Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Skripsi ini merupakan upaya penyingkapan permasalahan yang terjadi di dunia terkait penggunaan teknologi di era kontemporer sekaligus kritik terhadap penggunaan teknologi yang dilakukan. Kehidupan manusia tentunya tidak terlepas dari peredaran dan pengaruh teknologi. Teknologi di era kontemporer menunjukkan wujudnya yang lain dengan menjadi nature dalam kehidupan manusia. Nature tersebut bermanifestasi menjadi sebuah sistem sosial dimana manusia hidup dan berkembang. Proses kehidupan inilah yang menjadi persoalan ketika manusia tidak dapat lepas dari teknologi karena berada dalam jaringan yang tercipta. Faktor-faktor yang mendukung terjadinya keadaan ini adalah karakter dari teknologi, yakni, otomatisme, totalisasi, kesatuan, dan universalitas, dan karakter tersebut tidak disadari oleh manusia dengan menganggap teknologi hanya sekedar alat (korelasinisme), tidak memiliki being, sehingga menciptakan berbagai fenomena seperti, ekosistem digital, komputasi sosial yang berujung pada dinamika kemanusiaan. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, penulis berupaya menganalisis faktor substantif dari teknologi dan sudut pandang yang digunakan manusia dalam melihat teknologi. Melalui analisis tersebut, penulis bertujuan untuk menghindari degradasi rasionalitas pada manusia akibat pengaruh penggunaan teknologi dan sudut pandang yang digunakan. Bahwasanya, sebagai jawaban dari persoalan tersebut manusia perlu menggunakan sudut pandang baru dalam menggunakan teknologi, yakni sudut pandang Realisme Spekulatif. ......This thesis is an effort to disclosure issues raised in the world related to the use of technology in the contemporary era as well as criticism of its use. Human life must not be separated from the circulation and influence of technology. Technology in the contemporary era showed his form to another by being in the nature of human life. This Nature is manifest as a social system in which people live and thrive. Process of life that is the problem when people can not be separated from the technology because it is in the network are created. Factors that contribute to this situation is the character of technology, namely, automatism, totalization, unity, and universality, and these characters are not recognized by humans with regard technology just a tool (Correlationism), does not have being, thus creating a variety of phenomena such as , digital ecosystem, social computation in the dynamics that led to humanity. Based on this, the author attempts to analyze the factors of substantive technological and human point of view used in viewing technology. Through this analysis, the author aims to avoid degradation due to the influence of human rationality in the use of technology and use points of view. Behold, as the answer to the problems of human need to use a new perspective in the use of technology, namely Speculative Realism.;This thesis is an effort to disclosure issues raised in the world related to the use of technology in the contemporary era as well as criticism of its use. Human life must not be separated from the circulation and influence of technology. Technology in the contemporary era showed his form to another by being in the nature of human life. This Nature is manifest as a social system in which people live and thrive. Process of life that is the problem when people can not be separated from the technology because it is in the network are created. Factors that contribute to this situation is the character of technology, namely, automatism, totalization, unity, and universality, and these characters are not recognized by humans with regard technology just a tool (Correlationism), does not have being, thus creating a variety of phenomena such as , digital ecosystem, social computation in the dynamics that led to humanity. Based on this, the author attempts to analyze the factors of substantive technological and human point of view used in viewing technology. Through this analysis, the author aims to avoid degradation due to the influence of human rationality in the use of technology and use points of view. Behold, as the answer to the problems of human need to use a new perspective in the use of technology, namely Speculative Realism.

Abstrak :
Ontoteologi adalah musuh tradisional dari filsafat modern. Setiap filsafat muncul sebagai respon atasnya. Dalam disertasi ini, pemikiran Quentin Meillassoux yang adalah pelopor aliran realisme spekulatif menjadi obyek studi untuk direfleksikan kapasitasnya dalam menghalau metafisika ontoteologis. Ditunjukkan bahwa dalam seluruh prosedur pemikirannya mdash;postulasi problem, perumusan prinsip ontologis dan formulasi prosedur filsafat mdash;Meillassoux justru melakukan pengulangan ontoteologi ini dalam bentuknya yang disebut di sini sebagai ontoantropologi. Manusia anthropos , dalam filsafat Meillassoux, menjadi jangkar bagi ontologi itu sendiri. Dengan menggunakan psikoanalisis Jacques Lacan, disertasi ini memberikan kritik terhadap ontoantropologi Meillassoux. Pembahasan terbagi dalam tiga bagian besar. Pertama adalah pemaparan kondisi-kondisi institusional, sosial dan historis yang mana filsafat Meillassoux mengambil tempat. Bagian kedua merefleksikan postulasi ranah realitas obyektif, yang keberadaannya absolut dari pikiran manusia. Bagian ketiga mengevaluasi prinsip ontologis yang diformulasikan Meillassoux untuk memikirkan tentang realitas obyektif dan absolut ini. Selain refleksi kritis, penulis juga menawarkan sketsa kemungkinan solusi terhadap setiap manifestasi problem ontoantropologis Meillassoux. Akhirnya, disertasi ini berargumen bahwa problem ontoantropologis hanya bisa dipecahkan saat manusia-filsafat mengafirmasi kemungkinan bahwa kemanusiaannya berpotensi membatasi kapasitas filsafat dalam mengakses yang absolut, ketimbang mengabaikannya begitu saja sebagaimana yang dilakukan Meillassoux. ......Ontotheology is a traditional adversary of modern philosophy. Every brand new philosophy rises up as a response against it. In this dissertation, the thought of Quentin Meillassoux, a pioneer of recent new speculative realist, becomes the object of study to be reflected upon its capacity in overcoming ontotheological metaphysics. It is shown that in every of his thought procedure mdash postulation of problem, formulation of ontological principle, designation of philosophical procedure mdash Meillassoux is precisely repeating ontotheology in the guise of what to be called as ontoanthropology. Human anthropos , in Meillassoux philosophy, becomes the anchor for the ontology itself. By employing Jacques Lacan rsquo s psychoanaysis, this dissertation offers a critique of Meillassoux rsquo s ontoanthropology. The discussion is divided into three. The first describes institutional, social, and historical conditions under which Meillassoux rsquo s philosophy is taking place. The second part reflects on the postulation of the realm of objective reality, whose presence is absolute to human rsquo s mind. The third part evaluates the ontological principle formulated by Meillassoux to think about the objective and absolute reality. Besides a critical reflection, the author also offer a sketch of possibility of solution for every manifestation of Meillassoux rsquo s ontoanthropological problem. Finally, the dissertation argues that the problem of ontoanthropology can only be solved when the man of philosophy affirm the possibility that his humanity has the potential to limit philosophy rsquo s capacity in accessing the absolute, instead of just foreclosing it as Meillassoux does.