Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Persoalan utama ekonomi Indonesia dewasa ini adalah meningkatkan aktivitas perekonomian, baik investasi baru maupun pengembangan investasi yang sudah ada. Krisis ekonomi yang sedang terjadi saat ini dapat dijadikan momentum positif untuk menarik modal asing, karena pergerakan modal sedang mengarah ke Asia, termasuk Indonesia. Jenis modal asing yang yang diperkirakan paling baik untuk menggerakkan perekonomian adalah Penanaman Modal Asing Langsung (Foreign Direct Investment). Modal asing yang bersifat portfolio investment tidak baik untuk stabilitas, karena dapat keluar masuk dengan cepat dan sangat dipengaruhi oleh sentimen. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk melakukan analisa atas faktor-faktor yang diperkirakan dapat mempengaruhi Penanaman Modal Asing Langsung di Indonesia, yaitu Nilai Tambah Bruto, Suku bunga riil, Jumlah Tenaga Kerja, Infrastruktur, dampak krisis Asia 1996 dan dampak perubahan kebijakan pemerintah di bidang Investasi. Analisis dilakukan dengan model analisis regresi berganda (multiple regression analysis) dengan menggunakan metode data panel dan model estimasi Fixed Efect. Data yang digunakan adalah data panel enam sektor (Pertambangan dan Penggalian; Perindustrian; Perdagangan Besar dan Eceran, Restoran dan Komunikasi; Transport, Pergudangan dan Komunikasi; Lembaga Keuangan; serta Pertanian, Perburuan, Kehutanan dan Perkebunan) selama periode 1990 sampai 2010. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa Nilai Tambah Bruto berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap peningkatan Penanaman Modal Asing Langsung. Sementara, tingkat suku bunga riil berpengaruh significant dan negatif terhadap Penanaman Modal Asing Langsung. Selain itu, hasil analisis juga membuktikan bahwa krisis ekonomi tahun 1998 sebagai variabel dummy terbukti menurunkan jumlah Penanaman Modal Asing Langsung.

---

Indonesia's main economic issue nowdays is to increase economic activity, both new investment and development of existing investments. The economic crisis is happening now can be used as a positive momentum to attract foreign capital, because capital movements are heading to Asia, including Indonesia. Types of foreign capital is expected to be most good to increase the economy is Foreign Direct Investment. Foreign capital investment portfolio is not good for stability, because it can be in and out quickly and strongly influenced by sentiment.

This research was conducted with the aim to perform an analysis of the factors affecting the Foreign Direct Investment in Indonesia, namely the Gross Value Added, the real interest rate, amount of Manpower, Infrastructure, the impact of 1996 Asian crisis and the impact of changes in government policy in the Foreign Direct Investment.

Analyses were performed by multiple regression analysis model by using the data panel method and the Fixed-effect estimation model. The data used is panel data of six sectors (Mining and Quarrying; Industry: Wholesale and Retail, Restaurant and Communications; Transport, Storage and Communication; Finance and Agriculture, Hunting, Forestry and Plantation during) the period 1990 to 2010.

The analysis showed that the Gross Value Added has positive and significant impact on increasing Foreign Direct Investment. Meanwhile, real interest rates have significant negative impact on Foreign Direct Investment. In addition, the analysis also proved that the economic crisis of 1998 as a dummy variable shown to decrease the amount of Foreign Direct Investment."

