Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Pemberian remunerasi dinilai sebagai kebijakan yang efektif dalam meningkatkan gairah bekerja pegawai, serta menahan mereka dari perilaku korupsi. Kebijakan ini telah diimplementasikan di Indonesia, khususnya terhadap Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN). Namun, fenomena korupsi di kalangan ASN masih terus terjadi, baik sebelum maupun sesudah diberikannya remunerasi. Hal ini mengindikasikan adanya crime displacement sebagai bentuk adaptasi dari ASN dalam melakukan korupsi. Dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif, tulisan ini melakukan analisis data dengan ditunjang oleh tiga teori, yakni crime displacement, rational choice, dan fraud triangle theory. Data diperoleh dari tiga kasus korupsi ASN di sektor pelayanan publik. Tulisan ini menemukan bahwa pertama, adanya crime displacement ini dipengaruhi oleh peluang, biaya, dan manfaat. Secara lebih spesifik, faktor-faktor ini dapat dijelaskan melalui choice structuring properties sebagai turunan dari rational choice theory. Kedua, adanya crime displacement ini adalah hasil dari interaksi antara tiga elemen fraud triangle, yaitu a non-shareable problems, general knowledge/technical skills, dan verbalization/rationalization.

---

Remuneration is considered as effective policy in increasing employee enthusiasm for work and restraining them from corrupt behavior. This policy has been implemented in Indonesia, especially for the State Civil Apparatus (ASN). However, corruption among ASN continues to occur, both before and after the remuneration is given. This indicates the existence of crime displacement as a form of adaptation from ASN in committing corruption. By using qualitative methods, this paper analyzes data supported by three theories: crime displacement, rational choice, and fraud triangle theory. The data was obtained from three ASN corruption cases in the public service sector. This paper finds that opportunities, costs, and benefits influence crime displacement. More specifically, these factors can be explained through the choice-structuring properties as a derivative of rational choice theory. Second, crime displacement results from the interaction between the three elements of the fraud triangle: a non-shareable problems, general knowledge/technical skills, and verbalization/rationalization."

"Skripsi ini membahas tentang keberadaan portal aduanasn.id, dalam ini portal yang dibangun oleh pemerintah. Pada portal ini, yang menjadi obyek aduan adalah ASN. Portal ini benar-benar diperuntukan untuk ASN yang diduga melakukan pelanggaran berupa tindakan radikalisme, sosial media, ujaran kebencian yang mengarah pada unsur-unsur yang bertentangan dengan Pancasila, Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Permasalahan yang diangkat adalah mengenai keberadaan, mekanisme kewenangan antar lembaga negara dan kementerian, aspek pembinaan dan pengawasan yang dilakukan terhadap ASN yang terbukti melanggar. Adapun metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode yuridis normatif, dengan bahan utama berupa data sekunder melalui penelusuran dengan studi dokumen dan didukung oleh wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keberadaan portal sudah eksis namun masih belum banyak diketahui oleh masyarakat. Adapun mekanisme yang dilaksanakan oleh Satuan Tugas yang dibentuk oleh Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur dan Reformasi Birokrasi (KemenPANRB) diantaranya adalah berupa koordinasi dan sinergitas. Pembinaan dan pengawasan terhadap ASN yang melakukan pelanggaran radikalisme mengacu pada peraturan disiplin ASN, apabila terbukti melanggar berdasarkan kategori pelanggaran yang telah ditentukan maka ASN tersebut dijatuhi sanksi hukuman disiplin yang bergantung pada jenis pelanggarannya. Maka dari itu, dengan adanya portal aduanasn.id ini sebagai bentuk upaya pemerintah dalam membina dan mengawasi ASN agar benar-benar bersih dari paham radikalisme.

