Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Latar belakang: Perkembangan terkini dalam pelayanan pasien luka bakar telah menurunkan angka mortalitas serta lamanya perawatan pasien di rumah sakit. Oleh karenanya, angka kesintasan pasien bukan lagi tolok ukur hasil akhir yang memadai, akan tetapi penilaian kualitas hidup telah menjadi aspek yang lebih utama. Burn Specific Health Scale Brief (BSHS-B) merupakan instrumen yang banyak digunakan dan divalidasi di banyak pusat pelayanan luka bakar dalam rangka evaluasi kualitas hidup. Penelitian ini bertujuan untu dapat menghasilkan sebuah instrumen yang telah terstandarisasi sebagai metode untu evaluasi kualitas hidup paskapelayanan luka bakar di Indonesia. Metode: Penelitian ini dilakukan dalam dua tahap: tahap penerjemahan dan tahap validasi. BSHS-B akan diterjemahkan dari bahasa Inggris ke dalam bahasa Indonesia, sesuai dengan standar yang berlaku. Setelah didapatkan terjemahan yang telah disepakati, terjemahan ini akan digunakan pada uji coba validasi linguistik serta evaluasi validitas dan reliabilitas. Tahap validasi ini melibatkan 30 pasien luka bakar yang berbahasa Indonesia, yang mengisi Form BSHS-B versi bahasa Indonesia dan Short Form-36 (SF-36) versi bahasa Indonesia. Entri data dan analisis statistik dilakukan menggunakan program Statistical Package for Social Sciences versi 25.0 untuk Windows. Hasil: Hasil Cronbach s alpha untuk versi Bahasa Indonesia BSHS-B adalah 0.852. Dengan didapatkan korelasi signifikan (Spearman s rho: 0,325 - 0,782) dalam analisis validasi criterion antara BSHS-B dengan SF-36 menunjukkan hasil yang sesuai dengan arah diharapkan yaitu korelasi positif. Domain fungsi berhubungan secara signifikan dengan aspek vitalitas dari SF-36, sedangkan Domain aspek kulit memiliki korelasi kuat dengan aspek kesehatan umum, kesehatan mental serta vitalitas. Domain afek dan hubungan memiliki korelasi sangat bermakna dengan aspek kesehatan umum, kesehatan mental dan aspek vitalitas, dan yang terakhir aspek pekerjaan berkorelasi siginifikan dengan aspek fungsi fisik, nyeri badan, kesehatan umum, vitalitas dan fungsi sosial dari SF-36. Kesimpulan: Terjemahan bahasa Indonesia dari BSHS-B telah menunjukkan konsistensi internal dan validitas criterion yang memuaskan, yang sangat mendukung serta dianjurkan untuk diaplikasikan dalam praktik klinis secara rutin serta dalam penelitian internasional.

---

ABSTRACT
Background: Recent advancement in care of burned patients, many aspects have improved over the years. Decreased mortality and decreased length of hospital stay, have been truly outstanding and amazing. Therefore, survival is no longer a sufficient outcome measure, but quality of life (QOL) measurements are of prime importance. The Burn Specific Health Scale Brief (BSHS-B) is the most commonly used instrument used to evaluate burn survivors quality of life (QOL). This study aims to provide a standardized instrument for an evaluation method of after-burn care quality of life in Indonesia. Methods: The study was conducted in two steps: translation and validation. The Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) translated from the English version into Bahasa Indonesia, carried out according to accepted standards. The first step of the process requires two forward translations of the English version of the questionnaire into Bahasa Indonesia by two certified translator and the scond step was to translate the reconciled Bahasa Indonesia version back into English. Once the translation has been reviewed, the preliminary translation will undergo linguistic validation, a pilot-testing. In order to test the validity and reliability of the Bahasa Indonesia version of the BSHS-B, 30 burn survivors Bahasa Indonesia speakers completed the BSHS-B and SF-36. Data entry and statistical analysis will be performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 25.0. Results: The overall Cronbach s alpha value for the Bahasa Indonesia scale was 0.852. Significant correlations (Spearman s rho: 0,325 - 0,782) between the Bahasa Indonesia BSHS-B and the criterion measure, the SF-36, were in the expected direction. The function domain was significantly associated with the vitality aspects of SF-36, while the skin involvement domains correlated with the general health, mental health, and vitality. The affect and relationship domains significantly correlated with the general health, mental health, and vitality aspects, and lastly work domain correlates significantly with physical function, body pain, general health, vitality, and social function aspects of SF-36. Conclusion: The Bahasa Indonesia translation of BSHS-B has shown satisfactory internal consistency and criterion validity, supporting its application in routine clinical practice as well as in international studies.

