Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Dalam kasus yang penulis analisis bahwa telah terjadi persengketaan antara I.C.I Omicron B.V. dan PT Dwi Satrya Utama yang mana keduanya selaku pemegang saham dalam PT I.C.I Paints Indonesia (selanjutnya disebut PT ICI) perihal penetapan kuorum kehadiran dalam RUPS kedua yang diselenggarakan oleh Direksi PT ICI dengan agenda pembebasan tugas Direksi lama dan pengangkatan Direktur yang baru. Yang menjadi permasalahan adalah persyaratan dan prosedur apa sajakah yang harus dipenuhi dalam penyelenggaraan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham kedua tersebut berdasarkan ketentuan yang berlaku dikaitkan dengan Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas? Apakah hasil keputusan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham kedua yang telah dilaksanakan dapat dibatalkan oleh pengadilan? Apakah pertimbangan- pertimbangan hukum yang dipergunakan hakim dalam memutuskan perkara sehingga menghasilkan putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Jakarta No. 50/PDT/2003/PT.DKI? Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan dengan data sekunder sebagai sumber datanya. Persyaratan dan prosedur untuk memenuhi sah atau tidaknya suatu keputusan RUPS bergantung pada tiga hal, yaitu pemanggilan RUPS yang dilakukan, kuorum kehadiran pemegang saham dan kuorum pengambilan keputusan, dalam kasus ini semua persyaratan dan prosedur telah memenuhi tiga hal tersebut sehingga pelaksanaan maupun keputusan RUPS yang diambil adalah sah dan mengikat para pemegang saham Perseroan, tidak dianggap cacat hukum atau batal demi hukum. Penafsiran secara yuridis yang keliru perihal materi pembahasan dalam agenda RUPS kedua sebagai dasar permohonan pembatalan keputusan RUPS tersebut dan dikabulkan oleh Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan sebagaimana temyata dalam Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan No 235/Pdt.P/2001/PN.Jak.Sel menetapkan tidak sah dan batal demi hukum, sehingga diajukan gugatan kembali melalui Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan yang memutuskan dalam Putusan No. 249/Pdt.G/2002/PN.Jak.Sel bahwa Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan tersebut batal demi hukum dan tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum tetap yang kemudian dikuatkan lagi dengan Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi No. 50/PDT/2003/PT. DKI. Pertimbangan hukum yang dipergunakan hakim dalam memutuskan perkara tersebut adalah bahwa penggantian anggota Direksi bukan bagian dari materi hukum perubahan Anggaran Dasar yang sifatnya mendasar dan perlu persetujuan dari Menteri Hukum dan HAM RI, melainkan merupakan materi perubahan lain yang cukup dilaporkan kepada Menteri Hukum & HAM RI paling lambat 14 (empat belas) hari terhitung sejak keputusan RUPS. ......In case the writer analysis that already raised a dispute between I.C.I Omicron B.V. and PT Daya Satrya Utama which both are shareholders in PT I.C.I Paints Indonesia (hereinafter referred to as PT ICI) subject of the quorum existence stipulating in the second General Meeting of Shareholders arranged by the Board of Directors of PT ICI which agenda is to release and discharge of Board of Directors and to appoint the new Director. The problems is which requirements and procedures that must be fulfilled to arranger the second General Meeting of Shareholders considering the prevailing regulations related to the Limited Liability Company Regulation (Undang- Undang Perseroan Terbatas)? Do the decision of the second General Meeting of Shareholders that has been executed can be canceled by the Court? What is the law consideration taken by the judge to decide the case which result is the Supreme Court Decision No. 50/PDT/2003/PT.DKI? The research uses the method of bibliography research with secondary data as the data source. Requirement and procedures to fulfill the validity of the General Meeting of Shareholders Decision shall base on three matters, which are the invitation of meeting, the quorum existence of shareholders, and the quorum to reach the decision, in this case the three requirements should be firlfilled therefore the execution and decision taken in the meeting shall be legal and binding to the company shareholders, not consider as null and void according to the prevailing law. The wrong legal interpretation considering the agenda of meeting become subject of the application for the cancellation of General Meeting of Shareholders decision brought by PT DSU and granted by the District Court of South Jakarta as mention in the “Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan No. 235/Pdt.G/2002/PN.Jak.SeI specifies illegal and cancellation by the law, therefore ICI Omicron bring a lawsuit to the District Court of Jakarta Selatan which decide in Putusan No. 249/Pdt.G/2002/PN.Jak.Sel that Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan No. 235/Pdt.G/2002/PN.Jak.Sel shall be withdraw become null and void. The decision strengthened by the Supreme Court Decision No. 50/PDT/2003/PT.DKJ. The law consideration taken by the judge to deliver the decision is the replacement of the member of Board of Directors shall not reconsider as the basic matter of the changing of Articles of Association which require the Minister of Law and Human Right approval, otherwise it is consider as other change which shall be reported to Minister of Law and Human Right at least 14 (fourteen) days commencing the decision to be taken by General Meeting of Shareholders.

