reliability is measured from internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha value.

All of the items of Indonesian version of the BLQ get CVI≥0.83. EFA results extract 5 factors. Factors 4 and 5 have a Cronbach's alpha value≤0.7. These results indicate that the Indonesian version of the BLQ has good content validity for measuring the level of self-regulation of Indonesian medical students in a blended learning environment. However, this instrument does not have good construct validity so that currently it cannot be used on Indonesian medical students. Further research is needed to improve the construct validity and internal consistency of this instrument."

"[Tujuan: menguji validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen Health Literacy in Dentistry Scale versi Bahasa Indonesia pada kelompok usia 12-14 tahun di DKI Jakarta. Metode: Kuesioner HeLD diterjemahkan melalui forward-backward translation. Desain penelitian menggunakan cross sectional. Konsistensi internal dan eksternal, validitas konvergen dan diskriminan dari HeLD dievaluasi. Hasil: sebanyak 462 siswa menyelesaikan self-administered questionnaire. Rerata skor HeLD yaitu 3,45±0,02. Nilai Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) adalah 0,75 dan Cronbach?s alpha=0,77. Validitas konvergen dan diskriminan memiliki hubungan signifikan pada kunjungan terakhir ke dokter gigi (p<0,01). Kesimpulan: instrumen HeLD versi Bahasa Indonesia terbukti valid dan reliabel untuk mengukur oral health literacy anak usia 12-14 tahun;Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze validity and reliability of an Indonesian version of the Health Literacy in Dentistry scale (HeLD) instrument among 12-14 years old in Jakarta. Methods: HeLD questionnaire was forward-backward translated into Indonesian. This study design is cross sectional. The internal and external consistency, convergent and discriminant validity of HeLD were evaluated. Results: 462 students completed the self-administered questionnaire. The mean total HeLD score was 3.45±0.02. The Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) were 0.75 and Cronbach?s alpha=0.77. The convergent and discriminant validity were confirmed by HeLD scores being significantly associated with last dental visit (p<0.001). Conclusions: The Indonesian version of HeLD suggested that is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring oral health literacy in children ages 12-14 years old.;Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze validity and reliability of an Indonesian version of the Health Literacy in Dentistry scale (HeLD) instrument among 12-14 years old in Jakarta. Methods: HeLD questionnaire was forward-backward translated into Indonesian. This study design is cross sectional. The internal and external consistency, convergent and discriminant validity of HeLD were evaluated. Results: 462 students completed the self-administered questionnaire. The mean total HeLD score was 3.45±0.02. The Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) were 0.75 and Cronbach?s alpha=0.77. The convergent and discriminant validity were confirmed by HeLD scores being significantly associated with last dental visit (p<0.001). Conclusions: The Indonesian version of HeLD suggested that is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring oral health literacy in children ages 12-14 years old.;Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze validity and reliability of an Indonesian version of the Health Literacy in Dentistry scale (HeLD) instrument among 12-14 years old in Jakarta. Methods: HeLD questionnaire was forward-backward translated into Indonesian. This study design is cross sectional. The internal and external consistency, convergent and discriminant validity of HeLD were evaluated. Results: 462 students completed the self-administered questionnaire. The mean total HeLD score was 3.45±0.02. The Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) were 0.75 and Cronbach’s alpha=0.77. The convergent and discriminant validity were confirmed by HeLD scores being significantly associated with last dental visit (p<0.001). Conclusions: The Indonesian version of HeLD suggested that is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring oral health literacy in children ages 12-14 years old., Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze validity and reliability of an Indonesian version of the Health Literacy in Dentistry scale (HeLD) instrument among 12-14 years old in Jakarta. Methods: HeLD questionnaire was forward-backward translated into Indonesian. This study design is cross sectional. The internal and external consistency, convergent and discriminant validity of HeLD were evaluated. Results: 462 students completed the self-administered questionnaire. The mean total HeLD score was 3.45±0.02. The Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) were 0.75 and Cronbach’s alpha=0.77. The convergent and discriminant validity were confirmed by HeLD scores being significantly associated with last dental visit (p<0.001). Conclusions: The Indonesian version of HeLD suggested that is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring oral health literacy in children ages 12-14 years old.]"

