Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Skripsi ini membahas mengenai pengaturan kewenangan terhadap perawat di Indonesia sebagai negara berkembang dan di Singapura yang sudah menjadi negara maju. Setelah membahas mengenai kewenangan terhadap perawat yang berlaku di Indonesia dan kewenangan terhadap perawat yang berlaku di Singapura, dibahas pula mengenai perbandingan diantara pengaturan kewenangan terhadap perawat dari kedua negara tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif, yaitu penelitian ini membahas mengenai objek penelitian dari sudut pandang hukum dan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku di Indonesia maupun Singapura. Hasil dari perbandingan mengenai kewenangan perawat dari kedua negara tersebut adalah terdapat persamaan maupun perbedaan dalam penerapan maupun pengaturan kewenangan dari perawat di Indonesia maupun Singapura. Kedepan, diharapkan Singapura dapat menjadi contoh bagi Indonesia agar kewenangan perawat diatur dengan jelas.

---

ABSTRACT
This bachelor thesis discusses about the systematization of the authority of the nurse in Indonesia as a developing country and in Singapore, which has become a developed country. After discussing the applicable authority of the nurse systematization in Indonesia and Singapore, this thesis discusses the comparisons between the authority of the nurse arrangements of these two countries. This research is a normative juridical research. This research is about the object of research from the point of view of law and about the provisions of laws and regulations applicable in Indonesia and Singapore. The result between comparison of the authority of the nurse systematization from both countries is that there are similarities and differences in the application and systematization of the authority of the nurse between Indonesia and Singapore. In the future, Singapore is expected to be an example for Indonesia, so that the authority of the nurses is clearly regulated.

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Dalam penelitian ini dianalisis tanggung jawab rumah sakit terhadap perbuatan melawan hukum yang dilakukan dokter bukan pegawai rumah sakit, penerapan teori central responsibility dan analisis putusan No. 18/Pdt.G/2006/PN.PLG, 62/PDT/2006/PT.PLG, 1752 K/Pdt/2007 dan 352/PK/PDT/2010. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Rumah sakit bertanggung jawab terhadap perbuatan melawan hukum yang terjadi di rumah sakit. Penerapan teori Central Responsibility memberikan kepastian hukum bagi pasien dan rumah sakit dimana rumah sakit bertanggung jawab secara terpusat terhadap semua kejadian di rumah sakit. Pada putusan No. 18/Pdt.G/2006/PN.PLG, 62/PDT/2006/PT.PLG, 1752 K/Pdt/2007 dan 352/PK/PDT/2010 rumah sakit bertanggung jawab secara central responsibility.

---

ABSTRACT
In this research analyzed the relation between the hospital's responsibility with the unlawful act that done by the doctors who are not be part of hospital's employee and the application of the central responsibility theory, and analysis of the judicial decision number 18/Pdt.G/2006/PN.PLG, 62/PDT/2006/PT.PLG, 1752 K/Pdt/2007 and 352/PK/PDT/2010. This study uses normative juridical method with qualitative approach. The hospital is responsible for the unlawful act that occurred in the hospital. The application of the central responsibility theory makes the legal certainty of both patients and the hospital with the hospital responsible centrally to all cases that happen in the hospital. In the judicial decision number 18/Pdt.G/2006/PN.PLG, 62/PDT/2006/PT.PLG, 1752 K/Pdt/2007 and 352/PK/PDT/2010 hospital responsible centrally.

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Skripsi ini membahas mengenai tanggung jawab Kantor Kesehatan Pelabuhan dalam melakukan pengawasan atas penggunaan narkotika pada awak pesawat dengan fokus studi di Bandar Udara Halim Perdana Kusuma. Skripsi ini juga membahas tentang bagaimana implementasi pengaturan pelayanan kesehatan yang berjalan di Indonesia. Berdasarkan analisa penulis tentang pengawasan penggunaan narkotika pada awak pesawat dalam pelaksanaannya masih menemui kendala-kendala yang masih harus dibenahi oleh Pemerintah Indonesia. Kendala-kendala tersebut menurut penulis dapat diatasi apabila adanya peraturan tegas dari Pemerintah Indonesia khususnya Kementerian Kesehatan dan Kementerian Perhubungan dalam rangka menyelenggarakan pelayanan kesehatan yang prima bagi ruang lingkup Bandar Udara serta Keamanan Penerbangan di Indonesia.

---

ABSTRACT
This thesis discusses the responsibilities of the Airport Health Office in conducting the supervision on the use of narcotics on flight crews with the focus of study at Halim Perdana Kusuma Airport. This thesis also discusses how the implementation of health services arrangement that runs in Indonesia. Based on the author 39 s analysis on the supervision on the use on the use of narcotics flight crew, in its implementation, still encountered obstacles that still need to be fixed by the Government of Indonesia. These constraints, according to the author, can be overcome if there is a strict regulation from the Government of Indonesia, especially the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Transportation in order to provide excellent health services for the scope of Airports and Aviation Security in Indonesia.

