Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Tesis ini membahas mengenai kedudukan Hak Milik atas tanah yang berada diatas tanah Hak Pengelolaan di Komplek Kemayoran. Diterbitkannya sertipikat Hak Milik dengan penunjuk bahwa ?Tanah ini berdiri diatas Hak Pengelolaan No.1/Gunung Sahari Utara?, maka Hak Milik tersebut akan tetap memenuhi sifatnya sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 20 UUPA atau tidak dan bagaimana penyelesaian Hukum Tanah Nasional di Indonesia atas permasalahan hukum tersebut. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kepustakaan yang bersifat normatif, yaitu dilakukan dengan cara mengkaji berbagai peraturan perundang-undangan dan literatur yang berkaitan dengan permasalahan yang diteliti. ......The focus of this thesis is discuss the legal status of Right of Ownership. The published of Certificate of Right of Ownership with the bookmark that ?The land is standing over the Right of Management (Hak Pengelolaan) No. 1/Gunung Sahari Utara?, means fulfill the nature of the Right of Ownership as stipulated in article 20 of Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria or do not fulfill and the settlement by Indonesian Law of Land. This research is normative juridische, conducted by way of reviewing laws and regulations, and literatures which related to the research.

Abstrak :
Analisis yang dilakukan dalam penulisan ini adalah mengenai penguasaan Hak Milik oleh Warga Negara Asing berdasarkan "Nominee Arrangeraent". Persoalan muncul karena Hak Milik bukanlah hak yang dapat dikuasai oleh Warga Negara Asing tapi Warga Negara Asing tersebut tetap ingin menguasai Hak Milik. Maka dibuatlah "Nominee Arrangement" agar Warga Negara Asing bisa menguasai Hak Milik. Yang menjadi pokok permasalahan adalah Bagaimanakah hukum di Indonesia menyelesaikan sengketa tanah yang terjadi karena penguasaan tanah Hak Milik oleh Warga Negara Asing berdasarkan "Nominee Arrangement" dan Apakah Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2236 K/Pdt/2004 dalam memutus sengketa tersebut sudah benar. Untuk menjawab permasalahan hukum dalam kasus yang dimaksud maka dilakukan penelitian normati£ yang bersifat deskriptif analitis untuk menggambarkan teori-teori hukum dalam praktek dan pelaksanaannya berkenaan dengan permasalahan yang ada. Dari penelitian tersebut dapat diketahui bahwa penyelesaian sengketa apabila ada warga Negara asing yang memiliki Hak Milik berdasrkan "Nominee Arrangement" menurut hukum di Indonesia adalah cacat hukum oleh karena itu dapat dibatalkan. Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2236 K/Pdt/2004 sudah tepat, karena perbuatan hukum pemindahan Hak Milik berdasarkan "Nominee Arrangement" adalah cacat hukum dan karenanya dibatalkan oleh putusan pengadilan.

Abstrak :
Ketidak cocokan antara status tanah yang tersedia, degan subjek calon pemilik hak atas tanah, membuat beberapa pihak memikirkan berbagai cara untuk dapat memiliki bidang tanah yang diinginkan, salah satunya dengan cara Nominee. Seperti Tanah Hak Milik yang sudah jelas dalam peraturan perundang-undangan, hanya dapat dimiliki oleh Warga Negara Indonesia. Namun belakangan sering terjadi pmbelian tanah dengan status tanah Hak Milik yang mana pembelian tersebut di latar belakangi sebuah perjanjian Nominee yang dibuat dalam bentuk akta Notaris. Sehingga timbul masalah mengenai bagaimanakah Hukum Tanah Nasional mengatur mengenai pembelian bidang tanah dengan Nominee dan akibat hukum seperti apa yang timbul dari jual beli tanah Hak Milik dengan adanya Nominee. Penelitian ini bersifat Yuridis Normatif, dimana memperhatikan efektifitas asas-asas, sistematika hukum dalam UUPA dan PP 24/1997. Notaris sebagai jabatan kepercayaan seharusnya tidak malah memuluskan tindakan yang mengarah pada penyeludupan hukum. ......The discrepancy between the status of the land with the subject of the prospective owner of the rights to the land , making some party thinking of ways to be able to have a land in Indonesia, one way is Nominee. Hak Milik Land already clear in the legislation, can only be owned by Indonesian citizens . But lately, phurcase common ground with soil status Proprietary where such purchases in the background backs a nominee agreement made ??in the form of notarial deed . Which raised the question of how the National Land Law governing the purchase of plots of land with the nominee and what the legal consequences arising from the sale and purchase of Hak Milik land by the nominee . This research is normative juridical , where attention to the effectiveness of the principles , legal systematics in UUPA and PP 24/1997 . Notary as a position of trust should not even pave the actions that lead to smuggling law .

