Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRACTAlthough risk oversight committee has been mandatory for Indonesian banking industry since 2006, there has never been any inquiry trying to understand how the characteristics of risk oversight committee members may impact their tolerance towards bank management risk taking. Specifically, this research is aimed to shades light on how young age, female, and risk management experience characteristics of each members affect their inclination towards accommodating bank risk taking. The study uses panel data random effect regression for unique dataset of 27 banks from 2012 2016 and find that contrary to popular belief, increasing number of younger member reduce accommodation to bank risk taking. Moreover, increasing female members composition is proven to rise bank risk taking. These results are different with increasing proportion of risk management experienced committee members as they are proven to have no significant effect towards bank risk taking behavior. Additionally, sensitivity tests conducted using average age as young indicator and loosening risk management experience criteria by including previous risk oversight committee experience prove that these characteristics are not impacting bank risk taking. However, presence of female members in risk oversight committee have significant impact on improving accommodation to bank risk taking.

---

ABSTRACTWalaupun komite pemantau risiko diwajibkan untuk industri perbankan Indonesia sejak 2006, belum pernah terdapat studi yang mencoba mengerti bagaimana karakteristik yang dimiliki oleh anggota komite pemantau risiko berpengaruh terhadap toleransi pengambilan risiko yang dilakukan oleb manajemen. Secara spesifik, studi ini ditujukan untuk menjelaskan bagaimana anggota muda, wanita, dan pengalaman manajemen risiko setiap anggota mempengaruhi keputusan komite terkait pengambilan risiko. Studi ini menggunakan analisis data panel dengan random effect pada 27 bank dari 2012 hingga 2016. Riset menemukan bahwa peningkatan anggota muda menurunkan akomodasi terhadap pengambilan risiko perbankan dan peningkatan komposisi anggota wanita meningkatkan akomodasi komite terhadap pengambilan risiko bank. Di sisi lain, pengalaman manajemen risiko terbukti tidak memliki efek signifikan pada pengambilan risiko. Studi ini juga melakukan analisis tambahan dimana diketahui bahwa menggunakan rata-rata umur sebagai indikator muda serta memasukkan karir anggota komite pemantau risiko bank ke dalam indikator pengalaman tidak mempengaruhi hubungan komite pada pengambilan risiko bank. Walaupun demikian, keberadaan anggota wanita ditemukan memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap akomodasi komite terhadap pengambilan risiko bank."

"ABSTRACTPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan bukti empiris mengenai pengaruh karakteristik dan rangkap jabatan komite pemantau risiko dan komite audit terhadap risiko kredit perbankan di Indonesia. Kedua komite tersebut merupakan komite di bawah dewan komisaris yang bertanggung jawab terhadap pengawasan pelaksanaan manajemen risiko bank. Karakteristik komite diukur melalui aktivitas, ukuran, keahlian kompetensi berdasarkan checklist yang dikembangkan Hermawan 2011 dengan modifikasi peraturan yang berlaku. Sampel terdiri dari bank yang terdaftar dalam Bursa Efek Indonesia selama tahun 2013 hingga 2017. Hasil dari penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa karakteristik keahlian kompetensi, baik dalam komite pemantau risiko maupun komite audit, memiliki pengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap risiko kredit perbankan. Penelitian ini juga membuktikan bahwa rangkap jabatan dalam komite audit dan komite pemantau risiko memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap risiko kredit, menunjukkan fokus kinerja komite. Sementara, karakteristik aktivitas dan ukuran komite audit maupun komite pemantau risiko tidak memiliki pengaruh signifikan. Lebih lanjut, melalui pengujian tambahan, karakteristik keahlian keuangan non-akuntansi memiliki pengaruh negatif terhadap risiko kredit, menunjukkan bahwa keahlian ini mampu menunjang monitoring terhadap risiko kredit.

