Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Industri pengolahan minyak dan gas bumi merupakan industri yang dapat menghasilkan berbagai macam bahaya dan risiko diantaranya adalah risiko yang dihasilkan pajanan bahaya fisik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan gambaran penilaian risiko kesehatan atau Health Risk Assessment (HRA) terkait pajanan bahaya fisik di empat unit pengolahan minyak dan gas di Indonesia berdasarkan data sekunder sampel pada tahun 2017 hingga 2020. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode semi-kuantitatif yaitu dengan mengalikan tingkat pajanan dengan tingkat konsekuensi bahaya kesehatan sehingga mendapatkan nilai Risk Assessment Matrix (RAM) berdasarkan kepada pedoman penilaian risiko kesehatan International Petroleum Industry Environmental Conservation Association (IPIECA) dan International Association of Oil & Gas Producers (OGP) pada tahun 2006.Penilaian risiko kesehatan yang dilakukan pada penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat 9 jenis bahaya fisik yang teridentifikasi diantaranya pajanan kebisingan, getaran tangan dan lengan, getaran seluruh tubuh, pencahayaan, iklim kerja panas, radiasi sinar UV, radiasi elektromagnetik, radiasi pengion, dan NORM (Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material). Dengan tingkat risiko tinggi atau kategori prioritas pertama untuk pengendalian sebanyak 62 sampel (16,66%), risiko menengah atau kategori kedua untuk prioritas pengendalian sebanyak 124 sampel (33,33%), risiko rendah atau kategori ketiga untuk prioritas pengendalian sebanyak 84 sampel (22,58%), dan risiko sangat rendah atau kategori tidak memerlukan tindakan pengendalian segera sebanyak 102 sampel (27,42%).

---

The oil and gas processing industry or refinery unit is an industry that can produce various kinds of hazards and risks, one of the risks is resulting from physical hazards. This study aims to provide an overview of Health Risk Assessment (HRA) related to physical hazards in four oil and gas processing units in Indonesia based on secondary measurement data from 2017 to 2020. The method used in this study is a semi-quantitative method, by multiplying the level of exposure and the level of hazard consequences to get the Risk Assessment Matrix (RAM) value based on the health risk assessment standard from the International Petroleum Industry Conservation Association (IPIECA) and the International Association of Oil & Gas Producers (OGP) in 2006.

The health risk assessment conducted in this study showed that there are 9 types of physical hazards that come from exposure of noise, hand and arm vibration, whole body vibration, lighting, work climate / heat stress, UV radiation, electromagnetic fields radiation, ionizing radiation, and NORM (Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials). With the risk level of high risk or in the first category for control as many as 62 sample (16.66%), moderate risk or the second category for control priority as many as 124 sample (33.33%), low risk or the third category for control priorities as many as 84 sample (22.58%), and very low risk or the category does not require for immediate control measures as many as 102 sample (27.42%)."

