Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Laporan ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi proses rekapitulasi PPh (Pajak Penghasilan) Pasal 23 yang harus disetorkan oleh PT J selaku pemotong. Hasil rekapitulasi PPh 23 memudahkan PT J dalam melakukan perhitungan dan penyetoran PPh 23 dan pelaporan SPT Masa PPh 23. Berdasarkan hasil evaluasi, proses rekapitulasi PPh 23 yang dilakukan oleh PT J telah sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perpajakan yang berlaku. ......This report evaluates the recapitulation process of Article 23 Income Tax Payable, which should be settled by PT J as a collector. The result of recapitulation of Article 23 Income Tax Payable assist PT J in calculation and settle Article 23 Income Tax Payable and periodic tax return submission. Based on the result of evaluation, the recapitulation process performed by PT J has complied with the tax regulation.

Abstrak :
Laporan magang ini bertujuan mengevaluasi administrasi sewa dan jasa PPh 23 Perusahaan PQRinsurance. Administrasi sewa dan jasa ini seperti langkah-langkah prosedur pembuatan e-Bupot, pembayaran serta pelaporan. Dalam pembuatan e-Bupot PT PQRinsurance hanya memiliki satu NPWP, segala perpajakan pada bagian cabang diurus pada bagian kantor pusat. Pembayaran sewa dan jasa PPh 23 PT PQRinsurance dilakukan secara elektronik yaitu dengan membuat kode billing terlebih dahulu, setelah mendapatkan kode billing dapat dibayarkan melalui internet banking. Pembayaran dilakukan sebelum tanggal 10 pada awal bulan. Setelah pembayaran, akan mendapatkan BPN (Bukti Potong Negara) dan didalam BPN terdapat NTPN (Nomor Transaksi Penerimaan Negara) yang digunakan PT PQRinsurance untuk melapor pajak. Setelah melakukan pelaporan akan mendapatkan bukti potong, bukti potong tersebut dikirimkan ke perusahaan penyedia sewa dan jasa. Evaluasi dilakukan apakah sudah sesuai dengan mengacu kepada Undang-Undang dan peraturan-peraturan yang berlaku seperti Peraturan Menteri Keuangan dan Direktorat Jendral Pajak. Berdasarkan evaluasi kegiatan magang, evaluasi administrasi sewa dan jasa PPh 23 PT PQRinsurance telah sesuai dengan standar yang berlaku. ......This internship report aims to evaluate administration rent and service PPh 23 from PQRinsurance Company. The administration of these rent and services is like the steps for the procedure for making e-Bupot, payments, and reporting. In making e-Bupot PQRinsurance Company only has one NPWP, all taxes on the branch are handled at the head office. Payment for rent and service PPh 23 PQRinsurance Company uses electronic, by creating a billing code first, after getting the billing code, it can be paid via internet banking. Payment is made before the 10th at the beginning of the month. After payment, will get a BPN (Bukti Penerimaan Negara) and in the BPN there is an NTPN (Nomor Transaksi Penerimaan Negara) which is used by PQRinsurance Company to report taxes. After reporting. Will get proof of deduction, the proof of deduction is sent to the rent and service provider company. Evaluation is carried out whether it is in accourdance with the applicable laws and regulations such as the Regulation of the Minister of Finance and the Directorate General of Taxes. Based on the evaluation of intership activities, the evaluation administration rent and service PPh 23 for PQRinsurance Company has complied with applicable standards.

