Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Summary: Offers an accessible introduction to the topic of impact evaluation and its practice in development. While the book is geared principally towards development practitioners and policymakers designing prospective impact evaluations, it will also be a valuable resource for students and others interested in using impact evaluation

Abstrak :
This paper aimed to see the impact of the development of the tourism sector during Indonesia's MidTerm Development Planning Period (RPJMN) 2015-2019. The analysis also aimed to contribute to the Terminal Evaluation of RPJMN 2015-2019. The implementation of this impact evaluation analyzes the achievement of tourism's primary target sector to the national economy and the welfare of individual workers and business units engaged in the field of tourism. The impact on the national economy is evaluated based on relevant secondary data. While the impact analysis on the welfare of individual workers and the tourism business unit carried out using primary data obtained through surveys. The field survey was conducted on June-July 2019, covering all provinces, 2.125 individual workers, and 1.082 business units participate as respondents. The proportional sampling method was used to determine the number of respondents in each province. The study found that during 2014- 2019, the competitiveness of the Indonesian tourism sector has increased and has encouraged the increasing number of foreign tourists to visit. The sector has experienced growth and contributes positively to the national economy. At the micro-level, the sector generated a positive impact on the tourism business unit as most of them were claiming to gain profit sustainably during that period. However, the impact was still limited in improving business units' ability to innovate in product development and the ability to generate new employment. There was also a minimal positive impact on the welfare of the sector's workers. In terms of the average earning per month, the welfare of workers in this sector is still relatively low compared to workers in all other sectors.

Abstrak :
Tren migrasi di Indonesia menunjukkan peningkatan dalam beberapa tahun terakhir sebagai konsekuensi dari perkembangan fasilitas transportasi dan komunikasi, serta jaringan sosial sehingga mempermudah individu dalam melakukan perpindahan antar daerah. Sebagian besar motif migrasi adalah mencari pekerjaan agar mendapatkan penghasilan dan kehidupan yang lebih baik. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dampak migrasi terhadap peningkatan kesejahteraan para pelakunya. Dengan menggunakan data Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS) tahun 2007 dan 2014 serta metode Propensity Score Matching, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa migrasi memiliki dampak positif terhadap peningkatan kesejahteraan para migran. Peningkatan kesejahteraan akibat migrasi lebih tinggi pada mereka yang berpendapatan tinggi dibandingkan mereka yang berpendapatan rendah.

---

Migration trends in Indonesia have shown an increase in recent years as a consequence of the development of transportation and communication facilities, along with social networks, so that making it easier for individuals to do inter-regional mobility. Most of the motives for migration are looking for a better job to get a better income and life. This study aims to analyze the effect of migration in improving the migrants welfare and analyze the change in poverty status for poor people who migrate. Using the Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS) dataset in 2007 and 2014, as well as the Propensity Score Matching method, this study found that migration has a positive impact on improving the migrants welfare. Improved welfare due to migration is higher in those who were initially more prosperous than those who were low income.

Abstrak :
[Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) adalah program bantuan tunai bersyarat pertama di Indonesia. PKH merupakan cara baru penanggulangan kemiskinan yang sekaligus memutus rantai kemiskinan generasi yang akan datang. Berbagai studi telah dilakukan untuk melihat dampak program ini. Secara umum studi-studi tersebut menunjukkan bahwa PKH mempunyai dampak yang positif. Studi ini bertujuan melihat dampak PKH terhadap kesejahteraan masyarakat di Kabupaten Brebes. Rancangan studi ini menggunakan uji kuantitatif pengeluaran konsumsi berbasis rumah tangga dengan pengukuran sebelum dan sesudah intervensi dan antara rumah tangga penerima program (treatment) dan rumah tangga bukan penerima program (control). Temuan penting studi ini adalah bahwa PKH secara signifikan meningkatkan rata-rata pengeluaran konsumsi rumah tangga peserta program sebesar Rp 60.798 per kapita per bulan atau sekitar 14 persen dibanding sebelum program.

