Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAK Penelitian ini melihat hubungan antara volatilitas imbal hasil saham, kinerja operasional, dan imbal hasil saham. Studi-studi sebelumnya menunjukan terdapatnya anomali ‘low volatility’, dimana perusahaan-perusahaan dengan volatilitas imbal hasil yang rendah mengungguli perusahaan-perusahaan dengan volatilitas imbal hasil saham yang tinggi. Perusahaan-perusahaan dengan volatilitas imbal hasil yang rendah menghasilkan imbal hasil yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan perusahaan-perusahaan dengan volatilitas imbal hasil saham yang tinggi. Penelitian ini juga melihat hubungan antara saham dengan volatilitas yang rendah memiliki kinerja operasional (operating performance) yang lebih tinggi dan ini mungkin merupakan penjelasan mengapa saham dengan volatilitas yang rendah mendapatkan imbal hasil yang lebih tinggi. Hasil penelitian ini bertentangan dengan penelitian-penelitian sebelumnya dimana low volatility anomaly tidak terjadi khususnya di Indonesia.

---

ABSTRACT This study examines the relationship between stock return volatility, operating performance, and stock return in the Indonesian capital market. Prior studies showed that the ‘low volatility anomaly’ does exist in the international developed-countries capital markets and emerging markets as well. The low volatility firms tend to outperform the high volatility firms. This study tries to explain the anomaly relationship through the operating performance variable. Firms which the volatility are low will get the advantage through easiness access to capital so that the firms will be able to generate more expected cash flow and increase the operating performance. Furthermore, the high level of operating performance will push the price of stock up so that investor will get more return from this case. Our findings show that low volatility anomaly does not exist in the Indonesian capital market. There is no sufficient evidence support the relationship between volatility and operating performance. However, the relationship between operating performance and return still holds."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah afiliasi perusahaan dalam grup bisnis di Indonesia memiliki pengaruh terhadap volatilitas laba operasi yang diukur melalui standar deviasi laba operasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa afiliasi perusahaan grup bisnis di Indonesia berpengaruh secara positif dan signifikan terhadap standar deviasi laba operasi, sehingga perusahaan yang terafiliasi dengan grup bisnis tergolong lebih volatile dibandingkan dengan non grup bisnis. Penelitian ini juga bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah terdapat perbedaan kinerja antara perusahaan terafiliasi grup bisnis dengan non grup bisnis, dengan melihat nilai Tobin?s Q dan ROA. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perusahaan terafiliasi grup bisnis memiliki kinerja yang berbeda jika dilihat dari nilai Tobin?s Q, menandakan bahwa pasar lebih mengapresiasi secara positif perusahaan grup bisnis, namun tidak terdapat perbedaan kinerja antara perusahaan terafiliasi grup bisnis maupun non grup bisnis jika dilihat kinerjanya secara akuntansi yang diukur oleh ROA.

---

ABSTRACT

The objective of this research is to study whether an affiliation with a Business Group would affect to operating profit volatility which measured by standard deviation of operating profit. The result in this research support the hypothesis that an affiliation with a Business Group would have positive and significant effect to operating profit volatility, so the company that affiliated with Business Groups in Indonesia will be more volatile compared to non Business Groups. Another purposes of this research is to study the significant differences between Business Group affiliated companies and non-Business Group companies in terms of their performance measured by Tobin?s Q and ROA. The result of the study suggest that the markets are more attracted to Business Group affiliated companies which reflected by higher Tobin?s Q score. But the differences result has been occured when we used ROA as a based of firm performances. There is no differences significant performance result between companies that affiliated in Business Group and non-Business Group."

