Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Berbagai studi dan penelitian telah dilakukan di berbagai negara untuk mengetahui pengetahuan pasien terhadap anestesia namun tidak ada instrumen kuesioner yang baku untuk menilai pengetahuan pasien tentang anestesia, dan hal ini belum pernah dilakukan di Indonesia khususnya di RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo. Kuesioner pengetahuan yang valid dan reliabel diharapkan menjadi standar untuk menilai pengetahuan masyarakat terhadap anestesia, dan dapat menjadi dasar bagi penelitian selanjutnya.Metode: Kuesioner pengetahuan anestesia sebelumnya telah melalui tahapan pretest oleh ahli dan uji pilot, hasil kuesioner uji pilot disempurnakan sehingga dianggap layak diujicobakan. Penelitian dilakukan pada bulan Januri 2014 sampai dengan Maret 2014 terhadap subyek secara consecutive sampling yang akan menjalani pembiusan dan diperiksa di klinik preoperatif RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo Jakarta. Teknik uji validitas menggunakan validitas konstruk dengan koefisien korelasi minimal 0,3 dapat dianggap valid dan uji reliabilitas menggunakan teknik konsistensi internal dengan nilai cronbach α minimal 0,4 dianggap reliabel.Hasil: Penelitian ini diikuti oleh 95 subyek dengan 1 subyek dikeluarkan dari penelitian karena tidak mengisi kuesioner secara lengkap. Kuesioner pengetahuan terdiri dari 20 pertanyaan, 8 pertanyaan diantaranya dinilai tidak valid dan reliabel yang dapat disebabkan oleh pertanyaan dan jawaban kuesioner yang tidak dapat dimengerti oleh subyek, pembahasan terlalu dalam dan penggunaan istilah medis yang tidak familiar. Beberapa jawaban pertanyaan memiliki kesamaan yang dapat membingungkan subyek, serta terdapat inkonsistensi jawaban yang diberikan oleh subyek. Tingkat penghasilan dan pendidikan subyek yang rendah serta pengalaman dan informasi yang kurang, sangat mempengaruhi pengetahuan subyek terhadap anestesia, tercermin dari rendahnya rerata tingkat pengetahuan subyek sebesar + 31,6%.Kesimpulan: Kuesioner penilaian pengetahuan tentang anestesia pada pasien di klinik preoperatif RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo tidak dapat dijadikan sebagai suatu standar instrumen yang baku oleh karena dinilai tidak valid dan reliabel.

---

Various studies and researches have been conducted abroad to determine the patient?s anesthesia knowledge, although no standard questionnaires exist. Research on anesthesia?s knowledge questionnaires have never been done specifically in Cipto Mangunkusumo hospital. A valid and reliable questionnaire is aimed to be a standard instrument assessing the community?s knowledge on anesthesia, and as a foundation for future researches.Methods: The anesthesia knowledge questionnaires has been evaluated through a pre-test phase done by experts and pilot test, the results was then revised until it is acceptable and can be tested. Researches was conducted on January 2014 until March 2014 on subjects by consecutive sampling who are going to undergo anesthesia and evaluated at the preoperative clinic Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Jakarta. Validity test techniques using construct validity with the minimal correlation coefficient 0.3 is valid. Reliability tests using internal consistency techniques with minimal cronbach alpha value 0.4 is reliable.Results: Research was participated by 95 subjects with 1 subject excluded from the research because of not filling in the questionnaire completely. The knowledge questionnaire included 20 questions, whereas 8 questions was marked to be invalid and unreliable that may be caused by questions and answers were not fully understood by the subjects, the contents was too spesific, usage of medical terms that aren?t familiar. Some of the given answers have similarities that may confuse the subject, and also inconsistency from the subject?s answers. Low level of salary and education with lacking of experience and information from the subjects, has significant influence on the subjects knowledge on anesthesia which is reflected by the low average level of the subject`s knowledge which is + 31.6%.Conclusions: Anesthesia knowledge questionnaires on patients at preoperative clinic Cipto Mangunkusumo hospital is invalid and unreliable therefore fail to be a standard instrument."

