Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Student movements in Indonesia can be seen since the Dutch colonial era. They learnt from the Dutch how to unite and fight back for freedom. Even the risk and cost are very high, they kept on moveina until 1949. After the colonial era, students movements more integrated in a political party, especially in the Old Order era. From 1974-1998 non legitimate student organizations become a high risk and cost activities in the New Order era. From 1996-1998 they rised and fight back the New Order regime even though the risk and cost are very high. After 1998 student movements has serious problem in mobilization, much of student turn back to their own activities. Those things made the student organizations and actions committees with the "left" ideology try to be united into one national organization scale called the National Students League for Democracy (LMND), especially them who establiesed the work of the Solidarity of Indonesian Student for Democracy (SMID) all affiliation of organizations (Democratic People Party's (PRD)). Until Mei 2005 LMND being integrated into the student movements role. Even when the political situation are totally different from 1998. The movement of LMND had the same risk and cost, also this organizations network highly increased. This final paper is analyzing and describing the supporting factors of activities and recruitment process to high risk-cost activities at LINEN-D. The tools of analisis used the theory of Doug McArlam's network and high risk activities from the research of Freedom Summer high risk-cost activity. This theory sees that the recruitment in high risk-cost activities are differed from low risk and low cost. This theory explained the back around factors activities in high risk-cost. Those are the history of relevant activism, the deep ideologcal commitment, being integrated into activist networks and biographical availability. 4 conditions that shaped the final decision about participation are: 1. occurance of a recruitment attempt; 2. conseptualization of linkage beetween participation and identity; 4. absence of opposition from others who shape salient identity. Also view argument that recruitment process used a networks and the reason whypeople join activities. The inventions of this paper is LMND had high risk-cost activity and the recruitment process not too different from the case of Freedom Summer. LIVIND have all the background of Freedom Summer activities. In the background factors, history of relevant activity and being integrated to activits network are the most important supporting from the background factor. While biographical availability and deep ideological commitment/ prior organization not the most important factor to support the recruitment. The major factor that shaped the final decision about participation are the occurance of a recruitment attempt, the linkage beetween movement and identity, and the support of that linkage from those normaly sustain the identity. While the absence of opposition not to significant. In the case LMND, networks used in process of recruitments. The reason informant joined LMND activities are to achieving they aim and value."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis FKA ESQ-165 sebagai komunitas yang bergerak membangun penyadaran makna hidup dan cita-cita Indonesia Emas 2020. Analisis terhadap FKA ESQ-165 dibangun dengan landasan konsep komunitas dan konsep pembangunan sosial budaya. Konsep komunitas diambil dari Barry Wellman (dalam Delanty, 2003); Jim Ife (2002); Koentjaraningrat (1993); Christenson dan Robinson (dalam Hillery, 1955); Erna Karim (2008), dan Etzioni (1993, 1996). Sementara itu, konsep pembangun sosial budaya diambil dari Amartya Sen (1999); Mahbub Ul-Haq (1995); Selo Soemardjan (dalam Zuraida, 1993); dan Paulus Wirutomo (2011, 2012, dan 2014). Kemudian secara khusus digunakan analisis perspektif pembangunan sosial budaya dengan elemen struktur, kultur, dan proses sosial dari Paulus Wirutomo.Dari sisi metodologi, penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan fenomenologis, dengan metode studi kasus yang merupakan bagian penting dari studi kualitatif. Subyek penelitian ini adalah komunitas FKA ESQ-165 Jakarta, Bekasi dan FKA- ESQ-165 Tingkat Perusahaan. Total informan 56 orang, dengan rincian 38 orang dipilih berdasarkan teknik random sampling dan 18 didapat dari teknik Snow ball Sampling. Penelitian dilaksanakan selama 16 bulan, dari bulan Mei 2013 ? September 2014. Prinsip pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan empat langkah, yaitu: (1) studi pustaka; (2) observasi; (3) menyebar kuesioner; dan (4) wawancara mendalam. Sementara itu, analisis data dilakukan dengan cara mereduksi data, menyajikan data, dan menarik kesimpulan.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, pertautan konsep Indonesia Emas 2020 yang digagas FKA ESQ-165 secara sosiologis memiliki titik temu dengan perspektif pembangunan sosial budaya (PSB) dengan elemen struktur, kultur, dan proses sosial. Keduanya, mengidealkan tatanan masyarakat yang inklusif, toleran, dan harmoni. Gerakan komunitas FKA ESQ-165 menyosialisasikan konsep Indonesia Emas 2020 yang bercirikan nilai 165 dan 7 nilai budi utama sebagai cerminan nilai yang ideal. Operasionalisasi 7 nilai budi utama tersebut dapat dilihat dari level keluarga, intitusi (Al-Jannah Fundation), dan Corporate (PT. Bukit Asam, PT. JNE, PT. Propernas) yang telah membuktikan bahwa 7 nilai budi utama mampu mewujudkan perubahan. Penguatan dari studi ini menunjukkan bahwa elemen kultur sebagai inti dari perubahan sosial budaya (PSB) pada komunitas FKA ESQ-165. Elemen kultur bergerak dinamis dan bersifat siklikal.

