Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
After a two-month stand-off between Red Shirt protestors and the government of Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva, violence and arson scarred central Bangkok in mid-May 2010. This shocking turn of events underlined how poorly understood the deep divisions in the society and politics of Thailand remained, even five years into the country's prolonged crisis. This volume collects analysis and commentary on those divisions from an unusually large and prominent group of Thai and foreign scholars and observers of the country. Contributions examine socio-economic, political, diplomatic, historical, cultural, and ideological issues with rare frankness, clarity, and lack of jargon.

Abstrak :
Contents : (1) Mapping anxieties. (2) Buddhist fears. (3) Managing islam. (4) National reconciliation. (5) Communicating conflict. (6) Contested citizenship. (7) Autonomous futures. (8) Twin fires.

Abstrak :
Violent tragedy in Bali has a long history. Violence during the Dutch colonial regime, until the 1965 massacre of local political violence under the "Orde Baru" occurred. Post-Reform of 1998, the tragedy of violence re-emerged in tandem with the strengthening of indigenous authority (Pakraman Village) that forced silence during the centralized authoritarian "Orde Baru" regime. Pakraman village go hand in hand with the spirit of strengthening the cultural movement (Ajeg Bali) post Bali bombings of 2002 and 2005. Within institutions of Pakraman Village, there lies pecalangan, a traditional indigenous security forces who participates in the business of security and control of new settlers in these territories. In political violence contestation and strengthening of the culture, the local-hero who has a long history of political violence in Bali plays their vital role through the mass organizations and also joined as pecalangan. This paper tried to describe the relationship between political history of violence in Bali and the pursuit of the local-hero in it.

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini menganalisis penyebab kekerasan politik dalam Pilkada DKI Jakarta tahun 2017 dan kaitannya dengan politik identitas. Penelitian ini menggunakan konsep Hate Spin Cherian George (2016) sebagai konsep utama penelitian dan didukung dengan teori konflik sosial-agama Clifford Geerzt (1981) dan teori kekerasan Johan Galtung (1997). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan design studi kasus. Temuan penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa kekerasan bukan terjadi karena adanya mobilisasi dari wirausahawan politik yang terepresentasikan oleh Front Pembela Islam (FPI) dan Teman Ahok dengan menggunakan identitas, melainkan tumbuh dari kesadaran masyarakat sebagai bentuk ketersinggungan massa akan sebuah penghinaan atas dasar agama. ...... This study analyzes the causes of political violence in the DKI Jakarta Gubernatorial Election 2017 and its relation to political of identity. This study employs the concept of Hate Spin of Cherian George (2016) as the main concept which is supported by two theories of social-religious conflict of Clifford Geerzt (1981) and violence theory of Johan Galtung (1997).  Employing qualitative methods with case study design, this research suggests that violence did not occur because of the mobilization of political entrepreneurs represented by Front Pembela Islam (FPI) and Teman Ahok in using identity. The violence grew out to public awareness as a form of offense to the masses would be an insult on the basis of religion.

Abstrak :
On the morning of September 29, 1920, a young poet died in Santiagos asylum, where he had recently been moved after nearly two months in police custody. Why and how did Jose Domingo Gómez Rojas end up in a prison, an asylum, and a cemetery? This book is an effort to answer that question. It is not a biography of Jose Domingo Gomez Rojas, although he figures prominently in its pages. It is, rather, a book about the context within which his arrest, imprisonment, and death unfolded and about the experiences of a number of the men he counted as friends and comrades. Covering a four-month period of 1920 in Santiago, it is a book about anarchists and aristocrats, students and teachers, poets and prosecutors, and cops and Wobblies. While narrative in form, the book has a number of analytical threads. It pays close attention to university students and the radicalization and disidentification they experienced over the course of the 1910s as well as the close relationships they forged with working people at the time. The book also stresses the importance of anarcho-communism in Chile in the first two decades of the twentieth century. The narrative is structured around the lives and labors of agitators and organizers who spent most, if not all, of their lives in Santiago and thus emphasizes the importance of place to radical politics. This is, in sum, a story of individuals and the collective struggles they waged, futures they imagined, and worlds they occupied.