Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Despite its much-touted agenda to fight poverty and corruption, the Aquino administration was not able to produce good results during its term at the national level. However, some political forces and policy reforms that emerged with the administration achieved remarkable change at the local level. This paper explores the case of Siquijor Province, where an entrenched political dynasty was defeated in the 2013 and 2016 elections by candidates supported by the Liberal Party and its allied forces, Akbayan, and analyzes factors that brought this change by focusing on activities of People Power Volunteers for Reform, the impact of bottom-up budgeting projects, and the mobilization of powers of the national government through personal relationships. It also notes achievements of the Aquino administration at the local level, provides a critical perspective to the elite democracy discourse that sticks to a static view of Philippine politics, and clarifies local practices by progressive forces that confront oligarchy.

Abstrak :
Kinship politics may be a way to preserve the power of the elites through elections. With the strong support of kinship politics from the local political elite, the candidate for the South Minahasa district head, Michaela Paruntu, had a very high chance of winning the 2020 regional election in the South Minahasa District. But the reality was different. The popularity gained from the influence of the previous district head, a close relative of the candidate, and the support of the ruling party in the South Minahasa District were ineffective in generating public support for the candidate. This study analyzed the factors that caused the ineffectiveness of the kinship politics in the South Minahasa District. This phenomenon was interesting to study since previous studies on kinship politics presented empirical evidence that candidates who have a kinship with the authorities or elites have a better opportunity to win an election. This study used a qualitative method with a case study approach. The result of the study showed that the community's perception of kinship politics in the South Minahasa District influenced people's political choices in the 2020 Regional Head Election (Pilkada).

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini ingin menganalisis kekalahan Ratu Ati Marliati pada pilkada Cilegon dan kemenangan Ratu Tatu Chasanah pada pilkada Kabupaten Serang. Padahal kedua petahana dari dua dinasti politik di Kota Cilegon dan Kabupaten Serang memiliki beberapa kesamaan, baik latar belakang keluarga maupun dukungan politik. Hal ini terjadi karena beberapa faktor yang menyebabkan mereka berbeda nasib dalam pilkada serentak pada 2020 di kedua wilayah ini. Penelitian menggunakan teori boundary control Gibson (2012), dan dilengkapi dengan analisis strategi informal dan ilegal dari Buehler (2018) dan permainan tertutup (closed game) dari Behrend. Menggunakan metode kualitatif, penelitian ini memperlihatkan bahwa faktor kekalahan Ratu Ati disebabkan kegagalan dalam menerapkan strategi boundary strengthening, yang kemudian diiringi dengan keberhasilan oposisi menerapkan strategi boundary opening. Faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan kekalahan itu adalah ketiadaan aktor utama, konflik kepentingan elit partai, kontrol politik yang lemah, mesin politik tidak bekerja optimal, tidak ada akses terhadap elit partai di pusat, dan banyaknya kompetitor. Sedangkan faktor kemenangan Tatu Chasanah karena dia berhasil menerapkan boundary strengthening. Hal ini tampak dari besarnya dukungan partai politik, memobilisasi dukungan baik dari birokrasi maupun dari kelompok-kelompok masyarakat, sehingga mampu mengubah arena permainan menjadi tidak kompetitif. Hal ini memperkuat teori dari Gibson mengenai strategi boundary strengthening dan strategi boundary opening di Kota Cilegon dan Kabupaten Serang ......This study wants to analyze the defeat of Ratu Ati Marliati in the regional elections in Cilegon and the win of Ratu Tatu Chasanah in the regional elections of the Serang Regency. Even though the two incumbents from these two political dynasties have several things in common, both from family backgrounds and political support. This happened due to several factors that caused them to have different fates in the simultaneous local elections in 2020 in these two regions. The research uses Gibson's boundary control theory (2012) and is complemented by an analysis of informal and illegal strategies from Buehler (2018) and closed games from Behrend. Using a qualitative method, this research shows that Ratu Ati's defeat was caused by the failure to apply the boundary-strengthening strategy, which was followed by the success of the opposition in implementing the boundary-opening strategy. The factors that led to the defeat were the absence of the main actors, the conflict of interests of the party elites, weak political control, the political machine did not work optimally, there was no access to party elites at the center, and there were many competitors. Besides, Tatu Chasanah's winning factor because she succeeded in implementing boundary strengthening. This can be seen from the huge support of political parties, mobilizing support from both the bureaucracy and community groups, to turn the playing field into an uncompetitive one. This strengthens Gibson's theory regarding the boundary strengthening strategy and the boundary opening strategy in Cilegon City and Serang Regency

Abstrak :
Skripsi ini mengelaborasi strategi political marketing yang menekankan branding personal dari Betti Shadiq Pasadigoe dalam pemenangannya pada pileg 2014. Betti melakukan branding personal sebagai bagian dari dinasti politik Pasadigoe dan putri asli daerah Tanah Datar. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan data primer dan data sekunder. Temuan penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa terpilihnya Betti disebabkan oleh faktor jaringan keluarganya. Betti melakukan branding personal dengan memanfaatkan nama keluarganya yang identik dengan dinasti politik dari Bupati Tanah Datar selama dua periode, yaitu Muhammad Shadiq Pasadigoe. Selain itu, Betti berhasil melakukan branding personal bahwa ia menjadi satu-satunya perwakilan yang asli daerah Tanah Datar. Dua hal tersebut dimaksimalkan Betti untuk mengantarkannya menjadi anggota DPR RI pada pemilu tahun 2014. ......This thesis elaborates political marketing strategy that emphasizes personal branding from Betti Shadiq Pasadigoe in her victory in the 2014 legislative election. Betti did personal branding as part of the political dynasty of Pasadigoe and Putri Daerah of Tanah Datar. This study uses qualitative research methods based on primary and secondary data. The research findings show that Bettis electability was caused by her family networks. Bettis personal branding was carried out by utilizing her familys name which was identical with political dynasty from the two period figure in Regent of Tanah Datar, Muhammad Shadiq Pasadigoe. In addition, Betti succeeded in carrying out her personal branding that she only representative from Tanah Datar area. These two things were maximized by Betti do deliver herself to become a member of the House of Representatives of Republic of Indonesia in 2014 elections.