"Seiring dengan target pemerintah dalam peningkatan produksi minyak dan gas di lepas pantai, maka penggunaan bahan kimia dalam kegiatan produksi minyak dan gas semakin meningkat, hal ini memunculkan kekhawatiran akan potensi permasalahan kesehatan pekerja, oleh karenanya perlu dilakukan kajian risiko kesehatan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tingkat risiko (risk rating/RR) kesehatan terkait pajanan dari kesebelas bahan kimia utama yang digunakan pekerja, pada proses produksi minyak dan gas di kapal FPSO XYZ tahun 2022. Metode Chemical Risk Assessment (CRA) yang digunakan adalah Stoffenmanager® 8 version 5.0 yang merupakan tools untuk menilai risiko kesehatan jalur pajanan inhalasi dan dermal dari penanganan enam bahan kimia oleh production technician di area kerja topside deck dan lima bahan kimia oleh utility operator di area kerja machinery deck. Hasil CRA menunjukkan bahwa tingkat risiko (RR) jalur inhalasi dimana satu bahan kimia kategori risiko tinggi (1,highest) delapan bahan kimia kategori risiko sedang (2, medium), dan dua bahan kimia risiko rendah (3, lowest). Sedangkan berdasarkan risk characterization ratio (RCR) pajanan inhalasi, ada dua bahan kimia yang diketahui nilai RCR task ≥ 1, yang berarti perkiraan konsentrasi emisi yang dihasilkan saat beraktivitas (task concentration estimation/TCE) terhadap potensi bahaya terhirup oleh production technician dan utility operator saat beraktivitas pada jarak yang dekat dengan sumber emisi, dikategorikan berbahaya atau risiko tidak dapat di tolerir (Unacceptable risk). Untuk tingkat risiko dermal efek lokal (skin local), sembilan bahan kimia masuk kategori risiko tinggi dan dua bahan kimia masuk kategori risiko sedang. Sedangkan tingkat risiko dermal efek sistemik (skin uptake), empat bahan kimia kategori risiko sedang, dan tujuh bahan kimia kategori risiko rendah. Hasil risk rating (RR) menentukan pula prioritas tindakan (Action Priority/AP) pengendalian risiko kesehatan. Rekomendasi pengendalian adalah menurunkan tingkat bahaya (HR) dengan melakukan penggantian bahan kimia (subtitusi) dengan bahan kimia yang lebih rendah tingkat bahayanya bagi kesehatan, dan untuk pajanan dermal (ER), otomatisasi proses penanganan, modifikasi teknik pekerjaan dengan membuat sistem penambahan bahan kimia secara gravitasi, menurunkan jumlah dosis pemakaian namun tetap efektif efisien (workplace-related modifiers), mengurangi waktu dan frekuensi penggunaan bahan kimia tersebut (activity time), penambahan ventilasi lokal (LEV) selain ventilasi mekanik, serta menggunakan baju khusus tahan kimia beserta sarung tangannya atau Chemsuit (control measures modifiers).

---

Along with the government's target to increase offshore oil and gas production,  the use of chemicals in oil and gas production activities tends to increase, this raises concerns about potential health problems for workers, therefore it is necessary to conduct a chemical health risk assessment. This study aims to analyze the health risk rating (RR) related to exposure to the eleven main chemicals used by workers in the oil and gas production process on the FPSO XYZ ship in 2022. The Chemical Risk Assessment (CRA) method that is used is Stoffenmanager® 8 version 5.0 which is a tool to assess the health risks of inhalation and dermal exposure lines from the handling of six chemicals by production technicians on the topside deck work area and five chemicals by utility operators on the machinery deck work area. The results of the CRA show that the risk level (RR) for the inhalation route is one chemical in the high-risk category (1,highest), eight chemicals in the medium risk category (2, medium), and two chemicals in the low-risk category (3, lowest). Meanwhile, based on the risk characterization ratio (RCR) of inhalation exposure, there are two chemicals whose RCR task value is ≥ 1, which means the estimated concentration of emissions produced during the activities (task concentration estimation/TCE) against the potential inhalation hazard by production technicians and utility operators when activities at a close distance to the emission source, are categorized as a dangerous or unacceptable risk. For the level of dermal risk of local effects (skin local), nine chemicals are in the high-risk category and two chemicals are in the medium risk category. While the level of risk of dermal systemic effects (skin uptake), four chemicals were in the moderate risk category, and seven chemicals were in the low-risk category. The results of the risk rating (RR) also determine the priority of action (Action Priority/AP) for controlling health risks. Control recommendations are to reduce the level of hazard (HR) by replacing chemicals (substitutions) with lower chemicals levels of danger to health, and for dermal exposure (ER), automation of handling processes, modification of work techniques by making chemical addition systems automatically. gravity, reducing the number of doses used but still being effective and efficient (workplace-related modifiers), reducing the time and frequency of using these chemicals (activity time), adding local ventilation (LEV) in addition to mechanical ventilation, and using special chemical resistant clothing and gloves or Chemical suit (control measures modifiers)."

"Pekerja pada unit produksi minyak dan gas bumi berisiko terpajan berbagai bahaya kimia. Salah satu komponen bahan kimia dari minyak bumi adalah volatile organic compounds (VOC), dengan contoh bahan yang terkenal akan toksisitasnya adalah benzene, toluene dan xylene. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis risiko kesehatan terkait pajanan benzene, toluene dan xylene pekerja kilang minyak san gas di PT. X. Penelitian ini menganalisis data sekunder pajanan personal BTX melalui rute inhalasi menggunakan active sampler. Dengan menggunakan metode Chemical Health Risk Assessment (CHRA) dari Department of Safety and Health, Malaysia ditemukan bahwa risiko pajanan benzene pada SEG CDU (crude distillation unit) terkategori risiko sangat tinggi. Untuk pajanan toluene dan xylene berada pada tingkat risiko kesehatan rendah pada hampir seluruh SEG. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, diperlukan pengendalian yang tepat untuk mengatasi pajanan benzene, toluene dan xylene. Salah satu pengendalian yang direkomendasikan adalah meningkatkan konsistensi penggunaan alat pelindung diri, monitoring pajanan secara kontinu, melaksanakan biomonitoring dan pemeriksaan sel darah tepi.

