Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[Discourse of renewal adalah strategi komunikasi krisis yang didasari empat cara-cara komunikasi, yaknileader-base, provisional, prospective dan optimistic. Dalam pendekatan identitas sosial yang dipergunakan pada penelitian ini, cara komunikasi leader-base mengarah pada pembentukan kesamaan identitas (common identity) yang menghasilkan kesamaan nilai-nilai (common value). Cara komunikasi provisional mengarah pada cara komunikasi yang spontanitas sesuai dengan etika dan norma yang menjadi kesepakatan bersama (ethics and norms). Dan cara komunikasi prospective mengarah pada satu kesamaan tujuan (common vision). Sedangkan cara komunikasi optimistic mengarah pada perilaku positif (good behaviours). Keempat cara tersebut dapat memberikan suatu perubahan baru dalam nilai-nilai (renewed belief in core values) individu maupun organisasi. Berdasarkan penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan fenomenologi terhadap upaya-upaya komunikasi krisis komunitas JIS Dragon, maka hasil analisa yang diperoleh pada penelitian ini mengatakan bahwa komunikasi krisis discourse ofrenewal pada komunitas JIS Dragon terdapat kesamaan nilai (leader base) yakni humanity dan justice, yang dilakukan atas inisiatif spontan yang disesuaikan dengan etika dan norma (provisional), untuk membentuk dukungan bersama terhadap kasus yang menimpa anggotanya (prospective) dengan perilaku yang positif (optimistic).;Discourse of renewal is crisis communication strategy that have four different ways of communication which are leader-base, provisional, prospective and optimistic. In the social identity approach used in this research, the way of communication leader-base means merging some identities into a common identity that can lead into a common value. Provisional means expressing spontaneous communicatin that based on the ethics and norms. And prospectivemeans reaching common vision. While optimistic means doing with positive behaviors. These ways can renewed belief in the core values, both individual and organization. This phenomenological qualitative research have analysed the crisis communication discourse renewal of JIS Dragon community. The result obtain some points that JIS Dragon crisis communication has common values; humanity and justice (leader-base), which is carried on spontaneous initiatives that are basedonto the ethics and norms (provisional), to give support for justice (prospective) with a positive behaviours (optimistic)., Discourse of renewal is crisis communication strategy that have four differentways of communication which are leader-base, provisional, prospective andoptimistic. In the social identity approach used in this research, the way ofcommunication leader-base means merging some identities into a commonidentity that can lead into a common value. Provisional means expressingspontaneous communicatin that based on the ethics and norms. And prospectivemeans reaching common vision. While optimistic means doing with positivebehaviors. These ways can renewed belief in the core values, both individual andorganization. This phenomenological qualitative research have analysed the crisiscommunication discourse renewal of JIS Dragon community. The result obtainsome points that JIS Dragon crisis communication has common values; humanityand justice (leader-base), which is carried on spontaneous initiatives that are basedonto the ethics and norms (provisional), to give support for justice (prospective)with a positive behaviours (optimistic).]"

"Penelitian sebelumnya menunjukkan bahwa dalam situasi tertentu pemimpin yang melakukan transgresi tetap didukung oleh pengikut dan proses tersebut dipengaruhi oleh prototipikalitas. Namun, penelitian sebelumnya masih membandingkan antara pemimpin transgresif, bukan antara pemimpin transgresif dan normatif, serta belum mengeksplorasi pengaruh perbedaan individu pengikut. Berdasarkan teori kepemimpinan identitas dan ketidakpastian diri, penelitian ini membandingkan pengesahan pemimpin transgresif vs. normatif yang dimoderasi prototipikalitas pemimpin. Penelitian ini juga menguji pengaruh ketidakpastian diri terhadap prototipikalitas dalam interaksi tiga arah. Eksperimen daring (N = 190), mengukur ketidakpastian diri partisipan dan menggunakan vignette dengan kondisi 2 (transgresif dan normatif) x 2 (prototipikal dan nonprototipikal), dilakukan untuk menguji hipotesis. Analisis regresi majemuk menunjukkan bahwa pemimpin transgresif mendapatkan pengesahan yang lebih rendah dibandingkan pemimpin normatif. Perbedaan tersebut lebih kecil ketika pemimpin prototipikal dan pengikut memiliki ketidakpastian diri tinggi. Namun, pengaruh moderasi prototipikalitas dan interaksi tiga arah dengan ketidakpastian diri tidak signifikan. Analisis eksploratori menunjukkan terdapat perbedaan antara pemimpin prototipikal dan nonprototipikal yang dimoderasi oleh transgresi pemimpin dan ketidakpastian diri pengikut. Beberapa saran perbaikan penelitian didiskusikan meliputi desain studi, teknik manipulasi, dan metode analisis. Secara keseluruhan, penelitian ini berhasil mengobservasi beberapa temuan yang sejalan dengan penelitian terdahulu.

---

Previous studies have shown that in some situations leaders who transgress are still supported by their followers and leader prototypicality contributes to this process. However, previous studies primarily compared evaluations between transgressive leaders and not between normative and transgressive leaders; investigation on the influence of follower’s individual differences is also limited. Based on identity leadership theory and uncertainty identity theory, this study compared endorsement for transgressive vs. normative leader, moderated by prototypicality. This study also tested the role of followers’ self-uncertainty on prototypicality in a three way interaction. Online experiment (N = 190), measuring self-uncertainty and utilizing vignette with 2 (transgressive and normative) x 2 (prototypical and nonprototypical) between subject conditions, is conducted to test the hypotheses. Analysis using multiple regression showed transgressive leader received lower endorsement compared to normative leader. Aforementioned difference was attenuated when the leader was prototypical and follower’s self-uncertainty was high. However, those moderational effects were not significant. Exploratory analysis revealed differences in endorsement received based on leader prototypicality, which were moderated by leader transgression and follower self-uncertainty. Some suggestions for improving the study are discussed including suggestions on study design, manipulation, and analytical technique. Overall, this study observed several findings in line with previous study. "