Abstrak :
Tanah adalah salah satu kebutuhan dasar manusia. Hak atas tanah memberikan nilai ekonomis bagi para pemegang haknya yang bermuara pada peningkatan kesejahteraan. Namun, hak atas tanah bukanlah instrumen investasi sehingga pemanfaatannya harus mengedepankan fungsi sosial. Berdasarkan karakteristiknya, hak milik atas tanah menjadi hak atas tanah yang paling diingini oleh seluruh masyarakat termasuk Dosen dan Karyawan di lingkungan Universitas Tanjungpura Pontianak yang memperoleh hak atas tanah melalui pembelian berdasarkan Keputusan Menteri Negara Agraria/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 2 Tahun 1998 tentang Pemberian Hak Milik atas Tanah untuk Rumah Tinggal yang Telah Dibeli oleh Pegawai Negeri dari Pemerintah. Akan tetapi, sertipikat tanda bukti hak yang diterbitkan ternyata memuat cap/stempel bertuliskan larangan pengalihan hak sebelum pemegang hak menjalani masa pensiun. Cap/stempel yang didasarkan dari Surat Keputusan Rektor Universitas Tanjungpura tertanggal 28 November 2002 nomor 964a/J22/LK/2002 tentang Penetapan Perubahan/Pengalihan Letak Lokasi Kavling Tanah bagi Dosen dan karyawan yang membeli Tanah di Komplek Universitas Tanjungpura. Larangan pengalihan tersebut menangguhkan keleluasaan bagi pemegang hak atas tanah dan hal ini sangat bertentangan dengan prinsip hak milik atas tanah sebagai hak turun temurun, terkuat dan terpenuh yang dikehendaki oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-pokok Agraria. Dalam perjalanannya, muncul berbagai kebutuhan mendesak yang memaksa pemegang hak untuk mengalihkan hak atas tanahnya sebelum menjalani masa pensiun. Pemegang hak atas tanah kemudian melakukan tindakan pemindahan hak melalui lembaga perjanjian pengikatan jual beli dihadapan notaris. Hukum positif mensyaratkan bahwa jual beli hak atas tanah harus dilakukan dihadapan pejabat umum pertanahan yang berwenang, yakni Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah. Dengan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, Penulis hendak menganalisa pemberian hak atas tanah dimaksud dan sejauhmana perlindungan hukum bagi para pihak yang melakukan perjanjian pengikatan jual beli mengenai peralihan hak atas tanah. ......Land is one of human's basic needs. Land right gives an economical value for holders, which ending up on welfare increases. However, land rights are not the investment tools, in which the benefit should be prioritized on the substantial of social function. Based on its characteristics, land's ownership becomes people's most wanted rights, as accepted by Lecturers and Staffs in Tanjungpura University Pontianak. They acquired the ownership of land rights through the purchasing by the State Minister of Agrarian Affairs/Head of National Agency Number 2 of 1998 on the Granting of Ownership on Residential Land to Have Purchased by Civil Servant of the Government. However, the receipt of certificate issued contains of stamp in which state prohibition to transfer the rights to others before the rights holder is prior to the retirement. The stamp is based on the Tanjungpura University Rector's Decree dated 28 November 2002 on the Determination 964a/J22/LK/2002 number Change/Transfer of Location of Land Lot Locations for Lecturers and Staff who Purchased Land at Tanjungpura University's Complex. This prohibition to transfer the right suspends the discretion for the rights holders and it is contrary with the principle of rights on land as an inheritable right, the strongest and fullest right on land and transferable to other parties as stated by the Act Number 5 of 1960 on Basic Agrarian Law. As happened after that, there are many urgent needs that may force the holders to turn their ownership of land rights before the retirement period. The land holders later on transfered the rights before the notary with binding sale and purchase contract. The positive law requires that sale and purchase of land rights should do before the public official land officers, Land Deed Officer. Using the normative juridical research method, the author wants to analyze the granting of land rights and how far the legal protection for the parties who made the binding contract of the sale and purchase transfer of land rights.