---

Workers in oil and gas production units are at risk of exposure to various chemical hazards. One of the chemical components of petroleum is volatile organic compounds (VOC), with examples of materials known for their toxicity being benzene, toluene and xylene. This study aims to analyze health risks related to exposure to benzene, toluene and xylene of oil and gas refinery workers at PT. X. This study analyzes secondary data on personal exposure to BTX via the inhalation route using an active sampler. Using the Chemical Health Risk Assessment (CHRA) method from the Department of Safety and Health, Malaysia, it was found that the risk of benzene exposure in the SEG CDU (crude distillation unit) was categorized as very high risk. Exposure to toluene and xylene is at a low health risk level in almost all SEGs. Based on the research results, appropriate control is needed to overcome exposure to benzene, toluene and xylene. One of the recommended controls is increasing the consistent use of personal protective equipment, continuous monitoring of exposure, carrying out biomonitoring and examining peripheral blood cells."

"Proses kerja pada area Hydro Cracking Complex HCC memiliki risiko bahaya kesehatan kimia dan fisika bagi pekerja. Penelitian ini menilai gambaran bahaya risiko kesehatan dan Health Risk Assessment HRA dengan menggunakan metode semi kuantitatif untuk menentukan skor durasi, eksposure, konsekuensi, dan likelihood yang selanjutnya akan dihitung dalam Risk Assessment Matriks RAM . Pedoman yang digunakan untuk menghitung yaitu International Petroleum Industry Environmental Conservation Association IPIECA dan International Association of Oil Gas Producers OGP tahun 2006.Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan proritas pengendalian risiko di area HCC bahaya kesehatan fisika dan kimia berada pada 4 tingkat yaitu: tidak perlu dilakukan tindakan segera, prioritas pertama, kedua, dan ketiga untuk dilakukan tindakan.Penilaian HRA menunjukkan terdapat bahaya fisika berupa bahaya pencahayaan, heat stress, dan bising. Sedangkan bahaya kimia yang ditemukan yaitu uap Hidrocarbon, Fuel Gas CO, Fuel Gas H2S, Fuel Gas CO2, Ammonia NH3 , Benzene Toluene Xylene BTX , Soda Api NaOH , Katalis, Steam H2, Ceceran fuel oil, N2, SO2, LPG, Indoor Air Quality CO, CO, O2,Nox, SOx , dan Lube oil. Tingkat risiko bahaya kesehatan dapat dikurangi dengan melakukan hirarki kontrol, yaitu dengan mengeliminasi bahaya, menambah intensitas cahaya, pembatasan area kerja, rotasi pekerja, penggunaan APD yang sesuai, dan perhitungan kadar paparan bahan kimia.

---

Working processess at Hydro Cracking Complex HCC have chemical dan physical hazards for the workers. This study asssessed about health risk hazard and Health Risk Assessment HRA by using semiquantitative method to determine score, exposure, consequence, and likelihood, then we rsquo ll calculate them into Risk Assessment Matriks RAM . The guideline that we use is from International Petroleum Industry Environmental Conservation Association IPIECA and the International Association of Oil Gas Producers OGP.

Based on the calculation we found 4 level of risk hazard control for chemical dan physical hazards, there are, no need immediate action, first, second, and third priority of action.HRA result shows there are some physical hazards, lighting, heat stress and noise. There were also found chemical hazards, they are Hidrocarbon, Fuel Gas CO, Fuel Gas H2S, Fuel Gas CO2, Ammonia NH3 , Benzene Toluene Xylene BTX , NaOH, Katalis, Steam H2, fuel oil, N2, SO2, LPG, Indoor Air Quality CO, CO, O2,Nox, SOx , and Lube oil. The level of risk can be reduced by applying control of hierarchy, such as eliminating hazard, increasing light intensity, limiting working area, worker rotation, using appropriate PPE, and measure chemical hazard exposure."