---

ABSTRACTThis research aims to provide empirical evidence regarding the effect of characteristics and overlap membership of Risk Oversight Committee and Audit Committee on Banking credit risk in Indonesia. Both of committees are committee under Board of Commissioners that responsible for monitoring credit risk. Characteristics of each committees are measured by activities, size, and expertise competence based on Hermawan 2011 and Indonesia Financial Service Authority FSA regulation. Samples are consisted of banks listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange IDX during 2013 2017. The result from this research concludes that expertise and competence of both risk oversight committee and audit committee has negative effect on bank credit risk. This research also provides empirical evidence that overlap membership on both risk oversight and audit committee has positive effect on bank credit risk, implying its detrimental effect to the committee rsquo s effectiveness. While, activities and size of both risk oversight committee and audit committee do not have significant impact on bank credit risk. Further on additional test, it rsquo s concluded that only non accounting financial expertise has negative impact on bank credit risk, implying non accounting financial expertise may enhance the understanding of risk exposure and increase monitoring effectiveness of risk oversight committee and audit committee in monitoring credit risk. "

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis apakah efektivitas komite pemantau risiko (komite pemantau risiko wanita, jumlah anggota komite dan frekuensi rapat komite) berpengaruh terhadap pengambilan risiko dan kinerja bank umum di Indonesia. Penelitian ini juga meneliti pengaruh interaksi komite pemantau risiko dengan pengambilan risiko terhadap kinerja bank yang dihitung dengan menggunakan Tobin's Q. Dengan sampel 25 bank umum yang terdaftar di BEI periode 2008-2012, penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa frekuensi rapat komite berpengaruh positif terhadap pengambilan risiko sedangkan proporsi komite wanita dan jumlah anggota komite berpengaruh negatif terhadap pengambilan risiko. Frekuensi rapat berpengaruh negatif terhadap kinerja namun berpengaruh positif terhadap hubungan antara pengambilan risiko dan kinerja bank.

---

This study aims to examine whether risk monitoring committee effectiveness (female risk monitoring committee, size committee, and frequency of meetings) affects bank risk taking and bank performance. This study also examines the effect of risk monitoring committee effectiveness on the relationship between bank risk taking and bank performance measured by Tobin’s Q. With a sample of 25 bank listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2008-2012, this study finds that frequency of meetings committee positively affect bank risk taking while proportion of female risk monitoring committee and size committee negatively affect bank risk taking. Frequency of meetings negatively affects bank performance but positively affect the relationship between bank risk taking and bank performance."