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menginvestigasi pengaruh belanja pemerintah daerah terhadap kinerja keuangan pemerintah daerah, Selain itu, studi ini juga menguji peran moderasi dinasti politik dan reelection pada hubungan antara belanja pemerintah daerah dan kinerja keuangan pemerintah daerah. Dengan melakukan regresi berganda dengan pendekatan fixed effect pada 2929 observasi selama 2010-2015, ditemukan bahwa belanja pemerintah daerah berpengaruh positif terhadap kinerja keuangan pemerintah daerah namun berpengaruh negatif terhadap kinerja keuangan pada pemerintah daerah berdinasti politik. Kemudian, dinasti politik terbukti memperlemah pengaruh positif belanja pemerintah daerah dan kinerja keuangan pemerintah daerah. Selain itu, reelection terbukti memperkuat pengaruh positif belanja terhadap kinerja keuangan pada seluruh pemerintah daerah dan memperlemah hubungan negatif belanja dan kinerja keuangan pada pemerintah daerah berdinasti politik. Temuan ini dapat menjadi masukan bagi pemerintah pusat untuk merumuskan mekanisme untuk membatasi praktik dinasti politik karena berdampak buruk bagi kinerja pemerintah daerah. ...... This study aims to investigate the effect of local government spending on local government financial performance. In addition, this study also examines the moderating role of political dynasties and reelection on the relationship between local government spending and local government financial performance. By conducting multiple regressions with fixed effect approach on 2929 observation during 2010 2015, it was found that local government spending has a positive effect on local government financial performance, but it has a negative effect on financial performance of dynastic local governments. In addition, the political dynasty is proven to weaken the positive effect of local government spending on the financial performance of local governments. In addition, reelection is proven to strengthen the positive impact of spending on financial performance on all local governments and weaken the negative effect of spending and financial performance on dynastic local governments. These findings could serve as input for the central government to formulate mechanisms that would limit the practice of political dynasties because of their adverse impact on local government performance.

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini membahas mengenai pengaruh dinasti politik pada kegagalan implementasi kebijakan di Sri Lanka tahun 2019-2022. Mengacu pada teori implementasi kebijakan yang dikemukakan oleh George S. Edwards, dinasti politik yang mengakar pada perpolitikan Sri Lanka mampu mempengaruhi implementasi kebijakan ekonomi di Sri Lanka. Tulisan ini menyoroti beberapa faktor dan pengaruh yang mengakibatkan krisis keuangan Sri Lanka. Temuan dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa politik dinasti dengan anggota keluarga Gotabaya Rajapaksa yang mengisi jabatan strategis mampu mempengaruhi kebijakan ekonomi di Sri Lanka pada tahun 2019-2022. Sebagaimana yang telah dikemukakan oleh George S. Edward terkait empat variable yang harus dipenuhi demi keberhasilan implementasi kebijakan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan melakukan studi literatur dan ingin membuktikan hipotesis sementara bahwa dinasti politik keluarga Rajapaksa pada prosesnya mampu memengaruhi implementasi kebijakan yang berujung pada kegagalaan ekonomi pada tahun 2022. Politik dinasti yang memegang jabatan strategis kemudian menghasilkan kebijakan yang kurang matang dan menyebabkan gagalannya kebijakan tersebut yang berujung pada kegagalan ekonomi. ......This research discusses the influence of political dynasties on the failure of policy implementation in Sri Lanka in 2019-2022. Referring to the theory of policy implementation put forward by George S. Edwards, political dynasties that are rooted in Sri Lankan politics are able to influence the implementation of economic policies in Sri Lanka. This paper examines several factors and influences that resulted in the Sri Lankan financial crisis. The findings from this study indicate that dynastic politics with members of the Gotabaya Rajapaksa family filling strategic positions can influence economic policy in Sri Lanka in 2019-2022. As stated by George S. Edward the four variables that must be met for the successful implementation of the policy. This research uses qualitative methods by conducting literature studies and wants to prove the provisional hypothesis that the political dynasty of the Rajapaksa family in the process is able to influence the implementation of policies that lead to economic failure in 2022. Political dynasties holding strategic positions then produce policies that are inconsiderable and cause policy failure which led to economic failure.

Abstrak :
Despite its much-touted agenda to fight poverty and corruption, the Aquino administration was not able to produce good results during its term at the national level. However, some political forces and policy reforms that emerged with the administration achieved remarkable change at the local level. This paper explores the case of Siquijor Province, where an entrenched political dynasty was defeated in the 2013 and 2016 elections by candidates supported by the Liberal Party and its allied forces, Akbayan, and analyzes factors that brought this change by focusing on activities of People Power Volunteers for Reform, the impact of bottom-up budgeting projects, and the mobilization of powers of the national government through personal relationships. It also notes achievements of the Aquino administration at the local level, provides a critical perspective to the elite democracy discourse that sticks to a static view of Philippine politics, and clarifies local practices by progressive forces that confront oligarchy.