"

ABSTRAK

Nama : Egnes EkarantiProgram Studi : Magister Keselamatan dan Kesehatan KerjaJudul : Analisis Risiko Kesehatan yang Terkait dengan Pajanan Radiasidi PTKMR BATANPembimbing : Prof. Dr. dr. L. Meily Kurniawidjaja, M.Sc.,Sp.OkBekerja dengan radiasi dapat menimbulkan dampak kesehatan karena pekerja radiasimenerima pajanan radiasi yang terus menerus dan bersifat kumulatif selama bekerja.Dampak kesehatan yang diduga terkait dengan pajanan radiasi dapat berupa kanker,katarak, penyakit kardiovaskular, hiperkolesterol, hipertensi dan tumor jinak. Faktor –faktor yang diteliti di penelitian ini yaitu faktor di tempat kerja seperti dosis kumulatifTLD, lama bekerja dengan radiasi dan sistem proteksi radiasi. Faktor di luar tempatkerja yaitu riwayat diagnosis atau terapi medis radiologis. Faktor individu yaitusosiodemografi, lifestyle dan riwayat penyakit keturunan. Tujuan dari penelitian iniadalah untuk mengetahui adanya hubungan antara pajanan radiasi dan dampakkesehatan; adanya hubungan faktor-faktor risiko dan dampak kesehatan; sertapenerapan proteksi radiasi di PTKMR BATAN. Desain penelitian ini adalah crosssectional. Data primer diperoleh dari kuesioner, observasi lapangan dan wawancaraserta data sekunder lain yang dibutuhkan. Hasil penelitian ini didapat bahwa tidak adahubungan antara pajanan radiasi dengan dampak kesehatan pada pekerja di PTKMRBATAN. Ada hubungan yang signifikan antara faktor individu yaitu usia dengan CVD,hiperkolesterol dan hipertensi; jenis kelamin dengan hiperkolesterol; dan riwayatpenyakit keturunan dengan CVD, hiperkolesterol dan hipertensi. Penerapan sistemprotesi radiasi di PTKMR secara umum telah berjalan dengan baik. Disarankan agarPTKMR BATAN mengadakan pemeriksaan dengan WBC secara berkala; pemeriksaankhusus terkait dampak kesehatan yang diduga terkait dengan pajanan radiasi;peningkatan sistem proteksi radiasi; dan mengadakan program promosi kesehatanterkait penyakit degeneratif.Kata kunci: Radiasi; pekerja; faktor risiko; dampak kesehatan

---

ABSTRACT

Name : Egnes EkarantiStudy Program : Master Program of Occupational Health and SafetyTitle : Health Risk Analysis Related To Radiation Exposure on Workersat PTKMR BATANCounsellor : Prof. Dr. dr. L. Meily Kurniawidjaja, M.Sc., Sp.OkWorking with radiation can have adverse health effects because radiation workersreceived occupational radiation exposure continuously and cumulatively. Adversehealth effects related to radiation exposure include cancer, cataracts, cardiovasculardisease, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension and benign tumors. This study investigatedthe workplace risk factors such as the cumulative dose of TLD, length of work withradiation and radiation protection system; and the outside workplace risk factors suchas diagnosis or radiological medical therapy. Individual factors are sociodemography,lifestyle and history of hereditary disease. This study aimed to determine therelationship between radiation exposure and health effects; the relationship betweenrisk factors and health effects; and the implementation of radiation protection atPTKMR BATAN. study design was cross sectional. Primary data obtained byquestionnaires, field observations and interviews as well as secondary data needed.This study found that there is no significant relationship between radiation exposureand health effect; there is significant relationship between individual risk factors that isage and CVD, hypercholesterol and hypertension; gender and hypercholesterol; andgenetics with CVD, hypercholesterol and hypertension. Radiation protection has beenwell implemented at PTKMR BATAN. Some recommendation for PTKMR BATAN is toconduct examination using WBC regularly; specific health examination related tohealth effect due to radiation exposure; Increased radiation protection system; andhealth promotion programs related to degenerative diseases for workers.Keywords: Radiation; workers; risk factors; health effect

"

