Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Pada tahun 2005, India dan Indonesia tertarik untuk membangun kerjasama ekonomi dengan menginisiasi Indonesia-India Economic Comprehensive Agreement (II-CECA). Namun, 15 tahun berlalu, Indonesia dan India belum sama sekali menandatangani kesepakatan ekonomi II-CECA. Penelitian itu mencoba untuk menjawab penyebab belum adanya kesepakatan II-CECA. Dengan menggunakan studi literatur melalu pendekatan kualitatif, penelitian ini mencoba menganalisis fenomena ini dengan menggunakan pendekatan Society Centred Approach (Moravscik, 1998) dan faktor domestik yang mempengeruhi kebijakan luar negeri (Hiscox, 2017). Penelitian ini menemukan fakta bahwa kondisi politik domestik India berpengaruh terhadap mandegnya perjanjian II-CECA. Kondisi tersebut berupa adanya 1) pergantian kepemimpinan dari INC ke BJP, 2) perbedaan persepsi politik antara kedua partai, dan kelompok kepentingan berpengaruh seperti kaum Nasionalis Hindu. Penelitian ini juga membuktikan bahwa ormas nasionalis Hindu di India memiliki pengaruh yang kuat di pemerintahan Modi, terutama di bidang kebijakan ekonomi luar negeri karena memiliki akses langsung ke kekuasaan lewat partai politik BJP. ......In 2005, India and Indonesia initiated talks about Indonesia-India Economic Comprehensive Agreement (II-CECA) to strengthen the economic relations between the two countries. However, 15 years on, Indonesia and India have yet to sign the II-CECA economic agreement. This study examines this stagnation by looking at the domestic sources of foreign economic policy. With literature study and qualitative method, this research shall analyze the phenomenon using society centred approach (Moravscik, 1998) and domestic factor that influences economic foreign policy (Hiscox, 2017). This thesis argues that India's domestic factors contributed significantly to the stagnation of the II-CECA agreement. These factors are: (1) National leadership change from INC to BJP; (2) different political preferences among BJP and INC politians, and (3) the influence of powerful interest group such as the Hindu Nationalists. This research also proves that Hindu nationalist movement in India has a strong influence in the Modi’s government, through BJP, including in foreign economic policy.

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Tugas akhir ini membahas Konflik Hubungan Industrial Dalam Keijasama Perusahaan BUMD dengan Perusahaan Mitra Swasta di Wilayah Provinsi DKI Jakarta. Tugas akhir ini adalah penelitian dengan mengkomparasikan antara fakta dan data-data dalam Perusahaan BUMD, kemudian dianalisa dengan landasan teoritis yang telah dikemukakan. Diharapkan dapat mempeijelas serta menjawab tujuan dan manfaat penelitian. Hasil penelitian menyarankan konflik hubungan industrial pada Perusahaan BUMD dipecahkan dengan melakukan kompromi melalui negosiasi antara manajemen dengan karyawan (serikat pekeija).;

Abstrak :
Tesis ini membahas penyelesaian sengketa wilayah antara Indonesia dan Malaysia terhadap Pulau Sipadan dan Ligitan melalui International Court of Justice (ICJ). Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan pemaparan secara deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa Malaysia dapat memiliki Pulau Sipadan dan Ligitan setelah melalui proses perundingan antara Indonesia dan Malaysia melalui International Court of Justice (ICJ) berdasarkan keberadaannya sebagai pemilik (effectivities). ......The focus of this study is dispute settlement of Sipadan and ligitan island between Indonesia and Malaysia at International Court of Justice (ICJ). This research is qualitative interpretative. The result of this study shows Malaysia had full authority of Sipadan and Ligitan island after the processed of negotiation between Indonesia and Malaysia at International Court of Justice (ICJ) based on effectivities.

