Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini membahas tentang efektifitas penyelesaian banding oleh wajib pajak di Pengadilan Pajak. Bagaimana efektifitas dalam penyelesaian banding di Pengadilan Pajak, serta permasalahan yang dihadapi dalam proses penyelesaian banding baik dari internal maupun eksternal serta upaya yang dilakukan oleh pengadilan pajak.Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kualitatif. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan adalah wawancara mendalam dan studi pustaka. Analisa dilakukan dengan menggunakan indikator efektifitas organisasi yang menyelenggarakan pelayanan publik. Analisa yang dilakukan mengacu pada tema penelitian ini.

---

This study discusses the effectiveness of the completion of the appeal by the taxpayer in the tax court. How the effectiveness of the appeal in tax court settlement, and problems in dealing with the process of resolving appleals form both internal and external as well as the efforts made by tax court.

The method used in this study is qualitative. The data collection techniques are in-depth interviews and literature. The analysis is done using organizational effectiveness indicators organizing public services. Analysis conducted referring to the theme of this study."

"Upaya hukum pengajuan keberatan merupakan hak dari setiap pelaku usaha yang tidak menerima Putusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU). Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat secara sederhana mengatur pengajuan keberatan bagi pelaku usaha yang tidak dapat menerima sanksi yang dijatuhkan oleh KPPU. Karenanya, pada tanggal 18 Juli 2005, Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia menetapkan sebuah peraturan yang sangat penting bagi perkembangan dan penegakan hukum persaingan di Indonesia. Peraturan tersebut adalah Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2005 tentang Tata Cara Pengajuan Upaya Hukum Keberatan Terhadap Putusan KPPU. Lahimya Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 tahun 2005 ini setidaknya dapat mengatasi ketidakjelasan mengenai tata cara pengajuan upaya hukum keberatan terhadap Putusan KPPU yang selama ini memang masih menimbulkan polemik dan ketidakseragaman dari setiap Pengadilan Negeri yang rrmenangani kasus keberatan terhadap putusan KPPU. Namun demikian, Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2005 ini tidak seluruhnya dapat dikatakan sempuma dari segi substansi yang diaturnya, karena masih terdapat beberapa kelemahan, seperti: kurang komprehensifnya aturan-aturan hukum yang ada di dalamnya, perbedaan interpretasi antara Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Negeri dengan KPPU, dan kurangnya pemahaman Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Negeri mengenai hukum persaingan usaha. Dari paparan di atas, dapat dilihat bahwa Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 masih memerlukan perbaikan lebih lanjut, karena ternyata terdapat beberapa permasalahan yang timbul akibat undang-undang tidak mengatur upaya hukum apa yang seharusnya ditempuh oleh pelaku usaha yang diperiksa oleh KPPU, dan bagaimana proses beracara untuk kasus persaingan usaha di Pengadilan Negeri."

"ABSTRAKTax-related disputes with the Directorate General of Tax can be settled through the institution of objection, correction of tax assessment and administrative sanction reduction. The institution of objection, for the tax payer has been used within the scope of creating the agreement between the duties and rights of a taxpayer in looking for justice as the motivation of the performance of his/her tax obligation. The role of the institution of objection for the Directorate General of Tax sometimes creates dualism between the realization of tax collection by observing the rights of the tax payer. While tax disputes are inevitable in the interaction betweenthe Taxpayers and the Directorate General of Tax, in the task of securing the state revenue in tax sector. In a line with the increased trends of appealing with the Tax court, this can be an indicator that the institution of objection has not satisfied the taxpayers who bringtheir tax disputes for settlement. The settlement by the institution of objection at the Directorate General of Tax instance has not given the desired results, therefore must be appealed. So has not The Southern Jakarta Regional Office of Directorate General of Taxes, the increase has been quantitatively and qualitatively filed in theinstitution of objection as the effort of settling the tax dispute. From the trend of the dossier of objection cases filed within the last two (2) years, the objection with respect to Value Added Tax have dominated the dossiers of objection filed with The Southern Jakarta Regional Office of Directorate General of Taxes. From the entered 636 dossiers of objection, 468 of them have been objection related to Value AddedTax while 96.3% have been rejected by various reasons and major parts of them are being appealed. This research depicts anything that may be the causes of the rejection after the formal and material examination of the dossier of objection by the examiner. In addition to the problems that may arise to the rejection of the objection.This research applies descriptively qualitative method as the approachexpected to give comprehensive understanding regarding the institution of objection and the consequences of the implementation of the institution in the settlement of the tax disputes. By case studies in The Southern Jakarta Regional Office of Directorate General of Taxes , one can comprehensively find the roles of the taxpayers inempowering the institution of objection to satisfy the rights of the taxpayer. From this research, depiction may be taken that formal and material examinations have been conducted, however the rejection has still dominated total dossier of objection filed The Southern of Jakarta Regional Office of Directorate General of Taxes. The reasons for the rejection have been based on the examiner is not in agreement with the Taxpayer due to the lack of supporting proper evidences grounding the arguments of the objection. In addition, there have been also examiners who had no nerve to make any decisions since the disputed matters are not regulated in the tax regulation or due to many interpretation of the implementation of the laws. Here, the Directorate General of Tax sometimes prioritizes its interest as an institution authorized to collect or withhold taxes. Not all implementation of the tax regulations in the field can be easily exercises by the taxpayers, can?t it. When such matter arises from the assessment that exceeds the ability of the taxpayer to pay, the taxpayer will take advantages of the institution of objection.Should the Directorate General of Tax reject the objection, the Taxpayer will surely appeal. Appeal requirements and procedures require the taxpayers to be more patient pending the decision of the Tax Court that burdening their financial condition, by the advance payment of the assessed amount of the disputed tax. After thetaxpayers win the case at the Tax Court instance, the interest, as the laws may grant, will not immediately be enjoyable by the Taxpayers. Even the Tax Service Office will wait for the demand from the taxpayer regarding the interest. This indicates that not all decision of Tax Court is performed by the Directorate General ofTax. Weak supervision and control of the management may reflect the nonresponsiveness of the Directorate General of Tax toward the rights of taxpayers. Therefore, the Author recommends, that the institution of objection should be managed beyond the Directorate General of Tax to empower this institution proportionally and objectively to distance it from the influence of the duties of theDirectorate General of Tax, raising public funds through tax. In addition to the more standardized operational procedures to provide legal certainty, in preceding the objection at the Directorate General of Tax, another recommendation is that the examiners should be filled with more competent human resources on the basis of knowledge on the tax regulations and the more complex development of businesssector. So should the interest, better coordination between the Tax Court and the Directorate General of Tax is required, in the form of decision, of payment, of interest incorporated in the appellate decision granting the appeal of the taxpayers, thereforecan be enforced entirely without ignoring a standard mechanism in a standard operational procedure. "

