Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami permasalahan kemiskinan di DKI Jakarta melalui program pemenuhan hak terhadap tingkat kemiskinan dengan mengambil DKI Jakarta sebagai daerah penelitian selama periode 1999 ? 2005. Efektifitas pertumbuhan diukur dengan Growth Incidence Curve. Sementara program penanggulangan kemiskinan diamati melalui metode qualitatif (interview dan FGD) dengan lokasi penelitian, masyarakat miskin yang tinggal di bawah kolong Jembatan Jl. M.T Haryono Cawang Adapun hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa pertumbuhan dan program penanggulangan kemiskinan tidak efektif untuk mengurangi kemiskinan. Selain tidak memberi perbaikan hidup bagi masyarakat kelas bawah. Program yang dibangun oleah pemerintah dalam rangka untuk mengurangi tingkat kemiskinan, ternyata tidak dapat diakses oleh masyarak miskin. Hal ini dikarenakan, program berbasis pada regristrasi lokal, sedangkan orang miskin yang berada pada percentil terbawah, tidak terdaftar dalam regristrasi lokal.

---

This research attempts to comprehend the poverty problem in DKI Jakarta through right fullfill program toward poverty rate by taking DKI Jakarta as research samples during period 1999 ? 2005. Growth effectiveness is evaluated by Growth Incidence Curve, while poverty settlement program oversees through qualitatif method (inteview and FGD) Meanwhile program penanggulangan poorness is perceived pass by method qualitatif (interview and FGD) with research location, under class society who live in under bridge M.T. Haryono Street, Cawang, East Jakarta. The growth and poverty settlement program is no longer effective in reducing unwelfare society. Since in addition to provide no more living improvement to underclass society, this program which has constructed by goverment in order to undermine poverty rate in which unable to access by poor. It because the program is actually based on local regristration instead the poor that are not listed under percentile of local registration."

"This study aims to measure and analyze inclusive growth rate in Indonesia by using per capita expenditure data from Indonesian population. Inclusiveness of growth is obeserved from growth incidence curve and pro poor growth approach using poverty equivalent growth rate (pegr) method. it also sees the effect of growth and income redistribution on poverty change using decomposition of poverty through shapley value. this research is divided into periods, i.e. 2012-2014 and 2014-2016 by grouping the territory of indonesia into three areas, i.e. java and bali, sumatra and kalimantan island, and eastern indonesia. the result shows that in 2012-2014, the income growth in indonesia is inclusive, while in 2014-2016 its growth is not inclusive yet. this is due to the effect of economic growth still hampered by the effect of income inequality over the years 2014 to 2016."

"ABSTRAK

Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi dimensi spasial dari pertumbuhan ekonomi, redistribusi, dan pengentasan kemiskinan di Indonesia selama periode Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (yaitu, dari 2004 hingga 2014 menggunakan metode   dekomposisi kemiskinan, growth incidence curve, dan beberapa indeks pertumbuhan yang pro-poor.  Data yang digunakan berasal  dari Survei Sosial Ekonomi Nasional (Susenas) tahunan yang diadakan di Indonesia antara tahun 2004 dan 2014. Tesis ini menyajikan tiga wawasan ekonomi utama selama periode Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono: 1) insiden kemiskinan menurun secara signifikan antara tahun 2004 dan 2014, 2 ) pertumbuhan ekonomi yang terjadi selama periode ini umumnya tidak berpihak pada orang miskin, dibuktikan dengan kurva insiden pertumbuhan yang miring ke atas, dan 3) perbedaan regional ada dalam bentuk kurva insiden pertumbuhan; karena itu pro-poor pertumbuhan ekonomi bervariasi antar provinsi. Dengan menggunakan sistem klasifikasi yang dilakukan oleh Kakwani dan Pernia (2000), penulis mengklasifikasikan provinsi ke dalam lima kelompok berikut ini sehubungan dengan pro-poor growth index (PPGI). Hasil empiris  mendukung pertumbuhan yang berpihak pada penduduk miskin. Namun, beberapa provinsi seperti Maluku Utara, Gorontalo dan Bengkulu mengalami pertumbuhan untuk non-pro-poor  dan  pro-poor yang lemah. Untuk mempromosikan pertumbuhan yang berpihak pada penduduk miskin di semua provinsi, dukungan pemerintah dalam pembangunan infrastruktur dan sumber daya manusia sangat penting untuk provinsi-provinsi yang tertinggal tersebut.

---

ABSTRACT

 

---

This thesis explores the spatial dimensions of economic growth, redistribution, and poverty reduction in Indonesia during the Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono period (i.e., from 2004 to 2014) using the poverty decomposition method, the growth incidence curve, and several pro-poor growth indices. I gathered my data from the annual National Socio-economic Surveys conducted in Indonesia between 2004 and 2014. Analyzing this data, my thesis presents three key economic insights about the Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono period:1) poverty incidence significantly declined between 2004 and 2014, 2) the economic growth that occurred during this period was generally not pro-poor, made evident by an upward sloping growth incidence curve, and 3) regional differences exist in the shape of the growth incidence curve; the pro-poorness of economic growth therefore varies between provinces. Using the classification system proposed by Kakwani and Pernia (2000), I classify provinces into the following five groups with respect to their pro-poor growth index (PPGI). Our empirical results support the pro-poor growth in a nation. However, some provinces such as North Maluku, Gorontalo and Bengkulu experienced non-pro-poor growth and weakly pro-poor. To promote the pro-poor growth in all provinces, the governmental supports in infrastructure and human capital development are essential for the above lagged provinces.

 

"