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Dalam kasus yang penulis analisis bahwa telah teijadi persengketaan antara I.C.I Omicron B.V. dan PT Dwi Satrya Utama yang mana keduanya selaku pemegang saham dalam PT I.C.I Paints Indonesia (selanjutnya disebut PT ICI) perihal penetapan kuorum kehadiran dalam RUPS kedua yang diselenggarakan oleh Direksi PT ICI dengan agenda pembebasan tugas Direksi lama dan pengangkatan Direktur yang baru. Yang menjadi permasalahan adalah persyaratan dan prosedur apa sajakah yang harus dipenuhi dalam penyelenggaraan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham kedua tersebut berdasarkan ketentuan yang berlaku dikaitkan dengan Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas? Apakah hasil keputusan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham kedua yang telah dilaksanakan dapat dibatalkan oleh pengadilan? Apakah pertimbanganpertimbangan hukum yang dipergunakan hakim dalam memutuskan perkara sehingga menghasilkan putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Jakarta No. 50/PDT/2003/PT.DKI? Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan dengan data sekunder sebagai sumber datanya. Persyaratan dan prosedur untuk memenuhi sah atau tidaknya suatu keputusan RUPS bergantung pada tiga hal, yaitu pemanggilan RUPS yang dilakukan, kuorum kehadiran pemegang saham dan kuorum pengambilan keputusan, dalam kasus ini semua persyaratan dan prosedur telah memenuhi tiga hal tersebut sehingga pelaksanaan maupun keputusan RUPS yang diambil adalah sah dan mengikat para pemegang saham Perseroan, tidak dianggap cacat hukum atau batal demi hukum. Penafsiran secara yuridis yang keliru perihal materi pembahasan dalam agenda RUPS kedua sebagai dasar permohonan pembatalan keputusan RUPS tersebut dan dikabulkan oleh Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan sebagaimana ternyata dalam Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan No 235/Pdt.P/200l/PN.Jak.Sel menetapkan tidak sah dan batal demi hukum, sehingga diajukan gugatan kembali melalui Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan yang memutuskan dalam Putusan No. 249/Pdt.G/2002/PN.Jak.Sel bahwa Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan tersebut batal demi hukum dan tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum tetap yang kemudian dikuatkan lagi dengan Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi No. 50/PDT/2003/PT. DKI. Pertimbangan hukum yang dipergunakan hakim dalam memutuskan perkara tersebut adalah bahwa penggantian anggota Direksi bukan bagian dari materi hukum perubahan Anggaran Dasar yang sifatnya mendasar dan perlu persetujuan dari Menteri Hukum dan HAM RI, melainkan merupakan materi perubahan lain yang cukup dilaporkan kepada Menteri Hukum & HAM RI paling lambat 14 (empat belas) hari terhitung sejak keputusan RUPS.

---

ABSTRACT
In case the writer analysis that already raised a dispute between I.C.I Omicron B.V. and PT Daya Satrya Utama which both are shareholders in PT I.C.I Paints Indonesia (hereinafter referred to as PT ICI) subject of the quorum existence stipulating in the second General Meeting of Shareholders arranged by the Board of Directors of PT ICI which agenda is to release and discharge of Board of Directors and to appoint the new Director. The problems is which requirements and procedures that must be fulfilled to arranger the second General Meeting of Shareholders considering the prevailing regulations related to the Limited Liability Company Regulation (Undang- Undang Perseroan Terbatas)? Do the decision of the second General Meeting of Shareholders that has been executed can be canceled by the Court? What is the law consideration taken by the judge to decide the case which result is the Supreme Court Decision No. 50/PDT/2003/PT.DKI? The research uses the method of bibliography research with secondaiy data as the data source. Requirement and procedures to fulfill the validity of the General Meeting of Shareholders Decision shall base on three matters, which are the invitation of meeting, the quorum existence of shareholders, and the quorum to reach the decision, in this case the three requirements should be fulfilled therefore the execution and decision taken in the meeting shall be legal and binding to the company shareholders, not consider as null and void according to the prevailing law. The wrong legal interpretation considering the agenda of meeting become subject of the application for the cancellation of General Meeting of Shareholders decision brought by PT DSU and granted by the District Court of South Jakarta as mention in the “Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan No. 235/Pdt.G/2002/PN.Jak.Sel specifies illegal and cancellation by the law, therefore ICI Omicron bring a lawsuit to the District Court of Jakarta Selatan which decide in Putusan No. 249/Pdt.G/2002/PN.Jak.Sel that Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan No. 235/Pdt.G/2002/PN.Jak.Sel shall be withdraw become null and void. The decision strengthened by the Supreme Court Decision No. 50/PDT/2003/PT.DKI. The law consideration taken by the judge to deliver the decision is the replacement of the member of Board of Directors shall not reconsider as the basic matter of the changing of Articles of Association which require the Minister of Law and Human Right approval, otherwise it is consider as other change which shall be reported to Minister of Law and Human Right at least 14 (fourteen) days commencing the decision to be taken by General Meeting of Shareholders.