"[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh keputusan merger dan akuisisi terhadap kinerja perusahaan dengan mengevaluasi rasio keuangan mereka. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah perusahaan yang melakukan merger dan akuisisi antara 2004- 2007 dan tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). Dengan teknik purposive sampling, 18 perusahaan dipilih. Uji Kolmogorov-Smirnov dilakukan dan hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa data tidak normal maka uji non-parametrik digunakan. Menggunakan uji Wilcoxon dengan tingkat signifikansi 5%, menunjukkan bahwa seluruh rasio keuangan setelah merger dan akuisisi tidak berubah secara signifikan. Hasil mengarah pada kesimpulan bahwa merger dan akuisisi di Indonesia untuk jangka waktu tersebut tidak signifikan mempengaruhi kinerja perusahaan saat ditunjukkan oleh rasio keuangan ;This research aims to analyze the effect of merger and acquisition decisions on the performance of companies by evaluating their financial ratios. The population in this research are the companies that conducts mergers and acquisitions between 2004- 2007 and are listed in the Indonesian stock exchange (IDX). With a purposive sampling technique, 18 companies are chosen. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was conducted and results show that data is not normal hence non-parametric test was used. Using Wilcoxon signed rank test with a significance level of 5%, it shows that the entire financial ratios after mergers and acquisitions did not change significantly. The outcome lead to the conclusion that mergers and acquisitions activity in Indonesia for the said time frame does not significantly affect the performance of companies when proxied by financial ratios., This research aims to analyze the effect of merger and acquisition decisions on the performance of companies by evaluating their financial ratios. The population in this research are the companies that conducts mergers and acquisitions between 2004- 2007 and are listed in the Indonesian stock exchange (IDX). With a purposive sampling technique, 18 companies are chosen. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was conducted and results show that data is not normal hence non-parametric test was used. Using Wilcoxon signed rank test with a significance level of 5%, it shows that the entire financial ratios after mergers and acquisitions did not change significantly. The outcome lead to the conclusion that mergers and acquisitions activity in Indonesia for the said time frame does not significantly affect the performance of companies when proxied by financial ratios.]"

"[ABSTRAKPenelitian ini secara umum membahas mengenai pengaruh tingkat hutang terhadapkinerja perusahaan. Dengan menggunakan data perusahaan periode 2010?2014 padaperusahaan non-keuangan, khususnya perusahaan manufaktur, yang terdafar di BursaEfek Indonesia. Data diolah menggunakan analisis regresi OLS dengan metode efektetap, menggunakan data panel yang merupakan gabungan dari data cross-section dantime-series. Variabel independen pada penelitian ini adalah leverage. Sedangkanvariabel dependennya adalah kinerja perusahaan yang diproksikan dengan ROA. Danvariabel kontrolnya adalah umur perusahaan, ukuran perusahaan, dan interest. Hasilpenelitian menemukan bahwa tingkat hutang berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadapkinerja perusahaan

---

ABSTRACTIn general, this research discussed about leverage effect on company?s performance.Using firm data from 2010-2014 on non-financial firms, specifically manufacturefirms, that listing on Indonesia Stock Exchange. The data were running using OLSregression analysis with fixed-effect model, using panel data which combination ofcross-section and time-series data. The independent variable in this research isleverage. While the dependent variable is company?s performance which is representwith ROA. And the control variable are age, size, and interest. The results shows thatleverage affect the company?s performance significantly., In general, this research discussed about leverage effect on company’s performance.Using firm data from 2010-2014 on non-financial firms, specifically manufacturefirms, that listing on Indonesia Stock Exchange. The data were running using OLSregression analysis with fixed-effect model, using panel data which combination ofcross-section and time-series data. The independent variable in this research isleverage. While the dependent variable is company’s performance which is representwith ROA. And the control variable are age, size, and interest. The results shows thatleverage affect the company’s performance significantly.]"

"Pelanggaran dalam penyampaian laporan keuangan oleh manajemen menunjukkan bahwa konflik keagenan menjadi masalah penting bagi perusahaan. Konflik tersebut menimbulkan konsekuensi biaya keagenan yang harus ditanggung dan berdampak pada kinerja perusahaan. Penelitian ini menguji pengaruh biaya keagenan terhadap kinerja perusahaan, dan apakah beberapa variabel seperti mekanisme tata kelola perusahaan, kebijakan dividen, dan financial leverage dapat secara positif memoderasi hubungan biaya keagenan dan kinerja perusahaan. Biaya keagenan diukur dengan rasio pemanfaatan asset, rasio pengeluaran diskresioner dan interaksi antara arus kas bebas dengan pertumbuhan perusahaan. Sedangkan kinerja perusahaan diwakili oleh Return on Equity. Data dikumpulkan dari perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia dari tahun 2015 hingga 2019, selanjutnya data panel diregresi menggunakan Panel Corrected Standard Error Model (PCSE). Hasil temuan menunjukkan bahwa biaya keagenan berhubungan negatif dengan kinerja perusahaan yang mendukung penelitian empiris sebelumnya. Selain itu, ditemukan juga bahwa hubungan biaya keagenan dan kinerja perusahaan secara signifikan dimoderasi oleh ukuran dewan dan konsentrasi kepemilikan sebagai representasi mekanisme tata kelola perusahaan, serta oleh kebijakan dividen. Hal ini membuktikan bahwa tata kelola perusahaan dan kebijakan dividen dapat menjadi alat untuk mengurangi biaya keagenan sehingga meningkatkan kinerja perusahaan. Temuan ini diharapkan dapat memperkaya penelitian sebelumnya terutama di negera berkembang dan memberikan informasi tambahan kepada pemegang saham untuk mengendalikan keputusan oportunistik manajemen dalam melakukan investasi dan mengelola pengeluaran operasional.

