Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Anak-anak usia sekolah cenderung mengonsumsi makanan tinggi lemak dan rendah serat termasuk sayur. Rendahnya konsumsi sayur pada periode ini dalam jangka pendek dapat menyebabkan kerusakan sel, lemahnya imunitas tubuh, ISPA, dan masalah pencernaan sedangkan dampak jangka panjangnya dapat meningkatkan risiko terkena penyakit kronis seperti penyakit jantung koroner, COPD, stroke, kardiovaskular, dan kanker. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan proporsi konsumsi sayur anak usia 10-11 tahun berdasarkan food neophobia dan faktor lainnya di SDN Polisi 1 Kota Bogor. Penelitian ini bersifat kuantitatif menggunakan desain studi cross sectional dengan jumlah sampel sebanyak 142 responden. Data dikumpulkan melalui pengisian kuesioner serta formulir food record 2x24 jam oleh responden. Data dianalisis menggunakan uji chi-square. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hanya 18,3% responden yang mengonsumsi sayur setiap hari dan rata-rata konsumsi sayur responden hanya 33,75 gram per hari. Analisis statistik menunjukkan adanya perbedaan proporsi konsumsi sayur yang bermakna berdasarkan faktor kesukaan, keyakinan diri, hambatan, dan preferensi sayur. Edukasi mengenai pentingnya konsumsi sayur perlu diberikan kepada anak usia sekolah serta orang tuanya untuk mencapai anjuran konsumsi sayur yang direkomendasikan.

---

School aged children tend to eat high-fat and low fiber foods, also low vegetable intake. Low vegetable consumption in this period cause cell damage, low imunity system, URI, and inflammatory bowel disease, besides long term effect can cause heart disease, COPD, stroke, CVD, and cancer. The study aims to determine the proportional differences of vegetable consumption in 10-11 years old children based on food neophobia and the other factos at Polisi 1 Public Elementary School in Bogor City. This quantitative study uses cross sectional design with 142 respondents. Data were collected through self-registered questionnaire and 2x24 hours food record form and analysed using chi-square test. The result showed that there were only 18,3% respondents who eat vegetables daily and only 33,75 gram vegetables consumed each day. Statistical analysis also showed a significant vegetable consumption differences based on liking, self efficacy, perceived barrier, and vegetable preferences. Nutrition education is needed for school aged children and their parents to reach daily vegetable recommendation intake.

Abstrak :
Salah satu kerangka teori yang banyak digunakan dalam menjelaskan tentang perilaku berkendara adalah Health Belief Model (HBM), namun sayangnya penelitian di Indonesia yang menggunakan kerangka teori tersebut masih terbatas. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji peran tiga komponen dari HBM, yaitu threat perception (perceived severity dan perceived susceptibility), behavior evaluation (perceived benefits dan perceived barriers), dan cues to action dalam memprediksi penggunaan helm pada pengendara sepeda motor. Penelitian dilakukan terhadap 294 pengendara sepeda motor berusia 18-24 tahun di Jabodetabek. Dalam pengukuran variabel, peneliti menggunakan alat ukur Health Belief Model dari Brijs et al. (2014) yang sudah terlebih dahulu diadaptasi oleh peneliti. Berdasarkan analisis regresi linear berganda, ditemukan bahwa perceived susceptibility, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, dan cues to action signifikan dalam memprediksi perilaku penggunaan helm pada pengendara sepeda motor. Akan tetapi, perceived severity tidak signifikan dalam memprediksi perilaku penggunana helm. Perceived susceptibility memiliki peran yang paling kuat dalam memprediksi perilaku penggunaan helm. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa pengendara sepeda motor dengan perceived susceptibility yang tinggi, perceived benefitsyang tinggi, perceived barriers yang rendah, dan cues to action cues to action yang rendah memiliki kecenderungan yang lebih tinggi untuk menggunakan helm sepeda motor. ......One of the most widely used theoretical frameworks in explaining driving behavior is the Health Belief Model (HBM), but unfortunately research in Indonesia that uses this theoretical framework is still limited. This current study is focused on testing three components of HBM, threat perception (perceived severity and perceived susceptibility), behavior evaluation (perceived benefits and perceived barriers), and cues to action to predict motorcycle helmet use. The participants of this study are 294 motorcycle riders aged 18-24 years old in Jabodetabek. Measurements of variables were performed using Health Belief Model measurement tools by Brijs et al. (2014) which has previously been adapted by the author. Based on multiple regression analysis, it is found that perceived susceptibility, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, and cues to action significantly predict motorcycle helmet use. However, perceived severity was not significant in predicting motorcycle helmet use. Perceived susceptibility has the biggest role in predicting motorcycle helmet use. This study concluded that motorcycle drivers who perceived a high level of perceived susceptibility, high perceived benefits, few barriers, and a few cues to action were the most likely to use a motorcycle helmet.

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui adanya bukti empiris bahwa perceived behavioral control, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, dan perceived susceptibility mampu memprediksi aktivitas fisik pada orang dewasa yang dalam riwayat keluarganya terdapat sejarah penyakit kardiovaskular. Tipe penelitian yang digunakan yaitu kuantitatif, dengan desain korelasional. Data terkumpul dari 101 partisipan dengan rentang usia 20-60 tahun (dewasa muda dan madya). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan tingkat aktivitas fisik berdasarkan usia, jenis kelamin, dan rutinitas melakukan aktivitas fisik. Analisis regresi berganda menunjukkan bahwa model yang terdiri dari keempat prediktor mampu memperkirakan 14% varians aktivitas fisik, dengan perceived behavioral control dan perceived susceptibility sebagai prediktor terbaik. Temuan ini mengkonfirmasi bahwa perceived behavioral control juga mampu memperkirakan aktivitas fisik pada populasi ini, serupa dengan berbagai populasi lain yang telah diteliti sebelumnya. Selain itu, individu yang memiliki keluarga dengan PKV memiliki pengalaman-pengalaman yang tampaknya membuat mereka mampu menaksir tingkat risiko terkena PKV dengan lebih akurat, yang pada gilirannya juga memberikan kontribusi pada tingkat aktivitas fisik. Dengan demikian, intervensi aktivitas fisik pada orang dewasa dengan riwayat keluarga PKV dapat mempertimbangkan kedua faktor ini. ......This study aims to find empirical evidence that perceived behavioral control, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, and perceived susceptibility are significant predictors of physical activity in adults with a family history of cardiovascular disease. The type of research used is quantitative, with a correlational design. Data were collected from 101 participants with an age range of 20-60 years (young and middle adults). The results showed that there was no difference in the level of physical activity based on age, gender and physical activity routines. Multiple regression analysis showed that the model consisting of the four predictors was able to explain 14% variance of physical activity, with perceived behavioral control and perceived susceptibility as the best predictors. These findings confirm that perceived behavioral control can also estimate physical activity in this population, similar to other populations that have been studied previously. In addition, individuals who have families with PKV have experiences that seem to enable them to assess their risk level for developing CVD more accurately, which in turn contributes to their level of physical activity. Thus, physical activity interventions in adults with a family history of CVD should consider both of these factors.