Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKPositive leader identity, sebagai sebuah bentuk identitas sosial dalam lingkup organisasi, merupakan kunci dari kepemimpinan yang efektif, karena mampu meningkatkan motivasi untuk memimpin serta kemampuan individu dalam menghadapi stress. Akan tetapi, penelitian empiris mengenai pembentukan positive leader identity masih sangat minim. Penelitian berdesain korelasional ini dilakukan untuk meneliti mekanisme pembentukan positive leader identity melalui adanya leader prototypicality dan leader endorsement, dengan didasari oleh pandangan evaluatif serta mekanisme claiming-granting antara pemimpin dan bawahan dalam menjelaskan proses pembentukan identitas kepemimpinan. Untuk mengatasi common method bias, data penelitian diperoleh dari sumber berbeda: 65 pasang pemimpin dan bawahan di Indonesia dilibatkan sebagai partisipan penelitian. Seluruh alat ukur penelitian menunjukkan konsistensi internal yang baik dengan koefisien reliabilitas sebesar 0,7-0,9. Hasil analisis mediasi berbasis regresi menunjukkan bahwa a tidak terdapat hubungan positif yang signifikan antara leader prototypicality dan positive leader identity serta b leader endorsement bukan merupakan mediator dari hubungan antara keduanya. Dalam hasil analisis, ditemukan pengaruh yang signifikan dari jenis kelamin pemimpin terhadap leader endorsement dan positive leader identity: leader endorsement dan positive leader identity yang dimiliki oleh pemimpin laki-laki lebih tinggi dibanding pemimpin perempuan. Temuan ini menyajikan data empiris baru mengenai pembentukan dan evaluasi identitas sosial sebagai pemimpin dalam lingkup organisasi.

---

ABSTRACTAs a form of social identity in organizational context, positive leader identity is a key in effective leadership, for it positively influences motivation to lead and enables one to better cope with stress. However, little empirical research exists regarding the construction of positive leader identity. This current research, aiming to investigate the mechanism underlying the construction of positive leader identity through leader prototypicality and leader endorsement, was therefore conducted, grounded by the evaluative perspective and claiming granting mechanism between leader and followers. The data needed was obtained from two different sources in order to reduce common method bias 65 pairs of leader and follower in Indonesia were involved in a cross sectional study. All measures hold a relatively good internal consistency, with the reliability coefficients ranging from 0,7 0,9. Regression based mediation analysis shows that a leader prototypicality is not a significant predictor of positive leader identity and b there is no significant indirect effect of leader endorsement in the relationship between leader prototypicality and positive leader identity. In return, we found a strong influence of leader gender on both leader endorsement and positive leader identity male leaders received higher endorsement and had higher positive leader identity than female leaders. These findings provide new empirical evidence concerning the construction and evaluation of social identity as a leader in organizational setting."

"ABSTRAKPositive leader identity merupakan salah satu konsep diri yang penting untuk dimiliki seorang pemimpin. Berdasarkan perspektif teoritis claiming mengakui identitas diri sebagai pemimpin dan granting mengakui identitas orang lain sebagai pemimpin, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat apakah implicit leadership theories memediasi hubungan antara leadership self-efficacy dan positive leader identity. Data diperoleh melalui 65 pasangan pemimpin dan bawahan pada perusahaan makanan dan minuman di Indonesia. Pengukuran dilakukan menggunakan alat ukur leadership self-efficacy perception scale, implicit leadership theories scale, dan collective self-esteem scale.Hasil analisis regresi lanjutan pada penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa implicit leadership theories tidak memediasi hubungan antara leadership self-efficacy dan positive leader identity. Hasil ini memiliki implikasi bahwa granting yang diberikan bawahan kepada pemimpinnya untuk membentuk claiming dari pemimpin terhadap positive leader identity, tidak didasarkan pada penilaian dengan membandingkan sosok pemimpinnya dengan karakteristik pemimpin yang ideal.