Abstrak :
Keterbatasan pada alat ukur impulsivitas yang telah ada menyebabkan adanya kebutuhan untuk suatu alat ukur impulsivitas yang lebih memadai. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan suatu skala impulsivitas baru dengan cara mengevaluasi dan menguji skala baru tersebut. Skala baru terdiri dari 12 butir pernyataan dengan 7 skala pilihan jawaban untuk masing-masing butir. 217 mahasiswa sebagai partisipan diminta untuk mengisi kuesioner menggunakan skala impulsivitas baru. Barrat impulsive scale-11 (BIS-11) dan International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) Extraversion juga digunakan untuk menguji validitas skala baru tersebut. Dari uji reliabilitas menggunakan Cronbach Alpha, ditemukan bahwa skala baru memiliki reliabilitas yang tergolong baik. Indeks diskriminasi butir untuk skala baru juga ditemukan baik. Selain itu, konvergen validitas ditemukan yang disimpulkan berdasarkan korelasi positif yang signifikan antara skala baru dan BIS-11, juga IPIP extraversion dan skala baru. Mann-Whitney U tes menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang siknifikan antara laki-laki dan perempuan dalam tingkat impulsivitas. Dengan demikian disimpulkan bahwa alat ukur ini valid dan reliable untuk mengukur impulsivitas. ......Limitations on existing impulsivity measures lead to the need for a more adequate impulsivity measure. Thus, this study aims to develop a new impulsivity scale by evaluating and validating the new scale. The new scale consists of 12 items with 7 scale option for each item. 217 students as participants were asked to fill out questionnaire of new impulsivity scale. Barrat impulsive scale (BIS-11) and International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) extraversion were used to validate this new scale. From reliability test by using Cronbach Alpha, it was found that new scale has reliability that consider as good. Index discrimination item for new scale was found good. Besides, convergent validity was established that concluded based on significant positive correlation between new scale and BIS-11, also between IPIP extraversion and new scale. Mann-Whitney U test showed there was a significant difference between male and female on level of impulsivity. Thus, it is concluded that this new measures is a valid and reliable to measure impulsivity. Limitations on existing impulsivity measures lead to the need for a more adequate impulsivity measure. Thus, this study aims to develop a new impulsivity scale by evaluating and validating the new scale. The new scale consists of 12 items with 7 scale option for each item. 217 students as participants were asked to fill out questionnaire of new impulsivity scale. Barrat impulsive scale (BIS-11) and International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) extraversion were used to validate this new scale. From reliability test by using Cronbach Alpha, it was found that new scale has reliability that consider as good. Index discrimination item for new scale was found good. Besides, convergent validity was established that concluded based on significant positive correlation between new scale and BIS-11, also between IPIP extraversion and new scale. Mann-Whitney U test showed there was a significant difference between male and female on level of impulsivity. Thus, it is concluded that this new measures is a valid and reliable to measure impulsivity.