---

This thesis discusses about the existence of aduanasn.id portal website which was built by the government. In this portal, the object of complaint is about State Civil Apparatus. This portal is intended for Civil Servant who are suspected of violating radicalism, social media, hate speech that refer to Pancasila, The Constitution (UUD 1945). The issues are about the existence, the mechanism of authority between state institutions and ministries, and also about the aspects of guidance and supervision that carried out on State Civil Apparatus which are proven to violate. The research method used is a normative juridical method, with the main material in the form of secondary data through searching with document studies and supported by interviews. The results showed that the existence of the portal already exists but not yet known by the public. The mechanism implemented by the Task Force established by the Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform (KemenPANRB) namely in the form of coordination and synergy. Guidance and supervision of State Civil Apparatus that violates radicalism that refers to State Civil Apparatus Discipline Rules, and if it is proven to violate based on the categories of violations that have been determined, then the State Civil Apparatus is subject to disciplinary sanctions that depend on the type of violation. Therefore, with this aduanasn.id portal as a form of government efforts in fostering and supervising State Civil Apparatus so that it is completely free of radicalism."

"Penelitian ini akan membahas tentang mengapa mahasiswa asing yang belajar di Jepang memutuskan untuk belajar di Universitas Kyushu, Jepang. Dengan melalui internasionalisasi pendidikan tinggi, Universitas Kyushu telah menarik para mahasiswa asing untuk belajar di sana. Adapun para mahasiswa asing memiliki alasan-alasan tertentu tentang mengapa mereka memutuskan untuk belajar di universitas tersebut. Dengan menggunakan penelitian metode kualitatif, penelitian ini dilakukan dengan cara wawancara dan kajian literatur untuk menganalisis keputusan para mahasiswa asing untuk belajar di sana dari sudut pandang embeddedness dan pilihan rasional (rational choice). Beberapa faktor seperti ketersediaan beasiswa, relasi dengan guarantor, biaya hidup yang murah, program studi yang berkualitas tinggi, lingkungan alam yang asri, dan kelengkapan fasilitas publik adalah beberapa alasan yang menarik para mahasiswa asing untuk belajar di sana. Mereka juga menerima saran dan bantuan dari hubungan pertemanan mereka yang mempengaruhi keputusan mereka untuk belajar di universitas tersebut.

---

This research will discuss why some foreign students studying in Japan decide to undergo their studies at Kyushu University. Thanks to the university's internationalization of higher education, Kyushu University has successfully attracted thousands of foreign students to study at the university. In this regard, foreign students have personal reasons for why deciding to study at the university. Using qualitative research methods, this research was conducted by way of interviews and a literature review to analyze the decisions of foreign students to study there from the perspective of embeddedness and rational choice. Factors such as the availability of scholarships, low cost of living, high-quality study programs, a well-preserved natural environment, and well-equipped public facilities are some of the reasons that attract foreign students to study there. They also receive recommendations and assistance from their colleagues (friends, academic supervisors, etc.) which influence their decision to study at the university."