---

ABSTRACTPositive leader identity is one of the most important self concept to be possessed by a leader, based on the theoretic perspective of claiming acknow ledging one identity as leader and granting acknow ledging others identity as leader, this research was trying to see, is implicit leadership theories mediate the relationship between leadership self efficacy and positive leader identity. Data was collected from 65 pairs of leader rsquo's and follower in food and beverages company in Indonesia. Scales used by this research is leadership self efficacy perception scale, implicit leadership theories scale, and collective self esteem scale. Result from the regression analysis shows that implicit leadership theories does not mediate the relationship between leadership self efficacy and positive leader identity. This result indicate that granting that was given by followers to their leader rsquo s in order to form their claiming on positive leader identity, does not fully based on the evaluation by comparing their current leader with ideal leader characteristics."

"Penelitian sebelumnya menunjukkan bahwa dalam situasi tertentu pemimpin yang melakukan transgresi tetap didukung oleh pengikut dan proses tersebut dipengaruhi oleh prototipikalitas. Namun, penelitian sebelumnya masih membandingkan antara pemimpin transgresif, bukan antara pemimpin transgresif dan normatif, serta belum mengeksplorasi pengaruh perbedaan individu pengikut. Berdasarkan teori kepemimpinan identitas dan ketidakpastian diri, penelitian ini membandingkan pengesahan pemimpin transgresif vs. normatif yang dimoderasi prototipikalitas pemimpin. Penelitian ini juga menguji pengaruh ketidakpastian diri terhadap prototipikalitas dalam interaksi tiga arah. Eksperimen daring (N = 190), mengukur ketidakpastian diri partisipan dan menggunakan vignette dengan kondisi 2 (transgresif dan normatif) x 2 (prototipikal dan nonprototipikal), dilakukan untuk menguji hipotesis. Analisis regresi majemuk menunjukkan bahwa pemimpin transgresif mendapatkan pengesahan yang lebih rendah dibandingkan pemimpin normatif. Perbedaan tersebut lebih kecil ketika pemimpin prototipikal dan pengikut memiliki ketidakpastian diri tinggi. Namun, pengaruh moderasi prototipikalitas dan interaksi tiga arah dengan ketidakpastian diri tidak signifikan. Analisis eksploratori menunjukkan terdapat perbedaan antara pemimpin prototipikal dan nonprototipikal yang dimoderasi oleh transgresi pemimpin dan ketidakpastian diri pengikut. Beberapa saran perbaikan penelitian didiskusikan meliputi desain studi, teknik manipulasi, dan metode analisis. Secara keseluruhan, penelitian ini berhasil mengobservasi beberapa temuan yang sejalan dengan penelitian terdahulu.

---

Previous studies have shown that in some situations leaders who transgress are still supported by their followers and leader prototypicality contributes to this process. However, previous studies primarily compared evaluations between transgressive leaders and not between normative and transgressive leaders; investigation on the influence of follower’s individual differences is also limited. Based on identity leadership theory and uncertainty identity theory, this study compared endorsement for transgressive vs. normative leader, moderated by prototypicality. This study also tested the role of followers’ self-uncertainty on prototypicality in a three way interaction. Online experiment (N = 190), measuring self-uncertainty and utilizing vignette with 2 (transgressive and normative) x 2 (prototypical and nonprototypical) between subject conditions, is conducted to test the hypotheses. Analysis using multiple regression showed transgressive leader received lower endorsement compared to normative leader. Aforementioned difference was attenuated when the leader was prototypical and follower’s self-uncertainty was high. However, those moderational effects were not significant. Exploratory analysis revealed differences in endorsement received based on leader prototypicality, which were moderated by leader transgression and follower self-uncertainty. Some suggestions for improving the study are discussed including suggestions on study design, manipulation, and analytical technique. Overall, this study observed several findings in line with previous study. "