Abstrak :
Biaya komisi reasuransi merupakan biaya yang tidak terpisahkan dari bisnis reasuransi dengan komposisi biaya yang cukup besar, termasuk bisnis reasuransi yang dilakukan oleh PT RIU. Melalui mekanisme withholding tax dalam sistem pajak di Indonesia yang diatur dalam Pasal 23 UU PPh, DJP mengenakan PPh pasal 23 atas komisi reasuransi melalui proses pemeriksaan pajak, sehingga menimbulkan sengketa pajak antara DJP dan PT RIU. Penelitian ini merupakan studi kasus dengan metode kualitatif yang bertujuan untuk menganalisis aspek perpajakan atas biaya komisi reasuransi melalui sengketa pajak yang dihadapi PT RIU, dengan melihat substansi dari biaya komisi reasuransi melalui proses pencatatan dan penerapan perpajakan, kronologis sengketa pajak, manajemen pajak perusahaan dalam menghadapi sengketa, dan analisis pendapat para ahli, untuk memecahkan permasalahan yang dihadapi PT RIU dalam mementukan apakah komisi reasuransi merupakan objek PPh Pasal 23 atau bukan merupakan objek PPh Pasal 23. Penelitian ini juga bertujuan untuk mencari solusi agar sengketa pajak atas biaya komisi reasuransi tidak terjadi secara berulang di masa mendatang. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa komisi reasuransi bukan merupakan objek PPh Pasal 23 dengan melihat substansi dari transaksi, serta Putusan hasil sengketa yang dimenangkan oleh PT RIU untuk periode sengketa lima tahun berturut-turut yang memberikan kekuatan hukum tetap atas kasus komisi reasuransi. Hal ini mengindikasikan bahwa DJP harus lebih terbuka dalam memahami model bisnis dan proses bisnis perusahaan, dan petugas lapangan DJP agar lebih cermat dalam menerapkan suatu aturan perpajakan secara tepat. ......Reinsurance commission fees are costs that are inseparable from the reinsurance business with a fairly large cost composition, including the reinsurance business carried out by PT RIU. Through the withholding tax mechanism in the Indonesian tax system which is regulated in Income Tax Article 23, Directorat General Tax (DGT) Officer imposes Income Tax article 23 on reinsurance commissions through a tax audit process, giving rise to a tax dispute between DGT and PT RIU. This research is a case study with a qualitative method which aims to analyze the tax aspects of reinsurance commission fees through tax disputes faced by PT RIU, by looking at the substance of reinsurance commission fees through the process of recording and implementing taxation, chronology of tax disputes, company tax management in dealing with disputes , and analysis of expert opinions, to solve the problems faced by PT RIU in determining whether the reinsurance commission is an object of Income Tax Article 23 or not an object of Income Tax Article 23. This research also aims to find a solution so that tax disputes over reinsurance commission fees do not occur repeatedly in the future. The results of this research show that the reinsurance commission is not an object of Income Tax Article 23 by looking at the substance of the transaction, as well as the dispute result decision won by PT RIU for a consecutive five year dispute period which gives permanent legal force to the reinsurance commission case. This indicates that DGT must be more open in understanding the company's business model and business processes, and that DGT field officers must be more careful in implementing tax regulations appropriately.

Abstrak :
Pengenaan PPh Final bagi WP dengan omzet tidak melebihi 4,8 Miliar setahun Jasa Konsultan, Komputer, dan Penerbitan/Percetakan di Bogor berdampak pada pilihan-pilihan perlakuan terhadap PPh Pasal 23 yang tidak dapat dikreditkan, seperti mengurus legalisasi SKB, restitusi pajak, atau tidak melakukan keduanya. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis pilihan-pilihan tersebut ditinjau dari asas compliance cost. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data dan survey. Hasil penelitian ini adalah 17 responden yang mengurus legalisasi SKB menanggung compliance cost yang lebih kecil, tidak ada responden yang melakukan restitusi karena menghindari pemeriksaan pajak, dan 20 responden tidak melakukan keduanya menanggung compliance cost yang lebih besar.

---

The imposition of final income tax for Taxpayer with Omzet not Exceed 4,8 Billion which are Consulting, Computer, and Publishing/Printing Services in Bogor impacted with several treatment options like manage Tax-free Certificate, tax refunds or not both. The purpose of this research focused to analyze the options in terms Compliance Cost Principle. This research was using a quantitative method with survey. The results of this research are 17 respondents using Tax-free certificate bear smaller compliance cost, no respondents using tax refunds because they avoid tax audit, and 20 respondents did neither bear larger compliance cost.