"Latar Belakang : Tingkat kepuasan pasien merupakan salah satu indikator kualitas pelayanan anestesia, baik rawat inap maupun rawat jalan. Bedah rawat jalan menawarkan banyak kelebihan dibandingkan rawat inap, sehingga berkembang sangat pesat di Indonesia khususnya di RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo Jakarta dan sebagian besar jenis anestesia pada bedah rawat jalan adalah anestesia umum. Perkembangan ini harus diimbangi dengan peningkatan kualitas pelayanan anestesia. Oleh karena itu perlu dilakukan penilaian terhadap tingkat kepuasan pasien dan faktor-faktor yang memengaruhinya. Tingkat kepuasan pasien dapat memberikan feedback untuk meningkatkan kualitas pelayanan anestesia pada instalasi bedah rawat jalan. Tujuan : Mengetahui tingkat kepuasan pasien yang menjalani anestesia umum pada instalasi bedah rawat jalan di RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo dan faktor yang memengaruhinya. Metode : Penelitian ini adalah penelitian potong lintang. Dilakukan penilaian tingkat kepuasan pada 76 pasien dengan menggunakan kuesioner yang telah divalidasi. Kriteria penerimaan adalah usia 18-65 tahun yang menjalani pembiusan umum pada instalasi bedah rawat jalan di RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo Jakarta, dapat berbahasa Indonesia, membaca dan menulis, bersedia berpartisipasi dan menandatangani surat persetujuan penelitian, pulang dihari yang sama setelah pembedahan atau dirawat kurang dari 24 jam. Hasil kuesioner akan diolah menggunakan perangkat lunak SPSS dengan uji univariat dan bivariat. Hasil : Uji univariat menunjukkan tingkat kepuasan pasien terhadap anestesia umum rata-rata diatas 70 %. Sedangkan dari uji bivariat, faktor yang berpengaruh terhadap tingkat kepuasan pasien adalah usia, jenis kelamin dan pekerjaan. Kesimpulan : Pasien merasa puas terhadap pelayanan anestesia umum pada instalasi bedah rawat jalan di RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo Jakarta. Karakteristik pasien yang memengaruhi tingkat kepuasan pasien adalah usia, jenis kelamin dan pekerjaan.

---

Background : Patient satisfaction has been one of quality indicators in anesthesia services whether it is inpatient or outpatient. Ambulatory surgery offers more advantages compares to inpatient services, thus it developed nicely in Indonesia especially in RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo Jakarta where most patients undergone general anesthesia. This development is yet to be offset by improvement in anesthesia quality services. Thus, it is needed to assess patient satisfaction and factors. Patient satisfaction can give feedback to improve quality of anesthesia services in ambulatory surgery.

Purpose : The purpose of this study was to know patient satisfaction toward general anesthesia and influencing factors in ambulatory surgery RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo Jakarta.

Methods : This is a cross sectional study. Patient satisfaction was assessed in 76 patients using validated questionnaire. The inclusion criteria were age 18-65 undergoing general anesthesia in Ambulatory Surgery, Bahasa speaking, able to read and write, and agreed to participate in this study by signing research consent and discharged on the same day or hospitalized less than 24 hours after surgery. Result was processed using SPSS with univariate and bivariate test.

Results: Univariate test showed patient satisfaction toward general anesthesia was above 70%. While Bivariate test indicated factors influencing patient satisfaction were age, gender and occupation.

Conclusion : Patients were satisfied with general anesthesia services in Ambulatory Surgery RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo Jakarta. Patient characteristics influencing patient satisfaction were age, gender and occupation."