Abstrak :
How many citizens take part in moral and political decisions concerning the results obtained by the contemporary life sciences? Should they blindly follow skilled demagogues or false and deceptive leaders? Should they adhere to the voice of the majority, or should they take a different decisional path? Deliberative democracy answers these questions, but what is deliberative democracy? Can we really deliberate if we are completely ignorant of the relevant issue? What about ethical or political expertise, is it strictly necessary? Finally, and most significantly, can a deliberative process take place if we ignore the techniques governing it; that is, the techniques required to be minimally skilled in rational argumentation? Giovanni Boniolo goes back to the historical and theoretical foundations of deliberation showing us, with some irony, that deliberation is a matter of competence, and not just a matter of a right to decide. His conclusion might not delight everyone: “anyone who is not sufficiently acquainted with the subject matter or lacks the sufficient deliberative competence ought not be admitted to deliberative discussions. This restriction makes both good deliberation and a proper deliberative democracy possible, otherwise debate degenerates into demagogy and hypocrisy”.

Abstrak :
Ketentuan Perjanjian Kerja Bersama (PKB) tidak mengatur perihal batas masa waktu perundingan PKB sehingga memberikan keleluasaan waktu kepada pihak perusahaan dan pihak serikat pekerja/serikat buruh dalam merundingkan PKB yang terbaik bagi semua pihak namun di sisi lain menyebabkan pemenuhan hak-hak pekerja dalam PKB yang baru saja disepakati justru berpengaruh akibat telah terpotong masa waktu perundingan PKB itu sendiri apabila dalam perundingan tidak mengalami kesepakatan. Penelitian menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Bahan penelitian dianalisis dengan metode analitis deskriptif dengan mengumpulkan dan menganalisa bahan hukum. Ketentuan hak-hak pekerja PT Freeport Indonesia dan pokok-pokok permasalahan yang dirundingkan dalam Perjanjian Kerja Bersama ke-21 PT Freeport Indonesia adalah tuntutan peningkatan kesejahteraan pekerja/buruh; Pph 21 atas THR dan PHK ditanggung perusahaan; kenaikan upah pekerja pratama dan kenaikan upah pekerja muda level 1-3; usia pensiun 57 tahun; dan masa berlaku PKB sejak tanggal 1 Oktober 2019. Implikasi masa perundingan perjanjian kerja bersama terhadap hak pekerja berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial pada Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 334/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020/PN.JKT.PST adalah pelindungan hukum bagi hak pekerja menjadi terderogasi akibat masa perundingan PKB itu sendiri yang tidak ada kesepakatan. Ius constituendum terhadap ketentuan masa perundingan perjanjian kerja bersama dan terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial pada Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 334/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020/PN.JKT.PST adalah harus adanya batas waktu perundingan PKB; perlunya aturan pihak yang menolak anjuran mediasi harus mengambil upaya selanjutnya perihal penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial; dan perlunya pertimbangan hakim perihal teori pelindungan hukum pada putusan. ......The provisions of the Collective Labor Agreement (CLA) do not stipulate the time limit for the CLA negotiations so as to provide flexibility of time for the company and the trade unions/labor unions in negotiating the best CLA for all parties but on the other hand it causes the fulfillment of worker’s rights in the CLA that is what had just been agreed had an effect because the time period for the CLA negotiations had been cut short if there was no agreement in the negotiations. This research uses normative juridical research with a case study approach. Research materials were analyzed by descriptive analytical method by collecting and analyzing legal materials. The provisions on the rights of PT Freeport Indonesia's workers and the main issues negotiated in the 21st Collective Labor Agreement of PT Freeport Indonesia are the demands for improving the welfare of workers/laborers; Pph 21 on THR and layoffs borne by the company; an increase in the wages of primary workers and an increase in the wages of young workers level 1-3; retirement age 57 years; and the validity period of the CLA is from October 1, 2019. The implication of the period of negotiating collective labor agreements on worker’s rights based on the Decision of the Industrial Relations Court at the Central Jakarta District Court Number 334/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020/PN.JKT.PST is legal protection for worker’s rights to be derogated as a result of During the CLA negotiation period, there was no agreement. The ius constituendum on the terms of the negotiation period for the collective bargaining agreement and the Industrial Relations Court Decision at the Central Jakarta District Court Number 334/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020/PN.JKT.PST is that there must be a time limit for the CLA negotiations; the need for rules that parties who reject the suggestion of mediation must take further measures regarding the settlement of industrial relations disputes; and the need for judges' considerations regarding the theory of legal protection in decisions.