"[ABSTRAKTesis ini membahas kebijakan Aparatur Negara dalam dugaan tindakpidana korupsi. Dengan mengkaji konsep dan kewenangan kebijakan Aparatur Negara dalam Hukum Administrasi dan Hukum pidana. Kebijakan tersebut dinilai dari kedua pendekatan ilmu hukum tersebut untuk menilai kebijakan Aparatur yang bagaimana dapat dikriminalisasikan sebagai tindak pidana korupsi. Dalam tesis ini yang ingin didapatkan oleh penulis adalah (1) Apakah suatu kebijakanAparatur Negara yang melanggar ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan dapat dimungkinkan untuk dikenakan sanksi pidana; (2) Bagaimana terhadap suatu kebijakan Aparatur Negara yang di dalamnya mengandung unsur perbuatan melawan hukum atau unsur penyalahgunaan wewenang dalam tindak pidana korupsi; (3) Apakah terhadap kebijakan yang dikeluarkan oleh Aparatur Negara yang memberikan keuntungan kepada orang lain atau korporasi dan menimbulkan kerugian negara dapat dikenakan tindak pidana korupsi sedangkan dia tidak ada menikmati hasil tindakannya. Penelitian ini mengunakan metode penelitian dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan mengunakan data sekunder seperti dari buku-buku dan peraturan perundang-undangan yang terkait dengan tindak pidana korupsi, kerugian negara, penyalahgunaan wewenag dan literatur-literatur terkait lainnya. Kebijakan Aparatur Negara harus berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan. Seorang pejabat dilarang melakukan penyalahgunaan wewenang yang melanggar ketentuan perundang-undangan. Namun disisi lain pejabat juga diberikan hak kebebasan dalam mengambil kebijakan untuk kepentingan orang banyak bahkan kalaupun undang-undang tidak mengaturnya dapat diterapkan berdasarkan AAUPB. Namun apabila kebijakan tersebut ada unsur mens rea (niat jahat) dan dilakukan dengan sengaja maka kebijakanAparatur Negara tersebut dapat diminta pertanggungjawab pribadi bukan jabatan atas perbuatannya tersebut. Kalau perbuatan itu tidak ada unsur mens rea maka masuk kedalam ranah hukum administrasi atau hukum perdata. Pada saat ini kebijakan Aparatur Negara telah masuk dalam kategori kriminalisasi. Hal ini terjadi karena adanya kesalahan dalam pemahaman dimana kerugian negara ditempat sebagai bukti utama telah terjadi korupsi atas perbuatannya yangmelawan hukum atau menyalahgunakan wewenang tanpa diikuti adanya unsur koruptif. Padahal dalam banyak kasus kerugian negara ini terjadi karena adanya kesalahan administratif atau kecurangan dari pihak pemenang tender yang memanipulasi barang dan data sehingga tidak sesuai spesifikasi yang mana dokumen tersebut dipalsukan dan dibuat seolah-olah sah dan legal. Oleh karenanya, dengan lahirnya Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Negara diharapkan dapat memberikan perlindungan akan kriminalisasi terhadap putusan dan/atau tindakan Aparatur Negara yang didalamnya tidak ada unsur koruptifnya.

