Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan bukti empiris mengenai pengaruh ukuran, leverage, profitabilitas, dan tangibility perusahaan yang mempengaruhi pengadopsian fair value accounting pada aset non-keuangan di perusahaan-perusahaan yang terdaftar di Australia Stock Exchange (ASX) pada juni 2015. Penelitian ini mengambil sampel pada perusahaan-perusahaan yang mengadopsi fair value accounting pada aset non-keuangan dan yang tidak dengan metode matching sampling. Untuk mendapatkan hasil dari pengaruh tersebut, maka dilakukan regresi logistik. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa ukuran, leverage, dan tangibility perusahaan meningkatkan probabilitas suatu perusahaan mengadopsi fair value accounting pada aset non-keuangan, sedangkan profitabilitas tidak berpengaruh signifikan pada perusahaan-perusahaan yang terdaftar di ASX.ABSTRACTThe objective of this study is to provide empirical evidence about the effect of size, leverage, profitability, and tangibility of companies that affect the adoption of fair value accounting on non-financial assets in listed companies on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) in June 2015. This study samples are companies that adopt fair value accounting on non-financial assets and that do not adopted through matching sampling method. To get the results of the effect, then performed logistic regression. Results from this study indicate that the size, leverage, and tangibility companies increase the probability of a company adopts fair value accounting on non-financial assets, but no significant effect on the profitability of the companies listed on the ASX., The objective of this study is to provide empirical evidence about the effect of size, leverage, profitability, and tangibility of companies that affect the adoption of fair value accounting on non-financial assets in listed companies on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) in June 2015. This study samples are companies that adopt fair value accounting on non-financial assets and that do not adopted through matching sampling method. To get the results of the effect, then performed logistic regression. Results from this study indicate that the size, leverage, and tangibility companies increase the probability of a company adopts fair value accounting on non-financial assets, but no significant effect on the profitability of the companies listed on the ASX.]"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaruh penggunaan akuntansi berbasis nilai wajar terhadap imbal jasa audit perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia, Bursa Malaysia, dan Singapore Exchange pada tahun 2010-2012. Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa penggunaan nilai wajar memiliki pengaruh positif yang signifikan terhadap imbal jasa audit yang diberikan kepada auditor yang artinya imbal jasa audit pada perusahaan yang menggunakan nilai wajar secara signifikan lebih tinggi dari perusahaan yang tidak menggunakan nilai wajar. Penelitian ini juga memberikan hasil bahwa tidak ada perbedaan signifikan pada imbal jasa audit antara perusahaan yang melakukan penilaian aset dengan nilai wajar oleh manajemen dan oleh external appraisal. Penelitian juga memberikan hasil perusahaan yang melakukan upward revaluation dan frekuensi perusahaan melakukan revaluasi tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap imbal jasa audit.

---

This study aims to analyze the effect of fair value accounting on the audit fee paid by companies that listed in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore stock exchange during 2010 - 2012. The result shows that the use of fair value accounting has a significant positive effect on the audit fee, which means that company who uses fair value accounting will pay higher audit fee compare to company that uses historical cost. This study also provides evidence that there is no significant difference in the audit fee between companies whose asset revaluation are conducted by the management or by external appraisal. The research also shows that upward revaluation and the frequency revaluation have no significant effect on audit fee."

"Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis perbedaan pengukuran pendapatan berbasis akrual berdasarkan Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan (PSAK) 72 dan UU PPh (Undang-undang Pajak Penghasilan). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan bentuk studi pustaka dan wawancara mendalam. Berdasarkan analisis yang sudah dilakukan atas dokumen (studi pustaka) dan hasil wawancara mendalam, disimpulkan bahwa pengakuan pendapatan menurut akuntansi sesuai PSAK 72 Pendapatan dari Kontrak dengan Pelanggan dan ketentuan PPh sama-sama mengadopsi basis akrual untuk pengakuannya, namun basis pengukurannya berbeda. Akuntansi keuangan sesuai PSAK 72 menggunakan basis pengukuran nilai wajar (Fair Value Accounting atau FVA) sehingga nilai yang diakui mencakup juga jumlah yang diestimasi sesuai dengan professional judgment penggunanya. Sementara itu, akuntansi pajak sesuai UU PPh menggunakan basis pengukuran HCA (historical cost accounting), yang mengacu pada model akuntansi keuangan pada saat UU PPh 1983 diberlakukan. Sebagai konsekuensi dari penerapan HCA, nilai yang diakui tidak mencakup jumlah yang diestimasi. Basis pengukuran HCA menurut UU PPh masih belum mengalami perkembangan di dalam mendefinisikan serta memberi perlakuan terhadap pengakuan pendapatan berbasis akrual. Hal ini dikarenakan pajak menganut asas kepastian, sehingga dalam perhitungannya PPh atas pendapatan akrualnya tidak bisa menggunakan pendapatan yang bersifat estimasi. Penjelasan Pasal 28 ayat (7) UU KUP menguraikan bahwa pembukuan dapat menggunakan standar akuntansi keuangan yang lazim. Akan tetapi, jika pajak telah membuat pengaturan secara khusus, pembukuan harus dilakukan sesuai dengan peraturan perpajakan. Sehingga terdapat kesimpulan dari penelitian ini dimana pajak tidak sama seperti PSAK 72 dimana dapat mengakui pendapatan akrual bersifat estimasi. Berdasarkan kesimpulan tersebut, peneliti memberikan saran berupa tidak diselaraskannya kebijakan PPh dengan PSAK 72 terkait pengukuran dan pembukuan pendapatan akrual karena sifat PSAK 72 yang cenderung kompleks.

---

The purpose of this research is to analyze the differences in accrual-based income measurement based on the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (PSAK) 72 and the Income Tax Law (Income Tax Law). This research uses qualitative methods in the form of literature studies and in-depth interviews. Based on the analysis that has been carried out on documents (literature study) and the results of in-depth interviews, it is contained that recognition according to accounting in accordance with PSAK 72 Revenue from Contracts with Customers and PPh provisions both accept the accrual basis for recognition, but the basis for measurement is different. Financial accounting in accordance with PSAK 72 uses a fair value measurement basis (Fair Value Accounting or FVA) so that the recognized value includes the estimated amount in accordance with the professional judgment of its users. Meanwhile, tax accounting according to the Income Tax Law uses the HCA (historical cost accounting) measurement basis, which refers to the financial accounting model at the time the 1983 Income Tax Law was enacted. As a consequence of applying HCA, the recognized amount does not include the estimated amount. The basis for measuring HCA according to the Income Tax Law has not progressed in terms of the definition and treatment of recognition of rights. This is because taxes are considered as a certainty, so that in calculating income tax on accrued income, you cannot use estimated income. The elucidation of Article 28 paragraph (7) of the KUP Law outlines that bookkeeping can use common financial accounting standards. However, if the tax has made special arrangements, the bookkeeping must be done in accordance with the tax regulations. So there is a conclusion from this study that taxes are not the same as PSAK 72 where accrual income can be recognized is an estimate. Based on these conclusions, the researcher provides suggestions in the form of not harmonizing PPh policies with PSAK 72 regarding the measurement and accounting of actual income due to the nature of PSAK 72 which tends to be complex."