Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"The prohibition of forced displacement in international armed conflicts -- The prohibition of forced movement of civilians in non-international armed conflicts -- Case study : Israeli settlements, the separation wall and displacement of civilians in the occupied Palestinian territory -- Forced displacement as an international crime -- The protection of refugees under international humanitarian law -- Internally displaced persons as civilians in time of war -- International humanitarian law and the protection of refugee and IDP camps."

"In this evaluation of the international legal standing of the right to reparation and its practical implementation at the national level, Christine Evans outlines State responsibility and examines the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice, the Articles on State Responsibility of the International Law Commission and the convergence of norms in different branches of international law, notably human rights law, humanitarian law and international criminal law. Case studies of countries in which the United Nations has played a significant role in peace negotiations and post-conflict processes allow her to analyse to what extent transitional justice measures have promoted State responsibility for reparations, interacted with human rights mechanisms and prompted subsequent elaboration of domestic legislation and reparations policies. In conclusion, she argues for an emerging customary right for individuals to receive reparations for serious violations of human rights and a corresponding responsibility of States."

"Since it first developed, the law of war has focused on protecting human beings. It prioritises human protection by controlling the conduct of belligerents in order to minimise human injuries and casualties.However, the consequences of war are seldom limited to human casualties. War also causes major destruction to the environment. This article shows that despite prioritising human protection, internationallaw provides a significant number of rules to protect the environment during armed conflicts. Contrary to claims that existing rules are insufficient, the law of war adequately safeguards the environment during armed conflicts by prohibiting certain military activities that may cause significant damage to the environment. Furthermore, there are peacetime regulations that may continue to bind belligerents in times of war."

"The Law of Armed Conflict: International Humanitarian Law in War introduces law students and undergraduates to the law of war in an age of terrorism. What law of armed conflict/​international humanitarian law applies to particular armed conflicts? Does that law apply to terrorists as well? What is the status of participants in an armed conflict? What constitutes a war crime? What is a lawful target and how are targeting decisions made? What are rules of engagement? What weapons are lawful and unlawful, and why? This text takes the reader through these essential questions of the law of armed conflict and international humanitarian law to an awareness of finer points of battlefield law. The U.S.-weighted text incorporates lessons from many nations and includes hundreds of cases from jurisdictions worldwide"

"Penelitian ini mengangkat peran organisasi perempuan Aceh di tengah konflik Aceh yang didominasi oleh kelompok laki-laki. Peran mereka adalah pemberdayaan perempuan, advokasi dan investigasi perempuan korban konflik. Selain itu, dilakukan pemberdayaan ekonomi, advokasi kebijakan, dan penanganan perempuan di pengungsian. Penelitian ini menggunakan teori Ethics of care dengan pendekatan kualitatif yang menggunakan metode wawancara mendalam dan analisis data sekunder.Narasumber penelitian sebanyak 15 organisasi yaitu Flower Aceh, KKTGA, YPW. MiSPI, RPuK, Daulat Remaja, Matahari, Balai Syura Inong Aceh, Data Lajuna. ORPAD, Srikandi Aceh, SpuRA, Lampuan Aceh, PIIA dan Perempuan Merdeka.Temuan lapangan menunjukkan bahwa peran mereka yang lebih dominan adalah menangani dampak konflik. Implikasinya adalah tercipta koalisi perempuan yang kuat di tingkat pusat dan akar rumput; pelibatan perempuan dalam kehidupan sosial dan politik mulai menjadi wacana, munculnya data perempuan sebagai korban konflik; lahirnya revisi kebijakan yang berperspektif perempuan, dan menawarkan alternatif lain dalam penyelesaian konflik Aceh, yaitu pendekatan kepedulian yang tidak melahirkan kekerasan.

---

The Role Of Acehnese Women Organizations in Armed-Conflict Resolution in AcehThis research investigates the roles of non-governmental Acehnese women's organizations in handling the impacts of armed-conflicts in Aceh. Employing qualitative approach, data are gathered through in-depth interviews and secondary sources and are analyzed against Ethics of Care. Fifteen (I5) women's organizations are selected as subjects: Flower Aceh, KKTGA, YPW, MiSPI, RPuK, Daulat Remaja, Matahari, Balai Syura inong Aceh, Dara Lajuna, ORPAD, Srikandi Aceh, Spurs, Lampuan Aceh, PHIA, and Perempuan Merdeka.

The roles taken by these women's organizations among others are empowering women especially in terms of economics, investigating and advocating women victims of conflicts, taking parts in public policy making process, and tackling women's problems in refugee's (IDPs) camps. Study concludes that they are more intensely involved in addressing the various impacts of the armed-conflicts. This leads to a stronger coalition between women's organizations both in upper and grass root levels; emerging discourse on women's participation in social and political arena; availability of data of women as victims; more women's perspective policy-makings, and most important, the possibility of using Care approach instead of repressive and violent one to resolve the existing conflicts."