---

Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) is the first conditional cash transfer program in Indonesia. PKH is a new way to reduce poverty and prevent the transmission of poverty to future generation. There have been a number of studies attempting to assess its impact. The overall studies found that PKH had positive impact. This study aims to assess the impact of PKH on welfare of people in Kabupaten Brebes. The methodology used in this study is household based intervention quantitative assessment with measurements before and after and compare different impact between participant household (treatment) and non participant household (control). Main finding of this study is that PKH was significantly improve the welfare of beneficiary households. Their average monthly expenditures increased by Rp 60.798 per person, equal to a 14 percent increase in comparison to pre-program level., Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) is the first conditional cash transfer program in Indonesia. PKH is a new way to reduce poverty and prevent the transmission of poverty to future generation. There have been a number of studies attempting to assess its impact. The overall studies found that PKH had positive impact. This study aims to assess the impact of PKH on welfare of people in Kabupaten Brebes. The methodology used in this study is household based intervention quantitative assessment with measurements before and after and compare different impact between participant household (treatment) and non participant household (control). Main finding of this study is that PKH was significantly improve the welfare of beneficiary households. Their average monthly expenditures increased by Rp 60.798 per person, equal to a 14 percent increase in comparison to pre-program level]

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Program Corporate Social Responsibility menjadi fokus dalam penelitian ini. Secara khusus penelitian ini meneliti mengenai strategi komunikasi yang dijalankan oleh organisasi dalam upaya pencapaian objektif formal dari program CSR. Teori yang menjadi pedoman dalam penyusunan tesis ini adalah The Management Strategic yang dikemukakan oleh Grunig (1992). Grunig menyatakan bahwa untuk mencapai tujuan dari organisasi maka perlu dilakukan tujuh langkah yang dilakukan secara bertahap yaitu analisis stakeholders, analisis pubik, analisis isu, menyusun objektif formal, perencanaan, implementasi dan evaluasi.

Metodologi yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metodologi kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskripsi. Unit observasi dalam penelitian ini adalah CCFI, SBS dan ketiga target sasaran PerpuSeru, yaitu perempuan, pemuda dan pengusaha Usaha Kecil Menengah. Pengamatan yang hanya didasari kedekatan latar belakang budaya tidak cukup untuk memahami karakteristik target sasaran. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa memahami target sasaran menjadi kunci utama keberhasilan sebuah program.

---

ABSTRACT
The Corporate Social Responsibility program is the focus of this study. Specifically, this study examines the communication strategies undertaken by the organization in achieving the objective of formal CSR programs. Theories that guide in the preparation of this thesis is The Managemen Strategic by Public Realtion proposed by Grunig (1992). Grunig states that to achieve the goals of the organization, it is necessary to seven steps undertaken in stages: analysis of stakeholders, pubic analysis, issue analysis, establish a formal objective, planning strategy and tactics, implementing strategic and tactics and evaluate the impact of the strategy and tactics.

The methodology used in this study is a qualitative methodology to approach the description. The unit of observation in this study is CCFI, SBS and strategic publis of PerpuSeru, namely women, youth and entrepreneurs. Observations were only based on the proximity of cultural background is not enough to understand the characteristics of the target. This study concludes that the target understands the key of the success of a program.

