Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[ABSTRAKTerbukanya suatu pewarisan adalah karena kematian. Sehingga, dengan terbukanyapewarisan maka di dalam KUHPerdata telah ditentukan siapa-siapa yang akanmenjadi ahli waris. Namun, adanya perbedaan penafsiran, suatu warisan tidakdidapatkan apabila di dalam suatu ikatan perkawinan telah dilaksanakan dengan suatuperjanjian perkawinan. Sehingga timbul permasalahan yaitu bagaimana pengaruhperjanjian perkawinan pisah harta antara suami dan istrinya terhadap hak mewarisserta bagaimana kedudukan hukum mewaris suami dan adik pewaris terkait sebagaiahli waris yang ditinjau dalam KUHPerdata. Terhadap permasalahan tersebut,dilakukan penelitian untuk menemukan titik terang akan siapa yang akan berhakmenjadi ahli waris. Selanjutnya, penyusunan tesis ini disusun dengan metodepenelitian hukum normatif, untuk mendapatkan hasil penelitian yang bersifat analisiskualitatif yaitu dengan menelaah data yang diperoleh. Akhirnya, sampailah pada hasilpenelitian bahwa suatu perjanjian perkawinan mengatur pemisahan harta kekayaanselama perkawinan, dengan putusnya perkawinan akibat kematian seseorang terhadapharta kekayaan, akan adanya pewarisan dalam bentuk perpindahan kekayaan dandalam pewarisanpun telah ditentukan siapa yang menjadi ahli waris, sehingga suatuperjanjian perkawinan tidak dapat menutup hak mewaris seorang suami. Kedudukanhukum seorang suami dan adik pewaris sebagai ahli waris telah ditentukan denganpenggolongan ahli waris yang mana golongan ahli waris terdekat menutup golonganahli waris terjauh. Dengan demikian, karena masih adanya suami, harta peninggalanpewaris, haruslah jatuh pada golongan pertama. Disarankan bagi Notaris untukmemberi penjelasan bila ingin membuat perjanjian perkawinan.

---

ABSTRACTThe opening of inheritance would be occurred due to demise. Then, it has beendetermined which people who will inherit and be the heirs in Indonesian Civil Code(“ICC”). However, due to a dissimilar interpretation, inheritance will not be obtainedwhen the marriage done within a prenuptial agreement. Thereby, some issues arisessuch as how the effect of prenuptial agreement of split property against right ofinheritance between husband and wife and how the legal standing of heirs to inheritbetween husband and sister-in-law which is reviewed in the Indonesian Civil Code. Inregards to this issue, already doing some research to find some real information onwhose has the right to become heirs. Hereinafter, This thesis composed withnormative legal research method, which is to gain a result that based on qualitativeanalysis in which is analyzed by collected data. Finally, it can be concluded that aprenuptial agreement arranged the separation of wealth during the marriage, withdissolution of marriage due to demise towards the person’s wealth, there would betransfer of wealth in the form of inheritance and also, it’s already been determinedwhose going to be the heirs, so that a prenuptial agreement may not closed the right ofinheritance for husband. The legal standing of husband and sister-in-law as heirs havebeen determined by their classification, which is the closest heirs, would cancelfurther heirs. By this circumstances, because there’s still the husband of the late wife,the property of inheritance, must be owned by the first line of classified person.Suggestion for Notary, give information before the clients want to make prenuptialagreement, The opening of inheritance would be occurred due to demise. Then, it has beendetermined which people who will inherit and be the heirs in Indonesian Civil Code(“ICC”). However, due to a dissimilar interpretation, inheritance will not be obtainedwhen the marriage done within a prenuptial agreement. Thereby, some issues arisessuch as how the effect of prenuptial agreement of split property against right ofinheritance between husband and wife and how the legal standing of heirs to inheritbetween husband and sister-in-law which is reviewed in the Indonesian Civil Code. Inregards to this issue, already doing some research to find some real information onwhose has the right to become heirs. Hereinafter, This thesis composed withnormative legal research method, which is to gain a result that based on qualitativeanalysis in which is analyzed by collected data. Finally, it can be concluded that aprenuptial agreement arranged the separation of wealth during the marriage, withdissolution of marriage due to demise towards the person’s wealth, there would betransfer of wealth in the form of inheritance and also, it’s already been determinedwhose going to be the heirs, so that a prenuptial agreement may not closed the right ofinheritance for husband. The legal standing of husband and sister-in-law as heirs havebeen determined by their classification, which is the closest heirs, would cancelfurther heirs. By this circumstances, because there’s still the husband of the late wife,the property of inheritance, must be owned by the first line of classified person.Suggestion for Notary, give information before the clients want to make prenuptialagreement]"