"ABSTRAKLatar Belakang: Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) adalah salah satu instrumen yang telah digunakan luas di dunia untuk menilai kualitas pemulihan pascaanestesia umum. Saat ini belum ada instrumen spesifik yang menilai kualitas pemulihan pascaanestesia di Indonesia.Metode: Hasil terjemahan akan diujikan pada minimal 102 pasien yang menjalani anestesia umum satu hari praoperasi dan satu hari pascaoperasi. Uji kesahihan isi menggunakan koefisien Aiken v, uji kesahihan konstruksi (analisis faktor dan uji korelasi pearson), Konsitensi Internal ( Chronbach α), ketanggapan (responsiveness) dengan Standart respon mean (SRM) .Hasil: Uji kesahihan isi formula Aiken V didapatkan bahwa QoR-40 versi Indonesia sahih dengan nilai ≥ 0,5. Uji kesahihan konstruksi dengan analisis faktor menunjukan semua faktor memiliki korelasi yang tinggi (korelasi ≥ 0,5). Uji korelasi Pearson didapatkan 3 item pertanyaan dari dimensi dukungan tehadap pasien yang tidak sahih, (Mendapat dukungan dari dokter Rumah Sakit, ρ= 0,252), (Mampu memahami arahan dan nasehat ρ= 1,98), (Merasa bingung ρ= 0,202). Standart Respon Mean (SRM) pada Uji ketanggapan adalah 1,06. Terdapat hubungan negatif antara skor QoR-40 versi Indonesia dengan lama masa rawatanSimpulan: QoR - 40 versi Indonesia menunjukkan kesahihan dan keandalan yang memuaskan. Dimensi dukungan terhadap pasien dengan koefisien kesahihan terendah dan tiga pertanyaan yang tidak memiliki kesahihan konstruksi. Ada hubungan negatif antara skor QoR - 40 versi Indonesia dengan panjang pengobatan . Penelitian ini menghasilkan instrumen QoR - 40 versi Indonesia yang memiliki ketanggapan atau sensitif untuk menilai perubahan klinis pascanestesia umum.

---

ABSTRACTBackground: Quality of Recovery-40 (Qor-40) is one of the instruments that have been used widely in the world to assess the quality of recovery after general anesthesia. Currently there is no specific instrument that assesses the quality of recovery after general anesthesia in Indonesia.Methods: The translation will be tested on at least 102 patients undergoing general anesthesia preoperative one day and one day postoperative. Test the validity of the content using the coefficient Aiken V, Construction validity (factor analysis and Pearson correlation), Internal consistency (Chronbach α), responsiveness with Standard response mean (SRM).Results: Test the content validity of Aiken V formula found that Qor-40 Indonesian version valid with a value of ≥ 0.5. Test construction validity by factor analysis showed all the factors have a high correlation (correlation ≥ 0.5). Pearson correlation test item obtained 3 question in patient support dimension not valid, ( Getting support from Hospital doctors, ρ = 0.252), (Able to understand the direction and advice of ρ = 1.98), (Feeling confused ρ = 0.202). SRM on test responsiveness 1,06. There is a negative correlation between the scores Qor-40 version Indonesia with long term careConclusion: QoR-40 Indonesian version showed satisfactory validity and reliability. Dimensions support to patients with the lowest validity coefficient and three questions that do not have construction validity. There is a negative relationship between the score Qor-40 version of Indonesia with the length of treatment. This research resulted in the instrument Qor-40 Indonesia version (responsivness) or sensitive to assess clinical changes after general anesthesia."

"Latar belakang. Teknik Target Controlled Infusion untuk anestesia umum semakin banyak digunakan. Jumlah pasien geriatri yang harus menjalani prosedur operasi semakin bertambah, serta memerlukan pertimbangan khusus mengingat risiko operasi dan pembiusan yang lebih tinggi pada golongan ini. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan konsentrasi plasma (Cp) dan konsentrasi effect site (Ce) propofol menggunakan rumusan Marsh pada pasien geriatri ras Melayu di RSCM dengan dan tanpa pemberian premedikasi fentanil. Metode. Empat puluh pasien geriatri orang Indonesia Asli status fisik ASA 2, usia > 60 tahun dan BMI 18-30 kg/m2 dirandomisasi. Satu kelompok (20 pasien) mendapatkan Fentanil-Propofol, lainnya (20 pasien) mendapatkan NaCl-Propofol. Pemberian propofol menggunakan TCI rumusan Marsh dengan target konsentrasi plasma. Target Cp dimulai dari 1 µ/ml dinaikkan 1 µ/ml tiap menit sampai tercapai loss of consciousness (LoC) dan diteruskan sampai nilai BIS 45-60 selama 5 menit (steady state). Hasil. Pada kelompok Fentanil-Propofol saat LoC didapatkan Cp 3,15+0,35 µ/ml dan Ce 1,53+0,53 µ/ml dan saat BIS stabil didapatkan Cp 4,14+0,59 µ/ml dan Ce 2,63+0,60 µ/ml. Pada kelompok Nacl-Propofol saat LoC didapatkan Cp 4,20+0,61 µ/ml dan Ce 2,26+0,56 µ/ml dan saat BIS stabil didapatkan Cp 4,78+0,38 µ/ml dan Ce 3,30+0,52 µ/ml. Pasien-pasien yang mendapatkan fentanil terlebih dahulu memiliki Cp dan Ce yang lebih rendah baik saat LoC maupun saat nilai BIS stabil (P < 0,05). Kesimpulan. Terdapat perbedaan bermakna antara Cp dan Ce propofol yang diberikan premedikasi fentanil dan yang tidak.

