Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Latar belakang: Identifikasi dan deteksi dini gangguan komunikasi pada bayi dan anak membutuhkan alat uji penapisan sahih, andal, mudah diaplikasikan oleh orangtua/ pengasuh. Instrumen CSBS DP ITC adalah alat skrining yang sahih dan andal mendeteksi gangguan komunikasi anak, namun belum diterjemahkan dan diuji kesahihan dan keandalan dalam bahasa Indonesia.Tujuan: Mengetahui kesahihan dan keandalan CSBS DP ITC bahasa Indonesia sebagai alat uji penapisan gangguan komunikasi anak 6-24 bulan.Metode: Penelitian potong lintang di Poliklinik TKPS/ RS Cipto Mangukusumo Jakarta (Februari-Mei 2019) dua tahapan. Tahapan pertama kesahihan interna 2 periode yaitu pertama, adaptasi transkultural kuesioner CSBS DP ITC bahasa asli ke bahasa Indonesia dan kedua, pengujian kuesioner CSBS DP ITC versi bahasa Indonesia kepada 35 orangtua/ pengasuh. Uji kesahihan dianalisis menggunakan Spearman Correlation, uji keandalan dianalisis menggunakan Alpha Cronbach s coefficient. Tahapan kedua kesahihan eksterna, uji diagnostik CSBS DP ITC dibandingkan BSID III skala bahasa sebagai baku emas kepada 147 orangtua/ pengasuh dan 147 anak.Hasil: Kesahihan interna CSBS DP ITC bahasa Indonesia umumnya baik dengan nilai r > 0,3. Keandalan CSBS DP ITC bahasa Indonesia baik dengan Alpha Cronbach s (0,876-0,896). Kesahihan eksterna CSBS DP ITC bahasa Indonesia mendapatkan sensitifitas 71,43% dan spesifisitas 81,48%.Simpulan: Kuesioner CSBS DP ITC bahasa Indonesia terbukti sahih dan andal sebagai alat uji penapisan gangguan komunikasi anak usia 6-24 bulan

---

Background: Early identification and detection of communication disorders in children require valid and reliable screening tool that easily to apply. The CSBS DP ITC is a valid and reliable screening tool to detect communication disorder in children, but it has not translated and tested for validity and reliability in Indonesian language.

Objective To find out validity and reliability of CSBS DP ITC Indonesian version as a screening tool for communication disorders in children aged 6-24 months.

Methods: Cross-sectional study was carried out in clinic of Growth Development- Social Pediatric / Cipto Mangukusumo Hospital Jakarta (February - May 2019) in two stages. First stage was internal validity consisting 2 periods, transcultural adaptation from original language to Indonesian and second stage was final Indonesian CSBS DP ITC questionnaire was tested to 35 parents / caregivers. Validity analyzed using Spearman Correlation. Reliability analyzed using Alpha Cronbach s coefficient. Second stage was external validity by compared CSBS DP ITC with BSID III language scale as gold standard to 147 parents / caregivers and 147 children.

Results: Internal validity showed good validity with r > 0.3. Reliability showed good with Alpha Cronbach (0.876-0,896). External validity has 71.43% sensitivity and 81.48% specificity.

Conclusion: Indonesian CSBS DP ITC questionnaire valid and reliable as screening test for communication disorders in children aged 6-24 months."

