Sammy Saleh Alhuraiby
Abstrak :
Latar belakang: Anterior knee pain (AKP) merupakan penyebab utama terjadinya
permasalahan yang persisten paska dilakukannya TKR. Saat ini di Indonesia belum
terdapat data mengenai luaran ini untuk mengevaluasi paska dilakukannya operasi
TKR, oleh karenanya kami merasa perlu untuk dilakukannya penelitian ini.
Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kohort retrospektif. Subjek adalah
pasien yang menjalani operasi TKR di RS Cipto Mangunkusomo sejak Januari 2011
sampai Januari 2019. Pada penelitian ini, didapatkan total 69 lutut dimana 39 lutut
dilakukan tindakan non-resurfacing sementara 30 lutut dilakukan resurfacing.
Pasien dengan revisi TKR, riwayat infeksi sendi lutut atau tumor, implant
loosening, riwayat operasi pada sendi lutut sebelumnya di eksklusi dari penelitian
ini.
Hasil: Pada kelompok non-resurfacing terdapat 32 lutut perempuan (82,1%) dan 7
lutut laki-laki (17,9%), sementara kelompok resurfacing terdapat 22 lutut
perempuan (73,3%) dan 8 lutut laki-laki (26,7%). Baik pada kelompok nonresurfacing
dan resurfacing, terdapat peningkatan skor paska operatif joint motion
(p<0,001) dan expectation (p=0,046) dengan pengukuran KSS, namun nilai
satisfaction dibandingkan preoperative dan paska operatif pada kedua kelompok
menunjukan perbedaan yang tidak bermakna (p=0,314) dibandingkan dengan
sebelum dilakukannya operasi. Pada penilaian dengan kuesioner Kujala, ditemukan
perbedaan bermakna skor total (47 [42-58] vs 55 [45-63]; p < 0,001), limp (3 [3-5]
vs 5 [2-5]; p < 0,001), support (3 [3-5] vs 5 [3-5]; p < 0,001), walking (2 [2-3] vs 2
[2-5]; p < 0,035), running (0 [0-6] vs 3 [0-8]; p < 0,001), jumping (0 [0-0] vs 3 [0-
8]; p = 0,010), dan flexion deficiency (3 [0-3] vs 3 [0-5]; p = 0,021).
Kesimpulan: Kami menemukan bahwa TKR non-resurfasing berhubungan dengan
kejadian AKP. Namun tidak terdapat perbedaan skala nyeri diantara kelompok
resurfacing dan non-resurfacing patella. Selain itu, terdapat perbedaan signifikan
skor Kujala dan KSS pada kedua kelompok.
......Background: Anterior knee pain (AKP) is a main problem that commonly occurs
after total knee replacement (TKR). In Indonesia, there are no data regarding this
outcome.
Methods: This study aims to evaluate AKP after TKR. This was a retrospective
study. Subjects were patients who underwent TKR from January 2011 to January
2019.
Results: There were 69 knees in this study, in which 39 subjects were nonresurfaced.
Those with revision TKR, history of infected knee joint or tumor,
implant loosening, history of infected knee joint, were excluded from this study. In
the non-resurfaced group, there were 32 (82.1%) women’s knees and 7 (17.9%)
men’s knees. Whereas, in the resurfaced group, there were 22 (73.3%) women’s
knees, and 8 (26.7%) men’s knees. In both the non-resurfaced and resurfacing
groups, there was an increase in joint motion scores (p<0.001) and expectation
(p=0.046) by measuring KSS but satisfaction scores compared to preoperative and
postoperative in both groups showed no significant differences (p=0.314)
compared to before surgery. In the assessment using the Kujala questionnaire,
differences in total score (47 [42-58] vs 55 [45-63]; p <0.001), limping (3 [3-5] vs
5 [2-5]; p <0.001 ), support (3 [3-5] vs 5 [3-5]; p <0.001), walking (2 [2-3] vs 2
[2-5]; p <0.035), running (0 [0- ] 6] vs 3 [0-8]; p <0.001), jump (0 [0-0] vs 3 [0-
8]; p = 0.010), and flexion deficiency (3 [0-3] vs 3 [ 0 -5]; p = 0.021).
Conclusion: We found that non-resurfacing patellar TKR was associated with
AKP. But there was no difference in pain scale between the resurfacing and nonresurfacing
patella groups Moreover, there were significant differences of both
Kujala Score and Knee Society Score in both groups.
Jakarta: Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia, 2020
SP-pdf
UI - Tugas Akhir Universitas Indonesia Library