---

Background. The application of Target Controlled Infusion (TCI) technique in general anesthesia is progressively growing. Number of geriatric patients scheduled for operations increases every year, while this group needs special consideration following the higher risk of surgery and anesthesia. The purpose of our study was to compare the estimated plasma concentration (Cp) and the effect site concentration (Ce) of propofol using Marsh pharmacokinetic model for geriatric patients in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital with and without the administration of fentanyl premedication.

Methods. Forty patients, physical status ASA 2, aged > 60, BMI 18-30 kg/m2 randomly assigned to a fentanyl-propofol group or a saline-propofol group. TCI propofol was initiated using Marsh pharmacokinetic model. Initial plasma concentration in each group was 1 µ/ml and increased by 1 µ/ml every minute until there was no eyelash reflex, which defined as loss of consciousness (LoC). Propofol plasma concentration was increased and decreased to reach a stable BIS value between 45-60, considered as Cp and Ce at steady state.

Results. In the fentanyl-propofol group the estimated Cp at loss of consciousness was 3,15+0,35 µ/ml and Ce 1,53+0,53 µ/ml. At steady state, Cp was 4,14+0,59 µ/ml and Ce 2,63+0,60 µ/ml. In the saline-propofol group Cp 4,20+0,61 µ/ml and Ce 2,26+0,56 µ/ml. At steady state, Cp was 4,78+0,38 µ/ml and Ce 3,30+0,52 µ/ml. The estimated Cp and Ce in the fentanyl-propofol group were lower than saline-propofol group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion. There is a significant difference between Cp and Ce in the salinepropofol group and fentanyl-propofol group."

"[ABSTRAKLatar Belakang. Manajemen jalan nafas merupakan salah satu tahap yang paling penting dalam bidang anestesiologi. Salah satu jenis Alat bantu jalan nafas yang telah dipergunakan secara luas adalah Laringeal Mask Airway (LMA/Sungkup Laring). Pada pemasangan sungkup laring tanpa menggunakan pelumpuh otot membutuhkan kedalaman anestesi yang cukup, Tes klinis yang mudah, akurat dan aplikatif diperlukan untuk menghindari terjadinya komplikasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan trapezius squeezing test dan jaw thrust sebagai indikator kedalaman anestesi pada pemasangan sungkup laring dengan propofol sebagai agen induksiMetode. Sebanyak 128 pasien di randomisasi ke dalam 2 kelompok yaitu jaw thrust dan trapezius squeezing test. Seluruh pasien mendapatkan premedikasi dengan midazolam 0.05 mg/kgBB dan Fentanyl 1 mcg/kgBB. Induksi menggunakan propofol titrasi. Manuver jaw thrust dan trapezius squeezing test dilakukan setiap 15 detik. Saat respon motorik hilang dilakukan pemasangan sungkup laring. Dicatat keberhasilan pemasangan, dosis propofol, tekanan darah, laju jantung, dan insiden apneu.Hasil. Keberhasilan pada kelompok jaw thrust 93.8%, sedangkan trapezius squeezing test yang 90.6%. Penggunaan rerata propofol pada kelompok jaw thrust yaitu sebesar 120.34 mg, sedangkan pada kelompok trapezius squeezing test yaitu sebesar 111,86 mg. Insiden apneu yang pada kelompok jaw thrust terjadi pada 10 (15.6%) pasien, sedangkan pada kelompok trapezius squeezing test sebesar 11 (17.2%) pasien. Tidak terdapat perubahan hemodinamik yang berarti pada kelompok jaw thrust sedangkan sedangkan pada kelompok trapezius squeezing test terdapat perubahan hemodinamik yang berarti di menit ke 3 dan ke 4Kesimpulan. Trapezius squeezing test tidak lebih baik daripada jaw thrust sebagai indikator klinis dalam menilai kedalaman anestesia pada insersi sungkup laring.