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Latar Belakang: EORTC menekankan pentingnya menilai kualitas hidup pasien kanker. Saat ini, di Indonesia, belum ada kuesioner yang reliabel dan valid untuk menilai kualitas hidup pasien kanker payudara secara akurat. Tujuan: membuktikan bahwa EORTC-QLQ-BR23 merupakan kuesioner yang reliabel dan valid digunakan di Indonesia Metode: Penelitian dimulai dengan menerjemahkan EORTC-QLQ-BR23 ke dalam bahasa Indonesia dan kemudian diujicobakan pada 10 responden. Setelah itu, EORTC QLQ-BR23 hasil terjemahan digunakan pada penelitian utama. Test-retest dinilai dengan Intraclass Correlation Coeficient (ICC). Konsistensi internal dinilai dengan cronbach alpha. Construct validity dinilai dengan multi-trait scaling analysis. Validitas kriteria dinilai dengan melihat korelasi antara domain EORTC-QLQ-C30 dan EORTC-QLQ-BR23 dengan SF36. Hasil: Telah dilakukan pengambilan data terhadap 100 pasien kanker payudara dari September ? Oktober 2015. Nilai ICC (interval 1 jam) pada semua domain sangat baik (ICC > 0,8). Nilai cronbach alpha > 0,7 pada hampir semua domain. Multi-trait scaling analysis menunjukkan korelasi cukup tinggi antara skor pertanyaan dengan skor domainnya sendiri. Uji validitas kriteria, didapatkan 19 korelasi dengan r > 0,3 antara domain EORTC-QLQ-C30 dan EORTC-QLQ-BR23 dengan SF36. Simpulan: EORTC-QLQ-BR23 merupakan kuesioner yang reliabel dan valid digunakan di Indonesia.ABSTRACT
Background: EORTC emphasize the importance of assessing quality of life in cancer patients. In Indonesia, there has been no reliable and valid questionnaire to assess quality of life of breast cancer patients accurately. Objective: To prove that EORTC-QLQ-BR23 is reliable and valid questionnaire used in Indonesia. Methods: Study began with the EORTC-QLQ-BR23 translated into Indonesian and then tested on 10 respondents. Indonesian version of EORTC-QLQ-BR23 is used in main study. Test-retest was assessed with intraclass correlation coeficient (ICC). Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach alpha. Construct validity was assessed by multi-trait scaling analysis. Criteria validity assessed by looking at correlation between EORTC-QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-BR23 with SF36. Results: Data collection were done on 100 breast cancer patients from September to October 2015. ICC value (1 hour interval) in all domains of EORTC-QLQ-BR23 is very good (ICC> 0.8). Cronbach alpha values >0.7 in almost all EORTC-QLQ-BR23 domains. Multi-trait scaling analysis showed a high correlation between scores of questions with a score of his own domain. Criteria validity test, obtained 19 correlation with r>0,3 between domains EORTC-QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-BR23 with SF36. Conclusion: EORTC-QLQ-BR23 is a reliable and valid questionnaire used in Indonesia.;Background: EORTC emphasize the importance of assessing quality of life in cancer patients. In Indonesia, there has been no reliable and valid questionnaire to assess quality of life of breast cancer patients accurately. Objective: To prove that EORTC-QLQ-BR23 is reliable and valid questionnaire used in Indonesia. Methods: Study began with the EORTC-QLQ-BR23 translated into Indonesian and then tested on 10 respondents. Indonesian version of EORTC-QLQ-BR23 is used in main study. Test-retest was assessed with intraclass correlation coeficient (ICC). Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach alpha. Construct validity was assessed by multi-trait scaling analysis. Criteria validity assessed by looking at correlation between EORTC-QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-BR23 with SF36. Results: Data collection were done on 100 breast cancer patients from September to October 2015. ICC value (1 hour interval) in all domains of EORTC-QLQ-BR23 is very good (ICC> 0.8). Cronbach alpha values >0.7 in almost all EORTC-QLQ-BR23 domains. Multi-trait scaling analysis showed a high correlation between scores of questions with a score of his own domain. Criteria validity test, obtained 19 correlation with r>0,3 between domains EORTC-QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-BR23 with SF36. Conclusion: EORTC-QLQ-BR23 is a reliable and valid questionnaire used in Indonesia.

