Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Latar Belakang: Kesehatan gigi dan mulut sangat mempengaruhi kesehatan secara umum setiap individu, karena rongga mulut merupakan jalur utama masuknya asupan kedalam tubuh. Akan tetapi, mulut dapat menjadi sumber infeksi yang akan mempengaruhi kesehatan secara umum. Oral health literacy diperlukan untuk mengambil keputusan kesehatan yang sesuai untuk mencegah penyakit khususnya kesehatan gigi dan mulut. Dalam mengukur tingkat oral health literacy, diperlukan suatu kuesioner dengan tingkat validitas dan reliabilitas baik untuk mendapatkan hasil yang optimal.Tujuan: Menguji validitas dan reliabilitas kuesioner Health Literacy in Denstistry (HeLD) pada penduduk DKI Jakarta.Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan desain studi potong lintang atau cross sectional. Dua puluh sembilan pertanyaan yang ada dalam instrumen HeLD yang telah diterjemahkan ke Bahasa Indonesia, digunakan untuk mengukur oral health literacy.Hasil: Sebanyak 390 reponden mengisi kuesioner. Rerata skor HeLD yaitu 2,6. Cronbach alpha 0.958.Kesimpulan: Kuesioner Health Literacy in Denstistry versi Bahasa Indonesia yang digunakan pada penelitian ini memiliki validitas dan reliabilitas yang baik untuk mengukur status oral health literacy pada penduduk DKI Jakarta.

---

Background: Oral health was greatly affected human health in overall, regarding that the mouth is the main acess for food intake. Dispite its main function, the mouth could also be a significant source of infection that might influence the individual health. A valid and reliable questionnaire was needed in order to measure the Health Literacy In Dentistry (HeLD). Oral health literacy is needed to make appropriate health decisions to prevent diseases especially for oral health.

Purpose: To analyze the validity and reliability questionnaire HeLD for the people in DKI Jakarta.

Method: A cross sectional analytical study using 29 questions of HeLD Questionnaire that has been translated to Indonesian language to measure the oral health literacy.

Result: Three hundred and ninety respondents completed the questionnaire. The mean total HeLD score was 2,6. Cronbach alpha 0.958.

Conclusions: Health literacy in Dentistry (HeLD) Questionnaire which has been translated to Indonesian language is valid and reliable to measure the Oral Health Literacy for the people at the DKI Jakarta."