Abstrak :
Dalam upaya memberikan perlindungan sosial terhadap masyarakat miskin dari risiko kesehatan, pemerintah Indonesia mengimplementasikan program jaminan kesehatan sosial bersubsidi bagi masyarakat miskin Askeskin. Program ini kemudian diperluas target dan manfaatnya menjadi Jamkesmas. Penelitian ini meneliti dampak jaminan kesehatan bagi masyarakat miskin terhadap utilisasi layanan kesehatan berupa jumlah kunjungan rawat jalan dan rawat inap, proporsi belanja kesehatan terhadap pengeluaran rumah tangga, serta self-assessed health. Analisis dilakukan pada semua populasi dan subpopulasi termiskin kuintil pertama dalam populasi . Peneliti menggunakan metode propensity score matching dan difference-in-difference untuk analisis data Indonesia Family Life Survey IFLS tahun 2000, 2007 dan 2014. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan program jaminan kesehatan bagi masyarakat miskin memiliki dampak positif signifikan terhadap jumlah kunjungan rawat jalan dan rawat inap; di sisi lain program tidak memiliki dampak signifikan terhadap proporsi belanja kesehatan rumah tangga dan self-assessed health. Program jaminan kesehatan bagi masyarakat miskin secara signifikan telah meningkatkan akses masyarakat miskin terhadap layanan kesehatan, namun tidak signifikan melindungi masyarakat miskin dari risiko belanja kesehatan dan tidak signifikan meningkatkan kualitas kesehatan masyarakat miskin. ......To improve the poor's access to healthcare services, the Indonesian government introduced Askeskin, a subsidized social health insurance for the poor. Later, Askeskin had policy expansion and became Jamkesmas. We examine the effects of this social health insurance for the poor on health services utilization-outpatient visits, inpatient admissions, household budget share of health spending, and self assessed health. We analyze all samples and the poorest 1st quartile of the sample. Using propensity score matching and difference in difference matching strategies on Indonesia Family Life Survey IFLS datasets 2000, 2007 and 2014, we find the insurance have positive significant impact on outpatient visits and inpatient admissions it does not seem to have significant impact on household budget share of health spending and self assessed health, however. This finding suggests that social health insurance for the poor increases health services utilization outpatient visits and inpatient admissions, on the other hand it does not significantly protect the poor from health spending and not significantly improve health outcome of the poor.

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini menganalisis evaluasi dampak MPA untuk memahami perubahan dan kemajuan implementasi kebijakan. Penelitian terdahulu menyebutkan bahwa penetapan MPA merupakan suatu upaya untuk konservasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan tiga lokasi MPA dan kabupatennya Kabupaten Kepulauan Anambas, Kabupaten Padang Pariaman dan Kabupaten Berau dan kabupaten yang bukan lokasi MPA di Provinsi Kepulauan Riau, Sumatera Barat dan Kalimantan Timur untuk analisis mean difference, serta sebanyak 22 kabupaten MPA dan Non MPA tahun 2006-2016 untuk analisis regresi.Hasil analisis CPUE dengan mean difference antara MPA dan kabupaten tempat MPA berada dan analisis dengan membandingkan tingkat CPUE antara kabupaten dengan MPA dan kabupaten tanpa MPA menghasilkan mean CPUE di lokasi MPA yang berbeda signifikan dibandingkan dengan kabupaten tempat MPA. Mean CPUE juga menunjukkan hasil yang berbeda signifikan pada kabupaten yang merupakan lokasi MPA dibandingkan dengan kabupaten yang tidak memiliki MPA. Hasil analisis regresi menunjukkan bahwa penetapan MPA akan berpengaruh signifikan terhadap CPUE. Dimana penetapan MPA di kabupaten akan meningkatkan CPUE.

---

This study analyzes the MPA impact evaluation to understand the changes and progress of policy implementation. Previous research has suggested that MPA determination is an attempt to conserve. This study used three MPA and district locations Anambas Islands District, Padang Pariaman and Berau Districts and non MPA districts in Riau Islands Province, West Sumatra and East Kalimantan for mean difference analysis, as well as 22 MPA and Non MPA districts of the year 2006 2016 for regression analysis.The result of CPUE analysis with mean difference between MPA and district where MPA is located and analysis by comparing CPUE level between districts with MPA and districts without MPA produces CPUE mean in MPA location which is significantly different compared to district where MPA. Mean CPUE also shows significantly different results in districts that are the location of MPA compared to districts that do not have MPA. The result of regression analysis shows that the determination of MPA will have a significant effect on CPUE. Where the determination of MPA in the district will increase CPUE.