"Obyektif: Untuk menilai kualitas hidup pada pasien dengan penyakit kronis, WHO mengembangkan instrumen penilaian kualitas hidup yaitu WHOQOL-100 yang terdiri dari 100 butir pertanyaan dalam 6 domain dan 24 facet. Untuk kepentingan kepraktisan dikembangkan pula versi singkatnya yaitu WHOQOL-BREF yang terdiri dari 26 pertanyaan dalam 4 domain. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui apakah WHOQOL-100 dan WHOQOL-BREF stabil dan terpercaya dalam menilai kualitas hidup pada pasien yang berobat jalan di RSCM.Metode: Responden adalah pasien yang didiagnosis menderita penyakit kronis dan sedang berobat jalan di poli rawat jalan RSCM dan petugas kesehatan (perawat, pegawai dan residers) yang bertugas di RSCM. Validasi dilakukan dengan menguji Discriminant Validity dengan r test, sensitivitas, spesifisitas dan akurasi menggunakan Analisis Diskriminan, dan Analisis Faktor menggunakan Principal Componen Analysis. Untuk mengetahui reliabilitas dilakukan uji Cronbach 's alpha untuk memperkirakan internal consistency dan Test-Retest menggunakan Pearson 's r correlation.Hasil: Hasil uji sentivitas, spesifitas menunjukkan hasil yang cukup valid sedangkan pada Analisis Faktor terdapat 15 pertanyaan yang berkorelasi lemah pada WHOQOL-100 dan pada WHOQOL-BREF 9 pertanyaan. Uji Cronbach's alpha menghasilkan internal consistency seperti yang diharapkan. yaitu antara 0,6138-0,7808 untuk WHOQOLBREF dan 0,6320-0,8190 untuk WHOQOL-100 Test-Retest menunjukkan tidak ada perbedaan yang bermakna antara test dan retest. Sedangkan pada t-test menunjukkan perbedaan yang bermakna antara pasien dan orang sehat, kecuali pada domain spiritual.Kesimpulan: WHOQOL-100 dan WHOQOL-BREF valid dan terpercaya namun ada beberapa pertanyaan yang perlu diperbaiki, terutama pads tats bahasa agar mudah dipahami.

---

Objective: To assess quality of life in chronically ill patients, WHO developed an instrument which is called WHOQOL-100 contain 100 items of questions in 6 domain and 24 facets. For practical purpose an abbreviated 26 item and 4 domain instrument, the WHOQOL-BREF has been developed. The aim of this research is to analyze the reliability and validity of the WHOQOL-100 and WHOQOL-BREF in assessing the quality of life of patients Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital.Methods: Respondents consist of the chronically ill ambulatory patients who came to Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital and hospital personnel (paramedics, administrative and the residents) who are on duty in RSCM. Data analyses were carried out using SPSS 11.0. To analyze the validity, the Discriminant validity determined via t-test. For sensitivity, specificity and accuracy determined via Discriminant Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the items was carried out using Principal Component Analysis. To analyze the reliability we uses Cronbach's alpha to estimate the internal consistency, and for test-retest we use Pearson's r correlation.Result: The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy show good validity, even though there are 15 questions which have low correlation in WHOQOL-100 and 9 questions in WHOQOL-BREF. Cronbach's alpha show good internal consistency in the range 0.6138-0.7808 for the WHOQOL-BREF and 0.6320-0.8190 for the WHOQOL-100. For test-retest there is no significant difference between test and retest. And for t test there is significant difference between patients and health persons, except for spiritual domain.Discussion; WHOQOL-100 and WHOQOL-BREF are valid and reliable, even though there are several questions that have to be' reviewed' especially in connotation to make the questions more comprehensible for Indonesians."

"In a language testing,validity play a very important role validity is to see how the result of the test contribute in making decisions in relation with the goals determined in advance...."

"This book covers about thirty years of Csikszentmihalyi's work on three main and interconnected areas of study: attention, flow and positive psychology. Describing attention as psychic energy and in the footsteps of William James, Csikszentmihalyi explores the allocation of attention, the when and where and the amount of attention humans pay to tasks and the role of attention in creating 'experiences', or ordered patterns of information. "