"Latar Belakang TOPICOP adalah suatu skala yang dikembangkan untuk mengevaluasi topical steroidphobia pada pasien dermatitis atopik atau orang tuanya yang telah menjalani validasi statistik awal. TOPICOP dibuat dan diuji di Perancis, namun dimensi yang dieksplorasi pada kuesioner ini tidak terbatas pada pasien di Perancis dan validasi skala lebih lanjut di negara dan budaya lain diperlukan untuk memfasilitasi studi perbandingan internasional. Saat ini, belum tersedia instrumen penilaian prevalensi fobia steroid topikal di Indonesia. Oleh karena itu, dibutuhkan terjemahan serta uji validasi dan reliabilitas untuk membuat kuesioner TOPICOP berbahasa Indonesia agar dapat digunakan untuk penelitian dan pelayanan. Setelah divalidasi, akan dilakukan survey terhadap responden terkait topical steroid-phobia. Metode Kuesioner TOPICOP asli berbahasa Inggris diterjemahkan ke Bahasa Indonesia. Pengisian kuesioner TOPICOP ini dilakukan pada 30 subjek penelitian (SP) di Poliklinik Kulit dan Kelamin dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo (RSCM). Uji validitas dilakukan dengan menghitung nilai Pearson Correlation dan nilai signifikansi. Uji reliabilitas dilakukan dengan menghitung nilai Cronbach’s alpha. Hasil Terjemahan kuesioner TOPICOP asli berbahasa Inggris menghasikan kuesioner TOPICOP versi Bahasa Indonesia. Rentang nilai Pearson Correlation. pada seluruh pernyataan pada kuesioner ini sebesar 0,162-0,768 dan nilai signifikansi berada di rentang 0,000001-0,394. Terdapat tiga butir kuesioner yang tidak valid, yaitu BEL1, WOR2, dan BEH3. Nilai uji reliabilitas konsistensi internal pada pertanyaan yang valid pada kuesioner ini sebesar 0,826. Kesimpulan Perlu dilakukan beberapa modifikasi pada beberapa butir instrumen kuesioner TOPICOP agar dapat memenuhi uji validitasi.

---

Introduction TOPICOP is a scale developed to evaluate topical steroid-phobia in atopic dermatitis patients or their parents that has undergone initial statistical validation. TOPICOP was created and tested in France, however the questionnaire are not limited to patients in France and further validation of the scale in other countries and cultures is needed to facilitate international comparative studies. Currently, there is no instrument available to assess the prevalence of topical steroid phobia in Indonesia. Translation as well as validation and reliability tests are needed to create a TOPICOP questionnaire in Indonesian so that it can be used for research and services. After validation, a survey will be conducted on respondents regarding topical steroid-phobia Method The original TOPICOP questionnaire in English was translated into Indonesian. Filling out the TOPICOP questionnaire was answered by 30 research subjects at the Dermatology and Venereology clinic of dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo. The validity test is carried out by calculating the Pearson Correlation value and significance value. The reliability test was carried out by calculating the Cronbach's alpha value. Results The translation of the original TOPICOP questionnaire into English produces the Indonesian version of the TOPICOP questionnaire. Pearson Correlation value range. for all statements in this questionnaire it is 0.162-0.768 and the significance value is in the range 0.000001-0.394. There are three invalid questionnaire items, namely BEL1, WOR2, and BEH3. The internal consistency reliability test value for valid questions on this questionnaire is 0.826. Conclusion Several modifications need to be made to several items of the TOPICOP questionnaire instrument so that they can meet the validity test."

