Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Latar belakang: Gagal jantung dekompensasi akut (GJDA) termasuk penyakit kardiovaskular dengan mortalitas serta tingkat readmisi yang tinggi. Resistensi insulin saat ini merupakan salah satu faktor yang dapat menjadi prediktor terhadap prognosis pasien GJDA. Indeks trigliserida glukosa (ITG) telah dilaporkan sebagai salah satu prediktor risiko kardiovaskular dan petanda resistensi insulin yang sederhana. Namun, hubungan ITG terhadap kejadian readmisi 30-hari dan kematian dalam 6 bulan pascarawat pasien GJDA masih belum diteliti.Tujuan: Mengetahui hubungan ITG dengan kejadian readmisi 30-hari dan kematian dalam 6 bulan pascarawat pasien GJDA yang dirawat pertama kali.Metode: Studi dilakukan dengan desain kohort retrospektif. Data subjek diambil dari rekam medis berdasarkan admisi pasien yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi dari Januari 2018 – November 2021. Luaran klinis yang dinilai adalah readmisi 30 hari dan kematian dalam 6 bulan pascarawat. Data tersebut diolah dengan analisis multivariat dan laju kesintasan pada subjek.Hasil: Total subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah 467 orang, dengan 158 subjek mengalami luaran klinis readmisi 30-hari dan kematian dalam 6 bulan pascarawat. Proporsi readmisi sebesar 29% (135 subjek) dan kematian dalam 6 bulan pascarawat sebesar 5% (23 subjek). Analisis multivariat menunjukkan bahwa faktor yang berhubungan dengan luaran klinis readmisi 30- hari adalah hipertensi (p 0.05, HR 1.493, 95% IK 1.019 – 2.187), usia (p 0.013, HR 0.98, 95% IK 0.964 – 0.996), fraksi ejeksi <50% (p 0.016, HR 1.888, 95% IK 1.124 – 3.172), tekanan darah sistolik saat admisi (p 0.012, HR 1.010, 95% IK 1.001–1.017), denyut nadi sebelum pulang (p 0.017, HR 0.989, 95% IK 0.979 – 0.998), gula darah puasa (p 0.017, OR 0.992, 95% IK 0.986 – 0.999), dan nilai ITG ( p <0.001, OR 28.9, 95% IK 10.112 – 83.068). Sedangkan faktor independen terhadap luaran kematian dalam 6 bulan pascarawat adalah tanpa penggunaan diuretik (p 0.02, HR 6.89, 95% IK 2.022 – 23) dan gula darah puasa (p 0.017, OR 0.992, 95% IK 0.986 – 0.999).Kesimpulan: Nilai ITG dapat menjadi prediktor readmisi 30-hari, namun tidak berhubungan dengan luaran kematian dalam 6 bulan pasarawat pada pasien GJDA

---

Background: Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is a cardiovascular disease with high mortality and readmission rates. Currently, insulin resistance has been reported to predict prognosis of ADHF patients. Triglyceride glucose index (TyG) has now been proposed as an independent predictor of cardiovascular risk and a simple marker of insulin resistance. However, the association between TyG and 30-days readmission and 6 months mortality after hospitalization remains unclear.

Objective: To investigate TyG as a predictor of 30-day readmission and 6 months mortality after hospitalization in ADHF patients.

Methods: The study was conducted in a retrospective cohort. Data were taken from medical records based on the admission of patients who met the inclusion criteria from January 2018 – November 2021. The clinical outcomes were 30-days readmission and 6 months mortality. The data were analyzed by multivariate analysis and the survival rate of the subjects.