"Background: the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and dialysis patients is increasing every year in Indonesia. The impact of CKD and dialysis on patient quality of life (QOL) has been recognized as an important outcome measure in the management of CKD. The Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL-36) has been validated and is widely used as a measure of QOL for CKD and dialysis patients in many countries, but not in Indonesia. The aim of this study is to determine the reliabity and validity of the Indonesian version of KDQOL-36 on hemodialysis patients in Indonesia. Methods: the KDQOL-36 was translated into Indonesian language by a certified translator and then it was back-translated into English. The translated questionnaire was further reviewed by an expert panel. The final questionnaire was administered to hemodialysis patients in Hemodialysis Unit at Hasan Sadikin General Hospital. Validity was measured using Pearson's correlation between the kidney disease-targeted scores, generic dimensions (SF-12) scores and each scale score in KDQOL-36. The internal consistensy was assessed using Cronbach's Alpha and reliability was examined using test-retest. Results: out of 103 patients, we found that most subjects were male (52.4%) with median age of 51 (22-75) years. The duration of hemodialysis was 3.4 (SD 2.1) years. The validity test showed a significant correlation (p<0.001) on kidney disease-targeted total score, SF-12 and each score of the scale within it. All of the KDQOL-36 scales showed good test-retest reliability. Internal consistency reliability values were acceptable, with Cronbach's Alpha >0,7 for all scales. Conclusion: the Indonesian version of the KDQOL-36 questionnaire is valid and reliable for evaluating QOL in reguler hemodialysis patients."

"Skripsi ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui keabsahan pendirian perusahaan Perseroan Terbatas yang didirikan oleh Negara dengan menggunakan perjanjian pinjam nama (nominee agreement) pada tahun 1988. Perjanjian pinjam nama (nominee agreement) yang dilakukan di Indonesia cenderung digunakan sebagai sarana untuk melakukan penyelundupan hukum. Meskipun demikian, tidak seluruh perjanjian pinjam nama (nominee agreement) dilakukan untuk penyelundupan hukum. Penelitian ini bersifat kepustakaan dengan metode penelitian normatif, di mana penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan kasus. Adapun berdasarkan uraian latar belakang, rumusan masalah, dan tujuan penelitian, dan hasil analisis penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa Pendirian PT Aldevco pada tahun 1988 mengacu kepada Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Dagang, Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1967 tentang Penanaman Modal yang di dalamnya tidak melarang perjanjian pinjam nama (nominee agreement). Ketentuan-ketentuan dalam perjanjian pinjam nama (nominee agreement) pada pendirian PT Aldevco telah memenuhi syarat sah perjanjian pada Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata yang berkaitan dengan Hukum Perjanjian.

---

The purpose of this thesis aims to determine the legitimacy of the establishment of a Limited Liability Company established by the State through a nominee agreement in 1988. Nominee agreements made in Indonesia tend to be used as a means of smuggling laws. Nevertheless, not all nominee agreements are made for law smuggling. This research is literary with normative research methods. Which this research uses a statutory approach and a case approach. Based on the background, the formulation of the problem, the research objectives, and the results of the analysis of this research, it can be concluded that the establishment of PT Aldevco in 1988 refers to the Commercial Code and Law Number 1 of 1967 concerning Investment, which does not prohibited nominee agreements. The provisions in the name of nominee agreement on the exception of PT Aldevco have fulfilled the legal terms of the agreement in Article 1320 of the Civil Code relating to Agreement Law."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perjanjian tukar menukar benda tidak bergerak berupa tanah berdasarkan Hukum Perjanjian, ketentuan Hukum Tanah Nasional serta peraturan perundang-undangan lainnya yang terkait. Pokok permasalahan dalam penulisan skripsi ini adalah mengenai keabsahan perjanjian tukar menukar benda tidak bergerak berupa tanah dalam Putusan No. 200/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Sby. Penulisan artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan tipe penelitian yang bersifat deskriptif analitis. Dari hasil penelitian dapat diketahui bahwa tukar menukar tanah dinyatakan sah secara hukum jika telah memenuhi syarat sahnya suatu perjanjian tukar menukar tanah dan memenuhi syarat sahnya suatu perbuatan hukum pemindahan hak atas tanah. Penulis tidak setuju dengan pertimbangan Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya yang menyatakan bahwa perjanjian tukar menukar tanah yang dilakukan para pihak adalah sah secara hukum. Menurut Penulis tukar menukar hak atas tanah yang dilakukan para pihak tidak sah karena tukar menukar tersebut dilakukan oleh pihak yang tidak memiliki kewenangan untuk melakukan perbuatan hukum pemindahan hak atas tanah.