Abstrak :
Perkawinan beda agama saat ini sudah menjadi hal yang biasa dilakukan oleh pasangan-pasangan di Indonesia, tetapi sayangnya hal ini tidak diikuti dengan perkembangan hukum yang secara tegas mengatur hal tersebut. Setiap pasangan yang hendak melakukan perkawinan tentu saja menginginkan perkawinannya berjalan dengan lancar dan tidak berbenturan dengan peraturan hukum yang nantinya akan mengganggu jalannya perkawinan mereka, begitu juga dengan pasangan yang berbeda agama. Setiap perkawinan agar sah sudah seharusnya dilakukan berdasarkan hukum agama dan juga hukum negara, sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 2 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan, maka agar terjamin secara hukum perkawinan harus dicatatkan pada lembaga-lembaga yang telah ditunjuk oleh Undang-Undang yaitu Kantor Catatan Sipil bagi pasangan non Islam atau Kantor Urusan Agama bagi pasangan yang beragama Islam. Dalam perkawinan beda agama yang menjadi pokok permasalahan adalah bagaimana hukum perkawinan di Indonesia mengatur perkawinan beda agama dan juga pencatatan perkawinan tersebut serta akibat hukum yang ditimbulkannya. Bentuk penelitian yang digunakan adalah kepustakaan dan lapangan yang bersifat deskriptif analitis. Maka dapat penulis simpulkan, bahwa Undang-Undang Perkawinan mengatur secara implisit mengenai perkawinan beda agama melalui Pasal 2 ayat (1) dimana sahnya perkawinan dikembalikan lagi kedalam hukum agama. Penelitian ini mengkhususkan kepada Agama Islam dan Kristen. Dalam Islam perkawinan beda agama diharamkan, sedangkan pada agama Kristen, dari penelitian ditemukan pada beberapa gereja memperbolehkan perkawinan beda agama dengan syarat tertentu. Berdasarkan Pasal 35 huruf (a) Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 tentang Administrasi Kependudukan, pencatatan perkawinan beda agama dapat dilakukan pada Kantor Catatan Sipil melalui suatu penetapan pengadilan negeri, sedangkan dalam hal ini Kantor Urusan Agama tidak dapat mencatatkan perkawinan beda agama karena bertentangan dengan hukum Islam. Dengan dicatatkannya perkawinan beda agama, diakui secara hukum dan membawa akibat hukum terhadap pasangan tersebut sesuai dengan peraturan yang berlaku. ......Interfaith marriage is now a very common thing being done by couples in Indonesia. Unfortunately, it is not followed by the development of laws which expressly regulates interfaith marriages. Couples of same faith marriages and interfaith marriages want their marriages to run smoothly and not in conflict with the laws which will affect the course of their marriage. For a marriage to be valid it should be done under the laws of their own religion and also under the laws of the country. This is stipulated under Article 2 of the Matrimonial Act No.1 of 1974. In order to ensure that the marriage preformed is legal, it must be listed in the Civil Registry Office or the Office of Religious Affairs. The issues at hand are how Indonesian law regulates interfaith marriages, registry of interfaith marriages and the legal consequences thereof. The form of research used in this Undergraduate Thesis is normative juridical, which emphasizes on the use of primary data and secondary data as a source. In conclusion, interfaith marriages whether permitted or not is not strictly regulated in the Matrimonial Act No. 1 of 1974. It implicitly states in Article 2 of The Matrimonial Act No. 1 of 1974 where it states that the legality of the marriage is reverted to the law of their religion. This research is focused on Islamic and Christian laws. In Islamic law, interfaith marriages are forbidden. Where as in Christianity, some Churches allows interfaith marriages with specific terms. In cases of interfaith marriages, the marriages that have been previously performed may be registered at the Civil Registry Office through a Court order which the requests are previously filed by the couple of interfaith marriages to the District Court. This is in accordance with the provisions of Article 35 subsection (a) of The Civil Administration Act No. 23 of 2006. With the marriage being registered in the Civil Registry Office, the marriage is legal and the legal consequences arising from the marriage is regulated in accordance with the Act.