Results: This study included 467 subjects, with 158 subjects have clinical outcomes. The readmission rate is 29% (135 subjects), and 6 month mortality after hospitalization is 5%. Multivariate analysis showed that the factors associated with 30-days readmission were hypertension (p 0.05, HR 1.493, CI 95% 1.019 – 2.187), age (p 0.013, HR 0.98, CI 95% 0.964 – 0.996), ejection fraction <50% (p 0.016, HR 1.888, CI 95% 1.124 – 3.172), systolic blood pressure on admission (p 0.012, HR 1.010, 95% CI 1.001 – 1.017), heart rate predischarge (p 0.017, HR 0.989, CI 95% 0.979 – 0.998), gfsting blood glucose (p 0.017, OR 0.992, CI 95% 0.986 – 0.999), dan TyG (p <0.001, OR 28.9, 95% IK 10.112 – 83.068). Independent factors for 6 months mortality were no diuretic medication (p 0.02, HR 6.89, 95% IK 2.022 – 23) and fasting blood glucose (p 0.017, OR 0.992, 95% IK 0.986 – 0.999).

Conclusion: Triglyceride glucose index can predict 30-days readmission, but does not associated with 6-months mortality in ADHF patients."

"Latar belakang: Model prediksi risiko operasi memiliki peranan penting pada tindakan operasi katup jantung. Perubahan karakter pasien dan fasilitas pembedahan dalam waktu tertentu dapat mempengaruhi nilai prediksi skor risiko operasi.Tujuan: Mengetahui perbandingan validasi EuroSCORE II, skor Ambler dan skor Harapan Kita dalam memprediksi mortalitas di rumah sakit pasca operasi katup jantung.Metode: Dilakukan studi kohort retrospektif terhadap 416 pasien yang menjalani operasi katup jantung pada periode November 2018 hingga Desember 2019. Data berasal dari rekam medis dengan metode sampling konsekutif. Didapatkan nilai kalibrasi dan diskriminasi EuroSCORE II, skor Ambler dan skor Harapan Kita.Hasil: Angka kematian yang diobservasi sebesar 6,7%. EuroSCORE II, skor Ambler and skor Harapan Kita memiliki kalibrasi yang baik (uji Hosmer-Lemeshow p=0,065, p=0,233 and p=0,314). Kemampuan diskriminasi skor dalam memprediksi kematian di rumah sakit EuroSCORE II (AUC 0,763; 95% IK;0.660-0.867), diikuti skor Ambler (AUC 0.748; 95% IK; 0.655-0.841) dan skor Harapan Kita (AUC 0,694; 95% IK; 0.584-0.804)Kesimpulan: EuroSCORE II, skor Ambler dan skor Harapan Kita memiliki validasi yang cukup baik. Kalibrasi ketiga skor baik dengan kalibrasi skor Harapan Kita relatif lebih baik dari dua skor lainnya, sedangkan nilai diskriminasi skor Harapan Kita di bawah EuroSCORE II dan skor Ambler.

---

Background: Preoperative risk prediction models have important role in cardiac valve surgical management. Changing in patient characteristics and surgical facilities over time, might affect the predicting value of those scoring system.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the validation of EuroSCORE II, Ambler score and Harapan Kita score in predicting in-hospital mortality at patients underwent heart valve surgery

Methods: Cohort restrospective study was performed at 416 patients who underwent heart valve surgery from November 2018 to December 2019. Data was taken from the medical records by consecutive sampling method. The calibration and discrimination value of EuroSCORE II, Ambler score and Harapan Kita score were obtained.

Results: Observed in-hospital mortality was 6,7%. EuroSCORE II, Ambler score and Harapan Kita score have good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test p=0,065, p=0,233 and p=0,314). The discriminative value of these three scores in predicting in-hospital mortality for EuroScore II AUC 0,763 (95% CI; 0.660-0.867), Ambler score AUC 0.748 (95% CI; 0.655-0.841) and Harapan Kita score AUC 0,694 (95% CI; 0.584-0.804)

Conclusion: EuroSCORE II, Ambler score and Harapan Kita score have fairly good validation. Those scoring system have good calibration with Harapan Kita score calibration relatively better than EuroSCORE and Ambler score, meanwhile Harapan Kita score has less discrimination value than EuroScore II and Ambler score."