Abstrak :
Pada tahun 2015, pemerintah Indonesia meluncurkan program Dana Desa dan memberikan skema ‘1-Desa-1-Miliar’ untuk setiap desa di Indonesia. Sebagai salah satu transfer antar pemerintah terbesar di dunia, Dana Desa bertujuan untuk mempercepat pembangunan pedesaan, mengurangi kemiskinan, dan mengatasi ketimpangan regional. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi dampak Dana Desa terhadap kesejahteraan pedesaan dan ketimpangan wilayah di Indonesia. Studi ini menggunakan data cahaya malam sebagai proksi kesejahteraan pedesaan dan selanjutnya digunakan untuk mengukur ketimpangan regional. Dengan menggunakan Difference in Difference (DiD) kami menemukan dampak positif dana desa terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi di desa dalam jangka pendek. Dengan menggunakan Regression Discontinuity Design in Time (RDiT), kami menemukan dampak positif transfer Dana Desa terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi di  desa dalam jangka menengah. Pengaruh dana desa yang paling besar terungkap di desa tertinggal, di mana desa tertinggal tumbuh lebih cepat daripada desa maju. Hal ini menunjukkan indikasi awal konvergensi di level desa yang memerlukan penelitian lebih lanjut. ......In 2015, the government of Indonesia launched the Village Fund (VF) program and provided the ‘1-Village-1-Billion’ scheme for each village in Indonesia. As one of the largest intergovernmental transfers in the world, the VF aims to accelerate rural development, reduce poverty, and overcome regional inequality. This study aims to identify the impact of the VF on rural welfare in Indonesia. Due to the lack of rural welfare data, we use the monthly night-time light dataset as a proxy for rural welfare in around 75.000 villages from 2014 to 2019. By using Difference in Difference (DiD), we found the short-run positive impact of village funds on rural economic growth. Using Regression Discontinuity Design in Time (RDiT), we found a positive impact of village fund transfer on rural economic growth in the medium run. The most considerable influence of village funds reveals in underdeveloped villages,  where poor villages grow faster than developed villages. This unexpected finding could be an initial convergence at the village level that requires further investigation.

Abstrak :
Abstract. This paper discusses a program evaluation study on Community Information Group. It is a program that is established by the Ministry of Communication and Information, which is based on the Ministerial Decree No. 8/2010. Through the program, the government is expected to disseminate public information and, simultaneously, the community will be able to voice their concerns and needs. This research used an exploratory survey with a sequential exploratory. In the qualitative analysis, we interviewed 15 key persons to understand the nature of the program and the impact of the access to information. This is enriched with a quantitative analysis. A closed-ended questionnaire was used to survey 62 respondents. The evaluation method was randomized post-test only group design. This research utilized a case study of research design with the Community Information Group of Sukabungah Village - Bandung, because it is regarded as one of the best practices of CommunityInformation Group in Bandung City. Furthermore, Sukagalih Village was used as the control group of the evaluation program study. Dolbeare's model of policy impact was also used in this research. We constructed a causal logic of the program to fully understand the program itself. It is evident from the findings that a set of activities in this program did not meet its expectedimpact. Further, even though the activities are useful for the citizens, the citizens already had access to the same activities provided by other programs. It can be concluded that the establishment of the Community Information Group is inefficient. Hence the Community Information Group program should be re-designed to maximize the impact or otherwise be terminated. abstrak. Makalah ini merupakan studi evaluasi program Kelompok Informasi Masyarakat (KIM), yaitu program yang dibentuk berdasarkan pada Keputusan Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika RI No. 8 Tahun 2010. Program KIM bertujuan untuk menyediakan media bagi pemerintah untuk melakukan diseminasi informasi dan sebaliknya bagi masyarakat untuk menyuarakanpendapat, aspirasi dan kebutuhannya. Makalah ini merupakan hasil penelitian dengan menggunakan metode survei eksploratori yaitu eksploratori bertahap. Data-data dikumpulkan dari wawancara dengan 15 narasumber dan penyebaran kuesioner terhadap 62 responden. Metode evaluasi yang digunakan adalah desain randomized-post-test-only. Dua wilayah penelitian dalam penelitian ini adalah kelurahan Sukabungah yang merupakan kelompok eksperimen dimana di dalam kelurahan ini terdapat KIM, dan kelurahan Sukagalih yang merupakan kelompok kontrol yang akan digunakan sebagai pembanding analisa. Kerangka evaluasi yang digunakan untuk memahami logika program KIM adalah kerangka evaluasi dampak menurut Dolbeare. Temuan dalam penelitian ini adalah dampak yang terekam tidak sesuai dengan tujuan program KIM. Hal tersebut dibuktikan dengananalisa perbandingan temuan di dua wilayah penelitian. Kedua wilayah tersebut memiliki tingkat akses terhadap informasi yang sama. Namun peningkatan akses terhadap informasi dalam kelompok kontrol merupakan dampak dari program-program lain. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah program KIM tidak efisien mencapai tujuan dan dampaknya sehingga perlu untuk di desain ulang atau justru dihentikan.