Abstrak :
Gadai merupakan salah satu bentuk pemberian jaminan dalam rangka menjamin pelunasan fasilitas kredit. Permasalahan timbul saat penerima gadai bermaksud melelang objek gadai berupa saham berdasarkan Pasal 1155 KUHPerdata dimana penerima gadai tidak dipersyaratkan untuk melibatkan hakim melalui pelelangan namum dalam praktik hukum pejabat lelang mempersyaratkan penetapan pengadilan dalam rangka ekskusi gadai saham melalui lelang. Metode Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yang bersifat yuridis normatif, yakni penelitian yang memfokuskan pada penggunaan norma hukum tertulis serta ditopang dengan hasil dialog atau wawancara dengan narasumber dan informan yang berkompeten. Kesimpulan yang diraih adalah realitas pelaksanaan gadai saham yang berbeda antara hukum tertulis dan praktik hukum dimana dalam rangka eksekusi gadai saham melalui lelang maka pejabat lelang mempersyaratkan penetapan pengadilan sehingga menimbulkan multitafsir.Hukum gadai saham wajib memberikan manfaat hukum bagi dunia usaha agar lembaga gadai saham dapat berperan secara maksimal serta memberikan kontribusi bagi peningkatan perekonomian khususnya menghilangkan rasa takut bagi kreditor atas lembaga gadai saham. Adapun saran yang dapat diberikan adalah pembentuk Undang-undang dapat menyusun perundangundangan tentang gadai secara sistematis dan terperinci serta lengkap dalam rangka kepastian hukum serta perlindungan hukum sehingga jaminan gadai dapat mendukung transaksi dalam perekonomian. ......Pledge is one of the form of security in order to guarantee the full payment of credit facility. The legal issue occurred when the pledgee intends to have the auction on the the object of pledge which are shares based on Article 1155 of Civil Code whereby the pledgee is not required to involve the judge but in legal practice the auctioneer wolud require the court order in the framework of the execution of pledge of shares through auction. This research method is a normative juridical research, which focuses on the use of written legal norms and is supported by the results of dialogue or interviews with competent sources and informants. Conclusions reached understanding the reality of the implementation of execution of pledged shares through auction that is different between written law and legal practice, whereby the auctioner will require the court order which cause various of intepretations. The pledged shares law is obliged to provide legal benefits for the business world so that the pledged shares institution can play a maximum role and contribute to economic improvement in particular to eliminate the fear of the creditor to the pledged shares institution. There are suggestions that can be given. Legislators can compile legislation on pledge in a systematic and detailed and complete manner in the framework of legal certainty and legal protection so that the pledge can support transactions in the economy.

Abstrak :
[ABSTRAK
A dan B membina suatu hubungan bersama yang tidak terikat dalam suatu perkawinan yang sah. Hasil hubungan tersebut melahirkan anak luar kawin bernama X. X lahir berdasarkan Akta Kelahiran Nomor 924/U/PROP/2000 dengan tertulis bahwa A dan B adalah orang tua darinya. X di dalam Akta Kelahiran tersebut seharusnya tertulis nama ibunya saja yaitu B. Selain itu juga ada Penetapan 07/Pdt.P/2003/PN.KTG yang menetapkan bahwa X adalah anak kandung dari A dan B. Bagaimana pengaturan anak luar kawin dan akta kelahiran menurut peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku di Indonesia? mengapa terdapat akta kelahiran yang masih memerlukan penetapan dari Pengadilan Negeri? Penulis mempergunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif didukung dengan wawancara. Data Penelitian yang diperoleh Penulis bahwa A dan B tidak pernah terikat dalam perkawinan yang sah. X adalah benar anak luar kawin Akta kelahiran X dikatakan tidak terdaftar di Kantor Catatan Sipil DKI Jakarta. Penulis berpendapat seharusnya Akta Kelahiran X hanya tertulis nama ibunya saja berdasarkan Pasal 43 ayat (1) KUHPer. Masalah pembuktian kebenaran akta tersebut harus melalui suatu proses pembuktian di Pengadilan dan siapa yang mendalilkan dialah yang harus membuktikan ketidakbenaran akan isi akta tersebut. Bentuk perlindungan hukum yang bisa diberikan kepada X sebagai anak luar kawin adalah pengakuan anak. Kantor Catatan Sipil dan Pengadilan Negeri haruslah lebih teliti dalam melaksanakan ketentuan pengakuan anak luar kawin sesuai dengan yang telah diatur di dalam peraturan perundang-undangan.

