Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Saat kemunculannya ISIS menerima atensi besar dari global. Kini Raqqa dan Mosul sebagai pusat kekhilafahan maupun Baghouz sebagai wilayah terakhir pendudukan tidak sanggup dipertahankan. Jatuhnya ISIS tidak menyurutkan penyebaran propagandanya. ISIS masih menjadi ancaman serius, khususnya pendukung-pendukung pro-ISIS di Indonesia. Salah satunya adalah Aman Abdurrahman. Ia memiliki kemampuan untuk menyebarkan paham radikal dan menganjurkan murid-muridnya berbaiat pada ISIS. Konsekuensi baiat ini mengakibatkan beberapa pengikut Aman Abdurrahman melakukan upaya hijrah dan jihad. Pengaruh pemikiran Aman Abdurrahman akan dijelaskan melalui teori konstruksi sosial. Kemudian wawancara mendalam dengan mantan murid dan pendukung Aman Abdurrahman dilakukan guna melihat proses dialektis. Rangkaian aksi terorisme di Indonesia pada 2016- 2019 menunjukkan adanya pengaruh Aman Abdurrahman pada para pelaku. Oleh sebab itu, menganalisis sejauh mana pemikiran Aman Abdurrahman menginternalisasi, mengeksternalisasi, dan mengobjektifikasi para murid dan pendukungnya merupakan urgensi dalam penelitian ini. Terdapat beberapa temuan penting: 1) Aman Abdurrahman menginternalisasi sekaligus terinternalisasi; 2) adanya pergeseran pemahaman mengenai takfiri berantai pasca berbaiat pada ISIS; 3) terdapat empat faktor tolak ukur proyeksi jaringan proISIS di Indonesia yaitu: pemikiran dasar, komunikasi, jaringan, dan media. Selama masih ada faktor tersebut dalam konteks radikalisme, maka jaringan pro-ISIS di Indonesia masih akan terus bergerak.

---

ISIS became global attention at the beginning of its emergence. Now ISIS are no longer able to maintain Raqqa and Mosul as their center of the Chalipate or even Baghouz as its last enclave. The fall of ISIS have no effect on their propaganda agenda.ISIS is still a seriousthreat, especially the pro-ISIS in Indonesia. One of them is Aman Abdurrahman. He has the ability to spread the radicalism also encourage his students to pledge allegiance to ISIS. The consequences of this baiat has urged his followers to migrate and wage jihad. The influence of Aman Abdurrahman’s thinking will be explained through social construction theory. Then, indepth interviews with former students and Aman Abdurrahman supporters were conducted to see the dialectic process. Several terror attacks in Indonesia between 2016 and 2019 shows that Aman Abdurrahman’s influence on those perpetrators. Therefore the urgency of this studies is to understand the basis of Aman Abdurrahman’ thinkingand analyze how Aman Abdurrahman can internalizes, externalizes and objectifies his students and followers. There are several findings: 1) Aman Abdurrahman has internalize and was internalized; 2) the shifting on Aman Abdurrahman’s thinking of takfiri berantai after he pledged allegiance to ISIS; 3) there are four factors that become a benchmark projection of pro-ISIS network movements in Indonesia. These four factors include basic thinking, communication, networking, and media. As long as there are still these factors in the context of radicalism, the pro-ISIS network in Indonesia will continue to move.

"

"Penelitian ini menjelaskan mengapa ancaman transnasional terorisme tetap ada dan terus berkembang di kawasan meskipun mekanisme kerja sama kontraterorisme Indonesia-Filipina sudah dilakukan. Analisis dalam penelitian ini menggunakan teori kerja sama kontraterorisme oleh Wyn Rees (2006). Hasil penelitian ini menemukan bahwa terdapat perbedaan persepsi ancaman yang signifkan antara Indonesia dan Filipina yang berimplikasi terhadap perbedaan respon kontraterorisme dan eskalasi ancaman pro-ISIS yang berbeda di masing-masing negara. Indonesia menekankan pendekatan criminal justice model. Filipina menekankan pendekatan militeristik. Kedua, kerja sama internal institusi-institusi keamanan Indonesia dan Filipina cenderung bersifat formal daripada substansial. Hal ini dipengaruhi oleh kurangnya rasa saling percaya (trust and reliability), sensitivitas isu kedaulatan teritorial, dan kompetisi di antara institusi-institusi keamanan dalam negeri. Ketiga, kerja sama kontraterorisme AS dengan Indonesia dan Filipina menekankan pendekatan militeristik serta adanya perubahan prioritas keamanan AS yang berimplikasi kepada upaya kerja sama kontraterorisme di kawasan Asia Tenggara. Dengan demikian, upaya penanggulangan ancaman kelompok pro-ISIS di Asia Tenggara melalui kerja sama kontraterorisme Indonesia dan Filipina menjadi kurang optimal.

---

This research explains why the transnational threat of terrorism persists and continues to evolve in the region despite the existing counterterrorism cooperation mechanisms between Indonesia and the Philippines. This research uses a qualitative method. The analysis in this research applies Wyn Rees's (2006) theory of Counterterrorism Cooperation. The findings indicate significant differences in threat perception between Indonesia and the Philippines, leading to differing counterterrorism responses and varying level of escalations of pro-ISIS threats in each country. Indonesia emphasizes a criminal justice model approach, whereas the Philippines emphasizes a militaristic approach. Secondly, the internal cooperation of security institutions in Indonesia and the Philippines tends to be more formal than substantive. This is influenced by a lack of mutual trust and reliability, sensitivity to sovereignty issues, and competition among domestic security institutions. Thirdly, US counterterrorism cooperation with Indonesia and the Philippines emphasizes a militaristic approach and a change in US security priorities have implications for counterterrorism cooperation efforts in Southeast Asia. Consequently, efforts to counter the threat of pro-ISIS groups in Southeast Asia through Indonesia and the Philippines' counterterrorism cooperation become less optimal."