---

ABSTRACTThis Research is intended to analyze the FKA ESQ 165 as a communitythat engaged to build the awareness to the meaning of life and ideals of Gold Indonesia 2020 The analysis of FKA ESQ 165 is created with the foundation ofthe community concept and the socio cultural development concept Thecommunity concept which is used in this research is taken from Barry Wellman in Delanty 2003 Jim Ife 2002 Koentjaraningrat 1993 Christenson andRobinson in Hillery 1955 Ema Karim 2008 and Etzioni 1993 1996 As forthe socio cultural development concept is taken from AmartyaSen 1999 Mahbub UI Haq 1995 Selo soemardjan in Zuraida 1993 and PaulusWirutomo 2011 2012 and 2014 Then specifically used is the analysis of socioculturaldevelopment perspective with the elements of structure culture andsocial processes of Paulus Wirutomo.In terms of methodology this research is using the phenomenologicalapproach the case study method which is an important part of qualitative studies The subjects ofthis research arethe FKA ESQ 165 community Jakarta Bekasi andFKA ESQ 165 on the Company level The total of the source is 56 people withdetails of 38 people selected by random sampling technique and 18 obtained fromSnow ball sampling technique The research was conducted over 16 months fromthe month ofMay 2013 September 2014 The principle of data collection is doneby four steps namely 1 literature study 2 observation 3 questionnairespreading and 4 in depth interviews Meanwhile the data analysis is done byreducing the data presenting data and drawing the conclusions.The results ofthe research showed that the Gold Indonesia 2020 conceptwhich initiated by the FKA ESQ 165 sociologically have common ground withthe perspective of socio cultural development with elements of structure culture and social processes Both idealize the inclusive tolerant and harmonized society The community movement of the FKA ESQ 165 is to socialize the GoldIndonesia 2020 concept which characterized by the value of 165 and 7 main valueas a reflection of the ideal value The Operationalization of the 7 main values canbe seen from the family level the institution level Al Jannah Foundation andCorporate level PT Bukit Asam PT JNE PT PROPERNAS which has provedthat the 7 main value is able to realize the change The Strengthening of this studyindicate that the culture element as a core of social and cultural change in the FKAESQ 165 community Elements of culture are a dynamic and cyclical."