"[Tujuan: menguji validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen Health Literacy in Dentistry Scale versi Bahasa Indonesia pada kelompok usia 12-14 tahun di DKI Jakarta. Metode: Kuesioner HeLD diterjemahkan melalui forward-backward translation. Desain penelitian menggunakan cross sectional. Konsistensi internal dan eksternal, validitas konvergen dan diskriminan dari HeLD dievaluasi. Hasil: sebanyak 462 siswa menyelesaikan self-administered questionnaire. Rerata skor HeLD yaitu 3,45±0,02. Nilai Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) adalah 0,75 dan Cronbach?s alpha=0,77. Validitas konvergen dan diskriminan memiliki hubungan signifikan pada kunjungan terakhir ke dokter gigi (p<0,01). Kesimpulan: instrumen HeLD versi Bahasa Indonesia terbukti valid dan reliabel untuk mengukur oral health literacy anak usia 12-14 tahun;Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze validity and reliability of an Indonesian version of the Health Literacy in Dentistry scale (HeLD) instrument among 12-14 years old in Jakarta. Methods: HeLD questionnaire was forward-backward translated into Indonesian. This study design is cross sectional. The internal and external consistency, convergent and discriminant validity of HeLD were evaluated. Results: 462 students completed the self-administered questionnaire. The mean total HeLD score was 3.45±0.02. The Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) were 0.75 and Cronbach?s alpha=0.77. The convergent and discriminant validity were confirmed by HeLD scores being significantly associated with last dental visit (p<0.001). Conclusions: The Indonesian version of HeLD suggested that is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring oral health literacy in children ages 12-14 years old.;Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze validity and reliability of an Indonesian version of the Health Literacy in Dentistry scale (HeLD) instrument among 12-14 years old in Jakarta. Methods: HeLD questionnaire was forward-backward translated into Indonesian. This study design is cross sectional. The internal and external consistency, convergent and discriminant validity of HeLD were evaluated. Results: 462 students completed the self-administered questionnaire. The mean total HeLD score was 3.45±0.02. The Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) were 0.75 and Cronbach?s alpha=0.77. The convergent and discriminant validity were confirmed by HeLD scores being significantly associated with last dental visit (p<0.001). Conclusions: The Indonesian version of HeLD suggested that is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring oral health literacy in children ages 12-14 years old.;Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze validity and reliability of an Indonesian version of the Health Literacy in Dentistry scale (HeLD) instrument among 12-14 years old in Jakarta. Methods: HeLD questionnaire was forward-backward translated into Indonesian. This study design is cross sectional. The internal and external consistency, convergent and discriminant validity of HeLD were evaluated. Results: 462 students completed the self-administered questionnaire. The mean total HeLD score was 3.45±0.02. The Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) were 0.75 and Cronbach’s alpha=0.77. The convergent and discriminant validity were confirmed by HeLD scores being significantly associated with last dental visit (p<0.001). Conclusions: The Indonesian version of HeLD suggested that is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring oral health literacy in children ages 12-14 years old., Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze validity and reliability of an Indonesian version of the Health Literacy in Dentistry scale (HeLD) instrument among 12-14 years old in Jakarta. Methods: HeLD questionnaire was forward-backward translated into Indonesian. This study design is cross sectional. The internal and external consistency, convergent and discriminant validity of HeLD were evaluated. Results: 462 students completed the self-administered questionnaire. The mean total HeLD score was 3.45±0.02. The Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) were 0.75 and Cronbach’s alpha=0.77. The convergent and discriminant validity were confirmed by HeLD scores being significantly associated with last dental visit (p<0.001). Conclusions: The Indonesian version of HeLD suggested that is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring oral health literacy in children ages 12-14 years old.]"

"Gangguan produktivitas kerja pada kalangan pekerja akibat masalah kesehatan dapat berupa absenteisme dan presenteisme. Kuesioner World Health Organization-Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (WHO-HPQ) merupakan kuesioner lapor mandiri yang dibuat untuk menilai dampak yang dihadapi oleh pemberi kerja akibat penurunan produktivitas kerja yang disebabkan oleh presenteisme, absenteisme, dan cedera/kecelakaan akibat kerja. Studi ini bertujuan untuk melakukan validasi dan reliabilitas dari kuesioner WHO-HPQ bahasa Indonesia versi pendek. Adaptasi transkultural dilakukan dengan adaptasi transkultural dan uji reliabilitas terhadap kuesioner WHO-HPQ versi pendek. Proses adaptasi transkultural dilakukan melalui berbagai tahap termasuk penerjemahan, peninjauan ahli, pretesting dan wawancara kognitif, dan pengujian kuesioner versi final serta dokumentasi. Penilaian validitas pertanyaan menggunakan nilai inter-item correlation dengan minimal nilai 0.2 dan untuk uji reliabilitas, nilai Cronbach alpha dengan minimal nilai 0.7. Kuesioner WHO-HPQ bahasa Indonesia versi pendek telah valid dalam bahasa Indonesia baik pada bagian absenteime dan presentasi. Hasil uji reliabilitas menunjukkan nilai Cronbach’s alpha 0.328 untuk item bagian absenteisme dan 0.878 pada bagian presenteisme. Kuesioner WHO-HPQ bahasa Indonesia versi pendek dapat digunakan sebagai alat identifikasi absenteisme dan presenteisme pada pekerja di Indonesia.

