Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Pengaturan ruang lingkup Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah penting untuk memberikan kepastian hukum terkait dana APBN yang tunduk pada mekanisme Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. Adanya kesalahan penerapan aturan pengadaan barang/jasa oleh badan usaha/individu dapat dipandang sebagai suatu perbuatan melawan hukum dan dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban. Contohnya dalam sengketa pengadaan barang/jasa antara PT Bank Sumut dan Endang Sriasih tahun 2004 dan dalam kasus tindak pidana korupsi untuk pengadaan LTE PLTGU Belawan PT PLN Pembangkit Sumatera Utara tahun 2015. Penelitian ini tidak secara spesifik menganalisis kedua kasus tersebut, namun untuk mencegah terjadinya permasalahan hukum yang sama maka perlu pengaturan yang jelas terkait ruang lingkup Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. Metode yang dipakai oleh penulis adalah metode penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif dan menggunakan data sekunder. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini, kriteria dana APBN yang termasuk dalam ruang lingkup Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah adalah dana APBN dari pos belanja negara yang sifatnya belanja barang/jasa dan dana APBN yang berasal dari pos belanja negara dibelanjakan oleh pelaku pengadaan yakni Kementerian/Lembaga /Perangkat Daerah . Selain itu, penulis menemukan bahwa implikasi penggunaan istilah ldquo;Pembiayaan rdquo; dan ldquo;Anggaran Belanja rdquo; terhadap ruang lingkup Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah dapat menimbulkan salah penafsiran dan pemahaman terhadap ruang lingkup Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah apabila tidak selaras dengan tata kelola APBN.

---

ABSTRACT
Regulation of the scope of procurement of Government is important to provide legal certainty related to APBN funds subject to Government Procurement mechanism. Errors in the application of the rules of procurement by business entities or individuals can be considered as an act against the law and can be held responsible by the law. For example, in the procurement dispute between PT Bank Sumut and Endang Sriasih in 2004 and in the case of corruption for the procurement of LTE PLTGU Belawan PT PLN North Sumatra Power Plant in 2015. The research does not specifically analyze these two cases, but to prevent the occurrence of the same legal problems in the present and future then a clear regulation related to the scope of Government Procurement is required. The method used by the authors is a qualitative research method with a normative juridical approach using secondary data. Based on the results of this study, the criteria of APBN funds included in the scope of Government Procurement shall be APBN funds from expenditure items whose caracter is expenditures to buy goods services and APBN funds derived from the expenditure items are spent by the actor procurement, that is the Ministry Institution Local Government Organization . In addition, the authors find that the implications of the use of the term Financing and Expenditure on the scope of Government Procurement may lead to misinterpretation and misunderstanding of the scope of Government Procurement when use of the terms are not in line with APBN governance

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Luasnya lingkup keuangan Negara berpotensi menyebabkan pemahaman kerugianBUMN merupakan tindak pidana korupsi. Menurut teori transformasi kekayaan Negarapenyertaan modal negara pada BUMN telah bertransformasi menjadi kekayaan BUMN.PT PLN Persero sebagai perseroan terbatas memberlakukan ketentuan Undang-UndangNomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas termasuk prinsip Business JudgementRule dalam Pasal 97 sebagai perlindungan hukum atas pertanggungjawaban keputusanbisnis yang mengakibatkan kerugian perusahaan. Suatu ukuran Business Judgment Ruleadalah kerugian yang timbul bukan karena kesalahan/kelalaian direksi, direksi beritikadbaik dan penuh kehati-hatian untuk kepentingan dan tujuan Perseroan, tidak memilikibenturan kepentingan dan telah mengambil tindakan mencegah timbul atau berlanjutnyakerugian. Penelitian hukum yuridis normatif ini dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan danwawancara. Direksi PT PLN Persero berusaha konsisten menjalankan prinsip BusinessJudgement Rule sejak tahap perencanaan pengadaan hingga manajemen aset denganmengacu pada ketentuan Anggaran Dasar, batasan kewenangan, Board of Manual,ketentuan yang berlaku dan mengadopsi good procurements yaitu mengimplementasikanPendekatan strategis, Fokus Value for Money, Organisasi, Kultur Profesionalisme danPengendalian Risiko. Pengambilan keputusan/kebijakan korporasi dilengkapi denganjustifikasi. Apabila terdapat indikasi kerugian pada pengadaan barang dan jasa di PTPLN Persero untuk penyelesaian permasalahan hukumnya sebaiknya ditinjau terlebihdahulu berdasarkan Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Administrasi. PertanggungjawabanHukum Pidana seharusnya menjadi ultimum remidium atau sarana terakhir yangditerapkan.

---

ABSTRACT
The widespread scope of a state rsquo s financial has the potential to cause the financial loss inrelated to BUMN state owned enterprises to be the kind of of criminal acts of corruption.Whereas according to the theory of transformation of state assets, the partial state rsquo s capital inBUMN has transformed to become the asset of BUMN. Considering that PT PLN Stateowned electricity company is a limited liabilty company, in running their routine activity,therefore,they apply the provisions of Law No. 40 Tahun 2007 on limited liability companyinclusive of Business Judgement Rule principle in article 97 that constitutes legal protectionover the accountability of the funds in each and every business rsquo decision that results in a lossof the company. A measure of Business Judgement Rule is the loss that does not occurbecause of the fault the board of directors, in fact, they have good intentions and conductcarefully according the benefit and objective of the company, does not have personal interest,and has taken actions to prevent the occurrence or continuity of the loss. Business JudgementRule must be applied in the process first started in the pre decision, the decision phase, up tothe post phase decision. This normative legal research method is used literature study andinterviews. The boards of directors of PT PLN Persero have consistenly conducted theprinciple of Business Judgement Rule started in the planning phase of procurement of goodsand services up to management assets based on The Articles Of Association, provisions ofauthority constraints Board of Manual of Director and Commissioners Indonesian law regulations, adopting good procurements by applying a Strategic Approach, Value focus forMoney, and Profesionalism Organization, Professionalism Culture and Risk Control. Everydecision or corporate policies shall be conducted with any justification. If there is any loss damage indication in many of the procurement of goods and services in reinsurance in PTPLN Persero , the settlement of the lawsuit should be reviewed beforehand based on civillaw and through the administrative law. The accountability reports on the criminal law aresupposed to be the ultimum remidium or the last facility applied.