"Ketentuan-ketentuan mengenai perlindungan benda budaya pada masa konflik bersenjata dapat ditemukan dalam Convention IV respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land, Convention IV relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War dan kedua protokol tambahannya, serta Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict dan kedua protokolnya. Ketiga perangkat instrumen hukum humaniter internasional di atas memuat kewajiban negara untuk menghormati benda budaya pada masa konflik bersenjata. Beberapa prinsip dasar di dalamnya diakui sebagai hukum kebiasaan internasional. Penerapan dari ketentuanketentuan hukum internasional terkait benda budaya dapat dilihat dengan menelaah praktik International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Dua kasusnya, yakni Prosecutor v. Miodrag Jokic dan Prosecutor v. Pavle Strugar, menunjukkan pelaksanaan proses peradilan terhadap pelaku dalam penghancuran Kota Tua Dubrovnik.

---

The rules on the protection of cultural property during armed conflicts can be found in Convention IV respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land, Convention IV relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War and its two additional protocols, as well as Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict and its two protocols. These three sets of international treaties govern a state?s obligations concerning respect towards cultural property in times of armed conflict. Several provisions contained therein are acknowledged as customary international law. The implementation of the rules in international humanitarian law concerning cultural property can be seen by inspecting the practice of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Its two cases, namely Prosecutor v. Miodrag Jokic and Prosecutor v. Pavle Strugar, illustrates the judicial process involved in convicting perpetrators responsible for the destruction of the Old City of Dubrovnik."

"[The book examines commonalities and differences in the operation of various structures of power (gender, class, race/ethnicity, generation) and their interactions within the institutional domains of intra-national and especially inter-national migration that produce context-specific forms of social injustice. Additional contributions have been included so as to cover issues of legal liminality and how the social construction of not only femininity but also masculinity affects all migrants and all women. The resulting set of 19 detailed, interconnected case studies makes a valuable contribution to reorienting our perceptions and values in the discussions and decision-making concerning migration, and to raising awareness of key issues in migrants’ rights. , The book examines commonalities and differences in the operation of various structures of power (gender, class, race/ethnicity, generation) and their interactions within the institutional domains of intra-national and especially inter-national migration that produce context-specific forms of social injustice. Additional contributions have been included so as to cover issues of legal liminality and how the social construction of not only femininity but also masculinity affects all migrants and all women. The resulting set of 19 detailed, interconnected case studies makes a valuable contribution to reorienting our perceptions and values in the discussions and decision-making concerning migration, and to raising awareness of key issues in migrants’ rights. ]"

"Aplikasi drone di dalam konflik bersenjata merupakan hasil dari perkembangan teknologi militer modern, sekaligus perwujudan dari keinginan untuk menghindari korban jiwa kombatan maupun penduduk sipil. Secara fungsinya, drone tampil sebagai platform pengintaian dan platform serang. Legalitas dari penggunaan drone di medan pertempuran tersebut dapat ditelaah menggunakan Teori Perang Adil dan prinsip-prinsip dalam hukum humaniter internasional, baik dari keputusan untuk menggunakan drone sebagai alat militer maupun dari unsur-unsur yang ada pada diri drone. Aspek hukum drone juga dibahas dari sudut pandang praktik negara Amerika Serikat sebagai pihak utama yang mengembangkan teknologi drone militer dan mengoperasikan drone di dalam konflik bersenjata modern. Salah satu aplikasi drone di medan pertempuran dilakukan dalam bentuk operasi targeted killing, dimana drone secara aktif dioperasikan untuk memburu dan membunuh individu tertentu di medan pertempuran. Setidaknya sejak tahun 2002 Amerika Serikat, baik melalui angkatan bersenjata maupun lembaga intelijen CIA, telah mempraktikkan targeted killing dalam operasi kontraterorisme dalam kerangka "Perang Melawan Teror" di berbagai wilayah negara asing di Timur Tengah terhadap sejumlah aktor bukan negara seperti al-Qaeda, Taliban, dan ISIS. Israel juga diketahui telah mempraktikkan targeted killing dalam konteks kontraterorisme di wilayah Palestina terhadap teroris Hamas, utamanya di wilayah Jalur Gaza. Kedua negara menghadapi sejumlah persoalan hukum dalam menangani penggunaan drone dalam operasi targeted killing, baik hukum internasional maupun hukum domestik masing-masing.

---

The application of drones in armed conflict are the result of the advancement of modern military technology, as well as manifestation of the need to avoid casualties of both combatants as well as civilians on the battlefield. Function-wise, drones are used as intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance platform and as a more offensive-oriented, weapon platform. The lawfulness of drones on the battlefield can be studied through Just War Theory and the principles of international humanitarian law. State practice also play a role in deciding their lawfulness, for American practice in developing military drone technology and applying them in the battlefield. One of their application involved targeted killing, in which particular individuals were to be hunted down and killed. At least since 2002, American armed forces as well as the Central Intelligence Agency engaged in targeted killing operation against non-state actors in various states in the Middle East, i.e. al-Qaeda, Taliban, and ISIS. Meanwhile, Israeli forces are also known to use targeted killing as counterterrorism method against Hamas and other Palestinian terrorists in Palestinian territory. Both states faced legal issues regarding the decision to employ drone in targeted killing operation, both in international law as well as their respective domestic law."