---

Reduction of work productivity among workers due to health problems can take in the form of absenteeism and/or presenteeism. The World Health Organization-Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (WHO-HPQ) is a self-report questionnaire instrument was created to assess the cost faced by employers due to decreased efficiency caused by presenteeism, absenteeism, and work-related accidents/injuries. This study aims to carry out validity and reliability of the short Indonesian version of the WHO-HPQ questionnaire. We conducted transcultural adaptation and reliability testing the short version of WHO-HPQ questionnaire. This method employs multiple phases including translation, experts review, pretesting and cognitive interviewing, testing the final version and documentation. In order to determine if a question item is valid, item-correlation value must be greater than 0.2, and for the reliability, internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha value must exceed a minimum threshold of 0.7. The short version of the WHO-HPQ questionnaire is valid in Indonesian version, for the absenteeism and presenteeism aspects. The results of the reliability test showed a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.328 for the absenteeism section and 0.878 for the presenteeism section. The short Indonesian version of the WHO-HPQ can be used as a tool to identify absenteeism and presenteeism among workers in Indonesia."

"ABSTRAK

Pendahuluan: Konsep presenteeism banyak dikaitkan dengan faktor kesehatan. Presenteeism telah terbukti menyebabkan hilangnya produktivitas mencapai hampir 50% lebih besar dibandingkan dengan yang diakibatkan oleh absenteeism. Saat ini di Indonesia belum ada alat yang dikembangkan untuk menilai presenteeism di kalangan pekerja, khususnya lebih spesifik untuk menilai faktor masalah kesehatan yang dapat berpengaruh pada terjadinya presenteeism. Oleh sebab itu, peneliti melakukan uji validitas dan reliabilitas kuesioner SPS-6 versi Indonesia agar dapat digunakan sebagai salah satu instrumen penilaian komponen kesehatan presenteeism.

Metode: Penelitian ini dimulai dengan proses adaptasi lintas budaya yang merujuk pada metode ISPOR, dan dilanjutkan dengan uji validitas dan reliabilitas dengan analisis statistik. Uji statistik dilakukan dengan mengujicobakan kuesioner pada responden yang representatif dengan populasi target, yaitu pekerja kantor atau white collar worker.   Total responden yang berpartisipasi berjumlah 112 orang. Uji validitas dilakukan dengan uji validitas faktor dan butir, sedangkan uji reliabilitas dilakukan dengan metode uji konsistensi internal menggunakan nilai Chronbachs Alpha.

Hasil; Proses adaptasi lintas budaya SPS-6 telah berhasil dilakukan sehingga menjadi SPS-6 versi Indonesia yang valid. Perubahan paling signifikan terjadi pada penjelasan mengenai defisnisi masalah kesehatan. Pada uji validitas butir dan faktor, didapatkan uji korelasi antara skor butir masing-masing dimensi (fokus kerja dan psikologis) dengan total skor dimensi masing-masing signifikan berkorelasi. Pada uji korelasi antara skor tiap butir dengan keseluruhan skor total kuesioner signifikan berkorelasi. Pada uji reliabilitas didapatkan nilai Chronbachs Alpha dimensi fokus kerja sebesar 0,657 dan dimensi psikologis sebesar 0,646.

Kesimpulan: Kuesioner SPS-6 versi Indonesia dinyatakan valid dan reliabel, dan terbukti dapat digunakan sebagai instrumen untuk mengidentifikasi komponen kesehatan presenteeism bagi pekerja kantor (white collar worker) di Indonesia.

Kata Kunci : presenteeism, produktivitas kerja, validitas, reliabilitas

---

ABSTRACT

---

Introduction: The concept of presenteeism is mostly associated with health factors. Presenteeism has been proven to cause a loss of productivity reaching nearly 50% greater than that caused by absenteeism. Currently in Indonesia there are no tools developed to assess presenteeism among workers, especially more specifically to assess the factors of health problems that can affect the occurrence of presenteeism. Therefore, researchers conducted a validity and reliability test for the Indonesian version of the SPS-6 questionnaire so that it could be used as an instrument for evaluating the health component of presenteeism.