---

ABSTRACTBackground. Airway management is one of the most important phase in anesthesiology. One of airway device that have been used generally is Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA). Laryngeal mask insertion without muscle relaxant requires a level of depth anesthesia. An easy, accurate, an applicable clinical indicator were required to avoid complication. This study was determine the comparison trapezius squeezing test and jaw thrust as indicator of depth of anesthesia in laryngeal mask insertion with propofol as induction agent.Methods. 128 patient have been randomize in to 2 group that are jaw thrust and trapezius squeezing test. All patients were received premedication with midazolam 0.05 mg/kg and fentanyl 1 μg/kg. Induction were done by propofol titration. Jaw thrust and trapezius squeezing test maneuver were done in every 15 second. When motoric respond negative the laryngeal mask were inserted. The successful of laryngeal mask insertion was recorded, propofol consumption, blood pressure, heart rate, and incidence of apnea were also documented.Result. Laryngeal mask successfully inserted in 93.8% patients in jaw thrust group, and 90.6% in trapezius squeezing test group. Mean of propofol consumption in jaw thrust group is 120.34 mgs, and in trapezius squeezing test is 11.86 mgs. Incident of apnea in jaw thrust group happened in 10 patients (15.6%), and in trapezius squeezing test group happened in 11 patient (17.2%). Hemodynamic in jaw thrust group relatively stable but in trapezius squeezing test there is significant hemodynamic changing in minute third and fourth.Conclusion. Trapezius squeezing test is not better than jaw thrust as clinical indicators of depth of anesthesia for laryngeal mask insertion.;Background. Airway management is one of the most important phase in anesthesiology. One of airway device that have been used generally is Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA). Laryngeal mask insertion without muscle relaxant requires a level of depth anesthesia. An easy, accurate, an applicable clinical indicator were required to avoid complication. This study was determine the comparison trapezius squeezing test and jaw thrust as indicator of depth of anesthesia in laryngeal mask insertion with propofol as induction agent.Methods. 128 patient have been randomize in to 2 group that are jaw thrust and trapezius squeezing test. All patients were received premedication with midazolam 0.05 mg/kg and fentanyl 1 μg/kg. Induction were done by propofol titration. Jaw thrust and trapezius squeezing test maneuver were done in every 15 second. When motoric respond negative the laryngeal mask were inserted. The successful of laryngeal mask insertion was recorded, propofol consumption, blood pressure, heart rate, and incidence of apnea were also documented.Result. Laryngeal mask successfully inserted in 93.8% patients in jaw thrust group, and 90.6% in trapezius squeezing test group. Mean of propofol consumption in jaw thrust group is 120.34 mgs, and in trapezius squeezing test is 11.86 mgs. Incident of apnea in jaw thrust group happened in 10 patients (15.6%), and in trapezius squeezing test group happened in 11 patient (17.2%). Hemodynamic in jaw thrust group relatively stable but in trapezius squeezing test there is significant hemodynamic changing in minute third and fourth.Conclusion. Trapezius squeezing test is not better than jaw thrust as clinical indicators of depth of anesthesia for laryngeal mask insertion., Background. Airway management is one of the most important phase in anesthesiology. One of airway device that have been used generally is Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA). Laryngeal mask insertion without muscle relaxant requires a level of depth anesthesia. An easy, accurate, an applicable clinical indicator were required to avoid complication. This study was determine the comparison trapezius squeezing test and jaw thrust as indicator of depth of anesthesia in laryngeal mask insertion with propofol as induction agent.Methods. 128 patient have been randomize in to 2 group that are jaw thrust and trapezius squeezing test. All patients were received premedication with midazolam 0.05 mg/kg and fentanyl 1 μg/kg. Induction were done by propofol titration. Jaw thrust and trapezius squeezing test maneuver were done in every 15 second. When motoric respond negative the laryngeal mask were inserted. The successful of laryngeal mask insertion was recorded, propofol consumption, blood pressure, heart rate, and incidence of apnea were also documented.Result. Laryngeal mask successfully inserted in 93.8% patients in jaw thrust group, and 90.6% in trapezius squeezing test group. Mean of propofol consumption in jaw thrust group is 120.34 mgs, and in trapezius squeezing test is 11.86 mgs. Incident of apnea in jaw thrust group happened in 10 patients (15.6%), and in trapezius squeezing test group happened in 11 patient (17.2%). Hemodynamic in jaw thrust group relatively stable but in trapezius squeezing test there is significant hemodynamic changing in minute third and fourth.Conclusion. Trapezius squeezing test is not better than jaw thrust as clinical indicators of depth of anesthesia for laryngeal mask insertion.]"