"Latar belakang: Rehospitalisasi 30 hari pada gagal jantung menyebabkan perburukan prognosis dan paling sering terjadi karena kongesti hemodinamik yang ditandai oleh tekanan pengisian ventrikel kiri (left ventricular end diastolic pressure/LVEDP) persisten tinggi. Oleh karena itu, dekongesti komplit harus dipastikan sebelum pasien pulang dari perawatan. Salah satu modalitas yang potensial adalah skor SAFE melalui evaluasi 3 komponen kongesti hemodinamik, yaitu: pompa (ejection fraction/EF), pipa (internal jugular vein collapsibility index/IJVCI dan inferior vena cava/IVC) dan jaringan interstisial (B-lines). Pada studi ini, rerata E/e’ ditambahkan pada skor SAFE dengan pertimbangan nilai prognostik rerata E/e’ dalam memprediksi kejadian rehospitalisasi.Tujuan: Membandingkan skor SAFE dan skor SAFE+rerata E/e’ dalam memprediksi rehospitalisasi 30 hari terkait gagal jantung akut.Metode: Dilakukan studi kohort prospektif dengan melibatkan 82 orang pasien gagal jantung akut yang dirawat di RSJPDHK. Analisis bivariat dan multivariat dilakukan untuk membandingkan kemampuan prediksi skor SAFE dan skor SAFE+rerata E/e’ terhadap rehospitalisasi 30 hari terkait gagal jantung akut.Hasil: Insidensi rehospitalisasi 30 hari terkait gagal jantung akut mencapai 19,5%. Kurva Kaplan-Meier menunjukkan rehospitalisasi lebih rendah pada kondisi euvolemia daripada hipervolemia (p 0,003). Skor SAFE+rerata E/e’ memiliki kemampuan prediksi rehospitalisasi 30 hari yang lebih baik daripada skor SAFE (AUC 0,77 [95% CI: 0,64 – 0,89] vs AUC 0,74 [95% CI: 0,62 – 0,85]).Kesimpulan: Skor SAFE+rerata E/e’ memiliki kemampuan prediksi rehospitalisasi 30 hari terkait gagal jantung akut yang lebih baik daripada skor SAFE.

---

Background: Short-term-rehospitalization worsens prognosis and frequently occurs due to persistently high LVEDP (hemodynamic congestion) among patients with heart failure (HF). Therefore, it is necessary to ascertain complete decongestion prior to hospital discharge. SAFE score is a potential scoring system to do so because it measures 3 main components of hemodynamic congestion: pump (EF), pipe (IJVCI and IVC) and interstitial tissue (B-lines). In this study, average E/e’ is added to SAFE score considering its clinically significant prognostic value in predicting risk of rehospitalization among patients with HF.

Aim: To compare SAFE score and SAFE score+average E/e’ in predicting 30-day-acute HF (AHF)- related-rehospitalization.

Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted by involving 82 patients admitted with AHF in National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita (NCCHK). Bivariate and multivariate analysis were done to find out which of the 2 models: SAFE score and SAFE score+average E/e’ could better predict risk of 30-day-AHF-related-rehospitalization.

Results: The incidence of 30-day-AHF-related-rehospitalization in this study was 19,5%. By using Kaplan-Meier curve, we identified significantly lower 30-day-AHF-related-rehospitalization in patients discharged with euvolemia than those with hypervolemia (p 0,003). SAFE score+average E/e’ had better predictive properties than SAFE score regarding 30-day-AHF-related-rehospitalization (AUC 0,77 [95% CI: 0,64 – 0,89] vs AUC 0,74 [95% CI: 0,62 – 0,85]).

Conclusion: SAFE score+average E/e’ had better predictive properties than SAFE score regarding 30- day-AHF-related-rehospitalization."