"[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji peran komite pemantau risiko terhadap risiko dan profitabilitas di masa depan pada perbankan Indonesia Efektivitas komite yang diukur berdasarkan karakteristik independensi kompetensi dan aktivitasnya diharapkan dapat meningkatkan profitabilitas perbankan di masa depan melalui pengelolaan risiko yang efektif Efektivitas komite tersebut diukur berdasarkan metode skoring yang dikembangkan oleh Hermawan 2011 Pengujian hipotesis dilakukan melalui regresi data panel dengan sampel 25 bank yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada periode tahun 2010 2014 sehingga menghasilkan jumlah observasi 105 firm years Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa efektivitas komite pemantau risiko tidak dapat menurunkan risiko bank tetapi dapat meningkatkan profitabilitas di masa depan pada perbankan Indonesia Peningkatan profitabilitas ini disinyalir melalui risk premium kredit pinjaman yang relatif tinggi Pengujian tambahan kemudian dilakukan dengan menguji masing masing karakteristik komite terhadap risiko dan profitabilitas perbankan di masa depan Hasil pengujian tambahan ini menunjukkan bahwa hanya karakteristik independensi dari komite terkait yang berpengaruh positif terhadap profitabilitas terkait walaupun tidak pada risiko Namun tidak demikian dengan karakteristik lainnya yang tidak memberikan pengaruh terhadap risiko maupun profitabilitas di masa depan pada perbankan Indonesia ;This study aims to examine the role of risk oversight committees in managing and monitoring the risk and future profitability of Indonesian banks The effectiveness of the committee consisted of the following characteristics independency competency and activity It was measured using the scoring method developed by Hermawan 2011 is expected to increase bank rsquo s future profitability through effective risk management Hypothesis testing used panel data regression with sample of 25 banks listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange within the period of 2010 2014 Thus resulted in total observation of 105 firm years Results show that the risk committee effectiveness did not decrease bank rsquo s risk but increased its future profitability Increment in profitability was allegedly due to relatively high risk premium on loan Additional tests were performed by examining each of the committee characteristics Results show that only the independency characteristic of the committee positively affects bank rsquo s future profitability but not its risk Morever the committee rsquo s other characteristics neither affect bank rsquo s risk nor its future profitability ;This study aims to examine the role of risk oversight committees in managing and monitoring the risk and future profitability of Indonesian banks The effectiveness of the committee consisted of the following characteristics independency competency and activity It was measured using the scoring method developed by Hermawan 2011 is expected to increase bank rsquo s future profitability through effective risk management Hypothesis testing used panel data regression with sample of 25 banks listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange within the period of 2010 2014 Thus resulted in total observation of 105 firm years Results show that the risk committee effectiveness did not decrease bank rsquo s risk but increased its future profitability Increment in profitability was allegedly due to relatively high risk premium on loan Additional tests were performed by examining each of the committee characteristics Results show that only the independency characteristic of the committee positively affects bank rsquo s future profitability but not its risk Morever the committee rsquo s other characteristics neither affect bank rsquo s risk nor its future profitability , This study aims to examine the role of risk oversight committees in managing and monitoring the risk and future profitability of Indonesian banks The effectiveness of the committee consisted of the following characteristics independency competency and activity It was measured using the scoring method developed by Hermawan 2011 is expected to increase bank rsquo s future profitability through effective risk management Hypothesis testing used panel data regression with sample of 25 banks listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange within the period of 2010 2014 Thus resulted in total observation of 105 firm years Results show that the risk committee effectiveness did not decrease bank rsquo s risk but increased its future profitability Increment in profitability was allegedly due to relatively high risk premium on loan Additional tests were performed by examining each of the committee characteristics Results show that only the independency characteristic of the committee positively affects bank rsquo s future profitability but not its risk Morever the committee rsquo s other characteristics neither affect bank rsquo s risk nor its future profitability ]"

"Guna dapat memaksimalkan kekayaan shareholders, manajemen harus berupaya untuk meningkatkan nilai perusahaan. Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk menguji pengaruh dari pengambilan risiko dan ESG terhadap nilai perusahaan. Hasil studi akan menjelaskan apakah nilai perusahaan, yang diukur dengan Q Tobin, dapat dipengaruhi oleh tingkat pengambilan risiko manajernya. Selain itu, hasil penelitian juga akan menyimpulkan apakah ESG berpengaruh terhadap nilai perusahaan, serta apakah ESG dapat dimanfaatkan sebagai variabel yang memoderasi hubungan dari pengaruh pengambilan risiko terhadap nilai perusahaan. Sampel penelitian terdiri dari 30 perusahan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI), dengan total rentang periode penelitian dari tahun 2014 hingga 2020. Perusahaan perbankan dikecualikan dari sampel penelitian karena adanya perbedaan model bisnis dan tingkat regulasi antara industri perbankan dan industri lain pada umumnya. Studi ini menggunakan fixed effect model dari metode regresi data panel serta robust standard error. Temuan pertama membuktikan bahwa pengambilan risiko berpengaruh secara negatif signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan, mengindikasikan adanya perilaku excessive risk-taking pada manajerial perusahaan. Kemudian, temuan kedua menghasilkan pengaruh signifikan negatif dari ESG terhadap nilai perusahaan, menjelaskan ESG sebagai sebuah komitmen yang membebani perusahaan. Selanjutnya, temuan ketiga menunjukkan bahwa ESG tidak memoderasi hubungan pengambilan risiko terhadap nilai perusahaan secara signifikan. Hasil tersebut didukung oleh masih rendahnya kualitas dan transparansi ESG pada perusahaan di Indonesia sehingga belum mampu membatasi perilaku excessive risk-taking pada manajerial perusahaan.