"Ontoteologi adalah musuh tradisional dari filsafat modern. Setiap filsafat muncul sebagai respon atasnya. Dalam disertasi ini, pemikiran Quentin Meillassoux yang adalah pelopor aliran realisme spekulatif menjadi obyek studi untuk direfleksikan kapasitasnya dalam menghalau metafisika ontoteologis. Ditunjukkan bahwa dalam seluruh prosedur pemikirannya mdash;postulasi problem, perumusan prinsip ontologis dan formulasi prosedur filsafat mdash;Meillassoux justru melakukan pengulangan ontoteologi ini dalam bentuknya yang disebut di sini sebagai ontoantropologi. Manusia anthropos , dalam filsafat Meillassoux, menjadi jangkar bagi ontologi itu sendiri. Dengan menggunakan psikoanalisis Jacques Lacan, disertasi ini memberikan kritik terhadap ontoantropologi Meillassoux. Pembahasan terbagi dalam tiga bagian besar. Pertama adalah pemaparan kondisi-kondisi institusional, sosial dan historis yang mana filsafat Meillassoux mengambil tempat. Bagian kedua merefleksikan postulasi ranah realitas obyektif, yang keberadaannya absolut dari pikiran manusia. Bagian ketiga mengevaluasi prinsip ontologis yang diformulasikan Meillassoux untuk memikirkan tentang realitas obyektif dan absolut ini. Selain refleksi kritis, penulis juga menawarkan sketsa kemungkinan solusi terhadap setiap manifestasi problem ontoantropologis Meillassoux. Akhirnya, disertasi ini berargumen bahwa problem ontoantropologis hanya bisa dipecahkan saat manusia-filsafat mengafirmasi kemungkinan bahwa kemanusiaannya berpotensi membatasi kapasitas filsafat dalam mengakses yang absolut, ketimbang mengabaikannya begitu saja sebagaimana yang dilakukan Meillassoux.

---

Ontotheology is a traditional adversary of modern philosophy. Every brand new philosophy rises up as a response against it. In this dissertation, the thought of Quentin Meillassoux, a pioneer of recent new speculative realist, becomes the object of study to be reflected upon its capacity in overcoming ontotheological metaphysics. It is shown that in every of his thought procedure mdash postulation of problem, formulation of ontological principle, designation of philosophical procedure mdash Meillassoux is precisely repeating ontotheology in the guise of what to be called as ontoanthropology. Human anthropos , in Meillassoux philosophy, becomes the anchor for the ontology itself. By employing Jacques Lacan rsquo s psychoanaysis, this dissertation offers a critique of Meillassoux rsquo s ontoanthropology. The discussion is divided into three. The first describes institutional, social, and historical conditions under which Meillassoux rsquo s philosophy is taking place. The second part reflects on the postulation of the realm of objective reality, whose presence is absolute to human rsquo s mind. The third part evaluates the ontological principle formulated by Meillassoux to think about the objective and absolute reality. Besides a critical reflection, the author also offer a sketch of possibility of solution for every manifestation of Meillassoux rsquo s ontoanthropological problem. Finally, the dissertation argues that the problem of ontoanthropology can only be solved when the man of philosophy affirm the possibility that his humanity has the potential to limit philosophy rsquo s capacity in accessing the absolute, instead of just foreclosing it as Meillassoux does."

"Disertasi ini adalah penelitian untuk melihat upaya teoretis Richard Rorty untuk keluar dari perdebatan antara fondasionalisme dengan relativisme dan konsekuensinya pada bidang sosial-politik. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode refleksi kritis dan fenomenologi-hermenutika Gadamer untuk menganalisis teori kebenaran yang ditawarkan oleh Richard Rorty.Temuan penelitan ini adalah teori kebenaran tersebut didasarkan pada asumsi kuasi-realisme yang mengandung ?deflationary theory of truth?. Di sini,?deflationary theory of truth? menunjukkan manusia memahami diri ataupun dunia begitu saja dalam arus kehidupannya. Oleh karena itu, kebenaran tidak mungkin hadir terpisah dari kegiatan manusia itu sendiri ?dalam konteks ini, kegiatan berbahasa yang berciri kontingensi. Dengan ucap lain, kita tidak mungkin berbicara atau berpikir tentang kebenaran tanpa melakukan identifikasi dalam kosakata ataupun deskripsi, di mana kebenaran itu diformulasikan.

---

This dissertation is a study to see Richard Rorty?s theoretical efforts to escape of the debate between foundationalism and relativism, and their consequences on social-politic field. This study uses the methods of critical reflection and Gadamer?s phenomenology-hermeneutics to analyze the theory of truth offered by Richard Rorty.The finding of this study is the Richard?s Rorty theory of truth based on the assumption of quasi-realism containing deflationary theory of truth. It shows that human understanding about their self or the world just happen in flow of their life. Therefore, the truth is impossible to exist apart from human activities ?in this context, linguistic activities are characterized by contingency. In other words, we can not talk or think about the truth without identifying it in vocabulary or description, in which the truth is formulated."