"ABSTRAKLatar Belakang : Kami mengevaluasi kegunaan dari pemeriksaan rasio jarakhiomental (HMDR,hyomental distance ratio), yang didefinisikan sebagai rasiodari jarak hiomental (HMD,hyomental distance) posisi kepala ekstensi maksimaldengan posisi kepala netral, dalam memprediksi kesulitan visualisasi laring padapasien-pasien normal, yang dilakukan pemeriksaan prediktor-prediktor jalannapas praoperasi dengan skor Mallampati dan jarak tiromental (TMD,tyhyromental distance) sebagai pembanding.Metode Penelitian : Praoperasi, kami menilai empat prediktor jalan napas pada169 orang dewasa yang menjalani anestesi umum. Pelaku laringoskopi adalahresiden anestesiologi minimal tahun ke 2, dan menilai skor Cormack-Lehane(CL)yang dimodifikasi. Sulit visualisasi laring (DVL,difficult visualization of thelarynx) didefinisikan sebagai CL derajat 3 atau 4. Titik potong optimal (The cutoffpoint) untuk setiap tes ditentukan pada titik maksimal daerah di bawahkurva dalam kurva ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic). Skor Mallampatidengan derajat ≥ 3 sebagai prediktor DVL. Untuk TMD ≤ 65 mm dianggapsebagai prediktor DVL.Hasil : Didapatkan 21 (12,4%) orang pasien dengan sulit visualisasi laring(DVL).HMDR memiliki hubungan yang bermakna terkait dengan DVL. HMDR dengantitik potong optimal 1,2 memiliki akurasi diagnostik yang lebih besar (dengan areadi bawah kurva 0.694), dibandingkan prediktor tunggal lainnya (P <0,05), danHMDR sendiri menunjukkan validitas diagnostik yang lebih besar (sensitivitas,61,9%, spesifisitas, 69,6%) dibandingkan dengan prediktor lainnya.Kesimpulan :HMDR dengan ambang batas uji 1,2 adalah prediktor klinis handaldalam memprediksi kesulitan dalam visualisasi laring.

---

ABSTRACTBackground: We evaluated the usefulness of the hyomental distance (HMD) ratio(HMDR), defined as the ratio of the HMD at the extreme of the head extension tothat in the neutral position, in predicting difficult visualization of the larynx(DVL) in apparently normal patients, by examining the following preoperativeairway predictors: the modified Mallampati test, HMD in theneutral position, HMD and thyromental distance at the extreme of head extensionand HMDR.Methods : Preoperatively, we assessed the four airway predictors in 169 adultpatients undergoing general anesthesia. A second years resident, performed all ofthe direct laryngoscopies and graded the views using the modified Cormack andLehane scale. DVL was defined as a Grade 3 or 4 view. The optimal cutoff pointsfor each test were determined at the maximal point of the area under the curve inthe receiver operating characteristic curve. For the modified Mallampati test,Class ≥ 3 was predefined as a predictor of DVL. And thyromental distance (TMD)≤ 65 mm was predefined as a predictor of DVL.Results : The larynx was difficult to visualize in 21 (12,4%) patients. The HMDRwith the optimal cutoff point of 1.2 had greater diagnostic accuracy (area underthe curve of 0.694), with significantly related to DVL (P <0.05), and it aloneshowed a greater diagnostic validity profile (sensitivity, 61,9%; specificity,69,6%) than any other predictor.Conclusions : The HMDR with a test threshold of 1.2 is a clinically reliablepredictor of DVL."