---

This thesis aims to analyze the agreement for the exchange of immovable property in the form of land based on the Agreement Law, the provisions of the Indonesian Land Law and other related laws and regulations. The main subject in writing this thesis is the validity of the agreement to exchange immovable property in the form of land in the court verdict No. 200/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Sby. The writing of this thesis uses a normative juridical research method with a descriptive analytical type of research. Based on the research, it can be observed that land exchange is legally valid if it has met the legal requirements of a land swap agreement and has met the legal requirements of a legal act of transferring land rights. The author disagrees with the deliberation of the Panel of Judges at the Surabaya District Court which states that the land exchange agreement made by the parties is legally valid. The author deduces that the exchange of land rights performed by the parties is  not valid because the exchange was conducted by a party who did not have the authority to carry out legal acts of transferring land rights."

"[ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan skala baru dalam mengukur perilaku obsesif-kompulsif.Survei diberikan kepada 194 mahasiswa program sarjana S1 dari University of Queensland. Setelah semua datatelah terkumpul dan diselesaikan, skala baru yang telah dikembangkan dari perilaku obsesif-kompulsif pun diujireliabilitas, Item Discrimination Index, dan validitas dalam skala hubungannya dengan variabel lain yakni locusof control, status hubungan romantis, dan daftar Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (OCI-R) baru yang telahdirevisi. Skala obsesif-kompulsif baru yang telah dikembangkan ternyata memiliki reliabilitas yang tinggi diantara butir-butir lainnya. Item Discrimination Index menunjukkan bahwa tiap butir skala bisa dibedakan denganbaik, dengan hanya membutuhkan tiga butir untuk diubah penulisan katanya (M = 32.40, SD = 8.17). Ditemukanhubungan antara butir skala obsesif-kompulsif dengan locus of control (r(189) = .18, p = .013) dan variabel OCIRyang bertugas untuk memvalidasi (r(189) = .37, p < .001), tetapi tidak ditemukan hubungan antara obsesifkompulsifdengan status hubungan romatis (r(189) = .08, ns.). Skala butir yang baru dikembangkan padapenelitian ini terbukti dapat berlaku untuk setting non-klinis serta memerlukan penelitian lebih lanjut untukmemvalidasi penggunaannya dengan variabel lain yang ada.ABSTRACT The present study looked to develop a new scale in measuring obsessive-compulsive behaviour.

Surveys were administered to 194 undergraduate university students of The University of Queensland to

complete. After all the data have been gathered, the newly developed scale of OCB was tested on its reliability,

Item Discrimination Index, and validity in conjunction with other variables of locus of control, relationship

status, and OCI-R. The newly developed OCB scale proved to have high reliability among its items and good

discriminating index with only three items that need rewording (M = 32.40, SD = 8.17). Items demonstrated

relationship with locus of control (r(189) = .18, p = .013) and OCI-R validating variables (r(189) = .37, p <

.001), but none was found with relationship status (r(189) = .08, ns.). This newly developed scale proved to be

applicable to non-clinical setting and need further researches to validate its use with other existing variables., The present study looked to develop a new scale in measuring obsessive-compulsive behaviour.

Surveys were administered to 194 undergraduate university students of The University of Queensland to

complete. After all the data have been gathered, the newly developed scale of OCB was tested on its reliability,

Item Discrimination Index, and validity in conjunction with other variables of locus of control, relationship

status, and OCI-R. The newly developed OCB scale proved to have high reliability among its items and good

discriminating index with only three items that need rewording (M = 32.40, SD = 8.17). Items demonstrated

relationship with locus of control (r(189) = .18, p = .013) and OCI-R validating variables (r(189) = .37, p <

.001), but none was found with relationship status (r(189) = .08, ns.). This newly developed scale proved to be

applicable to non-clinical setting and need further researches to validate its use with other existing variables.]"