Abstrak :
Abstract. This paper discusses a program evaluation study on Community Information Group. It is a program that is established by the Ministry of Communication and Information, which is based on the Ministerial Decree No. 8/2010. Through the program, the government is expected to disseminate public information and, simultaneously, the community will be able to voice their concerns and needs. This research used an exploratory survey with a sequential exploratory. In the qualitative analysis, we interviewed 15 key persons to understand the nature of the program and the impact of the access to information. This is enriched with a quantitative analysis. A closed-ended questionnaire was used to survey 62 respondents. The evaluation method was randomized post-test only group design. This research utilized a case study of research design with the Community Information Group of Sukabungah Village - Bandung, because it is regarded as one of the best practices of CommunityInformation Group in Bandung City. Furthermore, Sukagalih Village was used as the control group of the evaluation program study. Dolbeare's model of policy impact was also used in this research. We constructed a causal logic of the program to fully understand the program itself. It is evident from the findings that a set of activities in this program did not meet its expectedimpact. Further, even though the activities are useful for the citizens, the citizens already had access to the same activities provided by other programs. It can be concluded that the establishment of the Community Information Group is inefficient. Hence the Community Information Group program should be re-designed to maximize the impact or otherwise be terminated. abstrak. Makalah ini merupakan studi evaluasi program Kelompok Informasi Masyarakat (KIM), yaitu program yang dibentuk berdasarkan pada Keputusan Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika RI No. 8 Tahun 2010. Program KIM bertujuan untuk menyediakan media bagi pemerintah untuk melakukan diseminasi informasi dan sebaliknya bagi masyarakat untuk menyuarakanpendapat, aspirasi dan kebutuhannya. Makalah ini merupakan hasil penelitian dengan menggunakan metode survei eksploratori yaitu eksploratori bertahap. Data-data dikumpulkan dari wawancara dengan 15 narasumber dan penyebaran kuesioner terhadap 62 responden. Metode evaluasi yang digunakan adalah desain randomized-post-test-only. Dua wilayah penelitian dalam penelitian ini adalah kelurahan Sukabungah yang merupakan kelompok eksperimen dimana di dalam kelurahan ini terdapat KIM, dan kelurahan Sukagalih yang merupakan kelompok kontrol yang akan digunakan sebagai pembanding analisa. Kerangka evaluasi yang digunakan untuk memahami logika program KIM adalah kerangka evaluasi dampak menurut Dolbeare. Temuan dalam penelitian ini adalah dampak yang terekam tidak sesuai dengan tujuan program KIM. Hal tersebut dibuktikan dengananalisa perbandingan temuan di dua wilayah penelitian. Kedua wilayah tersebut memiliki tingkat akses terhadap informasi yang sama. Namun peningkatan akses terhadap informasi dalam kelompok kontrol merupakan dampak dari program-program lain. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah program KIM tidak efisien mencapai tujuan dan dampaknya sehingga perlu untuk di desain ulang atau justru dihentikan.