Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
[The history of Italian colonial affairs has recently attracted renewed interest from historians and economists. It is a complex and involved question. Over the last few years, though perhaps slightly later than the more mature historiography of other European countries, the work of some important scholars has opened up new fields of investigation and research. Recent studies have tried to analyse in greater depth the working mechanisms of the colonial system, broadening the field of investigation also to the perspective of African countries and the political-economic equilibriums of the second half of the 20th century. This study fits into this area of research and analyses crucial aspects of the decolonisation of Somalia, the history of the presence of Italian banking in Somaliland, relations between Italian and Somali institutions, Italian political-monetary policies during the reconstruction and the first economic boom. , The history of Italian colonial affairs has recently attracted renewed interest from historians and economists. It is a complex and involved question. Over the last few years, though perhaps slightly later than the more mature historiography of other European countries, the work of some important scholars has opened up new fields of investigation and research. Recent studies have tried to analyse in greater depth the working mechanisms of the colonial system, broadening the field of investigation also to the perspective of African countries and the political-economic equilibriums of the second half of the 20th century. This study fits into this area of research and analyses crucial aspects of the decolonisation of Somalia, the history of the presence of Italian banking in Somaliland, relations between Italian and Somali institutions, Italian political-monetary policies during the reconstruction and the first economic boom. ]

Abstrak :
Strukturalisme merupakan salah satu perspektif dalam kajian ekonomi politik internasional yang memiliki kontribusi serta pengaruh yang masif dalam wacana pembangunan dan hubungan internasional. Sayangnya, hingga kini pembahasan dari perspektif strukturalisme masih bersifat sporadis dan terpisah-pisah, upaya akademisi untuk memberikan sintesis terhadapnya sudah ada namun tidak menyeluruh. Melalui tinjauan pustaka ini, penulis berupaya untuk mengisi kekosongan ini dengan mengkaji, menganalisis, dan mensintesiskan 64 literatur-literatur strukturalisme dalam ekonomi politik internasional. Lebih lanjut tulisan-tulisan tersebut penulis klasifikasikan ke dalam tiga bahasan tematik yaitu: (1) pemahaman terhadap strukturalisme yang membahas soal definisi, argumen utama, serta sejarah keilmuan strukturalisme; (2) pembahasan terhadap teori-teori strukturalisme yaitu Teori Sistem Dunia dan Teori Dependensi; serta (3) strukturalisme dan topik pembahasan kajian ekonomi politik internasional yaitu isu rantai komoditas global, perdagangan internasional, bantuan luar negeri serta investasi asing langsung. Tinjauan pustaka ini menganalisis kesepakatan, debat, dan kesenjangan literatur dan berhasil menemukan beberapa sintesis kunci, yaitu: (1) strukturalisme merupakan salah satu paradigma dalam studi ekonomi politik internasional; (2) seiring waktu terdapat diversifikasi topik riset strukturalisme; (3) tulisan didominasi oleh akademisi Amerika Serikat, Eropa, dan Amerika Latin sementara fokus pembahasan didominasi oleh kajian terhadap Amerika Latin; (4) masih terdapat senjang dalam literatur strukturalisme khususnya literatur-literatur yang: berorientasi kebijakan, memperhitungkan struktur nonmateril, menggunakan perspektif pascakolonialisme, dan memberikan inovasi kajian. ......Structuralism is one of the international political economy perspectives that has a massive contribution and influence in the discourse of development and international relations. Unfortunately, until now the available academic discussion about structuralism is still sporadic and fragmented, several efforts has been made to provide a synthesis of it yet it’s comprehensive nor holistic. Through this literature review, the author attempts to fill this academic gap by reviewing, analyzing, and synthesizing 64 structuralism literatures in international political economy. Furthermore, the authors classify these writings into three thematic topics, namely: (1) understanding of structuralism which discusses the definition, main arguments, and scientific history of structuralism; (2) discussion of structuralism theories, namely World System Theory and Dependency Theory; and (3) structuralism and international political economy issues, which discusses the issue of global commodity chains, international trade, foreign aid and foreign direct investment. This literature review and analyzes the agreement, debate, and gaps in the literature and finds several key syntheses, namely: (1) structuralism is one of the paradigms in the study of international relations; (2) over time there has been a diversification of structuralism research topics; (3) structuralist writings are dominated by academics from the United States, Europe, and Latin America while the focus of the discussion is dominated by studies on Latin America; (4) there are still gaps in the structuralism literature, especially the literature that: more policy-oriented, takes into account non-material structures, uses a post-colonial perspective, and provides research innovations.