---

To maximize shareholder wealth, management must strive to increase the firm value. Thus, this study aims to investigate the impact of risk-taking and ESG on firm value. The results of the study will explain whether the firm value as measured by Tobin's Q can be influenced by the level of risk-taking. In addition, this study also explores whether ESG affects firm value, and whether ESG can be used as a moderating variable in risk-taking and firm value relationship. The research sample includes 30 firms that are listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), and the study period spanned from 2014 to 2020. Banking companies were excluded from the research sample due to differences in business models and levels of regulation. In data processing, this study uses a fixed effect model of panel data regression, equipped with robust standard error. The first finding establishes that excessive risk-taking behavior exists at the managerial level, and it has a significant negative impact on firm value. Then, the second finding results in a significant negative effect of ESG on firm value, explaining ESG as a burdensome commitment to the firm. Lastly, the final finding demonstrates that the relationship between risk-taking and firm value is not significantly moderated by ESG. These findings are justified by the poor quality and insufficient transparency of ESG in Indonesian companies that have failed to limit excessive risk-taking in corporate management."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh dari kompetisi terhadap pengambilan risiko yang terdiri dari default risk, market risk, asset risk, capital risk dan liquidity risk yang terjadi di perbankan Indonesia pada periode 2010-2016. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada 41 bank umum konvensional yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pengujian regresi data panel. Kompetisi perbankan diukur dengan menggunakan pendekatan struktural yaitu consentration ratio CRn yang biasa disebut rasio konsentrasi lima bank dan Herfindahl-Hirschman Index serta ukuran persaingan non-struktural H-Statistik Panzar-Rosse. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa tingkat kompetisi yang diukur dengan concentration ratio berpengaruh terhadap default risk, asset risk, dan capital risk. Jadi kompetisi pada pasar yang lebih terkonsentrasi lebih rentan terkena risiko.

---

This study aims to determine the impact of competition on risk taking consist of default risk, market risk, asset risk, capital risk and liquidity risk in Indonesian banks on the period 2010 2016. This study was conducted on 41 conventional commercial banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The method used in this research is regression testing of panel data. Banking competition is measured using a structural approach that is the consentration ratio CRn commonly called the concentration ratio of five banks and the Herfindahl Hirschman Index as well as the non structural competition size of H Statistics Panzar Rosse. The results of this study conclude that the level of competition measured by the concentration ratio affects default risk, asset risk, and capital risk. So competition in a more concentrated market is more vulnerable to risk."

"Studi ilmiah ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh jenis kepemilikan bank terhadap perilaku pengambilan risiko pada bank. Klasifikasi bank umum dikategorikan menjadi Bank Pemerintah, Bank Swasta Nasional, dan Bank Asing. Studi ini juga melakukan pengujian apakah karakteristik spesifik bank memiliki pengaruh signifikan terhadap perilaku pengambilan risiko suatu bank. Penelitian menggunakan data publikasi laporan keuangan atas bank umum Indonesia untuk periode 2007-2016 dengan menggunakan metode Multiple Regression Analysis. Bank dengan dengan tipe kepemilikan pemerintah dan bank asing ditemukan memiliki kecenderungan pengambilan tingkat risiko yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan tipe bank swasta nasional. Penelitian ini juga menunjukkan bahwa faktor likuiditas bank dan diversifikasi pendanaan secara signifikan berpengaruh negatif terhadap perilaku pengambilan risiko sedangkan bank karakteristik lainnya tidak menujukkan adanya pengaruh yang signifikan.