Abstrak :
Tesis ini membahas mengenai kepastian hukum bagi pemegang Sertifikat Hak Milik atas Tanah terhadap gugatan dari pihak lain, dengan menganalisa Putusan PN Nomor : 27/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel). Bagaimana kekuatan Sertipikat Hak Milik atas Tanah sebagai alat bukti dalam pengadilan dan bagaimana hakim memutuskan pihak mana yang dimenangkan. Metode penulisan yang dipakai adalah metode yuridis normatif yang merupakan penelitian yang menekankan pada penggunaan data sekunder berupa norma hukum tertulis. Teknik analisa yang digunakan adalah analisis kualitatif, yaitu dari data sekunder yang telah dikumpulkan dan diolah untuk perumusan kesimpulan untuk memperoleh jawaban yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan mengenai kepastian hukum bagi pemegang Sertipikat Hak Milik atas Tanah terhadap gugatan dari pihak lain. Di bagian akhir disimpulkan bahwa penting bagi pemilik tanah untuk melakukan pendaftaran tanah dan memiliki Sertipikat Hak Milik atas Tanah. Karena di muka Pengadilan meskipun bukan sebagai alat bukti yang mutlak, Sertipikat Hak Milik atas Tanah merupakan alat bukti yang kuat. Pemegang Sertipikat Hak Milik atas Tanah meskipun masih dapat digugat oleh pihak lain akan tetapi memiliki kekuatan hukum atas haknya selama pihak yang menggugat tidak dapat membuktikan sebaliknya. ......This thesis discusses the rule of law for the holders of certificate of land ownership against third party lawsuit by analyzing district court decision number 27/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel. The analysis includes whether a certificate of land ownership can be determined as evidence before court and how judges rule the prevailing party in the dispute. The research method employed in this study was normative juridical methodwhich focused on secondary datum of formal legal principles. Moreover, the analysis technique used in this thesis was qualitative analysis. The data source for the analysis was collected from secondary datum which had been processed in order to draw a reliable conclusion regarding the rule of law for the holder of certificate of land ownership. In conclusion, the writer concluded the significance of land registration and the possession of land certificate by land owners. Even though, the certificate of land ownership does not have absolute and binding verification strength before court, it can be formally admitted as proper evidence in court proceeding. The certificate holder is entitled for his right of ownership, unless other party can prove otherwise.

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Tesis ini membahas mengenai pembatasan terhadap Warga Negara Indonesia Keturunan Tionghoa untuk memperoleh tanah dengan status Hak Milik di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, dengan didasarkan pada Instruksi Kepala Daerah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Nomor K/898/I/A/1975 tentang Penyeragaman Policy Pemberian Hak Atas Tanah Kepada Seorang Warga Negara Indonesia Non Pribumi. Metode yang digunakan bersifat yuridis normatif, sedangkan metode analisis data yang digunakan ialah metode kualitatif. Hasil pembahasan menyatakan bahwa dengan didasarkan pada praturan tersebut, Warga Negara Indonesia keturunan Tionghoa tidak dapat memiliki tanah dengan status Hak Milik di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, dan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria tidak sepenuhnya berlaku di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.

---

ABSTRACT
This thesis is about the restrictions for Indonesian Citizens of Chinese Descendant to own a land with proprietary status in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (Yogyakarta Special Region), based on Instruksi Kepala Daerah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Nomor K/898/I/A/1975 tentang Penyeragaman Policy Pemberian Hak Atas Tanah Kepada Seorang Warga Negara Indonesia Non Pribumi. The method used for this thesis is juridicial normative, and the qualitative method is used for data analysis. This study concludes that based on the regulation, Indonesian citizens of Chinese Descendant are not eligible to own a land in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta with proprietary status, and Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria is not copmpletely enforced in Special Region of Yogyakarta (Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta).

