Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Bioconsensus is a rapidly evolving scientific field in which consensus methods, often developed for use in social choice theory, are adapted for such areas of the biological sciences as taxonomy, systematics, and evolutionary and molecular biology. Typically, after several alternatives are produced using different data sets, methods or algorithms, one needs to find a consensus solution. The axiomatic approach of this book explores the existence or nonexistence of consensus rules that satisfy particular sets of desirable well-defined properties. The axiomatic research reviewed here focuses first on the area of group choice, then in areas of biomathematics where the objects of interest represent partitions of a set, hierarchical structures, phylogenetic trees, or molecular sequences. Axiomatic Consensus Theory in Group Choice and Biomathematics provides a unique comprehensive review of axiomatic consensus theory in biomathematics as it has developed over the past 30 years. Established here are the theory's basic results using standard terminology and notation and with uniform attention to rigor and detail. This book cites both traditional and current literature and poses open problems that remain to be solved. The bibliographic notes in each chapter place the described work within a general context while providing useful pointers to relevant research. The bibliographic references are a valuable resource for both students and experts in the field."

"Penelitian ini akan membahas tentang mengapa mahasiswa asing yang belajar di Jepang memutuskan untuk belajar di Universitas Kyushu, Jepang. Dengan melalui internasionalisasi pendidikan tinggi, Universitas Kyushu telah menarik para mahasiswa asing untuk belajar di sana. Adapun para mahasiswa asing memiliki alasan-alasan tertentu tentang mengapa mereka memutuskan untuk belajar di universitas tersebut. Dengan menggunakan penelitian metode kualitatif, penelitian ini dilakukan dengan cara wawancara dan kajian literatur untuk menganalisis keputusan para mahasiswa asing untuk belajar di sana dari sudut pandang embeddedness dan pilihan rasional (rational choice). Beberapa faktor seperti ketersediaan beasiswa, relasi dengan guarantor, biaya hidup yang murah, program studi yang berkualitas tinggi, lingkungan alam yang asri, dan kelengkapan fasilitas publik adalah beberapa alasan yang menarik para mahasiswa asing untuk belajar di sana. Mereka juga menerima saran dan bantuan dari hubungan pertemanan mereka yang mempengaruhi keputusan mereka untuk belajar di universitas tersebut.

---

This research will discuss why some foreign students studying in Japan decide to undergo their studies at Kyushu University. Thanks to the university's internationalization of higher education, Kyushu University has successfully attracted thousands of foreign students to study at the university. In this regard, foreign students have personal reasons for why deciding to study at the university. Using qualitative research methods, this research was conducted by way of interviews and a literature review to analyze the decisions of foreign students to study there from the perspective of embeddedness and rational choice. Factors such as the availability of scholarships, low cost of living, high-quality study programs, a well-preserved natural environment, and well-equipped public facilities are some of the reasons that attract foreign students to study there. They also receive recommendations and assistance from their colleagues (friends, academic supervisors, etc.) which influence their decision to study at the university."

"Memutuskan hal-hal yang benar atau salah adalah langkah paling penting dalam menentukan apakah seseorang akan terlibat dan melakukan sesuatu yang etis atau tidak etis. Ketika membuat penilaian moral, orang sering menggunakan standar sosial untuk mengurangi ambiguitas yang mereka hadapi dalam satu situasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyelidiki hubungan antara konsensus sosial dan penilaian moral pada sampel karyawan di negara berkembang dan kolektif. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian cross-sectional dan menggunakan kuesioner yang berisi skenario dan instrumen konsensus sosial dan penilaian moral. Menggunakan survei online, ada 324 karyawan yang terlibat dalam penelitian ini, dan hasil analisis korelasi menunjukkan bahwa ada hubungan antara konsensus sosial dan penilaian moral. Temuan ini menggambarkan bahwa ketika karyawan membuat keputusan etis, mereka juga mempertimbangkan perspektif sosial dalam situasi dilematis. Selain itu, perspektif sosial dalam budaya kolektivis lebih cenderung lebih kuat karena individu membuat penilaian berdasarkan kesejahteraan dan minat kelompok daripada individu itu sendiri.

---

Deciding what is right or wrong is the most important step in determining whether someone will be involved and do something ethical or unethical. When making moral judgments, people often use social standards to reduce the ambiguity they face in one situation. This study aims to investigate the relationship between social consensus and moral judgment on a sample of employees in developing and collective countries. This research is a cross-sectional study and uses a questionnaire containing scenarios and instruments of social consensus and moral judgment. Using an online survey, there were 324 employees involved in this study, and the results of the correlation analysis showed that there was a relationship between social consensus and moral judgment. These findings illustrate that when employees make ethical decisions, they also consider social perspectives in dilemmatic situations. In addition, social perspectives in collectivist cultures are more likely to be stronger because individuals make judgments based on the welfare and interests of the group than the individual itself."