"Latar Belakang. Bedah jantung terbuka mengakibatkan nyeri dan respons stres pascabedah yang dapat memberikan dampak buruk bagi pasien. Blok transversus thoracis plane merupakan blok interfascial dalam di area parasternal untuk mengatasi nyeri sternotomi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan efektivitas penambahan blok transversus thoracis muscle plane bilateral dalam mengurangi nyeri dan respons stres pascabedah jantung terbuka terhadap kontrol. Metode. Penelitian ini adalah uji klinis terkontrol acak tersamar ganda. Tiga puluh empat subjek yang memenuhi syarat yang menjalani operasi jantung elektif antara September 2020 dan Agustus 2001 secara acak dimasukkan ke kelompok blok TTP atau kontrol. Penelitian membandingkan beda rerata konsumsi morfin 24 jam pascabedah, waktu pertama dosis morfin pascabedah, waktu ekstubasi, konsentrasi plasma IL-6 dan kortisol pada 24 jam dan 48 jam pascabedah. Penelitian juga ingin mengetahui konsumsi fentanil intraoperatif, waktu pertama opioid rescue intraoperatif, komplikasi, efek samping opioid, dan lama rawat inap. Hasil. Konsumsi morfin 24 jam pertama pascabedah lebih tinggi secara bermakna (p<0,001) pada kelompok kontrol dibandingkan kelompok blok TTP. Waktu pertama pemberian morfin pascabedah lebih lama secara bermakna (p<0,001) pada kelompok blok TTP dibandingkan kelompok kontrol. Waktu ekstubasi tidak berbeda bermakna antara kelompok blok TTP dan kelompok kontrol. Konsentrasi plasma IL-6 dan kortisol tidak berbeda bermakna antara kelompok blok TTP dan kelompok kontrol pada 24 jam dan 48 jam pascabedah. Kesimpulan. Penambahan blok transversus thoracis muscle plane bilateral tidak terbukti lebih efektif dalam mengurangi nyeri dan respons stres pascabedah jantung terbuka dibandingkan dengan kontrol.

---

Background. Open-heart surgery is a major surgery that causes postoperative pain and surgical stress response, contributing further to postoperative complications and morbidity. Transversus thoracis muscle plane block is a deep interfascial block in the parasternal area to treat sternotomy pain. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of bilateral transversus thoracis muscle plane blocks in reducing pain and stress response after open-heart surgery versus control. Methods. This is a prospective, double-blind, randomized control trial. Thirty-four eligible subjects who underwent elective cardiac surgery between September 2020 and August 2001 were randomly assigned to the TTPB or control group. The primary outcomes were the different means of 24-hour postoperative morphine consumption, time of first postoperative morphine dose, extubation, postoperative plasma levels of IL-6 and cortisol at 24 hours and 48 hours after surgery. The secondary outcomes were intraoperative fentanil consumption, time of first intraoperative opioid rescue, complication, opioid side effects, and length of stay. Results. The 24-hour postoperative morphine consumption was significantly higher (p<0.001) in the control group than in the TTPB group. The time of first postoperative morphine dose was significantly longer (p<0.001) in the TTPB group than in the control group. Extubation time was not statistically different between the TTP block group and the control group. Plasma levels of IL-6 and cortisol were not statistically different between the TTP block group and the control group at 24 hours and 48 hours after surgery. Conclusion. The bilateral transversus thoracis muscle plane blocks were not shown to be more effective in reducing pain and stress response after open-heart surgery compared to controls."

"Latar belakang : Hipotensi merupakan salah satu komplikasi akibat anestesia subarakhnoid pada seksio sesarea yang berpotensi membahayakan ibu dan janin. Kejadian hipotensi pada seksio sesarea dengan dosis bupivakain 8 - 12,5 mg berkisar antara 25 - 60%. Mengkombinasikan anestetika lokal dosis rendah dengan opioid lipofilik dan modifikasi posisi saat injeksi subarakhnoid mungkin dapat lebih menurunkan kejadian hipotensi. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui efektivitas posisi Oxford dalam menurunkan kejadian hipotensi dibanding posisi lateral dengan regimen bupivakain 7,5 mg ditambah fentanil 25 mcg. Metode : Setelah lolos kaji etik dan mendapatkan persetujuan klinik 180 pasien yang akan menjalani seksio sesarea elektif dirandomisasi blok ke dalam kelompok posisi Oxford atau posisi lateral. Semua pasien mendapatkan dosis intratekal bupivakain 0,5% hiperbarik 7,5 mg ditambah fentanil 25 mcg. Coloading kristaloid diberikan 10 ml/ kgBB. Efedrin intravena diberikan sesuai standar. Kondisi hemodinamik dan profil blok sensorimotor dicatat. Penggunaan efedrin, efek samping dan nilai APGAR juga didokumentasikan. Hasil : Terdapat perbedaan yang secara statistik tidak bermakna pada kejadian hipotensi diantara kedua kelompok (p=0,121). Total jumlah penggunaan efedrin intravena diantara kedua kelompok berbeda dan dapat diperbandingkan. Profil blok sensorimotor diantara kedua kelompok dapat diperbandingkan. Kesimpulan : Modifikasi posisi Oxford pada anestesia subarakhnoid dengan dosis bupivakain 7,5 mg ditambah fentanil 25 mcg tidak memberikan hasil yang bermakna dalam menurunkan kejadian hipotensi.