---

ABSTRACT
A and B building a relationship that not bound together in legal marriage. The result of these relationships childbearing outside marriage named X. X was born by a Birth Certificate number 924/U/PROP/2000 in writing that A and B are the parent of X. X in the birth certificate should be written B name. There was also 07/Pdt.P/2003/PN.KTG stipulate that X is the biological child of A and B. How to setup the child outside marriage and birth certificates according to the legislation in force in Indonesia? Why the certificate of birth still Required Determination from district court? The writer use this issue using the method normatif of law analism and its support by interview. The data tell that A and B never been married in legal marriage and X is correct the children outside marriage. The certificate of birth of X not registered in civil registry office of DKI Jakarta. The writer assume that the parent of X in the certificate of birth is B base on Chapter 43 paragraph (1) KUHPer. The problem validating certificates must be proceed by court and the person who substantiate must be prove uncorrectly on the content of the certification. Form of legal protection that can be given to X as a child outside marriage is recognized endorsment. Civil registry Office and the District Court should be more careful in carrying out the provisition of recognition in accordance with the child outside of marriage that has been set in the legislation.;A and B building a relationship that not bound together in legal marriage. The result of these relationships childbearing outside marriage named X. X was born by a Birth Certificate number 924/U/PROP/2000 in writing that A and B are the parent of X. X in the birth certificate should be written B name. There was also 07/Pdt.P/2003/PN.KTG stipulate that X is the biological child of A and B. How to setup the child outside marriage and birth certificates according to the legislation in force in Indonesia? Why the certificate of birth still Required Determination from district court? The writer use this issue using the method normatif of law analism and its support by interview. The data tell that A and B never been married in legal marriage and X is correct the children outside marriage. The certificate of birth of X not registered in civil registry office of DKI Jakarta. The writer assume that the parent of X in the certificate of birth is B base on Chapter 43 paragraph (1) KUHPer. The problem validating certificates must be proceed by court and the person who substantiate must be prove uncorrectly on the content of the certification. Form of legal protection that can be given to X as a child outside marriage is recognized endorsment. Civil registry Office and the District Court should be more careful in carrying out the provisition of recognition in accordance with the child outside of marriage that has been set in the legislation.;A and B building a relationship that not bound together in legal marriage. The result of these relationships childbearing outside marriage named X. X was born by a Birth Certificate number 924/U/PROP/2000 in writing that A and B are the parent of X. X in the birth certificate should be written B name. There was also 07/Pdt.P/2003/PN.KTG stipulate that X is the biological child of A and B. How to setup the child outside marriage and birth certificates according to the legislation in force in Indonesia? Why the certificate of birth still Required Determination from district court? The writer use this issue using the method normatif of law analism and its support by interview. The data tell that A and B never been married in legal marriage and X is correct the children outside marriage. The certificate of birth of X not registered in civil registry office of DKI Jakarta. The writer assume that the parent of X in the certificate of birth is B base on Chapter 43 paragraph (1) KUHPer. The problem validating certificates must be proceed by court and the person who substantiate must be prove uncorrectly on the content of the certification. Form of legal protection that can be given to X as a child outside marriage is recognized endorsment. Civil registry Office and the District Court should be more careful in carrying out the provisition of recognition in accordance with the child outside of marriage that has been set in the legislation.;A and B building a relationship that not bound together in legal marriage. The result of these relationships childbearing outside marriage named X. X was born by a Birth Certificate number 924/U/PROP/2000 in writing that A and B are the parent of X. X in the birth certificate should be written B name. There was also 07/Pdt.P/2003/PN.KTG stipulate that X is the biological child of A and B. How to setup the child outside marriage and birth certificates according to the legislation in force in Indonesia? Why the certificate of birth still Required Determination from district court? The writer use this issue using the method normatif of law analism and its support by interview. The data tell that A and B never been married in legal marriage and X is correct the children outside marriage. The certificate of birth of X not registered in civil registry office of DKI Jakarta. The writer assume that the parent of X in the certificate of birth is B base on Chapter 43 paragraph (1) KUHPer. The problem validating certificates must be proceed by court and the person who substantiate must be prove uncorrectly on the content of the certification. Form of legal protection that can be given to X as a child outside marriage is recognized endorsment. Civil registry Office and the District Court should be more careful in carrying out the provisition of recognition in accordance with the child outside of marriage that has been set in the legislation., A and B building a relationship that not bound together in legal marriage. The result of these relationships childbearing outside marriage named X. X was born by a Birth Certificate number 924/U/PROP/2000 in writing that A and B are the parent of X. X in the birth certificate should be written B name. There was also 07/Pdt.P/2003/PN.KTG stipulate that X is the biological child of A and B. How to setup the child outside marriage and birth certificates according to the legislation in force in Indonesia? Why the certificate of birth still Required Determination from district court? The writer use this issue using the method normatif of law analism and its support by interview. The data tell that A and B never been married in legal marriage and X is correct the children outside marriage. The certificate of birth of X not registered in civil registry office of DKI Jakarta. The writer assume that the parent of X in the certificate of birth is B base on Chapter 43 paragraph (1) KUHPer. The problem validating certificates must be proceed by court and the person who substantiate must be prove uncorrectly on the content of the certification. Form of legal protection that can be given to X as a child outside marriage is recognized endorsment. Civil registry Office and the District Court should be more careful in carrying out the provisition of recognition in accordance with the child outside of marriage that has been set in the legislation.]