"Skripsi ini menganalisispenagihan tunggakan Pajak Pertambahan Nilai (PPN) atastransaksi pembiayaan murabahah berdasarkanasas kepastian hukum (Certainty). Indikator-indikator guna mengukur kesesuaian asas kepastian hukum (certainty) dalam penagihan tunggakan pajak pertambahan nilai (PPN) atas transaksi pembiayaan murabahah, antara lainkepastian atas subjek penagihan pajak, objek penagihan pajak, prosedur penagihan pajak, serta jaminan hukum berupaperlindungan bagi wajib pajak.Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan jenis penelitian deskriptif. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk memahami dan menganalisis penagihan tunggakan Pajak Pertambahan Nilai (PPN) atastransaksi pembiayaan murabahahmemenuhi asas kepastian hukumatau tidak. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan dengan membaca literatur yang berdasarkan penelitian, observasi, dan wawancara.Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa penagihan tunggakan Pajak Pertambahan Nilai (PPN) padatransaksi pembiayaan murabahah yang timbul pada dasarnyamemenuhi asas-asaskepastian hukum, namun muncul keraguan dari pihak Direktorat Jenderal Pajak pada pelaksanaannya.

---

This thesis analyzes the implementation of arrears billing Value Added Tax (VAT) on murabahah transaction based on the principle of legal certainty (certainty). Indicators to measure the suitability of the principle of legal certainty (certainty) in the implementation of value added tax arrears collection (VAT) on murabahah certainty as to the subject of tax billing, collection of objects of taxation, tax collection procedures, and legal guarantees of protection for taxpayers.This study uses a quantitative approach to the type of descriptive research. The purpose of this research is to understand and analyze the implementation of Value Added Tax arrears collection (VAT) on murabahah satisfy the principle of legal certainty or not. Data collection techniques used by reading the literature based on research, observations, and interviews.This study concludes that theimplementation of arrears billing Value Added Tax (VAT) on murabahah arising prior to April 2010 basically does not meet the principles of legal certainty."

"Atas utang pajak yang belum dilunasi ditagih dengan Surat Paksa yang mempunyai kedudukan hukum yang sama dengan putusan pengadilan, walaupun Wajib Pajak sedang mengajukan keberatan maupun Banding. Namun dalam Undang-undang yang baru, pasat mengenai keberatan dan banding telah dirubah yang intinya Wajib Pajak tidak akan ditagth dengan Surat Paksa apabila telah melunasi utang pajak paling sedikit sejumlah yang telah disetujui saja. Pasal Ketentuan Peralihan juga memungkinkan atas satu Wajib Pajak dikenakan dua ketentuan yaitu UU yang lama dan UU yang baru.

---

For the tax obligation have not . et paid addicted by the Force Letter that it same to the decision of court although Taxpayer is making objection or appeal. In the new rule, chapter of objection and appeal had changed and the poin is that the Taxpayer will not addicted if the Taxpayer had paid tax obligation at least as amount that he was agree to paid only. The chapter of transition enable for one Taxpayer probably two rules, they are new rule and old rule."

"Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tabun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha (selanjutnya disebut "UU Antimonopoli") merupakan sebuah undang¬undang yang secara khusus mengatur persaingan dan praktek monopoli, yang sudah sejak lama dipikirkan oleh para pakar, partai politik, lembaga swadaya masyarakat, serta instansi pemerintah. Sebagai contoh, misalnya Partai Demokrasi Indonesia pada tahun 1995 telah mengeluarkan gagasan tentang konsep Rancangan Undang-Undang tentang Antimonopoli. Namun demikian, semua gagasan dan usulan tersebut tidak mendapat tanggapan yang positif, karena pada masa itu belum ada komitmen maupun political will dari elite politik yang berkuasa untuk mengatur masalah persaingan usaha."