---

Fraud in the disclosure of financial statements by management shows that agency conflict is an important issue in the company. The conflict has consequences for the agency costs that must be borne and has an impact on the firm's performance. The effect of agency costs on firm performance is investigated in this study, as well as whether several variables such as corporate governance mechanisms, dividend policy, and financial leverage can positively moderate the agency cost and firm performance relationship. The agency cost is measured by the asset utilization ratio and discretionary expenditure ratio. The firm's performance is represented by the return on equity. Data was collected from the manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2015 to 2019, then regressed on the panel data using the Panel Corrected Standard Error Model (PCSE). According to the findings, agency costs are negatively related to firm performance, which supports previous empirical research findings. It also found that the agency cost and firm performance relationship is significantly moderated by board size and ownership concentration as the representatives of corporate governance mechanisms. It suggests that corporate governance can become tools to reduce agency costs and increase the firm performance as well. The empirical evidence adds to previous research on agency conflict, particularly in emerging markets. These findings are expected to supplement previous research and provide additional information to shareholders and bondholders in order to control opportunistic management decisions that affect their investments and discretionary operational expenses."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini secara umum membahas mengenai pengaruh kinerja perusahaan terhadap Market Value Added perusahaan tersebut dengan menggunakan perusahaan nonfinansial yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia selamaperiode 2010-2014. Data diolah dengan menggunakan data panel dan permodelan FEM (Fixed Effect Method). Kinerja perusahaan pada penelitian ini diproksikan dengan ROA, ROE, WACC, dan EVA. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ROA (Return on Asset), WACC (Weighted Average Cost of Capital), dan EVA (Economic Value Added) memiliki pengaruh terhadap nilai MVA (Market Value Added). Sedangkan ROE (Return on Equity) tidakmemberikanpengaruhterhadap MVA (Market Value Added

---

ABSTRACTGenerally, this study discusses the influence of company?s performance againts company?s Market Value Added using nonfinancial companies that listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange during period 2010-2014. Data were processed using panel data modeling, FEM (Fixed Effect Method). Company?s performance proxied by the ROA, ROE, WACC and EVA. The results showed that the ROA (Return on Assets), WACC (Weighted Average Cost of Capital), and EVA (Economic Value Added) has an influence on the value of MVA (Market Value Added). While ROE (Return on Equity) does not give effect to the MVA (Market Value Added)."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meneliti pengaruh struktur modal dan konsentrasi kepemilikan terhadap kinerja 83 perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode tahun 2017 - 2021. Penelitian ini menggunakan utang jangka pendek terhadap total aset dan utang jangka panjang terhadap total aset untuk mengukur struktur modal. Sementara untuk konsentrasi kepemilikan digunakan proporsi kepemilikan pemegang saham terbesar dan lima terbesar dari total pemegang saham perusahaan. Untuk kinerja perusahaan digambarkan dengan return on asset (ROA). Analisis regresi data panel menggunakan software STATA, dengan metode Random Effect Model (REM). Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa struktur modal mempunyai pengaruh yang negatif dan signifikan terhadap ROA. Peneliti juga menguji efek non-linear antara struktur modal terhadap kinerja perusahaan yang menunjukkan hubungan positif namun tidak signifikan, sehingga dapat dikatakan bahwa struktur modal lebih mempengaruhi kinerja perusahaan secara negatif dibandingkan efek positifnya. Untuk konsentrasi kepemilikan juga tidak ditemukan hasil yang signifikan dari kedua proksi. Hal ini berarti kepemilikan saham perusahaan yang terkonsentrasi maupun terdiversifikasi tidak mempengaruhi kinerja perusahaan.

---

This study aims to examine the effect of capital structure and ownership concentration on the performance of 83 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2017 - 2021. This study uses short-term debt to total assets and long-term debt to total assets to measure capital structure. Meanwhile, for the concentration of ownership, the proportion of ownership of the largest and the five largest shareholders of the company's total shareholders is used. The company's performance is described by return on assets (ROA). Panel data regression analysis using STATA software, with Random Effect Model (REM) method. The results of this study indicate that the capital structure has a negative and significant effect on ROA. The researcher also tested the non-linear effect between capital structure on company performance which showed a positive but not significant relationship, so it can be said that capital structure affects company performance more negatively than its positive effect. There was also no significant result for the concentration of ownership from the two proxies. This means that concentrated or diversified company share ownership does not affect the company's performance."

"Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis pengaruh pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) terhadap kinerja keuangan perusahaan. Variabel yang digunakan adalah pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) dan kinerja keuangan perusahaan, serta menggunakan variabel kontrol yaitu Ukuran Perusahaan, Leverage dan Likuiditas dari 195 perusahaan non keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2014-2018. Tambahkan tentang pengukuran q Tobin di sini (alasan dan ukuran apa). Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat pengaruh antara Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) dengan kinerja keuangan perusahaan yang diukur dengan nilai pasar.The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosure on the company's financial performance. The variables used are the disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and the company's financial performance, and use control variables, namely Company Size, Leverage and Liquidity of 195 non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014-2018. Add about Tobin's q measurement here (reason and what size). The results of this study indicate that there is no influence between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and the company's financial performance as measured by market value."

"Skripsi ini menganalisa mengenai pengaruh Degree of Operating Leverage (DOL) dan Degree of Financial Leverage (DFL) terhadap perubahan profitabilitas perusahaan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui seberapa besar pengaruh DOL dan DFL untuk meningkatkan profitabilitas perusahaan. Kegunaan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk melihat apakah perusahaan sudah dapat secara efektif menggunakan DOL dan DFL dalam tujuannya meningkatkan profitabilitas perusahaan. Dalam penelitian ini, digunakan metode data panel dengan estimasi fixed effect.Dari hasil penelitian yang telah dilakukan dengan menggunakan aplikasi Eviews, baik pengujian secara individu DOL dengan profitabilitas dan DFL dengan profitabilitas maupun pengujian bersama DOL dan DFL terhadap profitabilitas didapatkan hasil yang sama yaitu bahwa pada α =1% DOL berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap perubahan Profitabilitas perusahaan (ROE, ROI, ROA, dan EPS), sementara untuk DFL didapatkan hasil DFL tidak berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap perubahan profitabilitas perusahaan.

---

This skripsi is analys about the influence of degree of operating leverage (DOL) and degree of financial leverage (DFL) against of the change profitability of the company. The purpose of this study was to determine how much influence the DOL and DFL to increase the profitability of the company. The usefulness of this study was to see if the company has been able to effectively use the DOL and DFL in its goal improving the company's profitability. In this research, research use the method of panel data with the estimated fixed effect.

On the result of the research that research use Eviews aplication, even of DOL individual examination with the profitability and examination mutual DOL and DFL against profitability find the result is same, it's mean if α = 1% DOL influence significant against influence of profitability of company (ROE, ROI, ROA, and EPS), while for DFL find a result that DFL not influence of profitability of company."

"Skripsi ini menganalisa mengenai korelasi dan pengaruh profitabilitas serta ukuran perusahaan terhadap perubahan cash conversion cycle. Ukuran profitabilitas dinyatakan oleh return on aset (ROA) dan return on equity (ROE), sedangkan ukuran perusahaan dinyatakan dalam net sales dan total aset. Penulis mengumpulkan data laporan dari perusahaan dalam industri manufaktur di BEI periode 2007-2011. Uji data dalam penelitian ini dilakukan menggunakan Eviews6. Uji Anova menyatakan bahwa terdapat perbedaan panjang CCC, ROE, ROA, net sales dan total asset di tiap sektor dalam variabel penelitian. Uji korelasi Pearson menyatakan terdapat korelasi negatif antara variabel ROE, ROA dan net sales terhadap CCC, namun terdapat korelasi positif antara total aset dan panjang CCC. Untuk melihat adanya pengaruh, peneliti menggunakan metode data panel dengan estimasi fixed effect. Hasil uji t statistik yang dilakukan secara parsial, memiliki hasil yang sama dengan uji F yang dilakukan secara simultan. Hal itu berarti variabel independen yaitu ROE, ROA, net sales dan total aset memliki pengaruh terhadap variabel dependen yaitu cash conversion cycle.

---

This thesis analyzes the correlation and impact the profitability and company size to the changes of the cash conversion cycle. Measure of profitability expressed by return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE), while the size of the company stated in net sales and total assets. The authors collected data reports from companies in the manufacturing industry in the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period of 2007-2011. Test data in this study conducted using Eviews 6. Anova test states that there are differences in the length of CCC, ROE, ROA, net sales and total assets in each sector of the study variables. Pearson correlation test stated that there is a negative correlation between the variables ROE, ROA and net sales to the CCC, but there is a positive correlation between total assets and long-CCC. To see the effect, researchers using panel data with fixed effect estimation. The results of the statistical t-test done partially, have the same results with the F test performed simultaneously. That means that the independent variable is ROE, ROA, net sales and total assets possess an influence on the dependent variable is the cash conversion cycle."