Abstrak :
Background: Dyspepsia is an important health problem from economic and quality of life point of view. However; to date, there has not been specific instrument of quality of life to evaluate patients with dyspepsia specially design in Indonesian language. The Nepean Dyspepsia Index (NDI) is a reliable and valid instrument regarding quality of life in patients with dyspepsia and had been validated in Australia, Germany, ltaly and Netherlands. Objective: To report translation of NDI in Indonesian language and validation in Indonesian patients with dyspepsia and also evaluate the possibility of its use in subjects who speak Indonesian language. Methods: NDI was translated into Indonesian language. The amount of 49 subjects with a clinical diagnosis of dyspepsia according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited. Collection of data included demographic data, physical and laboratory examination. All subjects were asked to complete translation of NDI. Reliability analysis was evaluated by a-Cronbach's and test-retest. Since dyspepsia has no gold standard, validity was evaluated rising factor analysis. Result: Reliability of the questionnaire was good, a-Cronbach's and interclass correlation coefficient were found to be > 0.70 respectively and Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value was found to be > 0.64, suggesting that all items were appropriate to measure. Conclusion: translated NDI in Indonesian language can be used in dyspepsia, patients who understand Indonesian language.

Abstrak :
Latar Belakang: Penilaian kepatuhan minum obat adalah hal yang penting dalam tatalaksana pengobatan pasien psikosis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendapatkan instrumen untuk menilai kepatuhan minum obat pasien psikosis, yaitu MARS versi Bahasa Indonesia dan melakukan uji validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen tersebut. Metode: Penelitian potong lintang, diagnosis psikosis ditegakkan dengan SCID (Structured Clinical Interview and Diagnosis DSM IV di Unit Rawat Jalan Psikiatri Rumah Sakit Cipto Mangunkusumo pada Januari hingga Juli 2017 (N= 100, usia 18 hingga 59 tahun) dengan sampling konsekutif dan sampling sistematik untuk tes ulang (N=35), melakukan penerjemahan yang disesuaikan dengan budaya Indonesia, perjemahan balik, uji validitas isi dan reliabilitas instrumen MARS versi Bahasa Indonesia. Hasil: Uji validitas isi memperoleh koefisien 0,90 yang menunjukkan bahwa seluruh butir pertanyaan dalam instrumen sesuai dengan teori. Uji validitas konstruksi membuktikan bahwa butir-butir pertanyaan dalam instrumen mewakili konstruksi teoritis dan konseptual. Uji reliabilitas dengan penghitungan koefisien Cronbach's Alpha memperoleh hasil 0,80 dan test-retest 0.798 yang menunjukkan konsistensi internal instrumen adalah baik. Penelitian ini menghasilkan instrumen MARS versi Bahasa Indonesia yang sahih dan andal dalam menilai kepatuhan minum obat pasien psikosis. Diskusi: Belum ada instrumen pembanding kepatuhan minum obat pada pasien psikosis di Indonesia. ......Background: -Assessment of medication adherence is an important part of pharmacological treatment of psychotic disorders. This study aims to obtain an instrument to assess medication adherence in psychotic patients, MARS -- -Bahasa Indonesia version, - and to evaluate the validity and reliability of the instrument. - Methods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted in the Psychiatric Clinic of Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital from January to July 2017. Subjects were recruited through consecutive sampling (N = 100, aged 18-59 years old). Psychotic disorders were diagnosed using SCID (Structured Clinical Interview and Diagnosis DSM-IV). The instrument was translated, adapted to Indonesian culture, and back-translated. Content validity and test- retest reliability (N = 35 using systematic sampling) of MARS -- -Bahasa Indonesia version- were evaluated. Results-: All items in the instrument are relevant to theory, as evidenced by content validity coefficient of 0,90. Construct validity test showed that the items represent theoretical as well as conceptual construction of medication adherence. Internal consistency reliability -was good, with Cronbach’s alpha of 0,80 and 0,798 in the test--retest evaluation. This study produced a valid and reliable MARS -- -Bahasa Indonesia Version. - Discussion-: Currently there is no other instrument assessing medication adherence in psychotic patients in Indonesia.