Methods: The research began with a cross-cultural adaptation process that refers to the ISPOR method, and continued with a validity and reliability test with statistical analysis. Statistical tests were carried out by testing questionnaires on office workers or white collar workers who were representative of the target population. The total number of respondents who participated was 112 people. Validity test is done by item validity test and factor validity test. The reliability test was carried out using the internal consistency test method using the Chronbachs Alpha value.

Results: The cross cultural adaptation process of SPS-6 has been successfully carried out so that it becomes a valid Indonesian version of SPS-6. The most significant change occured in the explanation of the health problem definition. In the item validity test and factor validity test, the correlation test between the item score of each dimension (work focus and psychological) with the total score of each dimension is significantly correlated. In the correlation test between the score of each item with the overall total score of the questionnaire significantly correlated. In the reliability test the value of Chronbachs Alpha was 0.523.

Conclusion: The Indonesian version of the SPS-6 questionnaire was declared valid and reliable, and proved to be used as an instrument to identify the health component of presenteeism for office workers (white collar workers) in Indonesia.

Keywords: presenteeism, work productivity, validity, reliability

"

"

Prevalensi masalah kesgimul di DKI Jakarta tahun 2013 meningkat dibanding tahun 2007 namun hanya 39,5% di antaranya yang mendapat perawatan. Hal ini dapat dipengaruhi oleh tingkat Oral Health Literacy (OHL). Tingkat OHL yang rendah dapat mempengaruhi perilaku kesehatan seseorang. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk melihat tingkat OHL pada penduduk dewasa dan kaitannya dengan oral health key literacy outcomes seperi kunjungan terakhir ke dokter gigi, alasan berkunjung ke dokter gigi, dan frekuensi merokok. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat kaitan antara tingkat OHL dengan kunjungan terakhir ke dokter gigi dan alasan berkunjung ke dokter gigi (p<0,05)namun tidak dengan frekuensi merokok (p>0,05).

---

Prevalence of Oral health problems among adults during 2013 in DKI Jakarta increased from 2007 but only 39.5% of them got treatment from dental clinicians. This can be influenced by the level of Oral Health Literacy (OHL) that will affect their health behaviours. This study aims to know the OHL level and its relation to its Key Literacy outcomes such as last visit to dentist, reason to go to dentist, and smoking frequencies. Results showed that there’s an association between OHL and its outcomes (p<0,05) except with smoking frequencies (p>0,05)."

"Berbagai studi dan penelitian telah dilakukan di berbagai negara untuk mengetahui pengetahuan pasien terhadap anestesia namun tidak ada instrumen kuesioner yang baku untuk menilai pengetahuan pasien tentang anestesia, dan hal ini belum pernah dilakukan di Indonesia khususnya di RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo. Kuesioner pengetahuan yang valid dan reliabel diharapkan menjadi standar untuk menilai pengetahuan masyarakat terhadap anestesia, dan dapat menjadi dasar bagi penelitian selanjutnya.Metode: Kuesioner pengetahuan anestesia sebelumnya telah melalui tahapan pretest oleh ahli dan uji pilot, hasil kuesioner uji pilot disempurnakan sehingga dianggap layak diujicobakan. Penelitian dilakukan pada bulan Januri 2014 sampai dengan Maret 2014 terhadap subyek secara consecutive sampling yang akan menjalani pembiusan dan diperiksa di klinik preoperatif RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo Jakarta. Teknik uji validitas menggunakan validitas konstruk dengan koefisien korelasi minimal 0,3 dapat dianggap valid dan uji reliabilitas menggunakan teknik konsistensi internal dengan nilai cronbach α minimal 0,4 dianggap reliabel.Hasil: Penelitian ini diikuti oleh 95 subyek dengan 1 subyek dikeluarkan dari penelitian karena tidak mengisi kuesioner secara lengkap. Kuesioner pengetahuan terdiri dari 20 pertanyaan, 8 pertanyaan diantaranya dinilai tidak valid dan reliabel yang dapat disebabkan oleh pertanyaan dan jawaban kuesioner yang tidak dapat dimengerti oleh subyek, pembahasan terlalu dalam dan penggunaan istilah medis yang tidak familiar. Beberapa jawaban pertanyaan memiliki kesamaan yang dapat membingungkan subyek, serta terdapat inkonsistensi jawaban yang diberikan oleh subyek. Tingkat penghasilan dan pendidikan subyek yang rendah serta pengalaman dan informasi yang kurang, sangat mempengaruhi pengetahuan subyek terhadap anestesia, tercermin dari rendahnya rerata tingkat pengetahuan subyek sebesar + 31,6%.Kesimpulan: Kuesioner penilaian pengetahuan tentang anestesia pada pasien di klinik preoperatif RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo tidak dapat dijadikan sebagai suatu standar instrumen yang baku oleh karena dinilai tidak valid dan reliabel.

