Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[ABSTRAKPerkembangan situasi ekonomi internasaional semenjak tahun 1970-andiwarnai dengan peningkatan lalu lintas modal antar negara yangt telahmenimbulkan perdebatan di kalangan praktisi dan akademisi. Dengan latarbelakang tersebut, tulisan ini mencoba mengangkat mengenai landasan teoritisdari globalisasi keuangan yang diusung oleh dua pandangan liberal yaituKeynesian dan neoliberal. Tulisan ini menemukan bahwa kedua pandangantersebut memiliki posisi yang sama kuat di bidang akademis dan terdapatperdebatan yang tidak berujung mengenai berbagai aspek dari globalisasikeuangan. Tulisan ini kemudian menemukan bahwa literatur globalisasi keuangandi negara berkembang sangat fokus pada pembahasan mengenai penyebab dankonsekuensi dari fenomena tersebut.

---

ABSTRACTInternational economics has witnessed a dramatic increase in capital flowsbetween countries since 1970s. It has also sparked debate between practitionersand academician in explaining this phenomenon. Against this backdrop, thisliterature review tries to explain the theoretical foundation of the financialglobalization using liberal and Keynesian perspective. This literature finds thatboth perspectives are well-argued and the debate reaches an inconclusivity. Thisliterature also finds that most of the writings about globalization in developingcountries focus on the cause and effect of that particular phenomenon., International economics has witnessed a dramatic increase in capital flowsbetween countries since 1970s. It has also sparked debate between practitionersand academician in explaining this phenomenon. Against this backdrop, thisliterature review tries to explain the theoretical foundation of the financialglobalization using liberal and Keynesian perspective. This literature finds thatboth perspectives are well-argued and the debate reaches an inconclusivity. Thisliterature also finds that most of the writings about globalization in developingcountries focus on the cause and effect of that particular phenomenon.]"

"[ABSTRAKKestabilan rezim hanya dapat dijaga oleh aktor dominan dalam rezim yang berperan sebagai pemimpin yang relatif lebih kuat daripada aktor yang lainnya. Pasca krisis 2008, rezim keuangan internasional cenderung tidak stabil karena AS, sebagai hegemon status quo mengalami penurunan power. Di saat yang bersamaan, Tiongkok mengalami pertumbuhan ekonomi yang pesat. Tulisan ini mengungkapkan bahwa pasca krisis 2008, terdapat tiga perbedaan pandangan terhadap kepemimpinan dalam rezim keuangan internasional. Pandangan pertama, AS tetap menjadi hegemon. Kedua, Tiongkok mengambilalih hegemoni AS. Pandangan ketiga, kepemimpinan tersebar kepada dua atau lebih pihak dalam rezim keuangan internasional.

---

ABSTRACTRegime stability could only be kept by dominant actor in the regime playing the role as a leader, which is relatively stronger than other actors in the regime. Post 2008 crisis, international financial regime tends to be unstable as the power of US, the status quo hegemon, is declining. At the same time, China is having a rapid economic growth. This academic writing shows that in post 2008 crisis, there are three different views regarding leadership in international financial regime. First, US are still the hegemon. Second, China took over hegemony. Last, leadership diffusion to two or more actors in international financial regime. , Regime stability could only be kept by dominant actor in the regime playing the role as a leader, which is relatively stronger than other actors in the regime. Post 2008 crisis, international financial regime tends to be unstable as the power of US, the status quo hegemon, is declining. At the same time, China is having a rapid economic growth. This academic writing shows that in post 2008 crisis, there are three different views regarding leadership in international financial regime. First, US are still the hegemon. Second, China took over hegemony. Last, leadership diffusion to two or more actors in international financial regime. ]"