"Dua studi kuantitatif dilakukan dalam konteks konflik yang terjadi selama proses Pemilihan Gubernur 2017 di Jakarta. Data studi 1 dikumpulkan dari 442 sampel dan data studi 2 dikumpulkan dari 421 sampel, yang dipilih dengan menggunakan teknik accidental sampling. Sampel dipilih dari warga Jakarta yang menggunakan hak pilih mereka dan mengidentifikasi bahwa mereka sebagai anggota kelompok yang terlibat dalam konflik yang terjadi selama pemilihan Gubernur Jakarta 2017. Studi 1 dilakukan untuk menjelaskan bagaimana emosi berbasis kelompok seperti harapan, rasa benci, rasa bersalah, rasa malu, dan rasa marah dapat memprediksi kesiapsediaan untuk berekonsiliasi dalam konflik antarkelompok. Studi 2 dilakukan untuk membuktikan bahwa emosi berbasis kelompok seperti harapan, rasa benci, rasa bersalah, rasa malu, dan rasa marah dapat memprediksi kesiapsediaan untuk berekonsiliasi lebih baik daripada variabel bukan emosi seperti trust, identifikasi kelompok, dan out-group blame. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan teknik Structural Equation Modeling untuk membangun teori model terintegrasi dan menguji hipotesis penelitian. Hasil studi 1 menunjukkan bahwa harapan, rasa benci, rasa marah, dan rasa bersalah dapat memprediksi kesiapsediaan untuk berekonsiliasi, sementara hasil studi 2 menunjukkan adanya pengaruh yang signifikan antara harapan, rasa benci, rasa bersalah terhadap kesiapsediaan untuk berekonsiliasi Temuan dalam penelitian ini mendukung asumsi bahwa harapan, rasa bersalah dan trust memiliki pengaruh poositif terhadap kesiapsediaan untuk berekonsiliasi, sementara rasa benci dan out-group blame mengakibatkan berkurangnya tingkat kesiapsediaan untuk berekonsiliasi dengan kelompok lawan. Di antara semua variabel yang diuji, studi-studi ini memberikan bukti rasa bersalah terhadap out-group merupakan prediktor terkuat pada kesiapsediaan untuk berekonsiliasi antar-kelompok yang terlibat konflik PILKADA Jakarta 2017. Hasil penelitian ini juga memberikan bukti bahwa emosi berbasis kelompok dapat memprediksi kesiapsediaan untuk berekonsiliasi lebih baik dibandingkan variabel bukan emosi seperti out-group blame dan group identification.

---

Two quantitative studies were conducted within the context of conflict which occurred during Jakarta's 2017 Governor Election process. The first study aimed to gain explanation whether group-based emotion including hope, anger, hatred, shame and guilt could predicts willingness to reconcile. The second study was conducted to answer wheter group-based emotions could predicts more significantly than non-emotional variables such as trust, group identification, and out-group blame. In the first study, the data were collected using accidental sampling from 442 Jakarta residents, who use their voting rights and identified that they were part of the groups that involved in conflicts that occurred during Jakarta's 2017 Governor elections. The data for second study were collected from 421 sample within the same manner  The data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling techniques to build the integrated model theory and test the research hypothesis.

The result from first study revealed that hope, hatred, anger and guilt could predicts willingness to reconcile, while in the second study shows hope, hatred, guilt, trust and out-group blame could predicts willingness to reconcile. The findings support the notion that hope, trust, and guilt have a positive impact to the willingness to reconcile, while hatred, anger and out-group blame resulting in participants reducing the willingness to reconcile with opposing candidate's supporting group. These studies also gave evidence that guilt was the strongest predictor of willingness to reconcile in the inter-group conflict in the Jakarta 2017 regional elections. The results of the latest study provide evidence that group-based emotions could predict participant's willingness to engage in post-conflict reconciliation better than non-emotional variables such as trust and out-group blame."