Abstrak :
Pendahuluan: Kualitas hidup pasien dengan kanker kolorektal di Indonesia saat ini dievaluasi oleh kuesioner yang tidak seragam. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire ColoRectal 29 EORTC QLQ-CR29 , adalah sebuah kuesioner yang terstandarisasi untuk menilai kualitas hidup yang umum digunakan pada negara maju. Penelitian ini untuk membuktikan bahwa EORTC QLQ-CR29 adalah kuesioner yang valid dan reliabel untuk digunakan di Indonesia. Metode: Kuesiober EORTC QLQ-CR29 diterjemahkan kedalam bahasa Indonesia, dan diterjemahkan kembali ke bahasa Inggris. Dilakukan sebuah studi pilot terlebih dahulu, kemudian studi utama ke pasien kanker kolorektal pada poliklinik Bedah Digestif di RS dr.Cipto Mangunkusumo. Desain studi cross-sectional, digunakan intraclass correlation coeficient ICC untuk menilai test-retest reability. Konsistensi internal dievaluasi menggunakan Cronbach rsquo;s ? coefficient. Validitas konvergen dan diskriminan dianalisa dengan multi-trait scaling. Validitas klinis dievaluasi berdasarkan perbedaan klinis yang telah diketahui sebelumnya menggunakan known-group comparisons. Hasil: Sebanyak limapuluhdua pasien yang berpertisipasi pada penelitian ini. Proses penterjemahan membutuhkan sedikit perubahan akibat adanya perbedaan budaya. Uji test-retest dilakukan pada 17 subjek, yang menunjukan nilai yang dapat diterima 0.67-1.00 . Nilai Cronbach rsquo;s ? coefficient 0,77-0,86, nilai ini melebihi kriteria 0,7. Pada multi-trait scaling analysis menunjukan skala multi-item memenuhi standar validitas konvergen dan diskriminan. Pada uji known group comparison menunjukan kualitas hidup yang berbeda berdasarkan lokasi tumor. Kesimpulan: dibutuhkan adaptsi budaya dalam proses penterjemahan. Kuesioner EORTC QLQ-CR29 yang telah diterjemakan merupakan kuesioner yang valid dan reliabel untuk menilai kualitas hidup pasien kanker kolorektal di Indonesia. ......Background: Currently in Indonesia the quality of life QoL of colorectal cancer patients is evaluated by many questionnaire. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire ColoRectal 29 EORTC QLQ CR29 , as a standardized objective method to assess QoL of colorectal cancer patients has been widely used in developed country. This research is to prove that EORCT QLQ CR29 is a reliable and valid questionnaire to be used in Indonesia. Methods: The EORTC QLQ C29 was translated forward and backward into Indonesian language. A pilot study was firstly done then proceed with the main study towards colorectal patients in Digestive Surgery Clinic in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital. This is a cross sectional study, intraclass correlation coeficient ICC was used to assess the test retest reability. The Internal consistency reability was estimated using Cronbach rsquo s coefficient. Convergent and discriminant validity was analyzed with multi trait scaling. Clinical validity was assesed in terms of clinical difference using known group comparisons. Result: Fifty two patients participated in this study. The translation proses require some adjusment due to cultural adaptation. Test retest was administered to 17 patient, showed acceptable reproducibility 0,67 1,00. The Cronbach rsquo s coefficient 0,77 0,86 exceeded the 0,7 criterion and multi trait scaling analysis showed that multi item scales met standards of convergent and discriminant validity. The known group comparisons showed QoL differences between groups of patients based on tumor location. Conclusion: Some cultural adaptation is needed in the translation process. The translated EORTC QLQ CR29 is a reliable and valid questionnaire for assessing quality of life of colorectal cancer patients in Indonesia.

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Tujuan: mendapatkan kuesioner Minnesota Living with Heart Failure MLHFQ versi bahasa Indonesia yang sahih dan handal untuk digunakan di Indonesia. Metode: studi ini merupakan studi potong lintang dengan 85 subyek rerata usia 58 11, pria 55 pasien gagal jantung kronik di poli kardiologi Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Nasional Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Jakarta. Kesahihan diuji dengan menilai kesahihan konstuksi multitrait multimethod analysis dan kesahian eksternal dengan membandingkan dengan kuesioner SF-36. Keandalan dinilai dengan menggunakan cronbach ?, dan intraclass coefficient correlation ICC . Hasil: MLHFQ bahasa Indonesia memiliki korelasi sedang-kuat antara domain dan item pertanyaan r 0,571-0,748, ABSTRACT
Aim to obtain a valid and reliable Indonesian version of MLHFQ for Indonesian application. Methods This cross sectional study enroled 85 patients mean age 58 11, male 55 with chronic heart failure of of cardiology clinic Ciptomangunkusumo Central Hospital Jakarta. Validity of MLHFQ was evaluated by measuring construct validity using multitrait multimethod analysis and by compairing MLHFQ with SF 36. Reliability of MLHFQ was evaluated by calculating Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ICC and by calculating cronbach to determine internal consistency Results Indonesian version of MLHFQ has moderated strong correlation item to domain correlation r 0,571 0,748, p