Abstrak :
[ABSTRAK
Perkawinan adalah ikatan lahir batin antara seorang pria dan seorang wanita dengan tujuan untuk membentuk keluarga yang bahagia dan kekal berdasarkan keTuhanan Yang Maha Esa. Penulis berasumsi bahwa salah satu tujuan perkawinan adalah untuk mendapatkan keturunan atau anak. Dalam penelitian ini pokok permasalahan yang penulis angkat adalah mengenai kedudukan anak luar kawin ditinjau dari Pasal 43 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dan analisis terhadap Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor : 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim. Penulis menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Pasal 43 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan menyatakan bahwa anak luar kawin hanya memiliki hubungan hukum dengan ibu dan keluarga ibunya. Tindakan hukum yang dapat dilakukan anak luar kawin memiliki hubungan hukum dengan ayah dan keluarga ayahnya adalah melalui pengakuan terhadap anak luar kawin dan pengesahan anak luar kawin pada saat perkawinan kedua orangtuanya. Dalam Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor : 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim orang tua dari anak luar kawin tidak melakukan pengesahan terhadap anak luar kawin mereka pada saat perkawinan, sehingga meminta penetapan pengadilan negeri. Pengakuan dan Pengesahan Anak yang telah melebihi jangka waktu yang telah ditetapkan Pasal 49 dan Pasal 50 Undang-Undang Nomor 24 tahun 2013 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 tahun 2006 tentang Administrasi Kependudukan harus melalui Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri. Penulis setuju dengan pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor : 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim.