---

Various studies and researches have been conducted abroad to determine the patient?s anesthesia knowledge, although no standard questionnaires exist. Research on anesthesia?s knowledge questionnaires have never been done specifically in Cipto Mangunkusumo hospital. A valid and reliable questionnaire is aimed to be a standard instrument assessing the community?s knowledge on anesthesia, and as a foundation for future researches.Methods: The anesthesia knowledge questionnaires has been evaluated through a pre-test phase done by experts and pilot test, the results was then revised until it is acceptable and can be tested. Researches was conducted on January 2014 until March 2014 on subjects by consecutive sampling who are going to undergo anesthesia and evaluated at the preoperative clinic Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Jakarta. Validity test techniques using construct validity with the minimal correlation coefficient 0.3 is valid. Reliability tests using internal consistency techniques with minimal cronbach alpha value 0.4 is reliable.Results: Research was participated by 95 subjects with 1 subject excluded from the research because of not filling in the questionnaire completely. The knowledge questionnaire included 20 questions, whereas 8 questions was marked to be invalid and unreliable that may be caused by questions and answers were not fully understood by the subjects, the contents was too spesific, usage of medical terms that aren?t familiar. Some of the given answers have similarities that may confuse the subject, and also inconsistency from the subject?s answers. Low level of salary and education with lacking of experience and information from the subjects, has significant influence on the subjects knowledge on anesthesia which is reflected by the low average level of the subject`s knowledge which is + 31.6%.Conclusions: Anesthesia knowledge questionnaires on patients at preoperative clinic Cipto Mangunkusumo hospital is invalid and unreliable therefore fail to be a standard instrument."

"[Latar belakang: Oral health literacy (OHL) dibutuhkan untuk promosi kesehatandan upaya pencegahan penyakit yang berhubungan dengan kesehatan gigi dan mulut.Penelitian yang dilakukan mengenai OHL dan faktor-faktornya di Indonesia masihsangat minim.Informasi tentang OHL sangat dibutuhkan untuk membantu klinisi danpembuat kebijakan untuk meningkatkan pelayanan kesehatan gigi dan mulut danmembuat program kesehatan gigi dan mulut yang sesuai dengan kebutuhkankomunitas. Tujuan: Mengetahui perbedaan OHL antara berbagai kelompok denganperbedaan status sosiodemografi . Metode: Penelitian potong lintang yang dilakukanpada 390 responden dewasa di DKI Jakarta menggunakan kuesioner Health Literacyin Dentistry (HeLD) yang telah di adaptasi ke dalam bahasa Indonesia. Hasil: 390responden mengisi kuesioner HeLD. Rerata skor HeLD dari seluruh responden adalah2,6±0,98. Tidak ditemukan perbedaan skor HeLD antara responden laki-laki 2,63±1,0dan perempuan 2,57±0,98 pada penelitian ini (p>0,05). Terdapat perbedaan secarastatistik antara skor HeLD dengan kelompok umur dan kelompok dengan statussosioekonomi (p<0,05). Simpulan: Disimpulkan bahwa terdapat tingkat OHL yangsama antar laki-laki dan perempuan pada populasi penelitian ini. Selanjutnya,penurunan skor OHL sejalan dengan bertambahnya usia dan tingkat sosial ekonomi, Background: Oral health literacy (OHL) is needed to promote oral health and actionfor prevention to oral health related diseases. Only few studies have been conductedconcerning oral health literacy in Indonesia. The information can help clinicians andpolicy makers to improve oral health treatment and programs to suit the need ofsociety. Objectives: To analyze the differences of OHL between differentsociodemographic groups in DKI Jakarta. Methods: A cross sectional analyticalstudy using the Indonesian translated Health Literacy in Dentistry (HeLD)questionnaire on 390 adult living in DKI Jakarta area. Results: 390 respondentscompleted the self-administered questionnaire. The mean total of HeLD was2.6±0.98. There were no differences in HeLD score between male (2.63±1.0) andfemale (2.57±0.98) respondents in this study (p>0.05). However, statisticaldifferences were found between HeLD score amongst age and socioeconomic group.(p<0.05). Conclusion: This study showed that adult males and females in DKIJakarta have the same level of OHL, however increasing age and low socioeconomicstatus influenced the level of OHL]"