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis examines the policy of the State Apparatus in alleged corruption. To examines the concept and authority policy of the State Apparatus in Administrative Law and Criminal Law. The such policy is assessed from two approach the science of law to assessing how policies Apparatus which can becriminalized as an act of corruption. In this thesis that want achieved by the author are (1) Does a State Apparatus policies that violate the provisions of the legislation can be subject to criminal sanctions; (2) When is a policy of the State Apparatus can be regarded fulfill the elements of tort or elements of abuse of power in corruption; (3) A State Apparatus policies that provide benefits to another person or corporation and causing state losses while he did not get to enjoy the results of his conduct, whether such conduct may be subject tocorruption. This research uses research methods with normative juridical approach by using secondary data as the basis for this research as from books and legislation relating to corruption, state losses, abuse of power and other related literature and also supported by directly interviews to some of prosecutor in corruption. State Apparatus policy should be based law and legislation. A government official is prohibited do abuse of power that violate the statutoryprovisions. On the other hand the government official also granted the right of freedom in making decisions for the public good even if the law does not yet set such, the government official can make policy based on the Good Governance Principles. However, if the such policy has element of mens rea (malice) and there is deliberate and realized then the policies of the State Apparatus may be subject to responsibility in corruption. If the conduct did not have element mens rea thenhis conduct entered into the administrative law or civil law. At this time the policy of the State Apparatus has been included in the category of criminalization in corruption. This occurs because of an error in understanding where state losses in place as the primary evidence of corruption has occurred for his conduct against the law or abuse of power while his conduct without being followed by the corrupt elements. Therefore, there are cases of state losses caused toadministrative error or fraud, or because of defective juridical. To publication of Law No. 30 Year 2014 on the State Administration as a form protection to the criminalization of the decision and / or conduct of State Apparatus in which there is no element of corruptive;This thesis examines the policy of the State Apparatus in alleged corruption. Toexamines the concept and authority policy of the State Apparatus inAdministrative Law and Criminal Law. The such policy is assessed from twoapproach the science of law to assessing how policies Apparatus which can becriminalized as an act of corruption. In this thesis that want achieved by the authorare (1) Does a State Apparatus policies that violate the provisions of thelegislation can be subject to criminal sanctions; (2) When is a policy of the StateApparatus can be regarded fulfill the elements of tort or elements of abuse ofpower in corruption; (3) A State Apparatus policies that provide benefits toanother person or corporation and causing state losses while he did not get toenjoy the results of his conduct, whether such conduct may be subject tocorruption. This research uses research methods with normative juridical approachby using secondary data as the basis for this research as from books andlegislation relating to corruption, state losses, abuse of power and other relatedliterature and also supported by directly interviews to some of prosecutor incorruption. State Apparatus policy should be based law and legislation. Agovernment official is prohibited do abuse of power that violate the statutoryprovisions. On the other hand the government official also granted the right offreedom in making decisions for the public good even if the law does not yet setsuch, the government official can make policy based on the Good GovernancePrinciples. However, if the such policy has element of mens rea (malice) and thereis deliberate and realized then the policies of the State Apparatus may be subjectto responsibility in corruption. If the conduct did not have element mens rea thenhis conduct entered into the administrative law or civil law. At this time the policyof the State Apparatus has been included in the category of criminalization incorruption. This occurs because of an error in understanding where state losses inplace as the primary evidence of corruption has occurred for his conduct againstthe law or abuse of power while his conduct without being followed by thecorrupt elements. Therefore, there are cases of state losses caused toadministrative error or fraud, or because of defective juridical. To publication ofLaw No. 30 Year 2014 on the State Administration as a form protection to thecriminalization of the decision and / or conduct of State Apparatus in which thereis no element of corruptive;This thesis examines the policy of the State Apparatus in alleged corruption. Toexamines the concept and authority policy of the State Apparatus inAdministrative Law and Criminal Law. The such policy is assessed from twoapproach the science of law to assessing how policies Apparatus which can becriminalized as an act of corruption. In this thesis that want achieved by the authorare (1) Does a State Apparatus policies that violate the provisions of thelegislation can be subject to criminal sanctions; (2) When is a policy of the StateApparatus can be regarded fulfill the elements of tort or elements of abuse ofpower in corruption; (3) A State Apparatus policies that provide benefits toanother person or corporation and causing state losses while he did not get toenjoy the results of his conduct, whether such conduct may be subject tocorruption. This research uses research methods with normative juridical approachby using secondary data as the basis for this research as from books andlegislation relating to corruption, state losses, abuse of power and other relatedliterature and also supported by directly interviews to some of prosecutor incorruption. State Apparatus policy should be based law and legislation. Agovernment official is prohibited do abuse of power that violate the statutoryprovisions. On the other hand the government official also granted the right offreedom in making decisions for the public good even if the law does not yet setsuch, the government official can make policy based on the Good GovernancePrinciples. However, if the such policy has element of mens rea (malice) and thereis deliberate and realized then the policies of the State Apparatus may be subjectto responsibility in corruption. If the conduct did not have element mens rea thenhis conduct entered into the administrative law or civil law. At this time the policyof the State Apparatus has been included in the category of criminalization incorruption. This occurs because of an error in understanding where state losses inplace as the primary evidence of corruption has occurred for his conduct againstthe law or abuse of power while his conduct without being followed by thecorrupt elements. Therefore, there are cases of state losses caused toadministrative error or fraud, or because of defective juridical. To publication ofLaw No. 30 Year 2014 on the State Administration as a form protection to thecriminalization of the decision and / or conduct of State Apparatus in which thereis no element of corruptive, This thesis examines the policy of the State Apparatus in alleged corruption. Toexamines the concept and authority policy of the State Apparatus inAdministrative Law and Criminal Law. The such policy is assessed from twoapproach the science of law to assessing how policies Apparatus which can becriminalized as an act of corruption. In this thesis that want achieved by the authorare (1) Does a State Apparatus policies that violate the provisions of thelegislation can be subject to criminal sanctions; (2) When is a policy of the StateApparatus can be regarded fulfill the elements of tort or elements of abuse ofpower in corruption; (3) A State Apparatus policies that provide benefits toanother person or corporation and causing state losses while he did not get toenjoy the results of his conduct, whether such conduct may be subject tocorruption. This research uses research methods with normative juridical approachby using secondary data as the basis for this research as from books andlegislation relating to corruption, state losses, abuse of power and other relatedliterature and also supported by directly interviews to some of prosecutor incorruption. State Apparatus policy should be based law and legislation. Agovernment official is prohibited do abuse of power that violate the statutoryprovisions. On the other hand the government official also granted the right offreedom in making decisions for the public good even if the law does not yet setsuch, the government official can make policy based on the Good GovernancePrinciples. However, if the such policy has element of mens rea (malice) and thereis deliberate and realized then the policies of the State Apparatus may be subjectto responsibility in corruption. If the conduct did not have element mens rea thenhis conduct entered into the administrative law or civil law. At this time the policyof the State Apparatus has been included in the category of criminalization incorruption. This occurs because of an error in understanding where state losses inplace as the primary evidence of corruption has occurred for his conduct againstthe law or abuse of power while his conduct without being followed by thecorrupt elements. Therefore, there are cases of state losses caused toadministrative error or fraud, or because of defective juridical. To publication ofLaw No. 30 Year 2014 on the State Administration as a form protection to thecriminalization of the decision and / or conduct of State Apparatus in which thereis no element of corruptive]"

