Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Skripsi ini bertujuan sebagai pembelaan etik terhadap orang - orang yang telah bersusah payah untuk hidup dan merealisasikan mimpi - mimpinya, yang dipaksa untuk bertanggung jawab dan berkorban untuk menolong orang lain yang tidak dia inginkan melalui berbagai macam kemunafikan. Untuk berkata tidak dan menolak secara tegas tiap usaha yang menekan kebebasan manusia dari para "pencuri kehidupan". Etika objectivism milik Ayn Rand yang sering disebut sebagai etika objektivis yang beranggapan bahwa hal yang baik bagi tiap orang adalah perbuatan yang menguntungkan keinginan pribadi (self interest) bagi dirinya, dan mampu meminimalisir segala hal yang mampu merugikan self interestnya, sedangkan perbuatan buruk adalah perbuatan yang merugikan self interest bagi dirinya. Penulis ingin menarik masalah ini menjadi lebih praktis dengan mengaitkannya dengan perbuatan menolong orang lain (helping). Sebagaimana kita ketahui seringkali dalam permasalahan self interest Ayn Rand menekankan bahwa tiap manusia pastilah mengejar keuntungan yaitu pemenuhan self interest dan menjadi tidak rasional jika kita memikirkan self interest orang lain. Penulis dengan menggunakan metode hermeunetika ingin menafsir kembali pemikiran Ayn Rand tentang etika objektivis untuk menganalisa fenomena menolong orang lain. Perbuatan menolong merupakan hal yang sering kita rasakan dan lakukan sehari - hari. Fenomena perbuatan menolong orang lain tersebut yang seringkali dianggap mayoritas orang perbuatan remeh dan tidak pantas dijadikan bahan kajian akademis, namun penulis berkeyakinan bahwa perbuatan menolong orang tidak sesederhana itu dan bisa dikaji secara filosofis untuk menunjukan konsekuensi dari perbuatan menolong orang lain.

---

This essay is intended as a defense against the people who have taken the trouble to live and establish a dream, which was forced to take responsibility and make sacrifices to help the others, who do not him/her like, through various kinds of hypocrisy. To say no, and expressly reject all kind of act those suppress human freedom from the "Thieves Of Life". Ayn Rand objectivism ethics, often referred to as "the Objectivist ethics", is considered that, a good thing for each person is the beneficial action of personal interest (self-interest) for himself/herself, and able to minimize everything that is capable to harm the self interest, while bad deeds are deeds that adverse self-interest for him/her. The author would like to draw this to be a more practical problem, with associating objectivism ethics with deeds to help others (helping). As we all know, the problems of self-interest that often Ayn Rand stressed, each human being must pursue the advantage that the fulfillment of self-interest, and become irrational if we think of self-interest of others. I am, using hermeneutics method; want to interpret Ayn Rand's Objectivist ethics, to analyze the phenomenon of helping others. That kind phenomena, such as helping others, that are often considered trivial, and the majority of people think that problem is inappropriate to become an academic study, but I believe that the act of helping people not as simple as that, and it can be studied philosophically to show the consequences of helping others."

