Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
[ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh pergantian kantor akuntan publik, ukuran kantor akuntan publik, dan penerapan good corporate governance (yang terdiri dari ukuran dewan komisaris, proporsi komisaris independen, jumlah rapat dewan komisaris, ukuran komite audit, kompetensi komite audit, dan jumlah rapat komite audit) terhadap audit report lag. Penelitian ini juga menggunakan empat buah variabel kontrol, yaitu: profitabilitas perusahaan, ukuran perusahaan, opini going concern, dan jenis industri. Pengujian hipotesis dilakukan dengan menggunakan uji regresi linier berganda terhadap 331 perusahaan yang tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia per 31 Desember 2013. Sampel penelitian diperoleh melalui metode purposive sampling. Penelitian ini memberikan bukti empiris bahwa ukuran dewan komisaris, jumlah rapat dewan komisaris, ukuran komite audit, jumlah rapat komite audit, profitabilitas perusahaan, dan jenis industri berpengaruh negatif terhadap audit report lag. Penelitian ini juga memberikan bukti empiris bahwa ukuran perusahaan dan opini going concern berpengaruh positif terhadap audit report lag. Namun demikian, penelitian ini tidak dapat memberikan bukti yang cukup untuk menjelaskan pengaruh dari pergantian kantor akuntan publik, ukuran kantor akuntan publik, proporsi komisaris independen, dan kompetensi komite audit terhadap audit report lag.

---

ABSTRACT
The objective of this research is to examine the effect of audit firm changes, audit firm size, and good corporate governance implementation (which consists of the board of commissioner size, independent board of commissioner proportion, number of board of commissioner meetings, audit committee size, audit committee?s competence, and number of audit committee meetings) on audit report lag. This research also uses four control variables: the profitability of the company, the size of the company, going concern opinion, and the type of industry. The hypotheses testing is done by using multiple linear regression of 331 listed companies in the Indonesia Stock Exchange of December 31, 2013. The samples are taken by using purposive sampling method. The research provides empirical evidence that board of commissioner size, number of board of commissioner meetings, audit committee size, number of audit committee meetings, the profitability of the company, and the type of industry have a negative effect on audit report lag. This research also provides empirical evidence that the size of the company, and going concern opinion have a positive effect on audit report lag. However, this research can not provide sufficient evidence to explain the effect of audit firm changes, audit firm size, independent board of commissioner proportion, and audit committee?s competence on audit report lag., The objective of this research is to examine the effect of audit firm changes, audit firm size, and good corporate governance implementation (which consists of the board of commissioner size, independent board of commissioner proportion, number of board of commissioner meetings, audit committee size, audit committee’s competence, and number of audit committee meetings) on audit report lag. This research also uses four control variables: the profitability of the company, the size of the company, going concern opinion, and the type of industry. The hypotheses testing is done by using multiple linear regression of 331 listed companies in the Indonesia Stock Exchange of December 31, 2013. The samples are taken by using purposive sampling method. The research provides empirical evidence that board of commissioner size, number of board of commissioner meetings, audit committee size, number of audit committee meetings, the profitability of the company, and the type of industry have a negative effect on audit report lag. This research also provides empirical evidence that the size of the company, and going concern opinion have a positive effect on audit report lag. However, this research can not provide sufficient evidence to explain the effect of audit firm changes, audit firm size, independent board of commissioner proportion, and audit committee’s competence on audit report lag.]

Abstrak :
Tujuan dari studi empiris ini adalah untuk menguji dan menganalisis struktur tata kelola perusahaan (proporsi komisaris independen, rapat dewan komisaris, struktur kepemilikan, dewan direksi dan rapat komite audit) dalam hubungannya dengan pengungkapan modal intelektual. Sampel dari penelitian empiris ini perusahaan non keuangan dan non pemerintah yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) di 2012-2015. Hasil dari studi empiris yaitu (1) proporsi komisaris independen memiliki dampak yang signifikan dan positif terhadap pengungkapan modal intelektual, (2) rapat dewan komisaris memiliki dampak yang signifikan dan negatif terhadap pengungkapan modal intelektual, (3) struktur kepemilikan tidak berpengaruh terhadap pengungkapan modal intelektual, (4) jumlah dewan direksi memiliki pengaruh signifikan dan negatif terhadap pengungkapan modal intelektual, (5) pertemuan komite audit berpengaruh signifikan dan positif terhadap pengungkapan modal intelektual.

---

The objective of this empirical study is to examine and to analyze the effect of corporate governance structure (independent commissioner, board of commissioner meetings, ownership structure, board of director, and audit committee meetings) on the relation of intellectual capital disclosure. The sample of this empirical study is the manufacturing company that listed in Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) in 2012-2015. The result of this empirical study are (1) independent commissioner had positive significant influence to intellectual capital disclosure, (2) board of commissioner meetings had negative significant influence to intellectual capital disclosure, (3) ownership structure had not significant influence to intellectual capital disclosure, (4) board of director had negative significant influence to intellectual capital disclosure, (5) audit committee meetings had positive significant influence to intellectual capital disclosure.