"Latar Belakang. Kuesioner Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (BCTQ) merupakan kuesioner yang dikembangkan untuk menilai keluhan pasien sindrom terowongan karpal dalam melakukan aktifitas sehari-hari. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan uji validasi dan reliabilitas kuesioner BCTQ ke dalam bahasa Indonesia. Metode. Melakukan adaptasi dan translasi transkultural, kemudian dilakukan uji validitas dan uji reliabilitas kuesioner BCTQ versi bahasa Indonesia. Populasi dari penelitian ini adalah semua pasien dewasa dengan sindrom terowongan karpal yang datang ke Poliklinik Neurologi RSUPNCM yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi. Hasil. Tiga puluh lima pasien memenuhi kriteria inklusi. Sebagian besar adalah perempuan (88,6%). Usia berkisar antara 45 tahun sampai 71 tahun, dengan prevalensi tertingi > 50 tahun (91,4%), pekerjaan sebagian besar subjek adalah sebagai ibu rumah tangga (77,1%). Pada uji validitas domain derajat keparahan gejala pada uji pertama memiliki nilai antara 0,484-0,781, pada retes didapatkan nilai 0,482 sampai 0,760, untuk domain status fungsional didapatkan nilai antara 0,495 sampai 0,825, dan nilai 0,615 sampai 0,783 pada retes. Hasil uji reliabilitas domain derajat keparahan gejala 0,876 pada uji pertama dan 0,874 pada uji kedua, untuk uji reabilitas domain status fungsional pada uji pertama sebesar 0,857 dan pada retes 0,854. Waktu yang dibutuhkan untuk mengisi kuesioner oleh semua subjek kurang dari 10 menit, Kesimpulan. Kuesioner BCTQ versi Bahasa Indonesia valid dan reliabel dalam mengevaluasi keluhan serta gejala pada pasien dengan sindrom terowongan karpal.

---

Introduction. Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) is a questionnaire developed to assess complaints and symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome patients in carrying out daily activities. Aim of this study is to gain a valid and reliable Indonesian version of BCTQ. Methods. Trancultural adaptation and translation from the original version to Indonesian version, then validation and reliability test are carried out. The population of this study was adult patients with carpal tunnel syndrome who came to the neurology department RSUPNCM and met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-five patients met the inclusion criteria, majority are women (88,6%). Age ranged from 45-71 years, with the highest prevalence >50 years old. Most of the subjects were housewife. The value of symptoms severity scale domain between 0,484-0,781 for first test, 0,482-0,760 on the retest. For domain functional status 0,495-0,825 in the first tests, and 0,615-0,783 for the retest. The reliability test for symptoms severity scale domain for the first test is 0,876 and 0,874 for the retest. The realiability test value for functional status 0,857 for the first test and 0,854 for the retest. The time needed to complete the questionnaire is under 10 minutes. Conclusion. Indonesian version of BCTQ is a valid and reliable instrument to be used as instrument in evaluate complaint and symptoms in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome."