"Perbuatan Melawan Hukum sebagaimana yang disebutkan dalam Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata tidak hanya sering dijadikan sebagai dalil gugatan di pengadilan negeri, akan tetapi juga digunakan di pengadilan agama sejak berlakunya UU Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perubahan atas UU Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 Tentang Peradilan Agama. Namun pada prakteknya, masih sering terjadi kekaburan dalam gugatan perbuatan melawan hukum di pengadilan agama baik dalam penetapan kewenangan absolutnya maupun dalam pemenuhan unsur-unsurnya. Salah satu faktor penyebabnya adalah karena hukum Islam yang dijadikan sumber hukum utama di pengadilan agama, belum memiliki perumusan hukum yang jelas terkait konsep perbuatan melawan hukum perdata. Sehingga dibutuhkan perumusan hukum yang jelas terkait  konsep perbuatan melawan hukum dalam hukum Islam beserta perbandingannya dengan konsep perbuatan melawan hukum dalam KUHPerdata. Oleh karena itu, adanya penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan konsep perbuatan melawan hukum dalam konteks keperdataan antara KUHPerdata dan hukum Islam, mulai dari konsep dasar, unsur-unsur, hingga pertanggungjawaban ganti ruginya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yakni metode penelitian hukum yuridis-normatif dengan analisis kualitatif menggunakan data sekunder. Temuan perbandingan dalam penelitian ini dari segi konsep dasar yakni pada KUHPerdata menggunakan kaidah utamanya pada Pasal 1365, sementara hukum Islam menggunakan kaidah asal al-dhararu yuzaalu dari uhsul fiqh dan menggunakan istilah fi’il dharar. Dari segi unsur-unsur, ditemukan beberapa persamaan dan perbedaan dari keduanya. Serta dari segi pertanggungjawaban ganti ruginya, keduanya mengatur tentang tanggung jawab atas perbuatan diri sendiri dan atas perbuatan orang lain. KUHPerdata menggunakan prinsip pertanggungjawaban perdata berbasis hak subyektif berupa ganti rugi, sedangkan dalam hukum Islam mencakup prinsip ilahiyah yang berbasis kemashlahatan dalam bermuamalah, yang mana pertanggungjawabannya tidak hanya kepada manusia, tetapi juga kepada Allah SWT. 

---

Tort as stated in Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code are not only often used as arguments for lawsuits in district courts, but are also used in religious courts since the enactment of Law Number 3 of 2006 concerning Amendments to Law Number 7 of 1989 concerning Religious Courts. However, in practice, there is still often ambiguity in lawsuits for tort in the religious courts, both in determining the absolute authority and in fulfilling its elements. One of the contributing factors is that Islamic law, which is used as the main source of law in religious courts, does not yet have a clear legal formulation regarding the concept of acts against civil law. So that it is necessary to formulate a clear law regarding the concept of tort in Islamic law along with its comparison with the concept of tort in the Indonesian Civil Code. Therefore, this research aims to find out the differences in the concept of tort in the civil context between the Indonesian Civil Code and Islamic law, starting from the basic concepts, elements, to accountability for compensation. The research method used is the juridical-normative legal research method with qualitative analysis using secondary data. Comparative findings in this study in terms of basic concepts, that the Indonesian Civil Code uses the main rules in Article 1365, while Islamic law uses the original rules of al-dhararu yuzaalu from uhsul fiqh and uses the term fi'il dharar. In terms of elements, there are some similarities and differences between the two. As well as in terms of accountability for compensation, both regulate responsibility for one's own actions and for the actions of others. The Civil Code uses the principle of subjective rights-based civil liability in the form of compensation, whereas in Islamic law it includes the divine principle that is based on benefit in muamalah, where accountability is not only to humans, but also to Allah SWT."

"Perbuatan Melawan Hukum sebagaimana yang disebutkan dalam Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata tidak hanya sering dijadikan sebagai dalil gugatan di pengadilan negeri, akan tetapi juga digunakan di pengadilan agama sejak berlakunya UU Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perubahan atas UU Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 Tentang Peradilan Agama. Namun pada prakteknya, masih sering terjadi kekaburan dalam gugatan perbuatan melawan hukum di pengadilan agama baik dalam penetapan kewenangan absolutnya maupun dalam pemenuhan unsur-unsurnya. Salah satu faktor penyebabnya adalah karena hukum Islam yang dijadikan sumber hukum utama di pengadilan agama, belum memiliki perumusan hukum yang jelas terkait konsep perbuatan melawan hukum perdata. Sehingga dibutuhkan perumusan hukum yang jelas terkait konsep perbuatan melawan hukum dalam hukum Islam beserta perbandingannya dengan konsep perbuatan melawan hukum dalam KUHPerdata. Oleh karena itu, adanya penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan konsep perbuatan melawan hukum dalam konteks keperdataan antara KUHPerdata dan hukum Islam, mulai dari konsep dasar, unsur-unsur, hingga pertanggungjawaban ganti ruginya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yakni metode penelitian hukum yuridis-normatif dengan analisis kualitatif menggunakan data sekunder. Temuan perbandingan dalam penelitian ini dari segi konsep dasar yakni pada KUHPerdata menggunakan kaidah utamanya pada Pasal 1365, sementara hukum Islam menggunakan kaidah asal al-dhararu yuzaalu dari uhsul fiqh dan menggunakan istilah fi’il dharar. Dari segi unsur-unsur, ditemukan beberapa persamaan dan perbedaan dari keduanya. Serta dari segi pertanggungjawaban ganti ruginya, keduanya mengatur tentang tanggung jawab atas perbuatan diri sendiri dan atas perbuatan orang lain. KUHPerdata menggunakan prinsip pertanggungjawaban perdata berbasis hak subyektif berupa ganti rugi, sedangkan dalam hukum Islam mencakup prinsip ilahiyah yang berbasis kemashlahatan dalam bermuamalah, yang mana pertanggungjawabannya tidak hanya kepada manusia, tetapi juga kepada Allah SWT.