Abstrak :
Pasal 20-27 Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria mengatur tentang kepemilikan tanah hak milik di Indonesia termasuk didalamnya telah ditetapkan subjek hak milik dan akibat-akibat hukum jika hak milik jatuh ketangan pihak asing. Bentuk penyelundupan hukum yang umum dilakukan adalah dengan mengadakan perjanjian nominee. Praktek nominee agreement dapat menjadi bumerang bagi pihak asing karena sertipikat atas nama beneficiary maka secara jurudis mereka adalah pemilik sah tanah hak milik tersebut. Penulis berusaha menjelaskan resiko yang akan ditanggung oleh orang asing serta penulis berharap dapat memberikan saran bagi orang asing maupun kepada Pemerintah Indonesia sehubungan dengan praktek nominee agreement.

---

The Indonesia Agrarian Law (Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria) article 20-27 regulate land ownership in Indonesia, including the owner and legal implications in the case that land ownership falls to the hand of foreign national. The normal practice to circumvent this obstacle is in the form of signing a Nominee Agreement. This practice may well be a boomerang for foreign national involved, due to the fact that the land ownership certificate is under the name of the nominee (beneficiary) thus legally they are the rightful owner of the land. The author attempts to discuss the risk towards the foreign national involved and in the same time wishes to convey suggestion to the Indonesian government in relation to the utilization of Nominee Agreement.

Abstrak :
Larangan untuk orang asing mempunyai hak milik atas tanah sudah diatur secara tegas pada berbagai pasal dalam Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria (UUPA). Namun, masih banyak orang asing yang berusaha mempunyai tanah dengan hak milik. Mereka mengesampingkan larangan dalam UUPA tersebut dengan melakukan praktik nominee arrangement, yakni membuat seperangkat perjanjian antara warga negara Indonesia dengan orang asing yang memberikan orang asing kewenangan untuk melakukan segala perbuatan hukum terhadap tanah. Praktik semacam ini sebagaimana dapat dilihat dalam 5 (lima) putusan yang menjadi bahan analisis, yakni putusan antara Karpika Wati melawan Alain Maurice Pons dan Eddy Nyoman Winarta, S.H. (PN Denpasar, 2014), Dodi Usman melawan dr. Marc van Loo, Notaris H. Abdul Rahman, S.H., Elias Ola Perlolon (PN Tanjung Pinang, 2020), Louise Marie France Sumadi melawan Desak Nyoman Karmini, PT Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Padma, Alfred Victor Weiss, Notaris Ida Ayu Trisna Winarti Kusuma, S.H., Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional Kabupaten Badung, dan Kho Tjauw Tiam (PN Denpasar, 2020), Lambertus Hugo Johannes Maria Pruest melawan Shinta Purnamawati (PN Depok, 2019), serta putusan antara Antoni Suyanto melawan Marcus Lerijen dan Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Lombok Barat (PN Mataram, 2017). Praktik ini menimbulkan persoalan Hukum Perdata Internasional (HPI) akibat adanya unsur asing. Prof. Maria Sumardjono dan Prof. Sudargo Gautama menyebut praktik terkait sebagai penyelundupan hukum. Berdasarkan latar belakang tersebut, dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis-normatif, diadakanlah penelitian yang bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana praktik ini dilakukan di Indonesia beserta aspek-aspek HPI yang ada di dalamnya. Selain itu, untuk mengidentifikasi bidang hukum apa yang terjadi dalam penyelundupan hukum yang dimaksud kedua ahli tersebut. ......The prohibition for foreigners having the right of land ownership has been strictly regulated in various articles in Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Principles (UUPA). However, there are still many foreigners who try to have land with ownership rights. They overrule the mentioned prohibition in UUPA by carrying out the practice of a nominee arrangement, namely making a set of agreements with Indonesian citizens that give foreigners the authority to take all legal actions upon the related land. This kind of practice can be seen in 5 (five) decisions which become the analysis materials, namely the decisions between Karpika Wati against Alain Maurice Pons and Eddy Nyoman Winarta, S.H. (Denpasar District Court, 2014), Dodi Usman against dr. Marc van Loo, Notary H. Abdul Rahman, S.H., Elias Ola Perlolon (Tanjung Pinang District Court, 2020), Louise Marie France Sumadi against Desak Nyoman Karmini, PT Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Padma, Alfred Victor Weiss, Notary Ida Ayu Trisna Winarti Kusuma, S.H. , Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency for Badung Regency, and Kho Tjauw Tiam (Denpasar District Court, 2020), Lambertus Hugo Johannes Maria Pruest against Shinta Purnamawati (Depok District Court, 2019), as well as the decision between Antoni Suyanto against Marcus Lerijen and the Land Office West Lombok Regency (PN Mataram, 2017). This practice gives rise to a Private International Law (PIL) issue due to the presence of foreign elements. Prof. Maria Sumardjono and Prof. Sudargo Gautama called the related practice as a legal smuggling. Based on this background, using the juridical-normative research method, this paper is conducted which aims to analyze how this practice is carried out in Indonesia and the PIL aspects contained therein. In addition to that, to identify what field of law occurs in the legal smuggling referred to by the two experts.