"[ABSTRAKTujuan penelitian ini adalah : (1) Untuk menganalisis pengaruh aktivitas pelabuhan terhadap perekonomian Indonesia dilakukan melalui analisis angka pengganda (multiplier analysis), analisis kontribusi (share analysis) dan keterkaitan antar sektor pelabuhan Indonesia; (2) Untuk menganalisis posisi pelabuhan dalam sektor kunci perekonomian Indonesia; (3) Untuk menganalisis dampak investasi PT. Pelabuhan Indonesia (BUMN) terhadap pendapatan (income) dan nilai tambah bruto (NTB) perekonomian Indonesia.Adapun data yang digunakan menggunakan data-data yang dipublikasikan oleh Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) dan Universitas Indonesia (UI) khususnya adalah Tabel Input Output 2008 Updating dan 2010. Alat analisis yang digunakan adalah menggunakan pendekatan analisis Input-Output, yaitu angka pengganda (multiplier analysis), analisa keterkaitan antar sektor (forward-backward linkage), analisis kontribusi (share analysis) dan analisis dampak investasi terhadap pendapatan (income) dan nilai tambah bruto (NTB) sektor-sektor perekonomian Indonesia.Kesimpulan yang diperoleh adalah (1) Sektor-sektor pelabuhan memiliki nilai angka pengganda output yang relatif besar dan angka pengganda pendapatan yang relatif kecil. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa 4 (empat) sektor terpilih yaitu Jasa Penunjang Angkutan, Jalan, Jembatan dan Pelabuhan, Angkutan Laut dan Industri Kapal dan Jasa Perbaikannya, memiliki potensi penciptaan output yang besar dari permintaannya, tetapi memiliki sedikit potensi penciptaan pendapatan rumah tangga, hal ini disebabkan karena 4 (empat) sektor ini hanya sedikit menggunakan input yang berasal dari rumah tangga atau hanya menyerap sedikit tenaga kerja rumah tangga. (2) Koefisien teknologi tahun 2008 dan 2010, terdapat perbedaansehingga terjadi perubahan teknologi dalam proses produksi output perekonomian. Sektor Jalan, Jembatan dan Pelabuhan merupakan sektor yang memiliki kontribusi output (output share) dan kontribusi permintaan antara (intermediate demand) tertinggi.(3) Sektor Kunci perekonomian, yaitu sektor Jalan, Jembatan, dan Pelabuhan, Angkutan Laut, dan Jasa Penunjang Angkutan, sedangkan Industri Kapal dan Jasa perbaikannya masih belum menjadi sektor kunci perekonomian. (4) Stimulus investasi terhadap sektor-sektor pelabuhandapat meningkatkan distribusi pendapatan ke seluruh sektor-sektor perekonomian lainnya dan terjadi peningkatan total pendapatan dari output seluruh perekonomian.(5) Stimulus investasi terhadap sektor-sektor pelabuhan dapat meningkatkan nilai tambah bruto (NTB) ke seluruh sektor-sektor perekonomian lainnya dan terjadi peningkatan total NTB dari output seluruh perekonomian.(6) penurunan dwelling time terhadap sektor-sektor pelabuhan dapat meningkatkan nilai tambah bruto (NTB) ke seluruh sektor-sektor perekonomian lainnya danterjadi peningkatan total NTB dari output seluruh perekonomian.