"Di tengah semakin tingginya jumlah perempuan masuk ke ranah publik, muncul fenomena arus balik, yakni perempuan yang memilih berkarir sebagai ibu rumah tangga meski mereka telah mencapai gelar sarjana. Berbagai kajian menunjukkan bahwa keputusan perempuan menjadi ibu rumah tangga lebih didasarkan pada alasan kecukupan ekonomi, pengasuhan anak, dan atau tuntutan suami. Rasionalitas seringkali hanya dilekatkan pada perempuan berpendidikan tinggi yang menjadi wanita karir atau bekerja di sektor publik. Namun pada artikel ini membahas rasionalitas pilihan sarjana perempuan menjadi ibu rumah tangga, dengan menganalisis keputusan mereka berbasis perhitungan cost and reward serta Comparison Alternative (CA, Artikel ini mengulas keputusan perempuan bergelar sarjana menjadi ibu rumah tangga sebagai pilihan rasional. Kasus yang dipaparkan dikaji melalui metode kualitatif (wawancara mendalam dan observasi) terhadap empat perempuan sarjana yang memutuskan menjadi ibu rumah tangga.

---

While of increasing women to choose participating in public sphere as there is a greater chance of education and job opporunity. However, there is an indication that some women tend to work as housewives although they have earned a higher degree of education. In previous researches, women chose to become housewife because of economical sufficiency, children and also husband. Higher rationality is usually regards that women with higher education could attain career or work in the public sector. But, the purpose of this research is to describe the rationality of female graduates who chose to work as housewives. By analizing the cost and rewards which is accompanied by comparison alternative (CA) analysis, this research explains the rational choice of female graduates who later work as housewives. The method in this research uses qualitative approach, having in-depth interview and observation towards four housewives whom are bachelor graduates."

"Penggunaan aplikasi pesan dan antar makanan melalui telepon seluler semakin meningkat di Indonesia. Terdapat dua perusahaan m-commerce di Indonesia yang berada dalam bisnis aplikasi pesan antar makanan, yaitu Gojek dan Grab, dengan layanan bernama GoFood dan GrabFood. Kedua aplikasi ini memiliki target pasar yang sama, ditambah dengan layanan yang ditawarkan dan fitur aplikasinya yang serupa. Maka dari itu, penting bagi perusahaan untuk memiliki daya saing yang baik. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui penilaian pengguna terhadap aplikasi dan indikator yang mempengaruhi pemilihan merek layanan. Terdapat lima aspek dengan empat belas indikator yang digunakan dalam pengukuran pemilihan merek. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menyebarkan kuesioner untuk pengguna GoFood dan GrabFood yang kemudian diolah dengan menggunakan uji statistik univariat, bivariat, multivariat dan analisis faktor. Dilanjutkan dengan regresi linear berganda untuk mengetahui prioritas peningkatan. Berdasarkan hasil uji statistik didapatkan bahwa aspek yang mempengaruhi pilihan merek secara signifikan adalah aspek kualitas (mobile service quality). Berdasarkan hasil analisis faktor dan saran pengguna, hal yang perlu ditingkatkan aplikasi GoFood adalah promo, metode pembayaran, dan efisiensi. Untuk GrabFood keamanan, kemudahan penggunaan, dan penanganan komplain. Prioritas utama indikator yang perlu ditingkatkan GrabFood agar menyaingi GoFood adalah fulfillment dan trust. Penelitian ini diharapkan mampu membantu perusahaan dalam meningkatkan kualitas layanan aplikasinya.

---

Mobile food ordering application usage is increasing in Indonesia. There are two m-commerce companies in Indonesia that offer food delivery applications service, namely Gojek and Grab, with services called GoFood and GrabFood. Both of these applications have the same target market, similar services and application features. Therefore, it is important for companies to have good competitiveness. This research was conducted to determine user experience of applications usage and indicators that influence service brand choice. There are five aspects with fourteen indicators used in measuring brand choice. This research was conducted by distributing questionnaires to GoFood and GrabFood users which were then processed using univariate, bivariate, multivariate statistical analysis and factor analysis. Followed by multiple linear regression to determine the priority of improvement. Statistical tests results found that the aspects that significantly influence brand choice is quality aspect. Results of factor analysis and user experience, stated that GoFood need to improve their promos, payment methods, and efficiency. As for GrabFood security, ease of use and complaint handling. The top priority indicators that GrabFood needs to improve to compete with GoFood are fulfillment and trust. This research is expected to be able to assist companies in improving the quality of their services."