"Penanganan kasus korupsi di Indonesia seringkali melibatkan akuntanforensik yang berperan dalam melakukan penghitungan kerugian negara. Padabeberapa tahun terakhir, marak terjadi vonis bebas dan lepas terhadap terdakwa korupsi. Hakim menilai tidak terjadi kerugian negara, sementara akuntan forensik berkeyakinan telah terjadi kerugian negara. Di samping itu, terdapat banyak perkara korupsi dimana penetapan besaran kerugian negaranya tidak menggunakan hasil PKN akuntan forensik. Kondisi tersebut mengisyaratkan hasil PKN akuntan forensik belum sepenuhnya akurat, sehingga belum memenuhi unsur nyata dan pasti di mata hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif melalui analisis dokumendan wawancara kepada praktisi akuntan forensik, ahli konstruksi, jaksa fungsional, pakar akuntansi forensik, dan mantan hakim tindak pidana korupsi. Penelitian dilakukan menggunakan kerangka Segitiga Akuntansi Forensik sebagai kriteria ideal diterimanya hasil PKN di muka persidangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat dua faktor penyebab hasil PKN ditolak hakim, yaitu : (1) tidak ditemukannya niat jahat(mens rea) pada terdakwa, dan (2) hasil ahli teknis yang mendasari PKN ditolak hakim. Adapun lima faktor penyebab nilai PKN tidak digunakan dalam penetapan kerugian negara yaitu : (1) pengembalian ke kas negara/daerah, (2) pembayaran uang titipan perkara ke aparat penegak hukum, (3) dana yang telah dikeluarkan dalam pelaksanaan kegiatan, (4) lingkup kerugian terbatas pada terdakwa, dan (5) hasil ahli teknis tidakakurat. Hasil penelitian diharapkan mampu berkontribusi pada peningkatan kualitas PKN, sehingga menjadi pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus perkara korupsi dan menetapkan besaran kerugian negara.

---

Corruption case handling in Indonesia often involves forensic accountants who play a role in calculating state losses. There have been many acquittal and released sentences of corruption defendants in the last few years. The judge considered no state losses, while the forensic accountant considered there had been losses. In

addition, there are many corruption cases where the determination of the number of state losses does not use PKN results numbers. This condition implies that PKN result numbers are not yet entirely accurate, so they do not meet the real and definite elements in the eyes of the law.

This study uses a qualitative approach through document analysis and

interviews with forensic accountants, construction experts, functional prosecutors, forensic accounting experts, and former judges for corruption. The study used the Forensic Accounting Triangle as the ideal criteria for accepting PKN results in court.

The results showed that two factors caused the judge's rejection of the results of the PKN, namely: (1) no malicious intent (mens rea), and (2) the result of the technical expert that underlies the audit conclusion rejected by the judge. Five factors caused the PKN result numbers not to be used in determining state losses, namely: (1) returns to the state/regional treasury, (2) payment of case deposits to law enforcement officials, (3) funds that have been spent in carrying out activities, (4) the scope of the loss is limited to the defendant, and (5) the result of the technical expert not accurate. The research results are expected to improve the PKN's quality to become a judge's consideration in deciding corruption cases and determining the number of state losses."