Abstrak :
In this book, one of the most highly recognized entrepreneurship scholars shares in a personal and readable way his rich experience and ideas on how entrepreneurship can be researched. Entrepreneurship is a phenomenon of tremendous societal importance. It is also an elusive phenomenon, which makes researching it fun, fascinating—and frustrating at times. In this fully updated edition, numerous real examples accompany the treatment of problems and solutions concerning design, sampling, operationalization and analysis.  Researching Entrepreneurship is targeted primarily at research students and academics who are relatively new to research or to entrepreneurship research. This said, basic knowledge of research methods is assumed, and when foundational issues are discussed they are typically approach from a non-standard angle and/or with an eye to illuminate entrepreneurship-specific problems and solutions. This makes large parts of the contents potentially valuable for entrepreneurship scholars at any level of research proficiency. The book is also of interest to sophisticated, non-academic users with a professional interest in collecting and analyzing data from emerging and young ventures, and to those who make use of published entrepreneurship research. For example, analysts in marketing research or consultancy firms, business associations, statistical agencies and other government offices may find this book to be a valuable tool. Moreover, while the examples are derived from entrepreneurship research, the book provides a unique "experienced empirical researcher" (rather than "textbook method expert") treatment of issues that are of equal relevance across the social sciences. This goes for topics like the role of theory; research design; validity assessment; statistical inference, and replication. Entrepreneurship research has developed rapidly in the decade that has passed since the first edition. Therefore, all chapters have been comprehensively updated and many have been extended; sometimes to twice the original length. Two of the original chapters have been excluded to make room for entirely new chapters on “the Dependent Variable” and “The Entrepreneurship Nexus.” While retaining a unique, personal tone, the author uses examples and references that build on contributions from a large number of top entrepreneurship researchers.

Abstrak :
Background: Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) is the most commonly used questionnaire and it has a good EMPRO (Evaluating the Measurement of Patient-Reported Outcomes) score. The MLHFQ has been adapted and used by various countries worldwide. However, to be utilized in Indonesia, it needs validity and reliability studies. This study aimed to obtain a valid and reliable Indonesian version of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) so that it can be used in Indonesia. Methods: the present study was a cross sectional study with 85 subjects (mean age 58 (SD 11) years; 55% subjects were male) who had chronic heart failure and was treated at the outpatient clinic of cardiology in Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta. Validity of the MLHFQ was assessed by evaluating the construct validity using multitrait-multimethod analysis and external validity was evaluated by compairing the MLHFQ with the SF-36 questionnaire. Reliability was assessed using Cronbachs and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: the Indonesian version of the MLHFQ had moderate-to-strong correlation between domains and items in questionnaire (r: 0.571-0.748; p<0.01) and it had moderate negative correlation with SF-36 questionnaire (r -0.595; p<0.001). The Cronbach α of Indonesian version of MLHFQ was 0.887; while the ICCs was 0.918. Conclusion: the Indonesian version of MLHFQ has good validity and reliability to asses the quality of life of patients with chronic heart failure in Indonesia.

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Latar belakang: Perkembangan terkini dalam pelayanan pasien luka bakar telah menurunkan angka mortalitas serta lamanya perawatan pasien di rumah sakit. Oleh karenanya, angka kesintasan pasien bukan lagi tolok ukur hasil akhir yang memadai, akan tetapi penilaian kualitas hidup telah menjadi aspek yang lebih utama. Burn Specific Health Scale Brief (BSHS-B) merupakan instrumen yang banyak digunakan dan divalidasi di banyak pusat pelayanan luka bakar dalam rangka evaluasi kualitas hidup. Penelitian ini bertujuan untu dapat menghasilkan sebuah instrumen yang telah terstandarisasi sebagai metode untu evaluasi kualitas hidup paskapelayanan luka bakar di Indonesia.