"Risiko kesehatan di tempat kerja adalah permasalahan yang harus diminimalisasi agar para pekerja tetap sehat dan selamat. Penelitian yang dilakukan di Area Gas Plant dan Power Plant PT.X menunjukkan bahwa dua area pendukung eksplorasi minyak dan gas bumi PT.X ini masih banyak bahaya kesehatan yang belum teridentifikasi sehingga belum dilakukan pengendaliannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui nilai dan tingkat risiko Area Gas Plant dan Power Plant PT.X sehingga dapat diberikan rekomendasi pengendalian bahaya kesehatan yang sesuai untuk meminimalisasi risiko yang ada, berdasarkan penilaian risiko kesehatan dan analisis sumber daya. Desain studi yang digunakan adalah desktiptif analitik dengan pendekatan observasional yang mengacu pada standar AS/NZS 4360:2004 dan perhitungan nilai risiko berdasarkan metode semikuantitatif ICMM (2011). Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat berbagai bahaya kesehatan yang mendapatkan prioritas tinggi pengendalian yaitu bahaya bising, bahan kimia silika, dan bahan kimia amina di dua area tersebut.

---

Health risks in the workplace are the problem that must be minimized in order to keep workers healthy and safe. Research conducted in Gas Plant and Power Plant Area shows that the two areas of PT.X, which to support oil and gas exploration, still have many health hazards that have not been identified so that control is not performed. This study aims to determine the level of risk and the value of Gas Plant and Power Plant Area of PT.X so it can be given appropriate health hazard control recommendations to minimize risks, based on the health risk assessment and analysis of resources. Study design used is descriptive analytical observational approach which refers to standard AS/NZS 4360:2004 and calculation of risk based on a semiquantitative method of ICMM (2011). The results of this study indicate that there are a variety of health hazards whose priority is high, that is, noise hazards, silica chemicals, and chemicals amine in both areas."

"Penilaian risiko kesehatan terkait pajanan bahaya kimia merupakan penilaian yang dilakukan untuk memastikan bahwa risiko kesehatan yang disebabkan oleh pajanan bahaya kimia telah dikendalikan dengan tepat. Penelitian ini mendiskusikan tentang metode penilaian risiko kesehatan terkait pajanan bahaya kimia yang dikembangkan oleh negara, meliputi chemical health risk assessment (CHRA) dari Malaysia, control of substances hazardous to health (COSHH) oleh United Kingdom, semi-quantitative risk assessment (SQRA) dari Singapura dan semi-quantitative occupational risk prediction model (SQORPM) dari Taiwan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian adalah kajian pustaka naratif yang bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi cara penilaian, variabel yang digunakan, hubungan antar variabel serta analisis perbandingan umum dari empat metode dengan pendekatan argumentasi penulis. Keempat metode menggunakan variabel yang sama dalam menilai risiko, yakni variabel tingkat bahaya dan tingkat pajanan dan metode CHRA dan SQRA memiliki kesamaan dalam penentuan tingkat risiko. SQORPM menggunakan variabel toxicity index (TI), exposure index (EI) dan protection deficiency index (PDI). COSHH merupakan metode kualittatif dimana tingkat bahaya bersifat lebih umum, dan tingkat pajanan bahaya ditentukan oleh jumlah bahan kimia yang digunakan dan kemungkinan terdispersi ke udara. Menurut pendapat peneliti, CHRA yang dikembangkan oleh Malaysia merupakan metode yang tepat untuk digunakan di Indonesia karena matriks tingkat risiko yang diadopsi hampir sama.

---

Health risk assessment related to chemical hazard exposure is an assessment carried out to ensure that the health risks caused by chemical hazard exposure have been properly controlled. This study discusses the method of assessing health risks related to exposure to chemical hazards developed by the state, including chemical health risk assessment (CHRA) from Malaysia, control of substances hazardous to health (COSHH) by the United Kingdom, semi-quantitative risk assessment (SQRA) from Singapore and semi-quantitative occupational risk prediction model (SQORPM) from Taiwan. The method used in this research is a narrative literature review which aims to identify the method of assessment, the variables used, the relationship between variables and general comparative analysis of the four methods with the author's argumentation approach. The four methods use the same variables in assessing risk, namely the variable level of hazard and level of exposure and the CHRA and SQRA methods have similarities in determining the level of risk. SQORPM uses the toxicity index (TI), exposure index (EI) and protection deficiency index (PDI) variables. COSHH is a qualitative method where the level of hazard is more general, and the level of hazard exposure is determined by the amount of the chemical used and the possibility of dispersal into the air. In the opinion of the researcher, the CHRA developed by Malaysia is the right method to be used in Indonesia because the risk level matrix adopted is almost the same."