---

ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study were: (1) To analyze the effect of the port activity on the Indonesian economy is done through the multiplier analysis, analysis of the contribution (share analysis) and linkages between Indonesian port sector; (2) To analyze the position of the port in the key sectors of the Indonesian economy; (3) To analyze the impact of investment and dwelling time on PT. Pelabuhan Indonesia to earnings and gross value added Indonesian economy. The data that is being used from the data published by the Central Statistics Agency (BPS) and the University of Indonesia (UI) in particular is Updating Input Output Table 2008 and 2010. The analysis tool used is using the Input-Output analysis approach, the multiplier analysis, forward-backward linkage analysis, the analysis of the contribution (share analysis) and the analysis of investment impact on income and gross value added the Indonesian economy sectors. The conclusion is (1) Sectors port multiplier output value is relatively large and income multiplier is relatively small. This shows that 4 (four) selected sectors namely Supporting Services Transport, Roads, Bridges and Ports, Sea Transport and Industrial Ship and Improvement Services, has a great potential outputcreation of demand, but it has small potential for the creation of household income, this due to the 4 (four) sector is only inconsiderably small in using the input that comes from households or just absorb small amount of household labor. (2) The coefficient of the technology in 2008 and 2010, there is a difference resulting in a change of technology in the production process of the economy's output. Sector Roads, Bridges and Ports is the one that has the highest output share and intermediate demand. (3) The Roads, Bridges, and Ports, Sea Transport, Transport and Supporting Services are the key sectors of the economy, while the Shipbuilding Industry and Services improvement is still not a key sector of the economy. (4) Stimulus investments to the port sectors can improve incomedistribution to all other sectors of the economy and an increase in total revenue of the output of the entire economy. (5) Stimulus investments to the port sectors could increase the gross value added to throughout other sectors of the economy and an increase in the total value added of the output of the entire economy. (6) reduction in dwelling time for the Indonesian port could increase gross value added to all other sectors of the economy and an increase in the total value added of the whole output economy., The purpose of this study were: (1) To analyze the effect of the port activityon the Indonesian economy is done through the multiplier analysis, analysis of thecontribution (share analysis) and linkages between Indonesian port sector; (2) Toanalyze the position of the port in the key sectors of the Indonesian economy; (3)To analyze the impact of investment and dwelling time on PT. PelabuhanIndonesia to earnings and gross value added Indonesian economy.The data that is being used from the data published by the Central StatisticsAgency (BPS) and the University of Indonesia (UI) in particular is Updating InputOutput Table 2008 and 2010. The analysis tool used is using the Input-Outputanalysis approach, the multiplier analysis, forward-backward linkage analysis, theanalysis of the contribution (share analysis) and the analysis of investment impacton income and gross value added the Indonesian economy sectors.The conclusion is (1) Sectors port multiplier output value is relatively largeand income multiplier is relatively small. This shows that 4 (four) selected sectorsnamely Supporting Services Transport, Roads, Bridges and Ports, Sea Transportand Industrial Ship and Improvement Services, has a great potential outputcreation of demand, but it has small potential for the creation of householdincome, this due to the 4 (four) sector is only inconsiderably small in using theinput that comes from households or just absorb small amount of household labor.(2) The coefficient of the technology in 2008 and 2010, there is a differenceresulting in a change of technology in the production process of the economy'soutput. Sector Roads, Bridges and Ports is the one that has the highest output share and intermediate demand. (3) The Roads, Bridges, and Ports, Sea Transport,Transport and Supporting Services are the key sectors of the economy, while theShipbuilding Industry and Services improvement is still not a key sector of theeconomy. (4) Stimulus investments to the port sectors can improve incomedistribution to all other sectors of the economy and an increase in total revenue ofthe output of the entire economy. (5) Stimulus investments to the port sectorscould increase the gross value added to throughout other sectors of the economyand an increase in the total value added of the output of the entire economy. (6)reduction in dwelling time for the Indonesian port could increase gross valueadded to all other sectors of the economy and an increase in the total value addedof the whole output economy]"

"Jakarta sebagai Ibu Kota dan pusat perekonomian nasional telah mengalami fenomena pertumbuhan penduduk dan kegiatan ekonomi yang sudah melampaui batas administratif Jakarta. Akibat fenomena urbanisasi yang sangat cepat, Jakarta mengalami masalah urban sprawl, kemacetan, dan polusi udara. Sebagai upaya untuk mengatasi kemacetan dan menurunkan penggunaan kendaraan pribadi, Pemerintah pusat dan daerah membangun moda transportasi publik massal Moda Raya Terpadu (MRT). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengukur dampak output, pendapatan masyarakat, dan nilai tambah bruto dari pembangunan MRT terhadap perekonomian Jakarta dan Indonesia dengan menggunakan analisis Metode Interregional Input-Output

---

Jakarta as the capital city and the center of the national economy has experienced the phenomenon of population growth and economic activities that have exceeded the administrative boundaries of Jakarta. As a result of the rapid urbanization phenomenon, Jakarta is experiencing problems with urban sprawl, congestion, and air pollution. In an ef ort to overcome congestion and reduce the use of private vehicles, the central and regional governments have built a mass public transport mode of Mass Rapid Transit (MRT). This study aims to measure the impact of output, income, and gross added value of MRT development on the economy of Jakarta and Indonesia by using the Interregional Input-Output Method analysis."