"Aksi yang mengarah pada ekstremisme dan teror yang melibatkan Aparatur Negara adalah bagian dari fenomena puncak akibat dari paparan paham radikalisme dan terorisme di Indonesia. Beberapa Anggota TNI, Polri, PNS/ASN terbukti terlibat tindak pidana terorisme dan telah diputuskan bersalah oleh Pengadilan serta menjalani hukuman. Maraknya kasus radikalisme Aparatur Negara ini memberi peringatan akan bahaya radikalisme sehingga perlu dilakukan analisis mendalam serta evaluasi terhadap upaya pencegahan radikalisme yang dilakukan Pemerintah Indonesia. Penelitian ini melakukan analisis terhadap praktik radikalisme Aparatur Negara, khususnya Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) serta memberikan hasil analisis atas relevansi teori terhadap strategi pencegahan radikalisme ASN di Indonesia. Teori utama yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Teori Identitas Sosial (Social Identity Theory), Teori Pembelajaran Sosial (Social Learning Theory), Teori Pencegahan Kejahatan Sosial (Social Crime Prevention Theory) dan Teori Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (SDM). Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini, diketahui bahwa praktik radikalisme pada Aparatur Negara masih terjadi walaupun sudah diterbitkan Surat Keputusan Bersama 11 Kementerian. Untuk mengatasi hal tersebut, Pemerintah Indonesia dituntut melaksanakan strategi pencegahan yang komprehensif, diantaranya melalui penegakan hukum, pelibatan tokoh agama, kontra terorisme, kolaborasi antar instansi dan komunitas intelijen serta partisipasi aktif seluruh komponen masyarakat, memperkuat demokrasi dan counter-messaging (kontra narasi)

---

Actions that lead to extremism and terror involving State Apparatus are part of the peak phenomenon due to exposure to radicalism and terrorism in Indonesia. Several members of the TNI, Polri, and PNS/ASN have been proven to be involved in criminal acts of terrorism and have been found guilty by the Court and are serving their sentences. The rise of cases of radicalism by the State Apparatus warns of the dangers of radicalism, so it is necessary to carry out an in-depth analysis and evaluation of the efforts to prevent radicalism by the Government of Indonesia. This study analyzes the practice of State Apparatus radicalism, especially the State Civil Apparatus (ASN). It provides analysis results on the relevance of theory to the strategy of preventing ASN radicalism in Indonesia. The main theories used in this research are Social Identity Theory, Social Learning Theory, Social Crime Prevention Theory, and Human Resource Management Theory. The method used in this study uses a qualitative approach. The results of this study show that the practice of radicalism in the State Civil Apparatus still occurs even though the Joint Decrees of 11 Ministries have been issued. To resolve the issue, the Government of Indonesia is required to implement a comprehensive prevention strategy, including law enforcement, involvement of religious leaders, counter-terrorism, a collaboration between agencies and the intelligence community as well as the active participation of all components of society, strengthening democracy and counter-messaging (counter-narrative)."

"Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui pengaruh faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi manajemen perubahan dan kompetensi terhadap kinerja ASN pada Biro Hukum Kementerian Pertanian. Manajemen Perubahan Reformasi Birokrasi dilakukan untuk mengubah budaya dan pola pikir ASN sehingga dapat mencapai Profil Birokrasi yang diharapkan pada tahun 2025. Kementerian Pertanian khususnya Biro Hukum berkomitmen untuk melaksanakan Reformasi Birokrasi di lingkungan Kementerian Pertanian, khususnya dalam bidang perubahan pengaturan peraturan perundang-undangan. Untuk mencapai hal tersebut, Biro Hukum terus berupaya meningkatkan kompetensi ASN sebagai penyusun peraturan perundang-undangan. Penerapan manajemen perubahan dan peningkatan kompetensi di Biro Hukum bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kinerja di Biro Hukum khususnya dalam menghasilkan produk hukum di Bidang Pertanian. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan menyebarkan kuesioner sebagai data primer kepada 49 responden, sedangkan data sekunder dikumpulkan melalui studi pustaka dari berbagai jurnal, buku, peraturan perundang-undangan, dan sumber internet lainnya. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan terdapat pengaruh antara faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi manajemen perubahan dan kompetensi terhadap kinerja ASN di Biro Hukum Kementerian Pertanian.