"Latar belakang: Rehospitalisasi 30 hari pada gagal jantung menyebabkan perburukan prognosis dan paling sering terjadi karena kongesti hemodinamik yang ditandai oleh tekanan pengisian ventrikel kiri (left ventricular end diastolic pressure/LVEDP) persisten tinggi. Oleh karena itu, dekongesti komplit harus dipastikan sebelum pasien pulang dari perawatan. Salah satu modalitas yang potensial adalah skor SAFE melalui evaluasi 3 komponen kongesti hemodinamik, yaitu: pompa (ejection fraction/EF), pipa (internal jugular vein collapsibility index/IJVCI dan inferior vena cava/IVC) dan jaringan interstisial (B-lines). Pada studi ini, rerata E/e’ ditambahkan pada skor SAFE dengan pertimbangan nilai prognostik rerata E/e’ dalam memprediksi kejadian rehospitalisasi.Tujuan: Membandingkan skor SAFE dan skor SAFE+rerata E/e’ dalam memprediksi rehospitalisasi 30 hari terkait gagal jantung akut.Metode: Dilakukan studi kohort prospektif dengan melibatkan 82 orang pasien gagal jantung akut yang dirawat di RSJPDHK. Analisis bivariat dan multivariat dilakukan untuk membandingkan kemampuan prediksi skor SAFE dan skor SAFE+rerata E/e’ terhadap rehospitalisasi 30 hari terkait gagal jantung akut.Hasil: Insidensi rehospitalisasi 30 hari terkait gagal jantung akut mencapai 19,5%. Kurva Kaplan-Meier menunjukkan rehospitalisasi lebih rendah pada kondisi euvolemia daripada hipervolemia (p 0,003). Skor SAFE+rerata E/e’ memiliki kemampuan prediksi rehospitalisasi 30 hari yang lebih baik daripada skor SAFE (AUC 0,77 [95% CI: 0,64 – 0,89] vs AUC 0,74 [95% CI: 0,62 – 0,85]).Kesimpulan: Skor SAFE+rerata E/e’ memiliki kemampuan prediksi rehospitalisasi 30 hari terkait gagal jantung akut yang lebih baik daripada skor SAFE.

---

Background: Short-term-rehospitalization worsens prognosis and frequently occurs due to persistently high LVEDP (hemodynamic congestion) among patients with heart failure (HF). Therefore, it is necessary to ascertain complete decongestion prior to hospital discharge. SAFE score is a potential scoring system to do so because it measures 3 main components of hemodynamic congestion: pump (EF), pipe (IJVCI and IVC) and interstitial tissue (B-lines). In this study, average E/e’ is added to SAFE score considering its clinically significant prognostic value in predicting risk of rehospitalization among patients with HF.

Aim: To compare SAFE score and SAFE score+average E/e’ in predicting 30-day-acute HF (AHF)- related-rehospitalization.

Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted by involving 82 patients admitted with AHF in National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita (NCCHK). Bivariate and multivariate analysis were done to find out which of the 2 models: SAFE score and SAFE score+average E/e’ could better predict risk of 30-day-AHF-related-rehospitalization.

Results: The incidence of 30-day-AHF-related-rehospitalization in this study was 19,5%. By using Kaplan-Meier curve, we identified significantly lower 30-day-AHF-related-rehospitalization in patients discharged with euvolemia than those with hypervolemia (p 0,003). SAFE score+average E/e’ had better predictive properties than SAFE score regarding 30-day-AHF-related-rehospitalization (AUC 0,77 [95% CI: 0,64 – 0,89] vs AUC 0,74 [95% CI: 0,62 – 0,85]).

Conclusion: SAFE score+average E/e’ had better predictive properties than SAFE score regarding 30- day-AHF-related-rehospitalization."

