Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini mencoba menganalisa tingkat reliabilitas, validitas dan indeks diskriminasi item IDI alat ukur Locus of Control LOC baru pada domain hubungan romantis. Tujuh belas 17 mahasiswa Psikologi University of Queensland ikut serta dalam pilot study di mana mereka merespon pertanyaan pada alat ukur LOC dalam hubungan romatis untuk mengeliminasi item yang tidak layak dipakai pada versi final alat ukur. Dalam studi utama, 167 mahasiswa memberikan respon terhadap alat ukur LOC dalam hubungan romantis dan beberapa alat ukur lain yang mengukur validitas. Hasil menunjukan beberapa dukungan terhadap hipotesa peneliti, di mana: a reliabilitas yang tidak baik ditemukan dari empat item yang menunjukan skor IDI yang rendah, b korelasi positif yang signifikan dengan Levenson rsquo;s LOC scale yang menunjukan concurrent validity, c asosiasi negatif yang signifikan dengan self -control yang menunjukan convergent validity, d tidak ditemukannya convergent validity dengan konstruk jealousy cemburu . Asesmen psikometris dengan menggunakan test-retest reliability dan convergent validity dengan alat ukur lain yang sudah terbukti validitasnya harus dilakukan terlebih dahulu agar bias digunakan dengan yakin dalam praktis konseling pernikahan.

---

ABSTRACTThis paper has attempted to explore the reliability, validity, and item discrimination indices IDI of a new measure of locus of control LOC scale in the domain of romantic relationship. A total of 17 psychology students in the pilot study were asked to response to the new LOC scale of romantic relationship to eliminate items deemed unworthy for the final scale. In the main study, 167 students responded to the new romantic LOC scale and several other validating scales where partial support for hpyotheses were found: a a poor reliability as reflected by four items with low IDI, b isginificant positive association with Levenson rsquo;s LOC scale indicating concurrent validity, c significant negative association with self-control indicating convergent validity, d no indication of convergent validity was found with jealousy. The measure may have implication in marriage counselling, but a careful psychometric assessment must be explored first through test-retest reliability and convergent validity with other well-established scale to provide practical confidence. "

"Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui apakah locus of control kerja dapat menjadi moderator dari hubungan antara ketidakamanan kerja dengan kinerja kerja yang terdiri dari kinerja tugas dan perilaku warga organisasi (OCB). Pengukuran ketidakamanan kerja menggunakan alat ukur milik Sverke et al. (2004), pengukuran kinerja tugas menggunakan pengukuran kinerja penilaian sendiri dari Piccoli et al. (2017), pengukuran OCB menggunakan alat ukur milik Smith et al. (1983), dan lokus kerja kontrol pengukuran menggunakan Spector (1988) Lokus Kerja Skala Kontrol. Partisipan dalam penelitian ini ada 108 orang yang merupakan karyawan swasta berusia minimal 21 tahun dan telah bekerja setidaknya satu tahun di perusahaan saat ini. Sampel dipilih menggunakan teknik convenience sampling. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan locus of control kerja tidak memoderasi hubungan antara ketidakamanan kerja dan kinerja tugas (βJIxWLC = 0,0062; p> 0,05) dan OCB (βJIxWLC = 0,0105; p> 0,05). Namun hasil juga menunjukkan bahwa locus of control kerja adalah prediktor dari kinerja tugas. Selain itu, peran lokus kerja tidak ditemukan kontrol yang signifikan antara hubungan ketidakamanan kerja dengan OCB. Dengan demikian dapat dijadikan input bagi perusahaan bahwa locus of control karyawan merupakan salah satu faktor yang cukup penting dan perlu diperhatikan dalam dunia kerja.

---

This research was conducted to determine whether the work locus of control can be moderator of the relationship between job insecurity with job performance consisting of tasks performance and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). Job insecurity measurement using measuring instruments belonging to Sverke et al. (2004), task performance measurement using a self-rated performance measurement from Piccoli et al. (2017), measurement OCB uses a measuring instrument belonging to Smith et al. (1983), and work locus of measurement control uses Spector's (1988) Work Locus of Control Scale. Participant in this study there were 108 people who were aged private employees a minimum of 21 years and have worked at least one year in the company at this time. Sample chosen using convenience sampling technique.

The results showed work locus of control does not moderate the relationship between job insecurity and task performance (βJIxWLC = 0.0062; p> 0.05) and OCB (βJIxWLC = 0.0105; p> 0.05). However the results also showed that the work locus of control was a predictor from task performance. Besides that, the role of work locus is not found of significant control between the job insecurity relationship with OCB. With thus can be used as input for companies that employee locus of control is one factor that is quite important and needs to be considered in the world work."

"[ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan skala baru dalam mengukur perilaku obsesif-kompulsif.Survei diberikan kepada 194 mahasiswa program sarjana S1 dari University of Queensland. Setelah semua datatelah terkumpul dan diselesaikan, skala baru yang telah dikembangkan dari perilaku obsesif-kompulsif pun diujireliabilitas, Item Discrimination Index, dan validitas dalam skala hubungannya dengan variabel lain yakni locusof control, status hubungan romantis, dan daftar Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (OCI-R) baru yang telahdirevisi. Skala obsesif-kompulsif baru yang telah dikembangkan ternyata memiliki reliabilitas yang tinggi diantara butir-butir lainnya. Item Discrimination Index menunjukkan bahwa tiap butir skala bisa dibedakan denganbaik, dengan hanya membutuhkan tiga butir untuk diubah penulisan katanya (M = 32.40, SD = 8.17). Ditemukanhubungan antara butir skala obsesif-kompulsif dengan locus of control (r(189) = .18, p = .013) dan variabel OCIRyang bertugas untuk memvalidasi (r(189) = .37, p < .001), tetapi tidak ditemukan hubungan antara obsesifkompulsifdengan status hubungan romatis (r(189) = .08, ns.). Skala butir yang baru dikembangkan padapenelitian ini terbukti dapat berlaku untuk setting non-klinis serta memerlukan penelitian lebih lanjut untukmemvalidasi penggunaannya dengan variabel lain yang ada.ABSTRACT The present study looked to develop a new scale in measuring obsessive-compulsive behaviour.

Surveys were administered to 194 undergraduate university students of The University of Queensland to

complete. After all the data have been gathered, the newly developed scale of OCB was tested on its reliability,

Item Discrimination Index, and validity in conjunction with other variables of locus of control, relationship

status, and OCI-R. The newly developed OCB scale proved to have high reliability among its items and good

discriminating index with only three items that need rewording (M = 32.40, SD = 8.17). Items demonstrated

relationship with locus of control (r(189) = .18, p = .013) and OCI-R validating variables (r(189) = .37, p <

.001), but none was found with relationship status (r(189) = .08, ns.). This newly developed scale proved to be

applicable to non-clinical setting and need further researches to validate its use with other existing variables., The present study looked to develop a new scale in measuring obsessive-compulsive behaviour.

Surveys were administered to 194 undergraduate university students of The University of Queensland to

complete. After all the data have been gathered, the newly developed scale of OCB was tested on its reliability,

Item Discrimination Index, and validity in conjunction with other variables of locus of control, relationship

status, and OCI-R. The newly developed OCB scale proved to have high reliability among its items and good

discriminating index with only three items that need rewording (M = 32.40, SD = 8.17). Items demonstrated

relationship with locus of control (r(189) = .18, p = .013) and OCI-R validating variables (r(189) = .37, p <

.001), but none was found with relationship status (r(189) = .08, ns.). This newly developed scale proved to be

applicable to non-clinical setting and need further researches to validate its use with other existing variables.]"