"Latar Belakang: Penyakit periodontal dapat terjadi sebagai bentuk manifestasi oral selama masa kehamilan. Penyakit ini diketahui merupakan salah satu faktor risiko terjadinya hasil kehamilan bayi dengan berat badan lahir rendah (BBLR) dan prematur. Untuk mencegah hal tersebut, kunjungan ke dokter gigi diperlukan sehingga kesehatan rongga mulut serta kesehatan bayi dan kehamilan dapat dijaga. Kondisi pengetahuan diketahui berhubungan dengan kunjungan ibu ke dokter gigi selama masa kehamilan. Untuk melihat bagaimana kondisi pengetahuan dan perilaku ibu hamil terkait kesehatan gigi mulut selama masa kehamilan, dibutuhkan sebuah instrumen penelitian yang valid dan reliabel. Namun sayangnya, instrumen seperti itu belum ada di Indonesia. Tujuan: Menganalisis nilai validitas dan reliabilitas kuesioner Knowledge and Behavior towards Oral Health during Pregnancy (KBOHP) versi Indonesia. Metode: Metode penelitian analisis deskriptif dengan rancangan potong lintang dan metode pemilihan sampel dengan convinience sampling menggunakan kuesioner KBOHP. Proses adaptasi lintas budaya dilakukan dengan pendekatan simetris. Analisis psikometrik yang dilakukan adalah validitas isi, validitas konstruksi, dan reliabilitas tes ulang. Hasil: Kuesioner KBOHP berhasil diadaptasi lintas budaya kedalam Bahasa Indonesia menggunakan pendekatan simetris. Sebanyak 167 orang bersedia berpartisipasi dalam penelitian. Nilai koefisien validitas isi I-CVI sebesar 0.8, namun nilai validitas konstruksi domain pengetahuan dan perilaku 0,05. Uji reliabilitas tes ulang menunjukkan nilai Intraclass Correlation 0,89-1. Kesimpulan: Kuesioner KBOHP versi Indonesia berhasil diadaptasi lintas budaya dari Bahasa Inggris. Kuesioner KBOHP valid dan reliabel untuk digunakan pada populasi Indonesia, namun untuk dapat meningkatkan validitas konstruksi, dibutuhkan penyempurnaan pada pertanyaan kuesioner.

---

Background: Periodontal disease may occur as an oral manifestation during pregnancy, it is known to be one of the risk factor for low birth weight and premature pregnancy outcomes. To prevent those situations, a visit to the dentist is needed, so that oral health, the health of the baby and also pregnancy could be maintained. Knowledge is known to be associated to womens visit to the dentist during pregnancy. To determine the condition of knowledge and behavior of pregnant women related to oral health during pregnancy, a valid and reliable instrument is needed. Unfortunately, such instrument is lacking in Indonesia.

Objective: To analyze the validity and reliability value of the Indonesian version of Knowledge and Behavior towards Oral Health during Pregnancy (KBOHP) questionnaire.

Method: This was analytic descriptive crossectional study with convinience sampling design using previously published KBOHP questionnaire. Cross-cultural adaptation of the questionnaire is done using Symmetrical approach. Psychometric analysis of the questionnaire were analyzed using content validity, construct validity, and test retest reliability.

Result: The KBOHP questionnaire was successfully cross-adapted culturally into Indonesian using Symmetrical approach. There were 167 people agreed to participate in this study. The value of content validity index (I-CVI) was 0.8 but the construct validity of the knowledge and behavior domain was 0.05. The test and retest reliability showed the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) value of 0.89-1.

Conclusion: The KBOHP Indonesian version questionnaire was successfully cross-culturally adapted from the English version. The KBHOP Indonesian version was valid and reliabel to be used in Indonesian population. However, improvement is still needed on the items of the questionnaire in order to improve the construct validity."