---

Tort as stated in Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code are not only often used as arguments for lawsuits in district courts, but are also used in religious courts since the enactment of Law Number 3 of 2006 concerning Amendments to Law Number 7 of 1989 concerning Religious Courts. However, in practice, there is still often ambiguity in lawsuits for tort in the religious courts, both in determining the absolute authority and in fulfilling its elements. One of the contributing factors is that Islamic law, which is used as the main source of law in religious courts, does not yet have a clear legal formulation regarding the concept of acts against civil law. So that it is necessary to formulate a clear law regarding the concept of tort in Islamic law along with its comparison with the concept of tort in the Indonesian Civil Code. Therefore, this research aims to find out the differences in the concept of tort in the civil context between the Indonesian Civil Code and Islamic law, starting from the basic concepts, elements, to accountability for compensation. The research method used is the juridical-normative legal research method with qualitative analysis using secondary data. Comparative findings in this study in terms of basic concepts, that the Indonesian Civil Code uses the main rules in Article 1365, while Islamic law uses the original rules of al-dhararu yuzaalu from uhsul fiqh and uses the term fi'il dharar. In terms of elements, there are some similarities and differences between the two. As well as in terms of accountability for compensation, both regulate responsibility for one's own actions and for the actions of others. The Civil Code uses the principle of subjective rights-based civil liability in the form of compensation, whereas in Islamic law it includes the divine principle that is based on benefit in muamalah, where accountability is not only to humans, but also to Allah SWT."

"ABSTRAKTesis ini membahas mengenai pemberian hibah semasa hidup orang tua kepadasalah satu anaknya, dikompensasikan sebagai pelunasan hutangnya. Terkaitdengan hibah, dalam Hukum Waris terdapat lembaga hukum seperti inbreng yangterkadang disalahartikan dengan inkorting, sehingga salah penerapannya.Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan yang bersifat yuridisnormatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif untuk menghasilkan data deskriptif analitis.Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, disimpulkan bahwa lembaga inbreng diterapkanpada saat ketentuan subjek dan objeknya terpenuhi. Berbeda dengan inkorting,inbreng dilaksanakan pada saat melakukan pencatatan pada pemisahan hartapeninggalan dan dimaksudkan untuk terciptanya pemerataan pembagian warisanyang adil, bukan untuk pemenuhan bagian mutlak. Disarankan agar parapenyandang profesi hukum terutama hakim dan Notaris lebih mendalami danmemahami peran dan pelaksanaan lembaga inbreng, agar tidak merugikanmasyarakat dikemudian hari atas kesalahpahaman mereka.

---

ABSTRAKThis thesis discusses about grants during the life time of a parent to one of her/hischildren, which compensated as debt repayment. Related to the grant, in theInheritance Law there is a legal institution such as inbreng which sometimesmisinterpreted with inkorting, so that incorrectly applied. This research useliterature research method in the form of normative juridical with qualitativeapproach in order to provide analytical descriptive data. Based on the research, itwas concluded that the inbreng applied when its subject and object are fulfilled.In contrast to inkorting, inbreng implemented at the time of registration on theseparation of inheritance and intended to create an equitable distribution ofinheritance, rather than for legitieme portie?s fulfillment. Suggested that the legalprofessions, especially the judges and Notary to further explore and understandthe role and implementation of inbreng institution, so as not be detrimental to thesociety in the future over those misconceptions."