"Latar Belakang : Aplikasi mHealth menjadi modalitas menjanjikan dalam prevensi sekunder sindrom koroner akut. Tujuan dari studi ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh aplikasi mHealth HARKIT iCare terhadap angka rehospitalisasi dan kepatuhan minum obat.Tujuan : Mengetahui efek penggunaan aplikasi HARKIT iCare dibandingkan dengan layanan standar terhadap angka rehospitalisasi dan kepatuhan minum obat.Metode : Studi ini adalah uji klinis acak tunggal,106 subyek pasien pasca-sindrom koroner akut dirandomisasi dengan permutasi blok acak ke kelompok aplikasi berbasis aplikasi ponsel pintar HARKIT iCare atau layanan standar. Subyek diikuti selama 6 bulan lalu dilihat angka rehospitalisasi dan kepatuhan minum obat menggunakan MMAS-8 sebagai parameter luaran.Hasil : Rehospitalisasi berulang lebih rendah pada kelompok iCare dibandingkan kontrol setelah dilakukan analisis multivariat (2 [3.7%] vs 7 [13.5%], HR 0.11 [IK 95% 0.01-0.98], p=.048). Rehospitalisasi tak terencana lebih rendah pada kelompok iCare dibanding kontrol, tidak berbeda bermakna (13 [24.1%] vs 16 [30.8%], HR 0.73 [IK 95% 0.35-1.53], p=.41). HARKIT iCare berkorelasi pada peningkatan tingkat kepatuhan secara signifikan setelah dilakukan analisis multivariat (16 [30.8%] vs 26 [48.1%], RR 2.37 [IK 95% 1.00-5.61], p=.049). Terdapat peningkatan bermakna secara statistik perbedaan nilai median kepatuhan minum obat berdasarkan MMAS awal dan akhir pada kelompok iCare dibandingkan kontrol (iCare - MMAS awal 6.5 [2-8] akhir 8 [4-8] Δ median = +1.5, p=.000 ; kontrol - MMAS awal 7 [3-8], akhir 8 [5-8], Δ median = +1, p=0.053 ).Kesimpulan Penggunaan aplikasi HARKIT iCare berkorelasi dengan angka rehospitalisasi berulang yang lebih rendah dan peningkatan derajat kepatuhan minum obat diukur dengan peningkatan median MMAS.

---

Background Smartphone based mHealth applications is a promising platform for increase adherence to secondary prevention programs post acute coronary syndrome. The aim of this study is to know the impact of smartphone based mHealth applications HARKIT iCare on rehospitalization and medication adherence.

Objective To determine the impact of HARKIT iCare apps on secondary prevention compared to standard care on rehospitalization and medication adherence.

Method Study was a single blinded randomized clinical trial involving 106 subjects post-acute coronary syndrome. Subjects were randomized by permuted block randomization into HARKIT iCare (intervention) group or standard care. Subjects were followed for 6 months. The outcome of this study was rates of unplanned and recurrent rehospitalization, and also medication adherence by questionnare MMAS-8.

Result Recurrent hospitalization occurred fewer in the iCare group compared to control (Adjusted, 2 [3.7%] vs 7 [13.5%], HR 0.11 [CI 95% 0.01-0.98], p=.048). Unplanned rehospitalization also occured fewer in iCare group compared to control, significantly different (13 [24.1%] vs 16 [30.8%], HR 0.73 [CI 95% 0.35-1.53], p=.41). HARKIT iCare related to increased levels of adherence (Adjusted, 16 [30.8%] vs 26 [48.1%], RR 2.34 [CI 95% 1.03-5.33], p=.049). Comparison between pre and post median MMAS was significant for iCare group but not with control group. (iCare - MMAS pre 6.5 [2-8] post 8 [4-8] Δ median = +1.5, p=.000 ; control - MMAS pre 7 [3-8], post 8 [5-8], Δ median = +1, p=.053).

Conclusion HARKIT iCare related with fewer recurrent rehospitalization, increase of medication adherence and improvement of median MMAS significantly."