---

This study was conducted to determine the effect of Factors Affecting change management and competence on the performance of ASN at the Legal Bureau of the Ministry of Agriculture. Management of Change in Bureaucratic Reform is carried out to change the culture and mindset of ASN so that it can achieve the expected Bureaucratic Profile in 2025. The Ministry of Agriculture, especially the Legal Bureau is committed to implementing Bureaucratic Reform within the Ministry of Agriculture, especially in the area of ​​changes in the arrangement of laws and regulations. To achieve this, the Legal Bureau continues to strive to improve the competence of ASN as a drafter of laws and regulations. The application of change management and competency improvement in the Legal Bureau has the aim of improving performance in the Legal Bureau, especially in producing legal products in the Agricultural Sector. This study uses quantitative methods by distributing questionnaires as primary data to 49 respondents, while secondary data is collected through literature reviews from various journals, books, laws and regulations, and other internet sources. The results of this study indicate that there is an influence of the factors that influence change management and competence on the performance of ASN in the Legal Bureau of the Ministry of Agriculture."

"Penelitian ini membahas tentang kapasitas kebijakan Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara (KASN) dalam melaksanakan pengawasan sistem merit manajemen Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN). Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menggambarkan kapasitas kebijakan KASN dalam mengawasi pelaksanaan sistem merit manajemen ASN. Penelitian ini menggunakan teori tiga dimensi kapasitas kebijakan dari teori kapasitas kebijakan menurut Xun Wu, Michael Howlett dan M. Ramesh (2015) yaitu dimensi kapasitas analitis, dimensi kapasitas operasional, dan dimensi kapasitas politik. Penelitian ini menggunakan teknik pengumpulan data secara kualitatif dengan data yang diperoleh dari wawancara mendalam dan studi kepustakaan. Peneliti melakukan wawancara mendalam kepada pihak-pihak yang terlibat dalam pelaksanaan pengawasan sistem merit pada manajemen ASN yang merupakan pegawai KASN dan Badan Kepegawaian Negara (BKN). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara umum kapasitas kebijakan level organisasi KASN dalam pengawasan sistem merit sudah baik, yang ditunjukkan oleh terpenuhinya indikator pada dimensi analitis dan politik. Sementara indikator komitmen organisasi untuk mencapai tujuan dan indikator koordinasi proses internal pada dimensi operasional. Namun, dalam indikator ketersediaan sumber daya fiskal dan personel pada dimensi kapasitas operasional KASN masih cenderung lemah karena kurangnya ketersediaan anggaran dana dan SDM di KASN.

---

This study discusses the position of the State Civil Apparatus Commission in implementing the merit management supervisory system of the State Civil Apparatus. This study aims to describe the policy position of the State Civil Apparatus Commission in supervising the implementation of the State Civil Apparatus merit management system. This study uses a three-dimensional theory of policy capacity from the theory of policy capacity according to Xun Wu, Michael Howlett, and M. Ramesh (2015), namely the analytical capacity, operational capacity dimensions, and political capacity dimensions. This study uses qualitative data collection techniques with data obtained from in-depth interviews and literature studies. The researcher conducted in-depth interviews with the parties involved in implementing an appropriate supervisory system for managing the State Civil Apparatus, who are employees of the State Civil Apparatus Commission and the State Civil Service Agency. The fulfillment of indicators on the analytical and political dimensions of the merit system demonstrated that, in general, the organizational capacity at the policy level of the State Civil Apparatus Commission to supervise it was good. Meanwhile, indicators of organizational commitment to achieving goals and internal process coordination are on the operational dimension. However, the indicators for the availability of fiscal and personnel resources on the dimensions of the operational capacity of the State Civil Apparatus Commission still need to be more substantial due to the lack of availability of budgetary funds and human resources in the State Civil Apparatus Commission."