"Tulisan ini membahas tentang hukum waris apakah yang berlaku bagi keturunan Tionghoa beragama Islam di Indonesia dan dasar hukumnya, serta kekuatan pembuktian surat keterangan waris yang dibuat oleh Notaris bagi keturunan Tionghoa beragama Islam tersebut terhadap gugatan yang didasarkan pada hukum waris Islam. Pluralisme hukum waris di Indonesia, disertai dengan belum adanya peraturan khusus yang mengatur tentang hukum waris di Indonesia, menyebabkan terjadinya ketidakpastian hukum bagi masyarakat dalam pembagian harta warisan, terutama bagi pihak ketiga yang turut berkepentingan dan dirugikan karena ketidakpastian tersebut. Ketidakjelasan tentang hukum waris inilah, khususnya yang berhubungan dengan keturunan Tionghoa beragama Islam, yang hendak dijawab melalui penelitian ini melalui metode yuridis normative dan didukung dengan studi kepustakaan dan wawancara dengan narasumber di bidang kenotariatan. Adalah peran dan tanggung jawab Notaris dalam memberikan penyuluhan hukum yang benar bagi masyarakat, khususnya hukum apakah yang berlaku bagi warga Negara Indonesia yang dalam bidang hukum perdata tertentu, khususnya hukum waris, masih mendasarkan pada golongan penduduk pada masa penjajahan Belanda, serta sejauh apa kekuatan hukum yang diberikan oleh surat keterangan waris yang dibuat oleh Notaris dalam memberikan kepastian hukum bagi masyarakat.

---

This thesis study about what inheritance law applicable for Chinese Moslem in Indonesia and its legal basis, as well as the legal strength of certificate of inheritance produced by Notary for Chinese Moslem against lawsuit based on Moslem inheritance law. Pluralism of inheritance law in Indonesia, supported by lack of specific regulation in Indonesian inheritance law caused uncertainty for the people in division of inheritance, especially for third parties who were disadvantaged by this condition. This thesis in made to answer the uncertainty in inheritance law, specifically for Chinese Moslem, through normative juridical methodology supported by literature study and interview with expert in the field of notaries. It is the role and duty of a Notary to provide the appropriate legal guidance to the people, which includes what law applicable in certain aspect of civil law, specifically inheritance law, which still use the segmentation of people in the Dutch colonial era as basis, as well as the legal strength provided by certificate of inheritance made by Notary in providing legal certainty to the people."

"Dalam praktek kerap terjadi bahwa suatu PKWT telah memenuhi syarat sah perjanjian secara perdata juga telah melalui mekanisme pencatatan di Suku Dinas Ketenagakerjaan yang membawa serta implikasi telah dilakukan pemeriksaan materi muatan perjanjian kerja, namun demikian pasal-pasal tentang utamanya hak pekerja/buruh masih tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Skripsi ini membahas tentang perjanjian kerja waktu tertentu PT.X ditinjau dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata tentang syarat sahnya perjanjian dan kaitannya dengan Hukum Ketenagakerjaan tentang hak-hak pekerja/buruh kontrak yang diatur dalam perjanjian kerja waktu tertentu tersebut. Selanjutnya dibahas contract adjustment sebagai penyelesaian permasalahan tersebut.

---

Nowadays it often occur that the temporary work agreement has fulfilled the legal condition of the agreement and has been through the registration process in Ministry of Labor and Transmigration Local Office which means the contents of the work agreement has been verified, but the articles especially about the rights of the worker are not suitable with the valid regulation. The focus of this thesis is the temporary appointment work agreement in PT.X based on Indonesian Civil Code about legal condition of the agreement and Labor Law about the rights of worker under that temporary appointment work agreement. Furthermore contract adjustment as the solution of this problem will be discussed."

"ABSTRAKSkripsi ini membahas tentang keabsahan perjanjian kerja PT X dan penerapan jenis perjanjian kerja yang digunakan oleh PT X terhadap pekerja/buruhnya yang bekerja sebagai arsitek. Skripsi ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, perjanjian kerja PT X telah memenuhi syarat sahnya perjanjian namun belum tepat dalam menggunakan jenis perjanjian kerja. Hal ini terjadi karena pekerjaan arsitek tidak termasuk dalam jenis pekerjaan yang diperbolehkan untuk menggunakan PKWT, tidak lengkapnya identitas perusahaan dan pekerja/buruh, adanya masa percobaan dan PKWT yang belum dicatatkan. Akibatnya, perjanjian kerja PT X demi hukum berubah menjadi PKWTT.

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis discusses about the validity of the work agreement in PT X and the implementation of the work agreement that is used by PT X against its labor who work as an architect. This thesis uses normative juridical research. According to the result of the research, work agreement in PT X has fulfilled the requirements of the validity of the contract but has not used appropriately on the type of the work agreement. This happened because architect work is not included in the type of the work which is allowed to use fixed term work agreement, the incompleteness of the identity of the company and the labor, the presence of the probation, and fixed term work agreement which has not registered. Consequently, fixed term work agreement in PT X legally change to non fixed term agreement."