Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Lichen Planus is a chronic inflammatory disease that effects the skin and mucous membrane of squamous cell origin. Oral Lichen Planus can occur without the skin lesion and there are six types of the oral lesion, erosive, atrophic, bulla, papular, plaque like and retiqular. This disease can be caused by several factor, among them are antihypertensive drugs and emotional stress. In this case report we present a 43 years old female patient who suffered from several types of oral lichen planus that induced by ramipril, an antihypertensive drug, and emotional stress. There were some progressions after the drug was discontinued but the disease was worsening when emotional stress occured. The severity of the disease can be controlled by the use of topical corticosteroid and multivitamins.

Abstrak :
Hipertensi dan diabetes melitus menjadi salah satu faktor risiko kejadian kardiovaskuler. Tidak terkontrolnya hipertensi dapat menyebabkan perburukan kesehatan dan ekonomi pada penderitanya. Kombinasi terapi antihipertensi dinilai adekuat untuk mencapai target tekanan darah <140/90 mmHg. Obat antihipertensi golongan ACEI, ARB, dan CCB merupakan terapi yang sesuai untuk pasien dengan diabetes melitus tipe 2 dan harganya bervariasi. Penelitian sebelumnya menunjukkan bahwa golongan ARB lebih cost-effective dibandingkan yang lainnya. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis efektivitas biaya dari kombinasi terapi amlodipin-kandesartan dibandingkan dengan amlodipin-ramipril pada pasien hipertensi dengan diabetes melitus tipe 2. Penelitian cross-sectional ini dilakukan di RSUPN dr. Cipto mangunkusumo dengan menggunakan rekam medis pasien tahun 2017-2019. Subjek penelitian yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi sebanyak 87 pasien. Pasien dibagi menjadi dua kelompok: kelompok yang mendapat terapi amlodipin-kandesartan dan kelompok yang mendapat terapi amlodipin-ramipril. Analisis efektivitas biaya diperoleh dari perhitungan biaya medik langsung, menghitung efektivitas terapi berdasarkan jumlah pasien yang mencapai target tekanan darah <140/90 mmhg, serta menghitung nilai ACER. Kombinasi amlodipin-kandesartan memiliki efektivitas terapi 48.9%, sedangkan efektivitas terapi amlodipin-ramipril 45,2%. Nilai ACER kelompok amlodipin-kandesartan dan kelompok amlodipin-ramipril adalah Rp. 1.604.736,2 per efektivitas and Rp 1.811.278,8 per efektivitas. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa amlodipin-kandesartan lebih cost-effective dibandingkan amlodipin-ramipril.

---

Hypertension and diabetes mellitus are risk factors for cardiovascular events. Uncontrolled hypertension can cause health and economic burdens in patients. The combination of antihypertensive therapy is considered adequate to achieve the targeted blood pressure <140/90 mmHg. Antihypertensive drugs class such as ACEIs, ARBs, and CCBs are appropriated therapies for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and the price differences. Previous studies have shown that the ARBs are more cost-effective than others. The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of combination of amlodipine-candesartan compared to amlodipine-ramipril in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This cross-sectional study was conducted at Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital by using patient medical records in 2017-2019. Research subjects who met the inclusion criteria were 87 patients. Patients were divided into two groups: group receiving amlodipine-candesartan and group receiving amlodipine-ramipril. Cost effectiveness analysis obtained from the calculation of direct medical costs, calculated the effectiveness of therapy based on the number of patients who reached the target blood pressure <140/90 mmHg, and calculated the value of ACER. Amlodipine-candesartan has a therapeutic effectiveness of 48.9%, while the effectiveness of amlodipine-ramipril is 45.2%. The ACER value of the amlodipine-candesartan group and the amlodipine-ramipril group were Rp 1,604,736.2 per effectiveness and Rp 1,811,278.8per effectiveness. To conclude, amlodipine-candesartan is more cost-effective than amlodipine-ramipril.

Abstrak :
Gagal jantung merupakan masalah kesehatan yang progresif dengan angka mortalitas dan morbiditas yang tinggi di negara maju maupun negara berkembang termasuk Indonesia. Banyak pilihan yang dapat diberikan kepada pasien gagal jantung, salah satu contohnya adalah kombinasi ramipril-bisoprolol dan kandesartan-bisoprolol. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis minimalisasi biaya antara kelompok terapi kombinasi ramipril-bisoprolol dan kandesartan-bisoprolol pada pasien BPJS rawat inap gagal jantung di RSJPD Harapan Kita tahun 2017. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian cross-sectional dengan pengambilan data secara retrospektif terhadap rekam medis, resep dan sistem informasi rumah sakit. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan secara total sampling di Rumah Sakit Jantung dan Pembuluh Darah Harapan Kita. Efektivitas pengobatan diukur berdasarkan penurunan tekanan darah sistol dan diastol yang diasumsikan sama. Biaya didapatkan dari median total biaya pengobatan, meliputi biaya obat gagal jantung, obat non-gagal jantung, rawat inap, pemeriksaan penunjang dan jasa dokter. Sampel pada penelitian ini berjumlah 65 pasien, yaitu 37 pasien terapi kombinasi ramipril-bisoprolol dan 28 pasien terapi kombinasi kandesartan-bisoprolol. Median total biaya pengobatan kelompok terapi kombinasi ramipril-bisoprolol Rp 7.391.584,00 lebih mahal dibandingkan dengan kelompok terapi kombinasi kandesartan-bisoprolol Rp 7.061.533,00, terdapat selisih sebesar Rp 330.051,00. Analisis sensitivitas satu arah/-25 dilakukan untuk mengetahui kekuatan dari evaluasi ekonomi melalui perubahan terhadap hasil penelitian. Oleh karena itu, dapat disimpulkan bahwa kelompok terapi kombinasi kandesartan-bisoprolol lebih cost-minimal dibandingkan kelompok terapi kombinasi ramipril-bisoprolol dengan efektivitas yang setara. ......Heart failure is a progressive health problem with high mortality and morbidity in both developed and developing countries including Indonesia. Many options can be given to patients with heart failure, one example is a combination of ramipril bisoprolol and candesartan bisoprolol. The aim of this study was to analyze cost minimization between the combination therapy group of ramipril bisoprolol and candesartan bisoprolol in BPJS hospitalized patients with heart failure. This research was a cross sectional study with retrospective data retrieval on medical record, prescriptions, and hospital rsquo s information system. Sampling was done by total sampling. The effectiveness of treatment was measured by the decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure that was assumed to be the same. Cost was obtained from the median total cost of treatment, including the cost of heart failure drugs, non heart failure drugs, hospitalization, laboratorium and physician services. The sample in this study amounted to 65 patients, 37 patients from combination therapy ramipril bisoprolol and 28 patients from combination therapy candesartan bisoprolol. Based on the results of the study, the median total cost of treatment of Ramipril group Rp 7,391,584.00 was more expensive compared with the candesartan group Rp 7.061.533,00 , there was a difference of Rp 330,051.00. One way sensitivity analysis 25 was performed to determine the strength of the economic evaluation through changes to the research results. Therefore, it can be concluded that the candesartan therapy group is more cost minimal than the ramipril therapy group with equal effectiveness.