Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Studi ini menggunakan critical discourse analysis (CDA) dan menjelaskan konstruksi wacana dominan dalam Kurikulum Sosiologi SMA dan buku pelajaran sosiologi berdasarkan Kurikulum 2006 dan 1984. Wacana dominan tersebut merupakan representasi kekuasaan negara. Kedua, studi ini juga menjelaskan pertarungan simbolik antara BSNP sebagai pemegang otoritas pendidikan pasca diberlakukannya UU No. 20/2003 dan penerbit-penulis. Kesimpulan studi., bahwa wacana keteraturan sosial menjadi wacana dominan pada kurikulum sosiologi SMA khususnya Kurikulum 2006 dan 1984 sebagaimana menjadi fokus penelitian ini. Bourdieu menyebut itu dengan doxa. Kurikulum 1984 dipilih sebagai teks yang dianalisa sebagai representasi kurikulum produk Orde Baru, Kurikulum 2006 merupakan kurikulum produk pasca Orde Baru tumbang. Keteraturan sosial yang menjadi mainstream pads kurikulum 2006 merupakan upaya menciptakan harrnoni dan social order masyarakat Indonesia pasca Orde Baru tumbang. Harmonisasi ini menjadi representasi kekuasaan pada masyarakat Indonesia yang mengalami berbagai transisi dan perubahan. Keteraturan sosial yang mendorninasi Kurikulum 1984 merupakan upaya legitimasi terhadap praktek-praktek pembangunan yang scat itu sedang mengalami masa kejayaan. Demi mensukseskan pembangunan seluruh kekuatan masyarakat diharuskan tertib, teratur, harmoni. Dengan kata lain, negara berkepentingan menciptakan keteraturan sosial atas Hama pembangunan yang sedang dijalankan. Pada level ini, diskursus pembangunan menjadi mainstream dalam kurikulum sosiologi produk Orde Baru, khususnya Kurikulum 1984. BSNP menempati posisi obyektif dominan dalam ranah kekuasaan kurikulum, sedangkan penulis-penerbit pada posisi obyektif marjinai. Posisi obyektif tersebut juga mengindikasikan habitus yang berkembang diantara dua agen tersebut. Habitus BSNP adalah otoritas, intelektual dan akademik. Bourdieu percaya bahwa intelektual memiliki kekuasaan simbolik atau otoritas yang cukup di dalam pertarungan wacana. Habitus ini berkontribusi pada berbagai produk wacana yang dihasilkannya. Habitus penulis-penerbit lebih kepada idealisme dan selera pasar. Penerbit-penulis mensinergiskan artikulasi idealisme maupun basis wacana yang dimiliki penulis dengan berbagai pola penyesuaian terhadap tren dan perkembangan pasar.

---

This study used critical discourse analysis (CDA) and describe the construction of dominant discourse in the curriculum of sociology for senior high school and its references based on curriculum 2006 and 1984. Secondly, this study to explain the symbolic competition between BSNP (National Education Standardization Committee) as the authority holder of national education system after the issue of UU No. 2012003 and publisher-writer. Reffering to conclusion, that social order has became dominant discourse in the curriculum of Sociology for Senior High School, especially curriculum 2006 and 1984. Bourdieu called it as doxa. Curriculum 1984 was chosen as text to be analyzed as the representation of curriculum produced in Orde Baru era. Then, in the post Orde Baru era, it was substituted with curriculum 2006. Social order which had been the mainstream in curriculum 2006 was a kind of effort to make a harmony and social order after Orde Baru collapsed. This harmonization became a power representation to Indonesian people who were faced to many transitions and changes. Social order which had dominated curriculum 1984 was a kind of legitimating effort on development practices that was in its glory. All Indonesian people must be in order, well regulated. And kept in harmony support the development plan. At this level, developmentalism discourse becomes the mainstream in the curriculum of sociology produced in Orde Baru era, especially curriculum 1984. The analysis result on capital ownership shows that BSNP holds dominant objective position for curriculum authority and publisher-writer are in marginal position. The objective position also indicates the habitus developing among them. The habitus of BSNP are authority, intellectual, and academic. Bourdieu believed that intellectualism hold adequate symbolic power and authority in the discourse competition. This habitus gives contribution to eac discourse it has produced before. The habitus of publisher-writer is rather to idealism and market oriented. They make a synergy from their idealism or discourse base with some adaptation to trend and market development.

Abstrak :
To inherit something if it is not genetically is believed to be a culture. Knowledge is culture since it is not genetically acquired. When we are discussing the -function of knowledge that means we are discussing the `culture', because knowledge is transferred by socialization, and human get it by learning process. Knowledge in its formation is connected to power. One of the processes in formation of knowledge is through education and power is represented by the state and its government with its regulations reinforced. In education, curriculum is the reflection of power. The government issues the national curriculum, applied throughout the country. In the implementation, the uniformity can not be fully applied. The due to the various situation and condition in every region. Alternative education is considered to be against uniformity in the implementation of national curriculum. Alternative education is also viewed as power in education. Power contest is the condition that comes along with the formation of knowledge. Power contest appears when knowledge is constructed, deconstructed, and reconstructed. All happen within the constellation of power. The concept of contest is used to illustrate the struggle, the fight, competition and debate when knowledge is in formation within the constellation of power. Teaching through schools is one of the ways to formation of knowledge. In formation of knowledge, state with its national curriculum seems to stand in one side while, children, parents, peer groups, milieu, NGOs, and media are in the other side. Power contest seems to give certain color when alternative education is set in the context. SDKE Mangunan is a type of alternative education that we can use to illustrate power contest between education and the state in the formation of knowledge. Romo Mangun with his curriculum for SDKE Mangunan has to face the state which implements national curriculum. Children just have to face their teachers in class. This will become more complicated with the presence of others like parents, peer groups, milieu and media.