---

This study aims to examine the effect of bank s type of ownership on the level of bank risk taking behavior. We classifies banks based on their ownership structures into state owned bank Bank Pemerintah, Private National Bank Bank Swasta Nasional, and Foreign Bank Bank Asing. Using bank data in Indonesia, the study want to know which bank type has greater risk taking. The study also tested whether specific bank characteristics had an influence on risk taking. We used the data of Indonesian banks in the period of 2007-2016 by using Multiple Regression Analysis method. Research shows that banks with government owned structure Bank Pemerintah and Foreign Banks Bank Asing have a tendency to take a higher level of risk than Private National Bank Bank Swasta Nasional. The test results also showed that bank liquidity factor and funding diversification significantly affect the risk taking level while the other characteristic bank did not show any significant effect."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk memperoleh bukti empiris mengenai dampak dari budaya organisasi dan kepemimpinan terhadap Enterprise Risk Management (ERM), serta contingent fit ERM terhadap kinerja perusahaan. Pada variabel kinerja perusahaan, penelitian ini menggunakan dua pengukuran yang terdiri dari kinerja akuntansi perusahaan (yang diukur dengan return on assets-ROA) dan kinerja pasar perusahaan (yang diukur dengan price to book value-PBV). Penelitian ini menggunakan model contingent fit yang digunakan oleh Gordon et al. (2009), dengan perubahan pada variabel kontinjensi yang terdiri dari efektivitas komite pemantau risiko, jenis budaya organisasi, dan kepemimpinan transformasional. Penelitian ini menggunakan bantuan software analisa Nvivo untuk analisa laporan tahunan perusahaan terkait dengan jenis budaya organisasi dan kepemimpinan transformasional. Sebanyak 223 firm-year observations yang diperoleh dari perusahaan perbankan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia dijadikan sampel penelitian ini, dengan rentang periode 2013-2018. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa efektivitas komite pemantau risiko berpengaruh terhadap ERM. Sementara itu budaya organisasi tipe create berpengaruh positif terhadap ERM. Penelitian ini kemudian menemukan terdapat pengaruh dari contingent fit ERM terhadap kinerja akuntansi perusahaan. Sementara itu, penelitian ini tidak menemukan pengaruh dari contingent fit ERM terhadap kinerja pasar perusahaan.

---

ABSTRACTThe objective of this study is to obtain empirical evidence regarding the effect from organizational culture and leadership towards Enterprise Risk Management (ERM), also how the contingent fit of ERM impacts firm performance. This study used return on assets (ROA) as proxy of accounting-based performance and price to book value (PBV) as proxy of market-based performance. Using contingency model proposed by Gordon et al. (2009), these contingency variables were changed with the effectivity of risk comittee, organizational culture type, and transformational leadership. This study used Nvivo analysis software in analyzing the content of annual report to obtain the information regarding organizational culture type and transformational leadership. Data used on this study based on 223 firm-year observations that listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange, with period range from 2013 until 2018. The results show that the effectivity of risk oversight committee has negative impact to the effectivity of ERM, whereas different results happened when create culture type is being adopted by the sample company. When the contingent fit is being tested with firm performance, there were different effect towards both of them. However, there are similarities in results obtained in control variables, which indicate the firms must consider broader view in implementing ERM practices."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan bukti empiris atas pengaruh efektivitas Board of Directors dan komite audit terhadap risiko perusahaan secara langsung dan secara tidak langsung melalui kualitas IR. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan menggunakan data panel. Sampel yang digunakan adalah 143 perusahaan yang terdaftar di Johannesburg Stock Exchange (Afrika Selatan) dengan 4 tahun pengamatan yaitu dari tahun 2014 sampai dengan 2017. Structural Equation Model digunakan untuk menganalisis data dan menguji hipotesis. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa efektivitas BOD dan komite audit secara langsung berpengaruh negatif signifikan terhadap risiko perusahaan. Efektivitas BOD dan komite audit tidak berpengaruh terhadap kualitas IR, dan kualitas IR tidak berpengaruh terhadap risiko perusahan secara langsung. Penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa kualitas IR tidak dapat memediasi pengaruh efektivitas BOD dan komite audit terhadap risiko perusahaan karena penerapan IR hanya digunakan untuk memenuhi persyaratan regulasi.