Abstrak :
[ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini menganalisis keabsahan akta jual beli dan surat di Bawah tangan berupa pinjam pakai sertipikat tentang peralihan hak sertipikat hak milik nomor 66/ Pakutandang/ Ciparay/ Bandung/ Jawa Barat, dengan Studi Kasus: Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bandung No:404/ PDT/ G/ 2010/ PN.BDG). Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan merumuskan 2 (dua) permasalahan utama, yaitu mengenai bagaimana keabsahan akta jual beli dan surat di bawah tangan yaitu berupa pinjam pakai sertipikat dan apa dampak dari tidak pahamnya akibat hukum dari penandatanganan akta jual beli tersebut. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah diharapkan agar supaya kita jangan terlalu gampang meminjamkan sertipikat kepada orang lain sebagai alas untuk meminta kredit dan agar Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) lebih cermat dan teliti dalam memastikan apakah obyek jual beli tersebut telah sesuai dengan Asas Terang, Tunai dan Riil atau Nyata. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum dengan pendekatan secara yuridis normatif, mempergunakan data sekunder yang diperoleh dari studi kepustakaan, dan hasil penelitian bersifat analitis kualitatif, karena ditujukan untuk memberikan data yang seteliti mungkin tentang sifat-sifat hubungan hukum, keadaan atau gejala- gejala tertentu dalam suatu tindakan hukum. Penelitian ini menghasilkan kesimpulan bahwa kesalahan yang berupa persetujuan dalam akta jual beli terhadap tanah dan bangunan dapat mengakibatkan hak milik atas tanah dan bangunan jadi berpindah ke orang lain.