Abstrak :
ABSTRACT
Penelitian ini membahas tentang pembiaran medik dan keselamatan pasien dalam Putusan No. 381/Pid.B/2014/PN.Tk. Putusan tersebut dikategorikan sebagai pembiaran medik yaitu apabila pimpinan fasilitas pelayanan kesehatan dan/atau tenaga kesehatan tidak memberikan pertolongan pertama dalam keadaan gawat darurat. Dalam kasus tersebut pihak rumah sakit tidak termasuk pembiaran medik dalam hukum kesehatan. Pihak RSUD. Dr. A. Dadi Tjokro Dipo Bandar Lampung tidak memenuhi tujuh standar keselamatan pasien yang terdapat dalam Permenkes No.1691.Menkes/Per/VIII/2011 tentang Keselamatan Pasien Rumah Sakit sehingga pihak rumah sakit dapat dikenakan sanksi berupa teguran tertulis, terguran lisan, penundaan atau penanggahan perpanjangan izin operasional. Metode penelitian yang digunakan pada skripsi saya adalah yuridis normatif. Saran dari penelitian : 1 . Untuk pemerintah agar dapat mengawasi dengan ketat prosedur pelayanan rumah sakit seperti halnya adanya Badan Pengawas Rumah Sakit Indonesia yang salah tugasnya adalah mengawasi hak dan kewajiban pasien sehingga kasus yang menimpa pasien Suparman tidak terulang kembali. 2 . Untuk pemerintah juga agar dapat membuat peraturan mengenai pembiaran medik yang lebih luas di dalam luang lingkup hukum kesehatan sehingga pengaturan mengenai pembiaran medik di dalam hukum kesehatan tidak hanya mengenai pertolongan pertama pada keadaan gawat darurat saja. 3 .Terhadap pihak rumah sakit agar memberikan sosialisasi mengenai Keselamatan Pasien Rumah Sakit terutama Tujuh Standar Keselamatan Pasien Rumah Sakit yang terdapat dalam Permenkes No.1691.Menkes/Per/VIII/2011 tentang Keselamatan Pasien Rumah Sakit.

---

ABSTRACT
This research examines medical negligence and patient rsquo s safety in Verdict No. 381 Pid.B 2014 PN.Tk. The mentioned verdict is categorized as medical negligence, which means the head of healthcare facility and or medical workers do not give a first aid treatment in an emergency situation. In the case, the hospital did not do any medical negligence according to medical law. Public hospital RSUD. Dr. A. Dadi Tjokro Dipo Bandar Lampung did not fulfill the seven standard of patient rsquo s safety as stipulated in the Ordinance of the Health Minister No.1691.Menkes Per VIII 2011 about Safety of Hospital rsquo s Patient, hence the hospital could be penalized by giving them oral warning, delay or suspension of operational permission extension. Research method that is used in this thesis is normative juridical method. This thesis suggest 1 . The government should keep an eye close to hospital rsquo s service procedure through Indonesian Hospital Supervising Body, which have the authority to supervise the rights and obligations of patients so that the Suparman case will not happen again 2 . For the government also to make regulations on broader medical broadcasting within the scope of health law so that the regulation of medical neglect in health law is not only about first aid in emergencies 3 . Hospital have to give socialization about the Safety of Hospital rsquo s Patient. Particularly, the Seven Standards of the Safety of Hospital rsquo s Patient, which are stipulated in the Ordinance of the Health Minister No.1691.Menkes Per VIII 2011 about Safety of Hospital rsquo s Patient. hence the hospital could be penalized by giving them oral warning, delay or suspension of operational permission extension. Research method that is used in this thesis is normative juridical method. This thesis suggest 1 . The government should keep an eye close to hospital rsquo s service procedure through Indonesian Hospital Supervising Body, which have the authority to supervise the rights and obligations of patients so that the Suparman case will not happen again 2 . For the government also to make regulations on broader medical broadcasting within the scope of health law so that the regulation of medical neglect in health law is not only about first aid in emergencies 3 . Hospital have to give socialization about the Safety of Hospital rsquo s Patient. Particularly, the Seven Standards of the Safety of Hospital rsquo s Patient, which are stipulated in the Ordinance of the Health Minister No.1691.Menkes Per VIII 2011 about Safety of Hospital rsquo s Patient.

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Skripsi ini membahas mengenai penolakan pemenuhan kewajiban imbalan jasa oleh pasien karena tidak terpenuhinya hak pasien atas informed consent dan rekam medis dalam putusan No. 396/PDT.G/2008/PN.JKT.PST. Dalam skripsi ini akan dibahas mengenai peranan informed consent dan rekam medis terkait pemenuhan kewajiban imbalan jasa oleh pasien di rumah sakit serta tanggung jawab hukum rumah sakit terkait penolakan pemenuhan kewajiban imbalan jasa oleh pasien karena tidak terpenuhinya hak pasien atas informed consent dan rekam medis khususnya dalam putusan No. 396/PDT.G/2008/PN.JKT.PST. Pembahasannya dilakukan dengan metode yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa informed consent dan isi rekam medis dapat dijadikan sebagai dasar pembayaran pelayanan kesehatan yang diterima pasien di rumah sakit. Hasil dari penelitian ini menyarankan agar adanya sosialisasi yang lebih terkait apa-apa saja yang menjadi hak dan kewajiban antara pasien dan rumah sakit agar masing-masing dapat sadar dan memahami secara utuh hak dan kewajibannya, khususnya dalam hal informed consent dan rekam medis sebagai dasar pembayar pelayanan kesehatan yang diterima pasien di rumah sakit.

---

ABSTRACT
This thesis discusses the refusal fulfillment of the service fee obligation by the patient due to the non-fulfillment of the patient's right to informed consent and medical record (study case of the court decision 396/PDT.G/2008/PN.JKT.PST). This thesis is focusing on the role of informed consent and medical records related to the fulfillment of service fee obligation by the patient in the hospital and the hospital liability related to the refusal fulfillment of the service fee obligation by the patient due to the non-fulfillment of the patient's right to informed consent and medical record especially in court decision 396/PDT.G/2008/PN.JKT.PST. Research method that is used in this thesis is normative juridical method. This thesis concluded that informed consent and medical record can be used as a basis for payment of the health services received by patients in the hospital. As the outcome, the result of this study suggests that it is advisable to make more informed socialization of the rights and obligations between the patient and the hospital so that each of them can be aware and fully understand their rights and obligations, especially in the case of informed consent and medical records as the basis for payment of the health services received by the patient in the hospital.