Metode: Penelitian ini dilakukan dalam dua tahap: tahap penerjemahan dan tahap validasi. BSHS-B akan diterjemahkan dari bahasa Inggris ke dalam bahasa Indonesia, sesuai dengan standar yang berlaku. Setelah didapatkan terjemahan yang telah disepakati, terjemahan ini akan digunakan pada uji coba validasi linguistik serta evaluasi validitas dan reliabilitas. Tahap validasi ini melibatkan 30 pasien luka bakar yang berbahasa Indonesia, yang mengisi Form BSHS-B versi bahasa Indonesia dan Short Form-36 (SF-36) versi bahasa Indonesia. Entri data dan analisis statistik dilakukan menggunakan program Statistical Package for Social Sciences versi 25.0 untuk Windows.

Hasil: Hasil Cronbach's alpha untuk versi Bahasa Indonesia BSHS-B adalah 0.852. Dengan didapatkan korelasi signifikan (Spearman's rho: 0,325-0,782) dalam analisis validasi criterion antara BSHS-B dengan SF-36 menunjukkan hasil yang sesuai dengan arah diharapkan yaitu korelasi positif. Domain fungsi berhubungan secara signifikan dengan aspek vitalitas dari SF-36, sedangkan Domain aspek kulit memiliki korelasi kuat dengan aspek kesehatan umum, kesehatan mental serta vitalitas. Domain afek dan hubungan memiliki korelasi sangat bermakna dengan aspek kesehatan umum, kesehatan mental dan aspek vitalitas, dan yang terakhir aspek pekerjaan berkorelasi siginifikan dengan aspek fungsi fisik, nyeri badan, kesehatan umum, vitalitas dan fungsi sosial dari SF-36.

Kesimpulan: Terjemahan bahasa Indonesia dari BSHS-B telah menunjukkan konsistensi internal dan validitas criterion yang memuaskan, yang sangat mendukung serta dianjurkan untuk diaplikasikan dalam praktik klinis secara rutin serta dalam penelitian internasional.

---

ABSTRACT
Background: Recent advancement in care of burned patients, many aspects have improved over the years. Decreased mortality and decreased length of hospital stay, have been truly outstanding and amazing. Therefore, survival is no longer a sufficient outcome measure, but quality of life (QOL) measurements are of prime importance. The Burn Specific Health Scale Brief (BSHS-B) is the most commonly used instrument used to evaluate burn survivors' quality of life (QOL). This study aims to provide a standardized instrument for an evaluation method of after-burn care quality of life in Indonesia.

Methods: The study was conducted in two steps: translation and validation. The Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) translated from the English version into Bahasa Indonesia, carried out according to accepted standards. The first step of the process requires two forward translations of the English version of the questionnaire into Bahasa Indonesia by two certified translator and the scond step was to translate the reconciled Bahasa Indonesia version back into English. Once the translation has been reviewed, the preliminary translation will undergo linguistic validation, a pilot-testing. In order to test the validity and reliability of the Bahasa Indonesia version of the BSHS-B, 30 burn survivors Bahasa Indonesia speakers completed the BSHS-B and SF-36. Data entry and statistical analysis will be performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 25.0.

Results: The overall Cronbach's alpha value for the Bahasa Indonesia scale was 0.852. Significant correlations (Spearman's rho: 0,325-0,782) between the Bahasa Indonesia BSHS-B and the criterion measure, the SF-36, were in the expected direction. The function domain was significantly associated with the vitality aspects of SF-36, while the skin involvement domains correlated with the general health, mental health, and vitality. The affect and relationship domains significantly correlated with the general health, mental health, and vitality aspects, and lastly work domain correlates significantly with physical function, body pain, general health, vitality, and social function aspects of SF-36.

Conclusion: The Bahasa Indonesia translation of BSHS-B has shown satisfactory internal consistency and criterion validity, supporting its application in routine clinical practice as well as in international studies.