---

ABSTRACT
This study analyzes the validity of the deed of sale and purchase, also the letter of lease certificate in transfer of property rights certificate number: 66/ Pakutandang/ Ciparay/ Bandung/ Jawa Barat, with case studies: Resolution of Distric Court of Bandung Numb:404/ PDT/ G/ 2010/ PN.BDG. This research is done by formulating 2 (two) main issues. First, in relation to the validity of the deed of sale and purchase, also the letter of lease certificate, and second, is the impact of the ignorance in signing such deed. The purpose of this research is we shall not easily in lending certificate to anyone else as the legal base in accepting credit?s request, in the other hand, the Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah shall be more careful in ensuring whether the object of such sale and purchase has appropriate enough with Indonesia?s legal foundation in sale and purchase transaction, namely clear, cash and real. This reasearch is legal reasearch with juridicial normative approach, which uses secondary data which is got from library study, and the result of reasearch are qualitative analyzed, because it has purpose in providing the clearest legal data, in regarding to any legal relationship, legal matters or legal phenomenon in certain legal action. This reasearch generates conclusion that the fault in form of agreement in the deed of sale and purchase of land and building will impact the transfer of ownership right of land and building.;This study analyzes the validity of the deed of sale and purchase, also the letter of lease certificate in transfer of property rights certificate number: 66/ Pakutandang/ Ciparay/ Bandung/ Jawa Barat, with case studies: Resolution of Distric Court of Bandung Numb:404/ PDT/ G/ 2010/ PN.BDG. This research is done by formulating 2 (two) main issues. First, in relation to the validity of the deed of sale and purchase, also the letter of lease certificate, and second, is the impact of the ignorance in signing such deed. The purpose of this research is we shall not easily in lending certificate to anyone else as the legal base in accepting credit?s request, in the other hand, the Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah shall be more careful in ensuring whether the object of such sale and purchase has appropriate enough with Indonesia?s legal foundation in sale and purchase transaction, namely clear, cash and real. This reasearch is legal reasearch with juridicial normative approach, which uses secondary data which is got from library study, and the result of reasearch are qualitative analyzed, because it has purpose in providing the clearest legal data, in regarding to any legal relationship, legal matters or legal phenomenon in certain legal action. This reasearch generates conclusion that the fault in form of agreement in the deed of sale and purchase of land and building will impact the transfer of ownership right of land and building.;This study analyzes the validity of the deed of sale and purchase, also the letter of lease certificate in transfer of property rights certificate number: 66/ Pakutandang/ Ciparay/ Bandung/ Jawa Barat, with case studies: Resolution of Distric Court of Bandung Numb:404/ PDT/ G/ 2010/ PN.BDG. This research is done by formulating 2 (two) main issues. First, in relation to the validity of the deed of sale and purchase, also the letter of lease certificate, and second, is the impact of the ignorance in signing such deed. The purpose of this research is we shall not easily in lending certificate to anyone else as the legal base in accepting credit?s request, in the other hand, the Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah shall be more careful in ensuring whether the object of such sale and purchase has appropriate enough with Indonesia?s legal foundation in sale and purchase transaction, namely clear, cash and real. This reasearch is legal reasearch with juridicial normative approach, which uses secondary data which is got from library study, and the result of reasearch are qualitative analyzed, because it has purpose in providing the clearest legal data, in regarding to any legal relationship, legal matters or legal phenomenon in certain legal action. This reasearch generates conclusion that the fault in form of agreement in the deed of sale and purchase of land and building will impact the transfer of ownership right of land and building.;This study analyzes the validity of the deed of sale and purchase, also the letter of lease certificate in transfer of property rights certificate number: 66/ Pakutandang/ Ciparay/ Bandung/ Jawa Barat, with case studies: Resolution of Distric Court of Bandung Numb:404/ PDT/ G/ 2010/ PN.BDG. This research is done by formulating 2 (two) main issues. First, in relation to the validity of the deed of sale and purchase, also the letter of lease certificate, and second, is the impact of the ignorance in signing such deed. The purpose of this research is we shall not easily in lending certificate to anyone else as the legal base in accepting credit?s request, in the other hand, the Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah shall be more careful in ensuring whether the object of such sale and purchase has appropriate enough with Indonesia?s legal foundation in sale and purchase transaction, namely clear, cash and real. This reasearch is legal reasearch with juridicial normative approach, which uses secondary data which is got from library study, and the result of reasearch are qualitative analyzed, because it has purpose in providing the clearest legal data, in regarding to any legal relationship, legal matters or legal phenomenon in certain legal action. This reasearch generates conclusion that the fault in form of agreement in the deed of sale and purchase of land and building will impact the transfer of ownership right of land and building.;This study analyzes the validity of the deed of sale and purchase, also the letter of lease certificate in transfer of property rights certificate number: 66/ Pakutandang/ Ciparay/ Bandung/ Jawa Barat, with case studies: Resolution of Distric Court of Bandung Numb:404/ PDT/ G/ 2010/ PN.BDG. This research is done by formulating 2 (two) main issues. First, in relation to the validity of the deed of sale and purchase, also the letter of lease certificate, and second, is the impact of the ignorance in signing such deed. The purpose of this research is we shall not easily in lending certificate to anyone else as the legal base in accepting credit?s request, in the other hand, the Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah shall be more careful in ensuring whether the object of such sale and purchase has appropriate enough with Indonesia?s legal foundation in sale and purchase transaction, namely clear, cash and real. This reasearch is legal reasearch with juridicial normative approach, which uses secondary data which is got from library study, and the result of reasearch are qualitative analyzed, because it has purpose in providing the clearest legal data, in regarding to any legal relationship, legal matters or legal phenomenon in certain legal action. This reasearch generates conclusion that the fault in form of agreement in the deed of sale and purchase of land and building will impact the transfer of ownership right of land and building., This study analyzes the validity of the deed of sale and purchase, also the letter of lease certificate in transfer of property rights certificate number: 66/ Pakutandang/ Ciparay/ Bandung/ Jawa Barat, with case studies: Resolution of Distric Court of Bandung Numb:404/ PDT/ G/ 2010/ PN.BDG. This research is done by formulating 2 (two) main issues. First, in relation to the validity of the deed of sale and purchase, also the letter of lease certificate, and second, is the impact of the ignorance in signing such deed. The purpose of this research is we shall not easily in lending certificate to anyone else as the legal base in accepting credit’s request, in the other hand, the Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah shall be more careful in ensuring whether the object of such sale and purchase has appropriate enough with Indonesia’s legal foundation in sale and purchase transaction, namely clear, cash and real. This reasearch is legal reasearch with juridicial normative approach, which uses secondary data which is got from library study, and the result of reasearch are qualitative analyzed, because it has purpose in providing the clearest legal data, in regarding to any legal relationship, legal matters or legal phenomenon in certain legal action. This reasearch generates conclusion that the fault in form of agreement in the deed of sale and purchase of land and building will impact the transfer of ownership right of land and building.]

