Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Mengapa Yunani menandatangani Fiscal Compact menjadi pertanyaan yang tidak terelakkan ketika berkembangnya pandangan Euroscepticism terhadap manfaat langsung mata uang negara mereka bergabung dengan pasar umum. Krisis utang dimulai ketika Yunani gagal memenuhi persentase utang yang diizinkan oleh Kriteria Maastricht. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif untuk menghasilkan penjelasan yang bertumpu pada daya tawar, kepemimpinan dan keputusan negara. Menggunakan proses identifikasi melalui amandemen yang dihasilkan dari negosiasi rancangan resolusi, penelitian ini yakin untuk menyimpulkan bahwa Yunani adalah pengikut Perancis dan Jerman sehingga mereka tidak punya pilihan selain untuk menandatangani perjanjian. Negara-negara dengan power tinggi cenderung menjadi sponsor sebagai lawan penandatangan draft resolusi. Yunani memilihi tingkat rendah pada pemetaan power dibandingkan dengan negara-negara Uni Eropa lainnya. Oleh karena itu, akan sulit bagi Yunani untuk mengklaim kepemimpinan untuk bernegosiasi pada perjanjian. Akibatnya, ia tidak dimiliki kapabilitas untuk membentuk agenda yang bermanfaat dan cocok bagi negaranya.

---

Why would Greece sign the Fiscal Compact is an inevitable question when the growing of Euroscepticism finds no direct benefit of their country‘s currency joining the common market. The debt crisis started when Greece failed to comply within the Maastricht percentage of allowed debt. This research uses qualitative method to generate explanations that rests on bargaining power, leadership and actions. Using identification process through amendments resulting from negotiation of draft resolutions, this research is confident to conclude that Greece is a follower to France and Germany thus they had no choice but to sign the agreement. Power relations of Member States is a close indicators where high power states tend to be sponsors as opposed to signatories of draft resolutions. Greece is resting low on its power mapping compared to other EU states therefore it has been hard to claim leadership to negotiate on agreements. As a result, it does not posses the priviledge to form agenda that is beneficial and suitable for them."

"[ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis faktor faktor yang mempengaruhi pengambilan kebijakan bailout III setelah kegagalan kedua program bailoutdi Yunani Kebijakan bailout III bertentangan denga opini publik Yunani yang menolak kebijakan bailout diimplementasikan di Yunani Analisis penelitian ini menggunakan teori two level games oleh Robert Putnam dengan metode kualitatif Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pengambilan kebijakan bailout III dipengaruhi oleh tekanan Troika kepada pemerintah Yunani untuk memperpanjang program bailout dan juga tekanan ekonomi domestik yang disuarakan oleh para bankir di Yunani untuk segera mendapatkan bantuan dana sehingga dapat menghindarkan Yunani dari krisis Persetujuan Yunani untuk mengambil kebijakan bailout III mencerminkan lemahnya peran negara dalam menghadapi tekanan internasional maupun tuntutan domestik yang bertentangan satu sama lain ABSTRACTThis research aimed to analyze the factors that influence policy making at the third bailout in Greece after the failure of the fisrt bailout and second bailout Moreover the third bailout policy opposed by Greek public opinion which rejected the bailout The analysis of this research is using two level games theory by Robert Putnam and also using qualitative methods This research shows that the policy making at the third bailout influenced by Troika pressure on Greek government to extend the bailout Furthermore there is economic domestic pressure that voiced by the bankers in Greece to get funding immediately to avoid the Greek sovereign debt crisis Greek agreement to take the third bailout reflects the role of the weak states dealing with international pressure and domestic demands , This research aimed to analyze the factors that influence policy making at the third bailout in Greece after the failure of the fisrt bailout and second bailout Moreover the third bailout policy opposed by Greek public opinion which rejected the bailout The analysis of this research is using two level games theory by Robert Putnam and also using qualitative methods This research shows that the policy making at the third bailout influenced by Troika pressure on Greek government to extend the bailout Furthermore there is economic domestic pressure that voiced by the bankers in Greece to get funding immediately to avoid the Greek sovereign debt crisis Greek agreement to take the third bailout reflects the role of the weak states dealing with international pressure and domestic demands ]"