"Pelaksanaan Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja di laboratorium terutama di bagian Mikrobiologi merupakan hal penting yang harus dijalankan, dimana laboratorium di bagian Mikrobiologi merupakan salah satu tempat kerja yang mengandung bahaya kesehatan mudah terjangkit penyakit, risiko kecelakaan kerja dan penyakit akibat kerja. Tujuanya adalah diketahuinya tingkat risiko K3 pada aktivitas pemeriksaan sampel yang rutin dilakukan seperti pemeriksaan kultur darah, sputum dan memberikan rekomendasi. Tahapan manajement risiko dilakukan berdasarkan pendekatan manajemen risiko AS/NZS 4360:2004, metode identifikasi hazard yang digunakan adalah Generic Model dan untuk penentuan level risiko metode analisa risiko semikuantitatif mengunakan nilai berupa skor berdasarkan W.T. Fine dalam Cross Jean, 1998. Existing risk (dengan memperhitungkan pengendalian yang telah ada) pada aktivitas pemeriksaan kultur darah dan sputum dikelompokan menurut tahapan kerja dan dilakukan skoring berdasarkan Fine untuk menentukan level risikonya, didapatkan level risiko Besar sebanyak 13, level risiko Prioritas 3 sebanyak 17, dan level risiko Diterima sebanyak 6. Untuk mengurangi risiko K3 pada petugas analis kesehatan di bagian Mikrobiologi dilakukan engineering control, administrative control, dan alat pelindung diri (APD).

---

Implementation of Occupational Health and Safety in the Microbiology laboratory is especially important to be performed, where the Microbiology laboratory isone of workplace helath hazards easily contract the disease, the risk of occupational accidents and occupational diseases. The aim is to know the level of risk k3 activity routine sample check such as checking blood culture, sputum and provide recommendations. Stages of Management of risk approach to risk management i based on AS/NZS 4360:2004, hazard identification methods used are Generic Model for determinaation of the level of risk and risk analysis methods semiquantitatively using a score based on the value in WT Fine in Jean Cross, 1998. Existing risk (taking into account existing controls) on the activityof blood and sputum culture examination are grouped according to the stages of labor and scoring done by Fine to determine the level of risk, Great risk levels obtained were 13, the risk level Priority 3 as many as 17, and as Acceptable risk levels 6. To reduce the risk of K3 on workers health analyst at the Microbiology conducted engineering controls, administrative controls, and personal protective equipment (PPE)."

"Penelitian ini tentang health risk assessment pada kegiatan produksi yang dilakukan di area Stasiun Pengumpul A (SP A) dan Stasiun Pengumpul Utama B (SPUB) PT X tahun 2014. Penilaian risiko kesehatan dilakukan dengan dengan menganalisis nilai potensi dari bahaya yang ada (P), Frekuensi pajanan (F), Durasi (D), Risiko Awal (RA), Upaya Perlindungan (UP) dan Risiko Risidual (RR) untuk mengetahui level risiko kesehatan yang ada pada setiap kegiatan kerja. metode penelitian ini adalah semikuantitatif dengan melakukan observasi dan pengumpulan data. Hasil dari penilaian risiko menunjukkan bahwa pada kegiatan di area SP A yaitu pengukuran volume tangki di tangki produksi 7 (benzene, toluene, xylene, hexane, pasta gasoline), di tangki 4 dan 6 (pasta gasoline), pengoprasian pompa transfer, compressor (bising) memiliki risiko kesehatan tinggi. Sedangakn di area SPU B pajanan kebisingan pada pompa transfer memiliki risiko medium.

---

This Health Risk Assessment research that was held at Oil Station A (SP A) and Primary Oil Station B (SPU B) PT X Years 2014. Health risk assessment was conducted by analyzing the value potential of hazard (P), Frequency rate of exposure (F), Duration (D), level of risk (RA), Prevention means (UP) and Residual Risk (RR) from every job activity. This study is a semi quantitative method by observation and data collection. The result of this risk assessment indicated that in SP A activity, measuring the volume of tank in tank production 7 (benzene, toluene, xylene, hexane, gasoline pasta), in tank 4 and 6 (gasoline past), in transfer pump and compressor (noisy) has a high risk. While in the area SPU B noise exposure in transfer pump that have a medium risk."