Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
As it is stated at article 12 Law number 8 year 1971 about National Petroleum Company, Pertamina as the stockholder for mining oil and natural gas, then being changed by BP Migas as government authorized to sign and control management operation of mainstream business activity based on Law of Indonesian Republic about Petroleum & Gas number 22 year 2001, can cooperate with third party in the form of Production Sharing Contract, or other Contracts. Business activity in mainstream industry that is carried out by foreign companies cause expatriates mobilization according to the expertise and need of related companies to support their activities in Indonesia. Apart from high salary, they are also given various allowances to fulfill the expatriate's and their family?s need during their duties period in Indonesia, so that these expatriates can become very potential tax subject for the state revenue. This research aimed to get clearer description about imposing cost recovery and treating expatriates tax income in KPS according to the existing law. One of the dominant aspects in KPS is cost recovery spent first by contractor financed by government when contractor has successfully found petroleum reserve popularly known as cost recovery. Expatriates tax income treatment by doing gross-up and putting that tax allowance into cost recovery causes reduction to government share in Production Sharing Contract as much as these expatriates tax that should become the state revenue. From the result of research concluded that the treatment above is deviated from normative determination, but suitable with the prevailing determination of positive law, in this case contract and supporting rule. It is suggested that in KPS agreement contains more detail explanation about imposition of cost recovery components, and imposition of Income Tax Law for KPS can be more detailed and assertive so that it can give law certainty and reach agreement of Production Sharing Contract in Indonesia. Research methodology used in this research is descriptive analysis by using data collection such as field study through interview with PSG expert, VP finance, Tax advisor and HRD Manager, documentary data as well as library study. Biography : 50 Books (Tahun 1967 - 2001)

Abstrak :
Eksekusi Lelang atas jaminan yang berdasarkan Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan oleh Pengadilan dapat dilaksanakan apabila Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan yang telah diikuti Akta Pemberian Hak Tanggungan telah didaftarkan oleh Kantor Pertanahan sehingga terbit Sertipikat Hak Tanggungan. Apabila tidak diikuti dengan Akta Pemberian Hak Tanggungan dan adanya gugatan dari pihak ketiga yang memperoleh objek dengan iktikad baik maka dapat menimbulkan masalah hukum. Tesis ini membahas mengenai perlindungan hukum bagi pemilik sertipikat hak milik pada eksekusi lelang putusan pengadilan berdasarkan surat kuasa membebankan hak tanggungan namun tidak diikuti dengan akta pemberian hak tanggungan. Metode penelitian tesis ini berupa yuridis normatif dengan tipologi deskriptif-analitis. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diperoleh (1) sesuai ketentuan Pasal 1179 Jo Pasa 13 ayat (1), ayat (3) dan (5) Undang-Undang Hak Tanggungan objek yang diberikan Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan sah menjadi jaminan apabila telah terdaftar pada Kantor Pertanahan sehingga terbit Seripikat Hak Tanggungan. Serta Pasal 15 ayat (3) dan ayat (6) Undang-Undang Hak Tanggungan dengan tidak dilanjutkan pembuatan APHT dan tidak didaftarkan pada Kantor Pertanahan lebih dari 1 (satu) bulan selambat-lambatnya setelah waktu diberikan sehingga apabila tidak dilanjut maka berakibat tidak dapat dipergunakan lagi atau batal demi hukum. Oleh karena itu jaminan yang hanya berdasarkan Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan tanpa diikuti APHT dan tidak didaftarkan lebih dari 1 (satu) bulan menjadi batal dan juga eksekusi lelang yang telah berlangsung menjadi tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum. Alasan-Alasan tersebut dapat dijadikan perlindungan hukum bagi pihak ketiga yang memperoleh objek dengan iktikad baik. ......Auction execution of guarantee based on power of attorney imposing underwriting rihts by the court can be carried out if the power of attorney  imposing underwriting rights has been registered by the land office so that a certificate of mortgage is issued. If not followed by the deed of granting mortgage rights and lawsuit from a third party who obtained the object in good fauth, it can cause legal problems. This thesis discusses the legal protection for owner of certificates of ownership in the auction execution decision on guarantees bound by a power of attorney imposing mortgage rights but not followed by deed grating mortgage rights. This thesis research method is normative juridical with descriptive-analytical typology. Based on the results of the study obtained (1) in accordance with the provisions of Article 1179 Jo Article 13 paragraph (1), paragraph (3) and paragraph (5) of the underwriting right law object granted by the power of attorney imposing a legal mortgage becomes a guarantee if it has been registered at the land office so publishe mortgage certificate and article 15 paragraph (3) and paragraph (6) of the land office for more than 1 (one) month not later than the time given so that if its not continued, the result cannot be used anymore or null and void by law. Therefore, guarantees that are onlu based on power of attorney imposing mortgage rights without being registered for more than 1 (one) month will be canceled and the execution of the auction of the auction that has been held will not have legal force. These reasons can be used as legal protection for third parties who obtain objects in good faith.