Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh kepemilikan manajerial terhadap cost of debt pada perusahaan non-keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2006-2013. Proksi dari cost of debt adalah interest rate spread antara obligasi korporasi dengan obligasi pemerintah, sedangkan proksi untuk kepemilikan manajerial adalah proporsi kepemilikan saham yang dimiliki oleh manajer, direktur, dan dewan komisaris. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan menggunakan regresi berganda, analisis faktor, dan persamaan simultan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kepemilikan manajerial memiliki pengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap cost of debt, kepemilikan manajerial memiliki pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap cost of debt ketika perusahaan memiliki biaya keagenan utang, kepemilikan manajerial memili pengaruh negatif dan tidak signifikan terhadap cost of debt ketika peringkat obligasi perusahaan rendah, dan kepemilikan manajerial memiliki hubungan yang simultan dengan cost of debt.

---

This study aimed to analyze the effect of managerial ownership on the cost of debt of non-financial Firms listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2006-2013. The proxy of the cost of debt is the interest rate spread between corporate bonds and government bonds, while a proxy for managerial ownership is the proportion of shares that held by managers, directors, and the board of commissioners. Method of this research is a quantitative with multiple regression, factor analysis, and simultaneous analysis.

The results of this study find that managerial ownership has negative effect and significant on the cost of debt, managerial ownership has positive effect and significant on the cost of debt when firm has agency cost of debt, managerial ownership has negative effect and insignificant on the cost of debt when firm has low-quality bond, and managerial ownership has simultaneous relationship with the cost of debt."

"Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menganalisis pengaruh pengungkapan laporankeberlanjutan terhadap biaya utang Penelitian ini menggunakan sampel perusahaanterbuka di Indonesia dengan total observasi sebanyak 96 firm years dengan rentangwaktu tahun penelitian 2009 2013 Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwapengungkapan laporan keberlanjutan terbukti berpengaruh negatif signifikanterhadap biaya utang Hal ini disebabkan laporan keberlanjutan dapat memberikanpemahaman komprehensif kepada investor terkait kinerja ekonomi sosial danlingkungan entitas sehingga mampu menurunkan potensi asimetri informasi yangpada akhirnya mampu menurunkan biaya utang.

---

This research aims to analyze the impact of sustainability report disclosure on costof debt capital The total observations of this research is 96 firm years for the year2009 2013 The result indicates that the sustainability report disclosure have anegatively significant impact on cost of debt capital The triple bottom lineinformation that contained in sustainability report is believed to be a useful tool forthe investor to gain more comprehensive understandability toward the company Therefore asymmetrical information can be reduced and resulted in decrease on thecost of debt capital."

"[ABSTRAKTujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk membuktikan pengaruh penghindaran pajak dan kepemilikan keluarga terhadap biaya utang perusahaan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode panel dengan jumlah sampel 127 perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia dalam periode 2010-2013. Variabel kontrol yang digunakan yaitu umur perusahaan, ukuran perusahaan, kualitas auditor, leverage, dummy rasio utang terhadap ekuitas, dan arus kas operasi. Hasil penelitian membuktikan bahwa penghindaran pajak yang diukur dengan proksi abnormal BTD terbukti memiliki pengaruh negatif signifikan terhadap biaya utang. Selain itu, kepemilikan keluarga yang diukur dengan dummy kepemilikan keluarga mayoritas juga terbukti memiliki pengaruh negatif signifikan terhadap biaya utang.

---

ABSTRACTThe objective of this study is to examine the effect of tax avoidance and family ownership on corporate cost of debt. This study used panel method with 127 public firm listed in BEI in 2010-2013 as the sample. Control variabel used are firm age, firm size, auditor quality, leverage, and operational cash flow. The empirical results give evidence that tax avoidance, which is measured by abnormal BTD has significant negative effect on cost of debt. Family ownership, which is measured by dummy variable for majority family ownership also has significant negative on cost of debt.;The objective of this study is to examine the effect of tax avoidance and family ownership on corporate cost of debt. This study used panel method with 127 public firm listed in BEI in 2010-2013 as the sample. Control variabel used are firm age, firm size, auditor quality, leverage, and operational cash flow. The empirical results give evidence that tax avoidance, which is measured by abnormal BTD has significant negative effect on cost of debt. Family ownership, which is measured by dummy variable for majority family ownership also has significant negative on cost of debt., The objective of this study is to examine the effect of tax avoidance and family ownership on corporate cost of debt. This study used panel method with 127 public firm listed in BEI in 2010-2013 as the sample. Control variabel used are firm age, firm size, auditor quality, leverage, and operational cash flow. The empirical results give evidence that tax avoidance, which is measured by abnormal BTD has significant negative effect on cost of debt. Family ownership, which is measured by dummy variable for majority family ownership also has significant negative on cost of debt.]"

"Indikator perpajakan, seperti tax ratio, tax gap, dan tax compliance ratio, mengindikasikan marak terjadi praktik penghindaran pajak di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh tax avoidance dan institutional ownership terhadap cost of debt perusahaan properti yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) periode 2019-2023. Berdasarkan teori klasik keuangan, literatur menunjukkan hubungan yang negatif antara tax avoidance dan institutional ownership terhadap cost of debt. Meskipun demikian, di Indonesia, hubungan ini masih menjadi topik yang kurang diteliti. Cost of debt merujuk pada biaya utang yang ditanggung perusahaan, sementara tax avoidance adalah praktik penghindaran pajak yang legal secara hukum, dan institutional ownership mengacu pada kepemilikan saham oleh institusi sebagai fungsi pengawasan. Menggunakan data panel dari 31 perusahaan properti, penelitian ini membangun sebuah model hasil modifikasi dari model yang diusulkan oleh Lim (2009) dengan estimasi EGLS untuk mengatasi segala kecacatan pada data. Hasil penelitian ini tidak menunjukkan bukti empiris yang konklusif terkait hubungan antara cost of debt perusahaan dan tax avoidance dan institutional ownership.

---

Taxation indicators, such as tax ratio, tax gap, and tax compliance ratio, indicate that tax avoidance practices are rampant in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the impact of tax avoidance and institutional ownership on the cost of debt in property companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the period 2019-2023. Based on classical finance theory, literature suggests a negative relationship between tax avoidance and institutional ownership with the cost of debt. However, this relationship remains underexplored in the Indonesian context. The cost of debt refers to the interest expense borne by companies, tax avoidance is defined as the legal practice of minimizing tax liabilities, and institutional ownership pertains to the ownership of shares by institutions as a form of monitoring. Using panel data from 31 property firms, this research builds a model modified from the model proposed by Lim (2009), employing EGLS estimation to address potential data imperfections. The findings of this study provide no conclusive empirical evidence regarding the relationship between a company’s cost of debt and its tax avoidance or institutional ownership."