Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :

Pasca diterapkannya 8 area perubahan reformasi birokrasi menuntut setiap Kementerian/Lembaga/Pemerintah Daerah untuk dapat membangun organisasi yang good governance melalui Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP). Namun nyatanya, masih banyak Kementerian/Lembaga/Pemerintah Daerah mendapatkan hasil SAKIP yang belum cukup baik karena belum tercapainya sasaran kinerja yang sudah ditetapkan. Biro Perencanaan, Sumber Daya Manusia, dan Organisasi (PSDMO) Kementerian Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) merupakan biro yang sangat penting untuk mengatur pengorganisasian Kementerian BUMN mulai dari perencanaan hingga evaluasi. Keunikan Kementerian BUMN yang mengelola BUMN berdasarkan prinsip-prinsip pengelolaan korporasi (perusahaan) memerlukan strategi khusus untuk dapat mengambil keputusan berdasarkan Model 7’S McKinsey. Dengan menggunakan konsep 7’S McKinsey, peneliti ingin melihat bagaimana implementasi model 7’S McKinsey dalam meningkatkan kinerja Biro PSDMO dan permasalahan apa yang dihadapi dalam rangka meningkatkan manajemen kinerja di Biro PSDMO. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan positivisme. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini bersumber dari wawancara mendalam dan studi pustaka. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan semua tahapan dalam proses penyusunan strategi jangka panjang sudah dilakukan, tidak terdapat tumpang tindih di dalam Biro PSDMO, penempatan SDM yang sudah tepat sesuai kompetensi, skills sudah ditetapkan dalam roadmap SDM, Style pimpinan tertinggi Biro PSDMO adalah demokratis dan kendali bebas dimana merupakan modal utama untuk meningkatkan kualitas kinerja organsiasi.

 

---

......After the implementation of 8 areas of change in bureaucratic reform requires each Ministry/Institution/Local Government to be able to build a good governance organization through the Government Institution Performance Accountability System (SAKIP). However, in reality, there are still many Ministries/Institutions/Local Governments that have received SAKIP results which not been good enough because they have not achieved the performance targets that have been set. The Planning, Human Resources, and Organization (PSDMO) Bureau of the Ministry of State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN) is a very important bureau to regulate the organization of the Ministry of SOEs from planning to evaluation. The uniqueness of the Ministry of SOEs that manages SOEs based on the principles of corporate (company) requires specific strategies to be able to make decisions based on the McKinsey 7's Model. By using the 7 'S McKinsey model, researchers want to see how the implementation of the 7' S McKinsey model in improving the performance of the PSDMO Bureau and what problems are being faced in order to improve performance management in the PSDMO Bureau. This research uses a positivism approach. The data used in this study were sourced from in-depth interviews and literature studies. The results of the study concluded that all stages in the process of formulating a long-term strategy had been carried out, there was no overlap within the PSDMO Bureau, HR placement was appropriate according to competence, skills were set in the HR roadmap, the highest leadership style of the PSDMO Bureau was democratic and laisez faire which was main capital to improve the quality of organizational performance

 

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Dengan menggunakan hasil evaluasi kinerja organisasi Lapan Tahun 2010 dapat disimpulkan bahwa dari 8 (delapan) aspek yang diukur, terdapat 6 (enam) aspek yang hasilnya masih dibawah rata-rata, yaitu manajemen SDM, kepemimpinan, manajemen proses, pencapaian hasil, pengukuran, analisis dan manajemen informasi kinerja, dan Penganggaran. Dengan menggunakan konsep 7‟S McKinsey, peneliti ingin melihat bagaimana kinerja organisasi Lapan dan permasalahan apa yang dihadapi dalam rangka meningkatkan manajemen kinerja di Lapan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan Post-Positivism dan proses pengumpulan datanya dilakukan secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa ada tahapan yang tidak dilakukan dalam proses penyusunan strategi jangka menengah, masih terdapat tumpang tindih tugas dan fungsi antar Satuan Kerja, sistem yang ada belum seluruhnya diimplementasikan dengan baik, penempatan SDM banyak yang tidak tepat, diperlukan komitmen pimpinan dalam peningkatan skills, dan Style pimpinan tertinggi di Lapan adalah demokratis dimana merupakan modal utama buat meningkatkan kualitas kinerja organisasi.

---

ABSTRACT
By using the results of the performance evaluation organizations Lapan in 2010 can be concluded that of 8 (eight) aspects measured, there are 6 (six) aspects of the results are still below average, ie human resources management, leadership, process management, achievement of results, measurement, analysis and performance of information management, and budgeting. By using the concept of 7'S McKinsey, researchers wanted to see how the performance of the organization Lapan and what the problems faced in order to improve performance management in Lapan. This study uses the approach of Post-Positivism and the process of data collection is qualitative. The study concluded that there are stages that are not carried in the process of preparing a medium-term strategy, there are overlapping tasks and functions between the Unit, the existing system has not been fully implemented properly, many human resources placement is incorrect necessary leadership commitment in improving skills, and Style highest leadership in Lapan is a democratic where the main capital for improving the quality of organizational performance.