"Penyakit jantung koroner (PJK) masih menjadi penyebab utama kematian, dan hasilnya masih belum memuaskan pada kelompok pasien yang berisiko tinggi. Tindakan intervensi pada arteri koroner left main (LM) dengan strategi provisional stenting adalah salah satu skenario yang menantang dalam menangani lesi bifurkasio kompleks ini. Intervensi koroner perkutan (IKP) dengan panduan ultrasonografi intravaskular (IVUS) telah terbukti memberikan hasil klinis yang lebih unggul dibandingkan dengan IKP dengan angiografi saja. Namun, data-data penelitian sebelumnya yang tersedia tidak adekuat dalam membahas keuntungan IVUS untuk pasien dengan lesi bifurkasio left main – left anterior descending (LM-LAD) kompleks yang menjalani IKP dengan pendekatan provisional stenting. Penelitian kohort retrospektif observasional ini dilakukan di Pusat Jantung Nasional Harapan Kita (PJNHK) Jakarta pada periode pengamatan Januari 2017 - Desember 2022, dengan didapatkan total sampel berjumlah 178 orang. Analisa statistik dilakukan untuk melihat perbedaan kelompok antara grup IVUS vs Angiografi pada pasien-pasien PJK dengan lesi LM-LAD yang dilakukan provisional stenting, terutama terhadap luaran klinisnya berupa KKM, serta analisa faktor-faktor yang berpengaruh terhadap KKM dari kedua kelompok. Dari 178 pasien yang menjalani IKP provisional stenting dengan mayoritas diagnosa pre-tindakan berupa chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) berjumlah 155 orang (86.6%), hanya didapatkan 27 orang (15.1%) yang mengalami luaran KKM tanpa adanya perbedaan signifikan antara kedua grup IVUS vs angiogafi saja (16.1% vs 14.1%, p = 0.714). Angka tindakan IKP provisional stenting didapatkan cukup berimbang antara grup IVUS vs Angiografi (48.6% vs 51.4%) selama periode pengamatan penelitian. Dari semua variabel faktor resiko yang diteliti, hanya variabel diabetes melitus (DM) yang memiliki pengaruh signifikan secara independen terhadap kejadian KKM (p = 0.016, OR 3.44, 95% CI 1.55-7.62) pada kedua grup. Dengan kesimpulan Tidak terdapat perbedaan signifikan untuk luaran klinis KKM antara ultrasonografi intravaskular dan angiografi pada pasien yang menjalani intervensi koroner perkutan (IKP) dengan provisional stenting pada lesi arteri koroner LM-LAD.

---

Coronary artery disease still represents the leading cause of mortality, with the outcome still unsatisfactory in high-risk subsets of patients. Percutaneous treatment of the left main coronary artery with provisional stenting strategy is one of the most challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology for treating this complex bifurcation lesion. Intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to result in superior clinical outcomes compared with angiography- guided percutaneous coronary intervention. However, insufficient previous study data are available concerning the advantages of IVUS guidance for specific patients with complex left main – left anterior descending (LM-LAD) bifurcation lesion undergoing PCI with provisional stenting approach. This observational retrospective cohort study was conducted at the National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita (NCCHK) in the observation period between January 2017 - December 2022, with a total sample size of 178 participants. Statistical analysis was carried out to learn group differences between the IVUS vs Angiography-guided groups in CAD patients with LM-LAD lesions who underwent provisional stenting, especially regarding clinical outcomes in MACE, as well as analysis of factors that influenced the MACE from both groups. Of the 178 patients who underwent provisional stenting PCI with the majority of pre-operative diagnosis were chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) with total of 155 participants (86.6%), only 27 participants (15.1%) experienced MACE outcomes without any significant group differences between the two groups of IVUS vs Angiography-guided (16.1 % vs 14.1%, p = 0.714). There was quite balanced between the IVUS vs angiography-guided groups (48.6% vs 51.4%) for PCI imaging technique approach during the observation period. From all variables of risk factor studied, only diabetes mellitus (DM) had an independent significant impact on the incidence of MACE (p = 0.016, OR 3.44, 95% CI 1.55-7.62) in both groups. There is no significant difference in outcomes of MACE between IVUS and angiography- guided ultrasonography in patients undergoing PCI with provisional stenting in LM-LAD coronary artery lesions."