Abstrak :
Starting on April 2007, The Directorate General of Taxes has imposed Income Tax Article 23 of advertisement installing services at printed media by withholding tax system. Since the 2006 tax revenue did not reach its target, this policy is established as one of way to fulfill tax revenue in 2007 and years after it. The industry itself is in the financial unstable condition. This research begins with the fact that income from advertisement installing service is categorized as business income, which net income is difficult to determine before end of tax year because there are no exact amount of both revenues and expenses yet. It causes the difficulty in determining the accurate tax rate of Article 23 that is collected by withholding tax system. The inaccurate tax rate of Article 23 itself may affect the company?s cash flow. The research has two purposes: (1) to find out the policy?s backgrounds in imposing Income Tax Article 23 on advertisement installing services at printed media by withholding tax system; and (2) to explain the problems occur during the accomplishment of the impositions of Income Tax Article 23 on advertisement installing services at printed media. In order to accomplish the purposes mentioned above, this research done by qualitative approach using depth interview as qualitative data collection technique. This research can be also classified into descriptive, pure, and cross-sectional research. The results show that the reasons in imposing Income Tax Article 23 on advertisement installing services at printed media are: (1) to input advertisement installing services at printed media to taxation system in order to save its tax potential; (2) to explore a potential tax revenue from advertisement installing services transactions at printed media; (3) to help increasing the government?s revenue during the year. This research also proves that this Article 23 imposition causes several problems: (1) lack of proper socialization from tax officer causing less awareness of tax withholder in withholding printed media?s taxes; (2) dispute between user and advertisement agents in determining the party that obliged to withhold the Article 23 taxes of printed media as a result of bias procedure; (3) decreased daily budget of printed media; (4) increased administrative burden for both user, printed media, and tax officer.

Abstrak :
Laporan Magang ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi proses pelaporan PPh Pasal 15 dan PPh Pasal 23. Proses yang dievaluasi adalah proses pengenalan objek pajak, penghitungan beban pajak, pembuatan Surat Keterangan Pemotongan Pajak, dan Pemantauan Jumlah PPh. Evaluasi dilakukan berdasarkan peraturan perundang- undangan yang mendasarkan kewajiban pelaporan PPh Pasal 15 & PPh Pasal 23 dan Standar Prosedur yang dimiliki oleh perusahaan. Metode penulisan laporan ini adalah membandingkan antara peraturan dan standar prosedur dengan praktek nyata yang dilakukan di tempat magang. Hasil evaluasi menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar proses pelaporan sudah sesuai dengan undang-undang dan Standar Prosedur, tetapi salah satu proses tidak sesuai dengan Standar Prosedur karena kurangnya pekerja dan tugas yang berlebihan. Laporan ini juga menjelaskan tentang refleksi diri penulis selama masa magang di PT. XYZ. Pengalaman menjadi landasan bagi proses pengembangan penulis di masa yang akan datang. .......This Internship report aims to evaluate the Withholding process of Income Tax Article 15 and Income Tax Article 23. The process that are evaluated is the tax object recognition process, the calculation of tax expense, the making of the Certificate of Withholding Tax, and Income Tax Monitoring Process. The evaluation was carried out by the rules and regulations that based the obligation of both Income Tax Article 15 & Income Tax Article 23 and the Standard of Procedure that are owned by the company. The method of this report is to compare between the regulations and the standard of procedure with the real practice that conducted in the internship. The evaluation result shows that most of the Withholding process is in accordance with the law and the Standard of Procedure, but one of the processes did not complies with the Standard of Procedure due to lack of worker and overwhelming task. This report also explains about the author’s self-reflection during the internship period at PT. XYZ. The experience become the foundation of the author’s development process in the future.