"Gangguan produktivitas kerja pada kalangan pekerja akibat masalah kesehatan dapat berupa absenteisme dan presenteisme. Kuesioner World Health Organization-Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (WHO-HPQ) merupakan kuesioner lapor mandiri yang dibuat untuk menilai dampak yang dihadapi oleh pemberi kerja akibat penurunan produktivitas kerja yang disebabkan oleh presenteisme, absenteisme, dan cedera/kecelakaan akibat kerja. Studi ini bertujuan untuk melakukan validasi dan reliabilitas dari kuesioner WHO-HPQ bahasa Indonesia versi pendek. Adaptasi transkultural dilakukan dengan adaptasi transkultural dan uji reliabilitas terhadap kuesioner WHO-HPQ versi pendek. Proses adaptasi transkultural dilakukan melalui berbagai tahap termasuk penerjemahan, peninjauan ahli, pretesting dan wawancara kognitif, dan pengujian kuesioner versi final serta dokumentasi. Penilaian validitas pertanyaan menggunakan nilai inter-item correlation dengan minimal nilai 0.2 dan untuk uji reliabilitas, nilai Cronbach alpha dengan minimal nilai 0.7. Kuesioner WHO-HPQ bahasa Indonesia versi pendek telah valid dalam bahasa Indonesia baik pada bagian absenteime dan presentasi. Hasil uji reliabilitas menunjukkan nilai Cronbach’s alpha 0.328 untuk item bagian absenteisme dan 0.878 pada bagian presenteisme. Kuesioner WHO-HPQ bahasa Indonesia versi pendek dapat digunakan sebagai alat identifikasi absenteisme dan presenteisme pada pekerja di Indonesia.

---

Reduction of work productivity among workers due to health problems can take in the form of absenteeism and/or presenteeism. The World Health Organization-Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (WHO-HPQ) is a self-report questionnaire instrument was created to assess the cost faced by employers due to decreased efficiency caused by presenteeism, absenteeism, and work-related accidents/injuries. This study aims to carry out validity and reliability of the short Indonesian version of the WHO-HPQ questionnaire. We conducted transcultural adaptation and reliability testing the short version of WHO-HPQ questionnaire. This method employs multiple phases including translation, experts review, pretesting and cognitive interviewing, testing the final version and documentation. In order to determine if a question item is valid, item-correlation value must be greater than 0.2, and for the reliability, internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha value must exceed a minimum threshold of 0.7. The short version of the WHO-HPQ questionnaire is valid in Indonesian version, for the absenteeism and presenteeism aspects. The results of the reliability test showed a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.328 for the absenteeism section and 0.878 for the presenteeism section. The short Indonesian version of the WHO-HPQ can be used as a tool to identify absenteeism and presenteeism among workers in Indonesia."

"Latar Belakang. Migren adalah tipe nyeri kepala tersering yang dapat menyebabkan disabilitas, sehingga berdampak pada kehidupan pribadi, pekerjaan serta kehidupan sosial pasien. Perbaikan pada gejala dan kualitas hidup tidak sepenuhnya berkorelasi, oleh karena itu diperlukan suatu instrumen khusus seperti kuesioner Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS). Kuesioner sudah digunakan secara luas di seluruh dunia yang dapat digunakan sebagai panduan untuk memulai terapi profilaksis dan atau mengevaluasi serta melanjutkan terapi migren namun belum ada yang mengadaptasi ke dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan uji validitas dan reliabilitas kuesioner MIDAS ke dalam Bahasa Indonesia Metode. Dilakukan translasi dan adaptasi lintas budaya sesuai kaidah WHO, kemudian dilakukan uji validitas dan reliabilitas kuesioner MIDAS versi Bahasa Indonesia. Studi potong lintang dilakukan pada populasi pasien terdiagnosis migren minimal tiga bulan di Poliklinik Neurologi dan rawat inap RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo mulai Mei-Juni 2024. Uji validitas dilakukan dengan menggunakan Pearson correlation dan uji reliabilitas internal dengan Cronbach’s Alpha serta reliabilitas eksternal dengan metode test-retest. Hasil. Mayoritas subjek adalah perempuan (90,3%), dengan rerata usia 34,85±10,35 tahun, dengan diagnosis terbanyak migren tanpa aura (54,8%). Median total skor MIDAS-Ina adalah 35,5 (0-258) dengan frekuensi nyeri kepala 20 hari dan intensitas nyeri tinggi (median NRS 7). Pada uji validitas kuesioner MIDAS-Ina semua pertanyaan memiliki r-hitung lebih besar dibandingkan r-tabel (0,25). Hasil uji reliabilitas dengan Cronbach’s Alpha sebesar 0,778 dan metode test-retest dengan intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) sebesar 0,656 (95% CI 0,980-0,996) hingga 0,991 (95% CI 0,980-0,996). Waktu yang diperlukan untuk melakukan pengisian kurang dari 10 menit. Kesimpulan. Kuesioner MIDAS versi Bahasa Indonesia adalah kuesioner yang valid dan reliabel untuk menilai disabilitas yang ditimbulkan akibat migren pada populasi di Indonesia.

