Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Hasil Pencarian

Ditemukan 3 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query
cover
Budhi Paramita
"The Five Year Plan closely guides economic development in Indonesia. Starting from the first Five Year Plan, covering the period 1969-1974, the emphasis was shifted from rehabilitative operations to substantial economic development. The targets are to produce more of the traditional products and services in addition to building new organizations and manufacturing plants capable of producing new goods and services, which previously have been imported. In this phase of economic development, institutional and organizational problems often hampered the realization of specified targets. The introduction of empirical macro organization research at the present time will be important, because it may create an instrument for observing and analyzing organizational data to detect past errors and suggest ways of problem resolution. Such research can also help in designing good organization. The resulting higher organizational efficiency and productivity should provide more certainty in achieving those targets set in the Five Year Plan.
The focus of the study will be on the formal aspects of organizational structure, which is defined as the internal differentiation and patterning of relationships. The justification for this study is that size, complexity, centralization, formalization and coordination are those internal properties that fall under the realm of managerial prerogatives. When correctly applied to the particular situation, these principles will provide invaluable guides to the construction of a rational-efficient framework for managing. The assumption that: given the general purpose of an organization, one can identify the basic functions and structure necessary for the realization of this purpose, will be the basis for the present empirical investigation.
Choice of Organizational Model
Conditions external to the organization contribute to what goes on within the organization, the form that the organization takes, and the consequences of its action. In order to survive, organizations must be able to adapt to the demand and turbulences of the environment. An aspect of the socio-cultural environment, which might be expected to exert a strong influence on the structure and behavior of formal organizations, is the structure of society itself, and the values and attitudes that this structure tends to generate.
As in other Asian countries, the managerial style in Indonesia is paternalistic and autocratic in nature. It is a direct personalized kind of control and the locus of authority is most often at the top.
Blau who states that, when an authoritarian orientation prevails in society, strict hierarchical control may be the most effective method of organizational administration makes a similar observation.
Another important characteristic of the socio-cultural environment is its degree of homogeneity. According to Thompson, in heterogeneous environments such as those, which obtain the highly developed countries, organizations generally set up several specialized subunits, each assigned a specific area of the environment to deal with.3 Conversely, in relatively homogeneous environments such as those in predominantly agricultural societies in Asia and Africa, one would expect organizations to be less internally differentiated."
Depok: Universitas Indonesia, 1976
D255
UI - Disertasi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Mulyono Gandadiputra
"ABSTRACT
The study of the relationships between superiors and their subordinates of several companies in Jakarta started with our impression that there exists a need on the part of seine executives, managers and heads of work units in these companies to actualize a form of cooperation which they call 'participative management' or 'participative style of leadership?. Frequently the people who have managerial positions like those mentioned above state that they have difficulties in carrying out what they usually call 'participative management system' or 'participative style of leadership' in the companies where they are employed. They discuss the difficulties which they have in motivating their subordinates to participate in the decision making process and the solution of problems in everyday work. However, we are not primarily interested in the people in the very lowest echelons of the organization, but our interest is specifically focused on the people in the second and the third levels of the organization. The workers in the second layer from the bottom, the so-called 'first line supervisors', will in this study be called 'subordinates', and their immediate superiors will be called 'superiors'.
Our motive for scrutinizing the relations between the first-line supervisors, or the subordinates, and their immediate super-visor or the second-line supervisors, the superiors in this study, will be dealt with in the chapter on sampling. Based on their work experience, the superiors often express the troubles they have in understanding their subordinates. They want to have subordinates who are more active in carrying out -their daily tasks, more independent in solving the problems faced in daily work situations, and more active in the process of decision making on matters concerning their daily jobs.
They expect their subordinates to show more courage in putting forward new ideas, constructive thoughts, suggestions to increase working efficiency and to improve interpersonal relations, increase production quantitatively as well as qualitatively.
They notice that their subordinates act as if they were afraid to express their opinion in an outspoken manner, produce reports of mediocre quality. And, if there are problems which, according to the superior, could be solved at the subordinate level, they are more often than not, referred to the superiors. In short, subordinates appear to be more at ease when they are directed in how to carry out their work and how to solve problems. On the other hand, when the superior makes a decision directly concerning the task of the subordinates, no subordinate will feel happy with it. They will feel as if they were not being taken into consideration, not infrequently they would feel bypassed. They feel that their opinion is not heeded and they will consider their superior authoritarian. When questioned, however, before the superior reached a solution, they will hesitate to put forward a solution and often will state that they prefer to leave the solution to the superior, and they themselves desire only to carry out the steps to the final solution as instructed by the superior."
1978
D132
UI - Disertasi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Ashar Sunyoto Munandar
"ABSTRACT
Indonesia, a predominantly agricultural country, is now moving towards industrialization. The government is stimulating and supporting the industrial growth.In line with the Outline of State Policy (Garis-Garis Besar sia_luan Negara) one of the longterm objectives is to bring about a fun_damental change to the present structure of economic development so that there is a growing share of National production contributed by sources outs fde the agricultural sector and in which industry becomes the backbone of the economy."
1977
D236
UI - Disertasi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library