---

Background : Hypotension was one of the complications of subarachnoid anesthesia in caesarean section that potentially detrimental to the mother and baby. The insidens of hypotension in caesarean section with bupivacaine 8 - 12,5 mg were between 25 and 60%. Combining low dose of local anesthetics with lipofilic opioid and modification of position during subarachnoid injection might be more in lowering the hypotension insidens. The study was conducted to prove the effectiveness of Oxford position in lowering the hypotension insidens with regimen 7,5 mg bupivacaine added with 25 mcg fentanyl.

Methods : After ethical clearance and receive informed consent 180 elective caesarean section patient were randomized into Oxford group or lateral group. All the patient were receive the same dose of intrathecal 7,5 mg 0,5% hyperbaric bupivacaine added with 25 mcg fentanyl. Coloading of 10 ml/ kgBW with cristaloid was given. Intravenous ephedrine was given according to a standard. Hemodynamic changes and sensorimotor block profile were documented. Epedhrine consumption, side effect and APGAR score were also documented.

Result : There is a difference that statistically not significant in hypotension insidens between two groups (p=0,121). The total intravenous ephedrine consumption between two groups was different and comparable. The profile of sensorimotor block between two groups could be compared.

Conclusion : Modification of Oxford position in subarachnoid anesthesia with 7,5 mg bupivacaine added with 25 mcg fentanyl was not more effective in lowering insidens of hypotension."

"Latar Belakang: Insidens postdural puncture headache menggunakan jarum spinal ukuran kecil belum pernah diteliti di RSUPNCM. Saat ini di tempat kami jarum spinal yang tersedia yaitu jarum spinal Quincke ukuran 25G, 26G, dan 27G. Metode: Penelitian observasional ini dilakukan secara prospektif untuk mencari insidens postdural puncture headache sampai 72 jam pasca-anestesia spinal. Faktor-faktor risiko yang berhubungan dengan pasien dan prosedur dihubungkan dengan PDPH dan dilakukan analisis regresi linear terhadap faktor-faktor tersebut. Hasil: Insidens postdural puncture headache pasca-anestesia spinal sebesar 6,6%. Kelompok usia <50 tahun memiliki kemungkinan 3 kali PDPH dibanding kelompok umur lebih tua. Jarum spinal 25G/26G Quincke memiliki kemungkinan 2 kali risiko MPDPH dibandingkan jarum 27G. Kesimpulan: Insidens postdural puncture headache setelah anesthesia spinal di RSUPNCM tidak berbeda dengan hasil laporan di tempat lain.

---

Background : Incidence of postdural puncture headache using small spinal needles was not yet investigated in RSUPNCM. In our centre we use Quincke spinal needle sizes 25G, 26G, and 27G.

Methods : The incidence of postdural puncture headache was prospectively investigated until 72 hours after spinal anesthesia in 440 patients at RSUPNCM. Patient and procedure related factors were recorded and submitted to multiple logistic regression analysis to determine the relationship of these factors to postdural puncture headcahe.

Results: The incidence of postdural puncture headache after spinal anesthesia were 6,6%. The age <50 years old is identified increase three times for PDPH compare to older. Larger needles Quincke (25G/26G) is identified increase twice for PDPH compare to 27G.

Conclusion : The incidence of postdural puncture headache after spinal anesthesia at RSUPNCM is comparable to those reported elsewhere."