Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
A discourse generally consists of a number of sentences. In this case one sentence and another sentence should be related to each other. The relations among them can be identified through the components connecting those sentences, which are called cohesive devices. This research aims at describing cohesion in Javanese discourses, especially concerning the grammatical and lexical cohesive devices. Also, the cohesive ties among their components in various discourses are examined. The theory for this analysis is based on Halliday and Hasan's Cohesion in English (1979) and Language, Context and Text (1985). The theory is chosen since it is relevant to the subject and is also by far the most comprehensive. The data for this research is taken from various sources so that it is expected to represent the real uses of Javanese. The data is collected through the observation method, that is, by using the techniques of recording and noting on the data cards. Then, the data are analyzed by a distributional method. In this research, a great variety of grammatical cohesive devices, lexical cohesive devices, and even cohesive ties are found. There are four types of grammatical cohesive devices, i.e. reference, substitution, ellipsis, and con-junction; and six types of lexical cohesion, viz, repetition, synonymy, antonymy, hyponymy, meronymy, and collocation. For the group of the grammatical cohesions, some types of reference, covering personal pronouns, demonstrative pronouns, and reference by definite markers are obtained; substitution comprises noun and clause substitution; ellipsis covers noun, verb, and clause ellipsis; while the con-junctions are indicated by some marks of conjunctive relations. Besides, the semantic conjunctive ties are analyzed, comprising additive, adversative, causal, temporal, conditional, alternative, conclusive, validity and intensity. For the group of lexical cohesion, the types of repetition are shown by complete repetition, modified repetition, partial repetition, and additional repetition; synonymy is marked by the linguistic unit with similar or the same meaning; antonymy is realized through the lingual unit with binary, polar, relational and multiple taxonomic antonymy; hyponymy is constructed by superordinate-hyponym, hyponymsuperordinate and co-hyponym relations; meronymy is organized by holonym-meronym, meronym-holonym, and co-meronym, while collocation can be identified through noun and verb collocations. From the analysis of the cohesive ties, the cohesive devices used in one type of discourse and another type vary respectively, whereas the distance between the constituents is dominated by the immediate ties.

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini memaparkan kajian teoritis dan juga praktis terkait Cross-border Insolvency, khususnya mengenai pengakuan proses kepailitan asing sebagai aspeknya yang fundamental. Lingkup penelitian difokuskan terhadap penerapan konsep Centre of Main Interests (COMI) dalam kaitannya dengan Hukum Perdata Internasional secara mendalam, konsep yang telah digunakan oleh negara-negara yang sudah memiliki peraturan yang efisien terkait Cross-border Insolvency, salah satunya adalah Singapura yang telah mengadopsi UNCITRAL Model Law 1995 dalam Hukum Kepailitan Nasional. Hasil penelitian menyarankan agar Pemerintah Indonesia mengadopsi Model Law dan menegakkan kepastian hukum dengan memfokuskan perumusan mengenai faktor COMI yang dapat dijadikan pembantah bagi anggapan yang dimaksud dalam Pasal 16 ayat (3) Model Law, dan juga ketentuan mengenai lingkungan kuasa waktu COMI.
This research explains both theoretical and practical studies on Cross-border Insolvency, particularly regarding the recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings as its fundamental aspect. The scope of research is focused on the application of Centre of Main Interests (COMI) concept in relation to Private International Law, a concept that has been massively used in States with effective Cross-border Insolvency regulation such as Singapore which has adopted the 1995 UNCITRAL Model Law into its national insolvency law. Researcher suggests that Indonesian Government should adopt Model Law and enact legal certainty by focusing on drafting the criteria of COMI factors to displace such presumption as required on Article 16 (3) of Model Law, also to regulate the COMI’s sphere of time.

Abstrak :
Studi mengenai hubungan sosial di tempat kerja telah menunjukkan bahwa hubungan informal, seperti pertemanan, dianggap lebih bermakna bagi para karyawan. Persoalannya, konteks masyarakat kini jarang menumbuhkan hubungan mendalam untuk pekerjaan. Dalam kasus Sekolah 'BM', saya telah menemukan bahwa para karyawan terpecah belah akibat isu ini dan bahwa hal tersebut mempengaruhi praktik dan pengalaman mereka dalam hubungan berbasis tempat kerja. Menggunakan wawancara mendalam dan observasi partisipan, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji praktik pertalian sosial di tempat kerja, alasan di baliknya, dan bagaimana karyawan kemudian menindaklanjuti dan bernegosiasi melalui pertalian tersebut. Saya juga ingin menjelaskan bagaimana konteks khusus suatu tempat kerja dapat memengaruhi pengalaman bekerja karyawan. Berdasarkan temuan penelitian ini, pengalaman diferensiasi karyawan BM dapat dikorelasikan dengan riwayat kekeluargaan dan kekerabatan yang bertentangan dengan perubahan struktural BM untuk menjadi lebih seperti perusahaan. Saya berpendapat bahwa kecenderungan karyawan untuk membedakan dua hal ini dan bertindak sesuai pemahaman mereka menunjukkan suatu kontradiksi nilai. Di lain sisi, ketika tindakan mereka bertolak belakang dengan pemahaman tersebut, maka sedang terjadi suatu negosiasi nilai yang umumnya relasional. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa nilai-nilai yang berbeda, walau tetap ditindaklanjuti, juga mengalami kompromi dan pada kelanjutannya juga menjadi suatu negosiasi pertalian sosial. ......Studies have shown that informal relationships, such as friendships, are considered as more meaningful for employees in the workplace. The issue is that the current societal context rarely cultivates strong relationships for work. In the case of the ‘BM’ School, I have found that the employees are torn on this issue and that it affects their practice and experience of workplace-based relationships. Using in-depth interviews and participant observation, this research aims to examine the practice of social relations in the workplace, the reasoning behind them, and how the employees then act upon and negotiate through them. I also want to explain how the particular context of the workplace may affect the employees’ work experience. Based on the research findings, the BM employees’ experience of differentiation can be correlated with a history of kekeluargaan and kinship which contradicted the structural changes of BM to become more corporate-like. I argue that the tendency of employees to differentiate the two and to act according to their understandings of it shows a contradiction of values. On the other hand, when their actions are the opposite of that understanding, then a negotiation of values is occurring, which is generally relational. This shows that differing values, while acted upon, are also compromised, and hereinafter also becomes a negotiation of social ties.