---

ABSTRACT
Marriage is born inner bond between a man and a woman with the aim to a form a happy family and eternal based on one supreme divinity. The authors assume that one of purposes of marriage is to obtain offspring or children. The issue that i use is on the position of illegitimate child in view of Article 43 of Law Number 1 year 1974 concerning marriage and analysis to determination of district court number 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM. The autor uses the methode of normative legal research. Article 43 of Law number 1 year 1974 on marriage states that an illegitimate child only has a legal relationship with mother and her family. Legal actions that can be done to an illegitimate child has a legal relationship with his father and his father?s family is throught the recognition and validation of an illegitimate child at the time of his parents marriage. If parents of an illegitimate child negligent conduct agains an illegitimate child endorsement, can be done in state court determination as described in Article 32 paragraph 2 of Law number 26 year 2006 concerning administration of residence. In determination of district court number: 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim an illegitimate child?s parents do not approve of the marriage of their children at the time of marriage, so requast a court warrant. Recognation and validation of child who has exceeded a predetermined time period Article 49 and Article 50 of Law Number 24 year 2013 concerning changes to the Law number of 2006 concerning administration of residence must go through a court warrant. Autors agrees with the legal considerations in determination of district court number 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM.;Marriage is born inner bond between a man and a woman with the aim to a form a happy family and eternal based on one supreme divinity. The authors assume that one of purposes of marriage is to obtain offspring or children. The issue that i use is on the position of illegitimate child in view of Article 43 of Law Number 1 year 1974 concerning marriage and analysis to determination of district court number 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM. The autor uses the methode of normative legal research. Article 43 of Law number 1 year 1974 on marriage states that an illegitimate child only has a legal relationship with mother and her family. Legal actions that can be done to an illegitimate child has a legal relationship with his father and his father?s family is throught the recognition and validation of an illegitimate child at the time of his parents marriage. If parents of an illegitimate child negligent conduct agains an illegitimate child endorsement, can be done in state court determination as described in Article 32 paragraph 2 of Law number 26 year 2006 concerning administration of residence. In determination of district court number: 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim an illegitimate child?s parents do not approve of the marriage of their children at the time of marriage, so requast a court warrant. Recognation and validation of child who has exceeded a predetermined time period Article 49 and Article 50 of Law Number 24 year 2013 concerning changes to the Law number of 2006 concerning administration of residence must go through a court warrant. Autors agrees with the legal considerations in determination of district court number 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM.;Marriage is born inner bond between a man and a woman with the aim to a form a happy family and eternal based on one supreme divinity. The authors assume that one of purposes of marriage is to obtain offspring or children. The issue that i use is on the position of illegitimate child in view of Article 43 of Law Number 1 year 1974 concerning marriage and analysis to determination of district court number 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM. The autor uses the methode of normative legal research. Article 43 of Law number 1 year 1974 on marriage states that an illegitimate child only has a legal relationship with mother and her family. Legal actions that can be done to an illegitimate child has a legal relationship with his father and his father?s family is throught the recognition and validation of an illegitimate child at the time of his parents marriage. If parents of an illegitimate child negligent conduct agains an illegitimate child endorsement, can be done in state court determination as described in Article 32 paragraph 2 of Law number 26 year 2006 concerning administration of residence. In determination of district court number: 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim an illegitimate child?s parents do not approve of the marriage of their children at the time of marriage, so requast a court warrant. Recognation and validation of child who has exceeded a predetermined time period Article 49 and Article 50 of Law Number 24 year 2013 concerning changes to the Law number of 2006 concerning administration of residence must go through a court warrant. Autors agrees with the legal considerations in determination of district court number 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM., Marriage is born inner bond between a man and a woman with the aim to a form a happy family and eternal based on one supreme divinity. The authors assume that one of purposes of marriage is to obtain offspring or children. The issue that i use is on the position of illegitimate child in view of Article 43 of Law Number 1 year 1974 concerning marriage and analysis to determination of district court number 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM. The autor uses the methode of normative legal research. Article 43 of Law number 1 year 1974 on marriage states that an illegitimate child only has a legal relationship with mother and her family. Legal actions that can be done to an illegitimate child has a legal relationship with his father and his father’s family is throught the recognition and validation of an illegitimate child at the time of his parents marriage. If parents of an illegitimate child negligent conduct agains an illegitimate child endorsement, can be done in state court determination as described in Article 32 paragraph 2 of Law number 26 year 2006 concerning administration of residence. In determination of district court number: 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim an illegitimate child’s parents do not approve of the marriage of their children at the time of marriage, so requast a court warrant. Recognation and validation of child who has exceeded a predetermined time period Article 49 and Article 50 of Law Number 24 year 2013 concerning changes to the Law number of 2006 concerning administration of residence must go through a court warrant. Autors agrees with the legal considerations in determination of district court number 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM.]

