Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Rapid Transit System merupakan angkutan umum jenis baru yang memiliki waktu terjadwal dan lajur khusus sehingga memiliki waktu lebih efisien dibandingkan angkutan umum jenis lainnya. Ini juga berarti bahwa waktu perjalanan lebih cepat daripada yang lain. Saat ini, sebagian besar komuter dari Bekasi menggunakan transportasi pribadi, karena kepraktisan dan waktu tempuh yang lebih cepat dibandingkan dengan transportasi umum konvensional. Maka untuk melihat pengaruh waktu tempuh sistem rapid transit, waktu tempuh BRT dan LRT dibandingkan berdasarkan rute yang dipilih dari Summarecon Bekasi (Bekasi) ke Kawasan Dukuh Atas (Jakarta) dan rute yang sama untuk perjalanan yang dimulai dari Jakarta. Data tersebut kemudian dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan formulir survei dan alat pendukung. Setelah dilakukan pendataan maka dapat dihitung waktu tempuhnya sehingga diperoleh waktu tempuh BRT 71,49% lebih lama untuk rute Bekasi-Jakarta dan 56,27% lebih lama untuk rute Jakarta-Bekasi. Untuk kecepatan, Bekasi ke Jakarta lebih lambat 56,52%. Sedangkan untuk waktu tempuh LRT 32,25% lebih lama untuk rute Bekasi ke Jakarta dan 11,62% lebih lama untuk rute Bekasi ke Jakarta, kedua aspek tersebut dibandingkan dengan transportasi pribadi. Berdasarkan hipotesis statistik menggunakan analisis varians (ANOVA ), waktu tempuh sistem rapid transit tidak semuanya sama dengan nilai F perbandingan untuk BRT adalah 45,56 > 3,46 dan nilai F perbandingan untuk LRT adalah 58,807 > 5,32. Oleh karena itu, hipotesis alternatif terbukti, pengguna transportasi pribadi mana yang mungkin tidak mendukung penggunaan sistem angkutan cepat. ......Rapid Transit System is a new type of public transportation where it has a scheduled time and a dedicated lane for it, making it more time efficient than other types of public transportation. This also means that the travel time is faster than others. Currently, most commuters from Bekasi are using private transportation, due to practicality and faster travel time compared to conventional public transportation. Hence to see the travel time impact by the rapid transit system, the travel time of BRT and LRT are compared based on the chosen route from Summarecon Bekasi (Bekasi) to Dukuh Atas Area (Jakarta) and the same route for the trip that started from Jakarta. The data than being collected using a survey form and supporting tools. After the data collection, the travel time can be calculated, resulting the BRT travel time is 71,49% longer for Bekasi to Jakarta route and 56,27% longer for Jakarta to Bekasi route. For the speed, it is 56,52% slower for Bekasi to Jakarta. Meanwhile, for the LRT travel time is 32,25% longer for Bekasi to Jakarta route and 11,62% longer for Bekasi to Jakarta route, both aspects is being compared with private transportation.Based on the statistical hypothesis using analysis of variance (ANOVA), the rapid transit system travel time are not all equal with the F value comparison for BRT is 45,56 > 3,46 and F value commparison for LRT is 58,807 > 5,32. Hence, the alternative hypothesis is proven, which private transportation user might not in favor of using the rapid transit system.

Abstrak :
Service quality is a key performance indicator of a system, there being many elements that constitute service quality in a transport system. The customer’s point of view is at the center of policy, planning and delivery decisions. As an education city, Jogjakarta’s customers comes from all over Indonesia, and as an international tourism destination, Jogjakarta welcomes people from all over the world. As a business city, customers in Palembang have a different character to those in Jogjakarta. The aim of this research is to identify the main aspects of transit system service quality within tourism-education city and a business city.

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini membahas mengenai pengelolaan Trans Pakuan sebagai Bus Rapid Transit yang dikelola oleh Perusahaan Daerah Jasa Transportasi sebagai upaya pengembangan Sistem Angkutan Umum Massal (SAUM) di Kota Bogor sesuai dengan Peraturan Walikota Bogor Nomor 17 Tahun 2012 tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem Angkutan Umum Massal (SAUM) di Kota Bogor. Teori yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah konsep mengenai pengelolaan moda transportasi publik. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan post-positivist melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi, dan studi pustaka. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengelolaan Trans Pakuan belum berjalan dengan baik dilihat dari beberapa aspek yang seluruhnya belum terpenuhi.

---

The aim of this study is to describe the management of Trans Pakuan as a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system that is operated by the Regional Company of Transportation (PDJT) as an effort to develop Mass Transit System in the city of Bogor in accordance with the bill issued by the Mayor of Bogor Number 17 Year 2012 to regulate the Implementation of Mass Transit System in the City of Bogor. The theory used in this study is the concept of public transport management. This study used a post-positivist approach through in-depth interviews, observation, and literature review. The result of this study shows that the management of Trans Pakuan as lacking, this is based on the various aspects that were not met adequately.

Abstrak :
These conference proceedings include a collection of articles presented at the RailExchange conference in October 2017 at Newcastle University, UK. They will be useful for researchers in developing countries looking for opportunities of knowledge exchange. The RailExchange project aimed to develop sustainable railway education in Thailand, via international partnerships and industry collaborations based around stakeholders' expertise and experiences. It involved staff exchange (academics and researchers) between Mahidol and Newcastle University for joint research and curriculum development and also organizing railway conferences and workshops in both Thailand and the UK. The papers published here focus on rail-related issues and present a perspective of a widely understood 'exchange' in academia and industry environments. 'Exchange' is perceived as rail knowledge exchange between partners, rail staff exchange between academia and/or industry, research exchange between teams, student-lecturer knowledge exchange, academia-industry collaboration, etc. In addition, more general rail-related papers are also included.