Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKLatar Belakang Masalah Kebutuhan akan modal untuk mengembangkan perekonomian negara, menimbulkan gerak arus modal dari luar negeri. Negara yang mendambakan masuknya modal asing memberikan berbagai insentif dan fasilitas untuk menarik investor asing. Melalui Undang-Undang nomor 1 Tahun 1967, tentang Penanaman Modal Asing Indonesia menawarkan pula berbagai rangsangan seperti keringanan pajak, penggunaan hak-hak atas tanah, dan juga kesediaan untuk menyelesaikan sengketa melalui Arbitrase dan lain-lain. Perkembangan jumlah persetujuan penanaman modal yang telah dikeluarkan dapat dilihat pada tabel dibawah ini :Tabel PERKEMBANGAN PERSETUJUAN PENANAMAN MODAL PER PELITA dapat dilihat dalam file pdf.Persetujuan Penanaman Modal Asing (PMA) sejak dikeluarkan Undang-Undang nomor 1 Tahun 1967, tentang Penanaman Modal Asing sampai dengan bulan Desember 1997, tercatat 5.806 Proyek dengan nilai investasi sebesar US $ 191,85 Milyar.Dari persetujuan proyek PMA sektor yang paling banyak diminati Tahun 1997 adalah Industri Kimia (US $ 12,3 Milyar), Pengangkutan (US $ 5,9 Milyar), Industri Kertas (US $ 5,3 Milyar), Industri Barang Logam (US $ 2,3 Milyar), dan Listrik, Gas & Air Minum (US $ 1,8 Milyar).Sisi lain dari arus globalisasi dalam permodalan ini adalah akan meningkatnya benturan-benturan dari pelaku ekonomi. Karena itu perlu suatu tindakan antisipasi khususnya tentang persengketaan yang mungkin terjadi di antara investor asing dengan negara penerima modal dalam penyelenggaraan kegiatan penanaman modal tersebut.Pembenahan hukum akan memberikan ketertiban dan kepastian hukum sehingga akan memacu pertumbuhan ekonomi dengan ketertarikan investor asing ke Indonesia.Undang-Undang nomor 1 Tahun 1967 tentang PMA hanya menyatakan, bahwa bila ada nasionalisasi dan ada perselisihan yang timbul akibat sengketa, maka mengenai pembayaran kompensasi dapat diselesaikan melalui arbitrase.Pada saat ini dalam perdagangan internasional, berkembang suatu kecenderungan untuk menyelesaikan sengketa di luar Pengadilan, Priyatna mengemukakan bahwa:"ADR procedures are alternatives to the public judicial system found everywhere. Because private disputants are free to agree an variations to basic ADR procedures including adoption of those procedures and rules found in the public judicial system that can be used in ADR".Bentuk penyelesaian di luar pengadilan yang mulai dipopulerkan di Indonesia saat ini adalah melalui arbitrase.Arbitrase lebih disukai, karena berbagai Masan seperti dikemukakan oleh Gautama Sudargo, Priyatna Abdurrasyid, Erman Rajagukguk, Rene David, dan telah disimpulkan oleh Tineke Louise Tuegeh Longdong."

"The purpose of development rs to reach justice and prospenty in all aspects of lite by establishing amongst others small and medium companies both private and state companies. Therefore, certainty of law and adequate protection are needed to support their activities and consequently law must be obeyed by all stakeholders. Establishing a company needs capital for all its business activities. The opportunity to get capital for small and medium companies differ from/that of big companies. Since, the bigger ones have many sources to obtain capital, the smaller ones have not many options to enlarge their capital. This condition brings in balance and thus unfairness when small companies are dealing with big ones. Venture capital is one of the altematives to help small and medium companies to get proper sources of capital. The development of venture capital in indonesia is meant to open new opportunities to all business stakeholders for enlarge their companies, as they usually face many obstacles when borrow from a bank. Therefore, the existence of venture capital should be supported especially by government and business stakeholders as well as society at fast better the venture capital is growing the more small and medium companies can be helped by preserving capital for them. The system of finance order of the venture capital can be done by depositing capital into an investee company so that investment law and banking law will apply on those activities. The venture capital is based on the future prospect of the company rather than the collaterals. Consequently the venture capital has greater risk that ordinary loans, but also opens new market opportunities for the investor/lender. Administrative law has regulated the venture capital as a financing institution by enacting President's Decree No. 61/1988. However, the substantive law still uses the KUH Perdata (Civil Code). On the other hand venture capital agreements usually use standard contract which has not yet been regulated by the civil code, eventhough the regulation No. 8/1999 concern Consumers Protection has been regulated in a simple way. Therefore both our contract law as well as our corporate law need improvement. Cooperation agreement between the venture capital (venture capitalist) and the investee company is a mutual agreement, whereby the bargaining position of both the parties are not equal. The venture capitalist who has capital has a stronger position than the investee company who is the borrower whereas freedom of contract can only be applied properly when both parties have equal positions. The venture capitalist, however, tends to protect his interest (capital) by special clauses, inciuding his/her responsibilities thereby disturbing the equilibrium even further. Therefore, our laws should protect the weaker party but the govemment should also supervise and guard for such unscrupulous practices, like providing a ?black list" or "grey list" of such speciai clauses, condemning them nuii and void or voidabie (as the case may be) such as is done by the New Civil Code of the Netheriands on ?Algemene Voorwaarden"."