Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRACTPlagiarism is an act of taking or stealing ideas of others, whether intentionally or not. This plagiarism can happen anywhere, by anyone, and in various forms of writing. This plagiarism is referred to as academic crime, so it must be avoided by all parties. This article will examine ways to prevent plagiarism. The scope of this study is in the Indonesian online tutorial at Universitas Terbuka. This article is written based on observations and practices in tutorial activities. In the context of this discussion, plagiarism means writing the same answers from several students during the learning activities. The similarity of answers may be obtained from similar sources. The similariries occur because there is no attempt to write with the correct citation, or paraphrase it. Therefore, it demands creativity and innovation from the tutor in conducting the learning or tutorial, both during discussion time and tutorial task. Creativity is applied in selecting and designing the problem form in discussion activities. This creativity is also related to the skills of the tutor in higher order thinking skills to the students. The concept of innovation is applied in the dynamics of the problem in the tutorial task. Dynamic tutorial will be an indicator of professional educator in performing his duties as tutor. Through the creativity and innovation of tutors, students are indirectly required to answer honestly, thoroughly, and comprehensively. Besides, students are also required to always open the material and questions, because the tutor creates the tutorial class to be dynamic, not static. In this way, the tutorial activities will be a medium and place oflearning for students and tutors."

"Tesis ini berfokus pada strategi bertutur dalam forum daring. Data dalam penelitian ini adalah tuturan tertulis yang diambil dari diskusi yang terjadi di utas “Konsultasi: Problematika dengan Pacar”, dalam forum daring Female Daily, pada bulan Oktober 2014. Penelitian kualitatif dengan ancangan pragmatik ini bertujuan untuk menunjukkan bagaimana penanya dan penanggap dalam diskusi menggunakan strategi kesantunan. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa penanya dan penanggap menggunakan empat strategi kesantunan yang dirumuskan oleh Brown dan Levinson (1987, 1996), yaitu bertutur terus terang tanpa basa-basi, bertutur terus terang dengan basa-basi kesantunan positif, bertutur terus terang dengan basa-basi kesantunan positif, dan bertutur secara samar. Secara umum, penanya lebih banyak menggunakan strategi bertutur terus terang dengan basa-basi kesantunan positif dan penanggap menggunakan dua strategi bertutur, yaitu terus terang dengan basa-basi kesantunan positif dan bertutur terus terang dengan basa-basi kesantunan negatif. Hal tersebut menunjukkan bahwa penanya cenderung mengakrabkan diri dengan penanggap dan penanggap juga berupaya untuk dapat melindungi muka penanya dari keterancaman dengan mengakrabkan diri dengan penanya dan membebaskan penanya dari pembebanan yang mungkin ditimbulkan dari pendapat atau saran yang diberikan oleh penanggap.

---

This thesis focuses on politeness strategies in an online forum. The data in this study is a written speech taken from the discussions in the thread "Consultation: Problems with Boyfriend", in the online forum Female Daily, in October 2014. The qualitative research under pragmatics approach examined how the enquirers and respondents in the discussion using politeness strategies. The results show that the enquirers and respondents utilized four politeness strategies formulated by Brown and Levinson (1987, 1996), namely on record, positive politeness, negative politeness, and off record. The results show that the enquirers used a mainly positive politeness strategy and the respondents used both positive politeness and negative politeness strategies in an attempt to protect the face of the enquirers from being threatened. By highlighting friendliness with the questioner and at the same time also avoiding giving offense by showing deference, freed the questioner from the burden that may have arisen from the opinion or suggestion given by the respondent."