Abstrak :
Jual beli dibawah tangan merupakan suatu perjanjian jual beli tanah, dimana perbuatan hukum yang dilakukan berupa pemindahan hak dengan pembayaran tunai artinya bahwa harga yang disetujui dibayar penuh pada saat dilakukan jual beli tersebut. Surat jual beli di bawah tangan atas tanah dan bangunan dibuktikan dengan selembar kwitansi. Dengan demikian, semua perjanjian yang dibuat antara para pihak sendiri secara tertulis dalam akta di bawah tangan, bentuknya bebas, terserah bagi para pihak yang membuat dan tempat membuatnya juga dibolehkan di mana saja. Dilakukan perjanjian jual beli dibawah tangan memiliki akibat salah satunya, dimana penjualnya baik di dalam maupun diluar wilayah Republik Indonesia tidak diketahui keberadaannya lagi, sedangkan pembeli beritikat baik guna melakukan pencatatan peralihan hak di Kantor Pertanahan. Permasalahan yang dibahas dalam penelitian ini adalah mengenai perlindungan hukum bagi pembeli yang beritikat baik dan proses pencatatan peralihan hak tanah atas Sertipikat Hak Milik Nomor 1364/Sukamaju yang dilakukan dengan perjanjian dibawah tangan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, sifat penelitian yang digunakan bersifat deskriptif analitis, Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan untuk memperoleh data adalah studi dokumen dan wawancara. Metode analisis data yang digunakan oleh penulis adalah deskriptif. Adapun hasil penelitian bersifat deskriptif analitis. Hasil dari penulisan tesis ini adalah proses pencatatan peralihan hak yang mana penjualnya tidak diketahui lagi keberadaannya, serta perlindungan hukum bagi pembeli yang beritikat baik. Simpulan dari penelitian ini adalah terbitnya Sertipikat yang telah beralih namanya kepada nama pembeli dalam jangka waktu 30 hari (1 bulan). Saran dari penelitian ini guna mempersingkat lama waktu pencatatan peralihan hak maka masyarakat wajib melakukan transaksi jual beli atas tanah dilakukan dihadapan pejabat yang berwenang yaitu Notaris dan PPAT.

---

Private sale/purchase is a land sale/purchase agreement, where legal actions taken in the form of transfer of rights with cash payments mean that the agreed price is paid in full at the time of the sale/purchase. A letter of Private sale/purchase of land and buildings is proven by a receipt. Thus, all agreements made between the parties themselves in writing in the private deed, the form is free, it is up to the parties who make it and the place to make it is also permissible anywhere. Agreements of private deed has the effect of one of them, where the seller is both inside and outside the territory of the Republic of Indonesia, is no longer known, while the good buyer is to record the transfer of rights at the Land Office. The problems that will be discussed in this study are about legal protection for buyers with good ties and the process of recording the transfer of land rights over certificates of ownership number 1364/Sukamaju, which are carried out private sale/purchase. This study uses a normative juridical research method, the nature of the research used is descriptive analytical. Data collection methods used to obtain data are document studies and interviews. The data analysis method used by the author is a descriptive method, the results of the study are descriptive analytical. The conclusion of this study is the issuance of a certificate that has changed to the name of the buyer within 30 days (1 months). Suggestions from this research are to shorten the length of time to record the transfer of rights, the community is obliged to conduct private sale/purchase transactions on land in the presence of the authorized officials, namely Notary and PPAT.