Abstrak :
Jaman telah berganti, hal tersebut adalah hal yang tidak dapat kita elakkan. Dahulu mayoritas hanya pria sebagai kepala keluarga yang mencari nafkah untuk keluarganya, sedangkan sang istri dirumah untuk mengurus keluarga. Seiring perubahan zaman dan tuntutan akan kesetaraan wanita mulai bekerja dan bersama dengan pria mulai bergerak dalam perekonomian di berbagai bidang dan pekerjaan. Hal tersebut tidak dapat kita pungkiri telah membawa pandangan baru dalam perkawinan, masyarakat kini telah merasa perlu untuk melindungi hak-hak yang merupakan harta pribadinya, melalui sebuah perjanjian yang disebut dengan perjanjian perkawinanlah hal tersebut dapat dilakukan, dimana didalamnya suami dan istri sepakat untuk memisahkan harta mereka. Di dalam peraturan hukum mengenai perkawinan yaitu di dalam Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata serta Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan disebutkan bahwa perjanjian kawin dapat dilakukan sebelum atau pada saat perkawinan, permasalahan muncul tatkala terdapat pasangan yang ingin membuat perjanjian kawin setelah perkawinan berlangsung dan mempertanyakan kemungkinan hal tesebut dapat dilakukan. Penulis kemudian meneliti permasalahan ini dengan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, dimana penulis dalam meneliti mengacu pada aturan-atauran hukum yang ada untuk kemudian dapat menjawab permasalahan ini secara deskriptif analitis. Melalui penelitian penulis menemukan jawabannya bahwa, hal tersebut dimungkinkan dengan sebelumnya mengajukan permohonan terlebih dahulu dan ijin untuk membuatnya baru muncul ketika Pengadilan melalui Hakim mengabulkan permohonan tersebut. ......Time has changed, it is something we can not avoid. Formerly is majority that only men as heads of households who make a living for his family, while his wife at home, take care of the family. With the change of times and demands for equality, women began working too in various fields and jobs. It brought a new view of marriage, society has now felt the need to protect the rights which are personal property, and the possibility to do that is through an agreement called marriage agreement. In which husband and wife agreed to separate the they property. In the legislation on marriage that is in Civil Law and Law Number 1 of 1974 About Marriage states that marriage agreement can be performed before or during marriage. Problems arise when there are couples who want to make a marriage agreement after the marriage and questioning the possibility to do so. The author then examines these issues with the method of juridical normative research, which examined in reference to the existing rules of law to then be able to answer this problem in a descriptive analytic. Through the study authors found the answer that, it is possible to do by previously apply for permission in advance and if the Court of Justice granted the request.

Abstrak :
Skripsi Ini membahas tentang Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Yang Lewat waktu. Lewat waktunya penyelenggaran RUPS Ketiga ini dikarenakan adanya permohonan kepada Ketua Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan untuk Penetapan Jumlah Kuorum RUPS yang lebih kecil. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendapatkan gambaran mengenai konsekuensi hukum dari PT yang melakukan Permohonan Tersebut. ......This thesis discusses the General Meeting of Shareholders That the time around. Through his time organizing the Third General Meeting of Shareholders is due to the application to the Chairman of the South Jakarta District Court for the Determination of Total Quorum the GMS smaller. This study aimed to gain insight about the legal ramifications of doing PT X Such application.

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Sebuah akta perjanjian perkawinan dapat mengikat pihak ketiga apabila telah dicatatkan oleh Pegawai Pencatat Nikah, jika tidak dicatatkan maka perjanjian perkawinan tersebut hanya berlaku untuk para pihak saja, yaitu suami istri. Dalam praktek, tidak sedikit dari pasangan suami istri yang telah membuat akta perjanjian perkawinan lalai untuk mencatatkan perjanjian perkawinan mereka. Sehingga, dalam hal ini, pada praktek pasangan suami istri tersebut akan meminta penetapan dari pengadilan untuk mencatatkan perjanjian perkawinan mereka. Skripsi ini membahas bagaimana akibat hukum yang ditimbulkan oleh suatu penetapan pengadilan yang menetapkan bahwa suatu perjanjian perkawinan dapat dicatatkan oleh Pegawai Pencatat Nikah walaupun perjanjian perkawinan tersebut terlambat didaftarkan terhadap harta benda suami istri yang telah ada sebelum penetapan tersebut dikeluarkan oleh pengadilan serta ketentuan mengenai pencatatan perjanjian perkawinan melalui penetapan pengadilan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan Undang-Undang. Penulis menggunakan bahan hukum primer, sekunder, maupun tersier, dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menyarankan bahwa Pegawai Pencatat Nikah dan Notaris dapat memberikan penjelasan kepada calon pengantin agar mencatatkan akta perjanjian perkawinan yang mereka buat.

---

ABSTRACT
A prenuptial agreement will legally binding the third party if it has been registered by a the marriage registry officer, if not registered then the prenuptial agreement shall legally binding only to the parties, husband and wife. In practice, a few of married couples who have made the prenuptial agreement forgot to registered their agreement to the marriage registry officer. Thus, in this case, in practice the couple will submit an apeal to the court to regist their prenuptial agreement. This thesis discusses how the legal consequences arising from a court decree to husband and wife property before the court decree. This research used normtive legal research method with legislation approach. The author uses primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials using a qualitative approach. The results of the study suggest that the marriage registry officer and Notaries may provide explanations to brides to register their prenuptial agreement.