---

Background. Migraines are the most common type of headache that can cause disability, thus impacting patients' personal lives, work, and social interactions. Improvement in symptoms and quality of life do not always correlate, making a specialized instrument like the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire necessary. This questionnaire is widely used globally as a guide to initiate prophylactic therapy and/or evaluate and continue migraine therapy. So far, and to the best of our knowledge, no Indonesian version of this tool has been adapted. This study aims to test the validity and reliability of MIDAS questionnaire into Indonesian Language. Methods. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation were carried out according to WHO rules, then the Indonesia version of MIDAS questionnaire was tested for validity and reliability. A cross-sectional study was conducted on a population of patients diagnosed with migraines for at least three months at the Neurology Clinic and ward of RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo from May-June 2024. Validity testing was performed using Pearson correlation, internal reliability testing with Cronbach’s Alpha, and external reliability testing with the test-retest method. Results. The majority of subjects were female (90.3%), with a mean age of 34.85±10.35 years, and the most common diagnosis was migraine without aura (54.8%). The median total MIDAS-Ina score was 35.5 (0-258) with a headache frequency of 20 days and high pain intensity (median NRS 7). In the MIDAS-Ina validity test, all questions had an r-count greater than the r-table (0.25). The reliability test results showed a Cronbach’s Alpha of 0.778 and a test-retest method intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranging from 0.656 (95% CI 0.980-0.996) to 0.991 (95% CI 0.980-0.996). The time required to complete the questionnaire was less than 10 minutes. Conclusion. The Indonesian version of the MIDAS questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for assessing migraine-related disability in the Indonesian population."

"Bonding antara ibu dengan anak merupakan proses yang bersifat dinamik dan dua arah. Bonding berperan sangat penting pada masa awal kehidupan seorang anak. Bonding yang terbentuk akan mempengaruhi sikap pengasuhan ibu terhadap anak yang masih bergantung penuh pada dirinya. Bonding juga mempengaruhi perkembangan sensorik dan motorik anak. Dalam jangka panjang, gangguan bonding dapat menyebabkan berbagai gangguan emosi dan perilaku pada anak. Diperlukan alat ukur untuk menilai bonding antara ibu dengan anak, sehingga jika terdapat masalah maka dapat dilakukan intervensi segera. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengelaborasi kesahihan dan keandalan instrumen Mother-Infant Bonding Scale dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Kesahihan instrumen ini dalam Bahasa Indonesia baik, dibuktikan oleh uji validitas isi. Keandalan instrumen Mother-Infant Bonding Scale versi Bahasa Indonesia menurut nilai Cronbach?s alpha untuk keseluruhan butir instrumen adalah 0,4; untuk faktor lack of affection adalah 0,4; sedangkan untuk faktor anger and rejection adalah 0,5.

---

Bonding between a mother to her infant is a dynamic and bidirectional process, it play a very important role in the first days of life. Bonding create nurturing behavior of a mother to her infant that fully dependent to others to fulfill its need. Bonding also has important role in sensory motor development of the baby. In a long term, disorder of mother-infant bonding affect child?s emotional regulation and behavior. Assessment tools is needed to assess the quality of mother-infant bonding, so if there was problem, intervention should be done soon.

We did this research to evaluate validity and reliability of Mother-Infant Bonding Scale in Indonesian version. The validity of these instruments in Indonesian version tested with content validity by experts worth 1.00. Reliability of Mother-Infant Bonding Scale in Indonesian version according to Cronbach's alpha values for whole item is 0.4; for lack of affection factor is 0.4; whereas for anger and rejection factor is 0.2."