---

This study aims to provide empirical evidence on the effect of the board of directors and audit committee effectiveness on firm risk directly and indirectly through IR quality. This study is a quantitative research and used panel data. The sample used is 143 listed companies on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (South Africa) with 4 years observation that is from 2014 to 2017. Structural Equation Model is used to analyze data and test hypotheses. The results of this study found that BOD and audit committee effectiveness has a significant negative effect on firm risk directly. BOD and audit committee effectiveness has not affect IR quality, and IR quality has not affect firm risk directly. This study also found that IR quality can not mediate the effect BOD and audit committee effectiveness on firm risk because IR implementation is only used to comply with regulatory requirements."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh perilaku risk taking terhadap tingkat investment efficiency dengan efektivitas dewan komisaris dan keberadaan komite pemantau risiko sebagai moderasi. Perusahaan yang memiliki tingkat perilaku risk taking yang tinggi akan cenderung melakukan investasi meskipun proyek investasi tersebut memiliki Net Present Value negatif. Efektivitas dewan komisaris dan adanya komite pemantau risiko dalam perusahaan diprediksi dapat mempengaruhi investment efficiency. Penelitian dilakukan menggunakan metode regresi multinomial logistik dengan sampel 307 perusahaan 921 observasi yang terdaftar di BEI tahun 2013-2015. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan semakin tinggi perilaku risk taking akan meningkatkan kemungkinan over-investment. Akan tetapi, semakin rendah perilaku risk taking tidak terbukti meningkatkan kemungkinan under-investment. Efektivitas dewan komisaris terbukti memperlemah pengaruh positif perilaku risk taking terhadap kemungkinan terjadinya over-investment. Akan tetapi, efektivitas dewan komisaris tidak terbukti memperlemah pengaruh negatif perilaku risk taking terhadap kemungkinan terjadinya under-investment. Keberadaan komite pemantau risiko terbukti memperlemah pengaruh negatif perilaku risk taking terhadap kemungkinan terjadinya under-investment. Namun keberadaan komite pemantau risiko tidak terbukti memperlemah pengaruh positif perilaku risk taking terhadap kemungkinan terjadinya over-investment

---

ABSTRACTThe research objective is to examine the effect of risk taking to investment efficiency with board of commissioners rsquo effectiveness and the presence of risk monitoring committee as the moderating variable. Firm with higher level of risk taking tend to invest in a project, even such project probably giving them negative Net Present Value. Board of commissioners rsquo effectiveness and the presence of risk monitoring committee in a firm are also predicted to have impact on investment efficiency. Therefore, the effect of risk taking on investment efficiency through board of commissioners rsquo effectiveness and risk monitoring committee are predicted. In this research, we use multinomial logistic model. This research takes 307 companies 921 observations that are listed in Indonesia rsquo s Stock Exchange BEI from 2013 to 2015. The empirical study shows that higher risk taking more likely to increase the probability of being in over investment. However, there are no significant effect on negative relationship between risk taking and the likelihood of being in under investment. Board of commissioners rsquo effectiveness weaken the positive effect of risk taking and the likelihood of being in over investment but board of commissioners rsquo effectiveness didn rsquo t weaken the negative relationship between risk taking and likelihood of being in under investment. The presence of risk monitoring committee significantly weakens the negative relationship between risk taking and the likelihood of being in under investment but the presence of risk monitoring committee didn rsquo t weaken the positive relationship between risk taking and the likelihood of being in over investment."