"While the history books are filled with tales of obsessive visionary geniuses who remade the world in their image with sheer, almost irrational force, I've found that history is also made by individuals who fought their egos at every turn, who eschewed the spotlight, and who put their higher goals above their desire for recognition."--The prologue Many of us insist the main impediment to a full, successful life is the outside world. In fact, the most common enemy lies within: our ego. Early in our careers, it impedes learning and the cultivation of talent. With success, it can blind us to our faults and sow future problems. In failure, it magnifies each blow and makes recovery more difficult. At every stage, ego holds us back. Ego Is the Enemy draws on a vast array of stories and examples, from literature to philosophy to hisƯtory. We meet fascinating figures such as George Marshall, Jackie Robinson, Katharine Graham, Bill Belichick, and Eleanor Roosevelt, who all reached the highest levels of power and success by conƯquering their own egos. Their strategies and tactics can be ours as well. In an era that glorifies social media, reality TV, and other forms of shameless self-promotion, the battle against ego must be fought on many fronts. Armed with the lessons in this book, as Holiday writes, "you will be less invested in the story you tell about your own specialness, and as a result, you will be liberated to accomplish the world-changing work you've set out to achieve.In the tradition of Steven Pressfield's The War of Art, a short, powerful meditation on ego and creativity, from the bestselling author of The Obstacle is the Way. In The Obstacle is the Way, Ryan Holiday introduced tens of thousands of readers to the world of Stoic philosophy. In The Ego is the Enemy, Holiday again delivers practical and inspiring philosophy to people who need it, picking up on a powerful concept that runs back centuries, across borders and schools of thought. Our main impediment in life is not the outside world but ourselves. It's our ego that is our most common enemy. Early in our careers, it can prevent us from learning and developing our talents. When we taste success, ego can blind us to our own faults, alienate us from others and lead to our downfall. In failure, ego is devastating and makes recovery all the more difficult. It is only by identifying our ego, speaking to its desires, and systematically disarming it that we will ever create our best work. In The Ego is the Enemy, Holidaydraws on a vast array of stories and examples, from literature to philosophy to history to his own experience advising many high-profile clients. Like Steven Pressfield's The War of Art, the book offers a brutally honest portrait of how we let our egos seduce us, and offers valuable advice for how we can overcome them"

"ABSTRAKSkripsi ini membahas tentang Egoisme Manusia dalam novel Mendhung karya Yes Ismie Suryaatmadja. Skripsi ini menggunakan model penelitian sastra Jawa dengan psikologi-sosiologi, khususnya pada analisis egoisme manusia dalam novel Mendhung berbahasa Jawa. Penelitian ini fokus membahas tentang karakter tokoh. Berdasarkan pembacaan atas novel Mendhung dan melalui peristiwa fungsional yang terkandung di dalam novel Mendhung, penulis menemukan adanya bukti-bukti keegoisan tokoh-tokoh dalam novel Mendhung beserta motif-motif yang melatarbelakangi adanya egoisme manusia tersebut.

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis discusses about Human Selfishness in the Mendhung Novel Written by Yes Ismie Suryaatmadja. This thesis to use a model of Javanese literature research with psychology-sociology in particular for the analysis of human selfishness in the Mendhung Novel in Javanese. This research focus on discussing about the character. Based on a reading of the Mendhung novel and the functional events contained in it. The researchist has found the human selfishness facts in characters of the Mendhung Novel and their motives background."

"ABSTRAKSkripsi ini membahas pencapaian kesejahteraan pribadi manusia secara egoisme rasional. Dua bentuk egoisme rasional yang dibahas dalam skripsi ini adalah simpati berdasarkan pemikiran Adam Smith, dan kompromi berdasarkan pemikiran Ayn Rand. Simpati disebut sebagai bentuk egoisme rasional karena kesejahteraan orang lain adalah implikasi dari tindakan yang dilakukan demi pemaksimalam self-interest, namun ada bentuk self-interest yang lebih relevan dikarenakan adanya pertukaran value bagi kedua pihak, yaitu kompromi. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian kualitatif dengan dasar argumentatif antara kedua konsep tersebut. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah konsep kompromi lebih kuat dibandingkan simpati sebagai bentuk pemaksimalan self-interest, dan kompromi dapat terjadi karena adanya simpati.

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis is examines an achievement of self-interest by rational egoism. Two rational egoism?s form that examined in this thesis are sympathy based from Adam Smith?s thought, and compromise based from Ayn Rand?s thought. Sympathy mentioned as a form of rational egoism because the welfare of other is an implication from an action with a maximalization self-interest motive. But there is one of self-interest form, that more relevant because there is a value exchange behind it, and that is a compromise. This research using a qualitative research with argumentative way towards the two concept. The result of this research is that compromise concept is more relevant than sympathy as a maximalization of self-interest, and compromise could happen because of sympathy."